Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Closing the Loop: Strategies to Extend Care in the ED

2,550 views

Published on

This HIMSS15 presentation discusses the challenges faced in hospital emergency departments and offers insights for implementing a process to follow up with discharged ED patients to enhance outcomes and satisfaction,while optimizing utilization and reducing risk.

Published in: Healthcare
  • Be the first to comment

Closing the Loop: Strategies to Extend Care in the ED

  1. 1. Closing the Loop: Strategies to Extend Care in the ED April 13, 2015 Timothy Kelly, MS, MBA / Director DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and do not necessarily represent official policy or position of HIMSS. Tom Scaletta, MD / ED Chair and Medical Director Edward-Elmhurst HEALTHCARE © HIMSS 2015
  2. 2. Conflict of Interest Timothy Kelly, MS, MBA Mr. Kelly receives a salary from The Standard Register Company. He does not own any stock, options or other interest in The Standard Register Company or its affiliates. Tom Scaletta, MD In addition to his full-time position at Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare, Dr. Scaletta, is the CEO and Principal of Smart-ER, LLC, which is a business partner of Standard Register Healthcare. © HIMSS 2015
  3. 3. Learning Objectives • Define the unique challenges faced by Emergency Departments (EDs) that can be addressed by post-discharge patient contact systems. • Contrast the optimum queries to present to discharged ED patients to confirm well-being, understanding of instructions and satisfaction with the care experience. • Design a system that closes the loop with discharged ED patients by leveraging the EHR and other HIT tools to contact patients, document responses, alert providers to reported issues and reply to patients acknowledging any reported concerns. © HIMSS 2015
  4. 4. Strategies to Extend Care in the ED: An Introduction to the Benefits Realized for the Value of Health IT http://www.himss.org/ValueSuite S T E P S Satisfaction – organizations are focused on enhancing patient satisfaction and instilling patient loyalty Treatment – hospitals seek to extend care outside their walls while avoiding readmissions and return visits to the ED Electronic – patients increasingly demand electronic communications while hospitals struggle with portal utilization Prevention – hospitals seeks initiatives that help to avoid missed diagnoses and resolve follow-up issues Savings – organizations continue to struggle with financial challenges ranging from the Two-Midnight Rule to patients who present with poor reimbursement © HIMSS 2015
  5. 5. Why Focus on the ED? © HIMSS 2015
  6. 6. Volume • 3.9 ED visits for every inpatient admission 1,2 • 16 percent are admitted 3 contributing 44 percent of inpatient admissions 4 1 136.3 million annual ED visits in US hospitals FastStats, Emergency Department Visits, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/emergency-department.htm (accessed 2/20/15). 2 35.4 million annual hospital admissions in US hospitals Fast Facts on US Hospitals, 2014 ed., American Hospital Association, www.aha.org/research/rc/stat-studies/fast-facts.shtml (accessed 2/20/15). 3 Health, United States, 2012 with Special Feature on Emergency Care, HHS, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus12.pdf (accessed 2/20/15). 4 The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States, Rand Health, 2013, http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR200/RR280/RAND_RR280.pdf (accessed 2/20/15). © HIMSS 2015
  7. 7. Increasing Load and Increasing Competition • Medicaid expansion has increased ED visits, particularly among patients without a PCP or who are unfamiliar with the healthcare system • Competition from expansion of Urgent Care Centers and Freestanding Emergency Rooms Headlines cited: www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/06/08/more- patients-flocking-to-ers-under-obamacare/10173015/ www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2013/03/11/a-boom- in-urgent-care-centers-as-entitlement-cuts-loom/ www.kaiserhealthnews.org/news/stand-alone- emergency-rooms/ (all accessed 2/20/15). © HIMSS 2015
  8. 8. Emphasis on Patient Satisfaction • In 2013 and 2014, CMS tested a 53-question survey instrument patterned on Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS)1 • Emergency Department Patient Experience of Care (EDPEC) Survey – frequently referred to as ED-CAHPS • CMS is expected to implement in 2016 1 Emergency Department Patient Experiences with Care (EDPEC) Survey, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Research/CAHPS/ed.html (accessed 2/20/15). © HIMSS 2015
  9. 9. Review of the CAHPS Approach
  10. 10. CAHPS-Style Surveys • Most useful for internal benchmarking o By service line o Year-to-year • Less useful for external benchmarking (control of variables) o Against peers Emergency Department Patient Satisfaction, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, http://cedars- sinai.edu/Patients/Quality-Measures/Patient- Satisfaction/Emergency-Department-Patient- Satisfaction.aspx (accessed 2/20/15).
  11. 11. Challenges with CAHPS-Style Surveys • Small Sample Size – typical response rate < 2%1 • Ethno-Demographic Bias – e.g., English speakers provide higher scores1 • Impact of Outliers – behavioral health and drug- seeking patients can skew results2
