v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COM Global Warming Persuasive Essay Sample HUMAN ENDEAVOUR: TOO WARM FOR ITS OWN GOOD EssayShark.com - Online Academic Assistance
v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COMSince inception of the argument about global warming, which erupted in the scientific andpopular literature during the 1980s, this aspect of environment change has been addressed bythose involved in the geosciences, the biological sciences, astronomy, and environmentalsciences. Other disciplines, such as economics, political science, demographics andpopulation statistics, medicine, agriculture, and engineering have taken up the debate. Anumber of good books discourse about the intricate interactions between these disciplines.Many authors have attempted to integrate them, and to develop meaningful conclusions andpotentially useful solutions (Strom xii). Here, an effort is made to explore an explanation ofglobal climate change, examine why it is such a politically-charged issue, and show how it ishumans who are causing the recorded rises in temperature.In his book Hot House: Global Climate and the Human Condition, Robert Strom (2007)attempts to explain the broad – or rather, enormous – cycles of cooling and warming thathave enveloped Earth since the beginning. He explains how catastrophic climate change hasalways affected the conditions on the planet’s surface and directed the minute or giganticchanges in environmental factors – and through them, speciation, and other biologicaldynamics (Strom 60). This happened even before humans evolved.Strom goes on to show how mass extinction events have always been caused by sudden orgradual changes in Earth’s surface temperatures, caused by climactic conditions orcataclysms such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and other colossal happenings (Strom59).Other authors and scientists, such as Roy Spencer in his book Climate Confusion (2010) takeup the opposing view and enumerate how climate change hysteria has gathered pace in theworld, fueled by international politics, international skirmishes over finite resources, andeconomic doom-saying by stakeholders with ulterior motives (Spencer 20). This popularscientist appeals to the layperson and gives easy to understand rationales to refute political,religious, and philosophical reasons placed behind the global warming argument thatproposes the warming aspect can be blamed on human activity.Spencer (2010) places abuse of authority, both scientific and political, at the root of all thefights taken up by opposing factions in the debate. He states that just because the science ofthe day, and the politicians in power, make persuasive arguments, it does not necessarilymake those opinions watertight or even true.
v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COMHuman activity is to blame for much of the change in temperature experienced in the lastmillennium or so, many scientists purport to show (Spencer 52). Emissions from humanendeavor to feed, clothe, and transport people and their goods around the globe have, sincethe industrial revolution and the invention of the internal combustion engine – not to mentionthe provision of reticulated fuel and power to all human habitations – caused irreparabledamage to the atmosphere. If these emissions were not continually pumped into theatmosphere, some say, Earth’s temperatures would not experience the rises and fluctuations,or the freak weather patterns, which seem to plague all regions in recent times (Strom 39).Geographical studies and astronomy have shown this to be true. Economics reports have alsoshown a correlation between human prosperity and success with the warming of the planet(Strom 93).Chapter Five of the seminal collection of essays by Peter Newell et al (2012) shows howemissions and the continued abuse of Earth’s environment is bound to be perpetuated furtherthan ever in the history of human interaction and activity, through the new carbon dealingsbetween groups of nations (Newell et al 104). These political transactions are more to do withthe politics of the day than any true concern with the state of the environment bequeathed tosubsequent generations of users and abusers.This has always been so, and will continue to be the main reason behind the warmingenvironment. What also remains true, however, is an important concept few consider whenthey enter the debate. This can never be an argument on whether the situation is “natural” dueto the constant cycles of the planet that cannot be interfered with, or a “synthetic” reasonwrought by humans (Spencer 111). Since human life is indubitably normal and biological,one can only argue that whatever humans do, and however the world gets warmer, becausehumans are a natural part of Earth and its dynamic existence, and their activity cannot be asartificial as some might protest, all reasons to do with the planet’s temperatures must beentirely natural.
v See more essay samples onESSAYSHARK.COM ReferencesNewell, P., Boykoff, M. and Boyd, E.The New Carbon Economy: Constitution, Governance and Contestation Antipode Books, 2012Spencer, Roy W. Climate Confusion Encounter Books, 2010Strom, Robert G. Hot House: Global Climate and the Human Condition Springer, 2007..