Charge&initial recs21june12

366 views

Published on

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
366
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Emily:will present our draft Work Group charge for review. Marian: will open it up for discussion and for agreement. What form should the recommendations take? (Is it a formula? Is it a process? Is it recommendation for 2014-2015 and a process?) Decisions: agreement on a charge.
  • -This is not meant to dismiss ideas offered that didn’t fall into the five themes.-Wanted to provide you with a general sense of the ideas raised and criteria people were thinking about
  • Charge&initial recs21june12

    1. 1. Parks & Trails Legacy FundingWork Group Meeting #2Marian Bender, Emily Franklin & Eric DavidJune 21, 2012
    2. 2. Work Group ChargeThe charge for Work Group members is to:Develop consensus recommendations for the allocation of the parks andtrails fund for the FY 2014-2015 Biennial Budget.The recommendations should serve as a model for future fundingallocations (for example, for the next ten years) and will also include arationale for why it was chosen. The recommendations may take the formof a process, formula or combination of these elements.The Work Group will not make recommendations for specific projects orfor other sources of funding for state and regional parks and trails.
    3. 3. Initial Recommendations • Responses were thoughtful and creative • Some recommendations were more prescriptive than others (offering specific percentages vs. a more general process) • Five themes emerged
    4. 4. 6543210 Initial Recommendations

    ×