  12. 12. Challenges with CAHPS-Style Surveys • Delay in Acquiring Data o Survey data is typically not available for a month or more until after a patient’s ED visit. • Nature of Emergency Medicine o Time spent with acute patients may detract from time with less acute patients. o Acute patients are frequently admitted and thus their satisfaction scores may not be tied back to the ED. Sullivan W and DeLucia J. 2+2=7? Seven things you may not know about Press Ganey Statistics. Emergency Physicians Monthly. September 22, 2010. www.epmonthly.com/features/current-features/227- seven-things-you-may-not-know-about-press-gainey-statistics/ (accessed 2/20/15).
  13. 13. System Design – Optimum Queries
  14. 14. Objectives for an ED Follow-up System • Efficiently assess patient wellbeing on the day after discharge1 • Alert providers to gaps in post-discharge knowledge (instructions, medications) or access to follow-up care1 • Document patient satisfaction with providers and with the overall ED experience1 • Provide specific patient experiences to review in the daily huddle in the Emergency Department2 1 Scaletta T. Automating Patient Contact After ED Discharge Enhances Safety and Reduces Risk. Storyboard presented at the 26th Annual National Forum on Quality Improvement in Health Care. December 7-10, 2014, Orlando, Florida. 2 Steenbergen P. Incorporating “Medical Minute” Into Daily Huddles in the Emergency Department. Studer Group. June 11, 2014. www.studergroup.com/resources/news-media/publications/insights/june- 2014/incorporating-medical-minute%E2%80%9D-into-daily-huddles-i (accessed 2/20/15).
  15. 15. Evaluating Wellbeing • The most critical component of follow-up • Extends care outside the walls of the ED • Can parallel processes already in place to address serious post-discharge issues (such as positive microbiology cultures) CVVV
  16. 16. CVVV Identifying Gaps in Understanding • Areas to assess: o Discharge instructions o New medications o Follow-up appointments • Essential to have processes in place to address a knowledge gap or need for timely assistance
  17. 17. CVVV Rating the Providers • When sample sizes and response rates are large, provider ratings become statistically valid and more compelling • Systems should match patient feedback to specific providers • Best approaches can eliminate responses from drug-seeking, behavioral health and other care plan patients
  18. 18. CVVV Rating the Providers • Nurses, residents, mid-levels, and other staff may be rated • Rapid feedback can be leveraged to modify behavior • The best approaches also report work efficiency and utilization metrics by provider
  19. 19. CVVV Evaluating Other Aspects of the Care Experience • Open-ended questions are useful for uncovering opportunities to enhance patient experience • Forward-thinking organizations may vary survey questions from time to time to evaluate the impact of specific patient experience initiatives
  20. 20. System Design – Approaches to Patient Follow-Up © HIMSS 2015
  21. 21. In-House Survey • Survey administered before the patient leaves the ED via web-based tools on a tablet or iPad • High response rate • Requires staff and equipment coordination • Fails to assess post- discharge wellbeing/progress • Patients may not feel safe offering critical feedback while still present in the department © HIMSS 2015
  22. 22. Call-back • Easy to implement (from daily list to commercial call-back consoles) • Calls from physician, nurse, clerical personnel or outsourced • Call-backs completed by nurses and physicians boost satisfaction scores regardless of waiting time, length of stay or triage class1 • Labor intensive and costly 1 Guss DA, Gray S, Castillo EM. The impact of patient telephone call after discharge on likelihood to recommend in an academic emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2014;46(4):560-6. • Requires an immediate response – may thus be less thoughtful • May be perceived as interruptive or inconvenient by patients © HIMSS 2015
  23. 23. Stand-Alone Call Manager • Should have the ability to sort patients by acuity, visit frequency, diagnosis and/or disposition © HIMSS 2015
  24. 24. EHR-Embedded Call Manager • During the ED visit, the provider selects in the EHR whether the patient is to receive a call back and by whom (attending, specific mid-level or mid-level pool) • EHR sends email alert to an appropriate provider’s “Call-Back Folder” (queue) • Provider initiates telephone encounter via link in email • Navigation template facilitates documentation of patient responses to survey questions within the EHR • Full business rules and logic including ability to quickly generate a new prescription
  25. 25. EHR-Embedded Call Manager • No special programming required beyond existing tools available within the EHR • 4 person-weeks to build and test (excludes time to develop and refine system specifications)1 1 Personal communication – Jackson Wilde, IS Epic ASAP Analyst Lead, Ochsner Health System. January 22, 2015. © HIMSS 2015
  26. 26. Interactive Voice Response (IVR) • Very useful for patient reminders • Supports automated surveys • Cost-efficient • Does not require patient to be “on-line” • May be perceived as impersonal, interruptive or inconvenient • Requires an immediate response and may thus be less thoughtful © HIMSS 2015
  27. 27. Text or Email • Survey mechanisms transmitted to patients via text or email • Cost-effective • Requires patient to be “on-line” or to have a smart device • Allows patient to respond when convenient yielding potentially a more thoughtful response 1 Patel PB, Vinson DR. Physician e-mail and telephone contact after emergency department visit improves patient satisfaction: a crossover trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(6):631-7. • Satisfaction advantages similar to call-back1 © HIMSS 2015
  28. 28. Hybrid Approaches • A combination of any of these approaches: • In-house survey • Call-back • IVR • Email • Text (SMS messaging) • Multiple methodologies may increase overall response rates • Effective systems attempt one approach and then “roll” to the next approach
  29. 29. Hybrid Approaches Daily Data Upload from the EHR Secure, HITRUST-Certified, HIPAA-Compliant Cloud- Based ServerEmergency Care Innovation of the Year Awards Structured Electronic Follow-Up for Patients Discharged from the ED Edward-Elmhurst Healthcare Urgent Matters Names Winners of the 2014 Emergency Care Innovation of the Year Award, George Washington School of Medicine & Health Sciences, smhs.gwu.edu/urgentmatters/news/urgent- matters-names-winners-2014-emergency-care- innovation-year-award (accessed 2/20/15). First Layer Text / Email Contact with Patient Second Layer Call Center Contact with Patient Patient Monthly Performance Reports Case Manager Addresses any Outpatient Management Issues
  30. 30. Additional Benefits of Automating the Follow-Up of Discharged ED Patients
  31. 31. Patient Feedback Can Often Make Your Day Actual Patient Feedback. Courtesy of Edward Hospital.
  32. 32. Score Cards • Effective behavior modification with adequate monthly contact Courtesy of Edward Hospital.
  33. 33. Staff Motivation • Emergency Nurses Week 2014 • 8 pages long Courtesy of Edward Hospital.
  34. 34. Frequent ED Users • High ED Users (≥4 visits/2 years) comprise 1 percent of the population and 16 percent of ED expenditures1 • 14 to 27 percent of all ED visits could take place at alternative sites saving $4.4 billion annually2 • A multidisciplinary ED-care-coordination program was found to reduce ED visits by 79 percent for extreme ED users (>12 visits/ year) and 71 percent for frequent ED users (3-11 visits/year)3 o Direct costs were reduced by $24,364 and $5,140 per year for the extreme and frequent users, respectively 1 Kaiser Family Foundation. Characteristics of Frequent Emergency Department Users. October 2007. www.kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/7696.pdf (accessed 2/20/15). 2 Weinick RM, Burns RM, Mehrotra A. Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(9):1630-6. 3 Murphy SM, Neven D. Cost-effective: emergency department care coordination with a regional hospital information system. J Emerg Med. 2014;47(2):223-31.
  35. 35. Potential to Reduce Observation Admissions • Short-Stay Observation Admission o Challenging for the hospital – “soft” admission reimbursement is less than for inpatient admissions o Challenging for the patient – Medicare patients are covered under Part B (higher out-of-pocket charges and co-pays) o May adversely impact satisfaction • Observation admissions may be reduced with post-discharge wellness checking Two-Midnight Rule Limits hospital discretion with observation stays that do not span at least two midnights. Treated as outpatient visits under Medicare Part B. Kelly T. The observation admission - overcoming challenges for improved patient satisfaction. Becker’s Hospital Review. November 13, 2014. www.beckershospitalreview.com/hospital-management-administration/the-observation- admission-overcoming-challenges-for-improved-patient-satisfaction.html (accessed 2/20/15).
  36. 36. Risk Reduction • Proactive o Identify and respond to patients who take a turn for the worse o Assist patients who fail to understand or follow their care plan o Address complaints and misperceptions before they progress to a claim • Defensive o Document patient improvement, understanding of instructions and satisfaction with care Top Medical Malpractice Claim Against EDs: of cases Error in Diagnosis Average Indemnity Payouts for Alleged Misdiagnosis: PE Meningitis Stroke Kelly T. Closing the Loop: Strategies to Minimize Risk in the Emergency Department. Becker’s Hospital Review. June 4, 2014. www.beckershospitalreview.com/legal-regulatory-issues/closing- the-loop-strategies-to-minimize-risk-in-the-emergency- department.html (accessed 2/20/15). © HIMSS 2015
  37. 37. Support for Your Patient Portal • MU Stage 2 Objective – View, Download, and Transmit to Third Party • Must satisfy both of the following requirements: o > 50% of those discharged from the inpatient or emergency department have their information available online within 36 hours of discharge o > 5% of those discharged from the inpatient or ED view, download or transmit to a third party Meaningful Use Final Stage 2 – 2014 Edition Objective. © HIMSS 2015
  38. 38. Support for Your Patient Portal • MU Stage 3 Proposed Final Rule o > 25% of inpatient/ED patients engage with the EHR (view/download/transmit) Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program—Stage 3. Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Proposed Rules. © HIMSS 2015
  39. 39. Support for Your Patient Portal • Consider making the final “thank you” screen a link to your organization’s patient portal Courtesy of National Park Medical Center. CVVV © HIMSS 2015
  40. 40. Support for Your Patient Portal • Place patients with a web-connected smart device one click away from your portal Courtesy of National Park Medical Center. CVVV © HIMSS 2015
  41. 41. Next Steps © HIMSS 2015
  42. 42. A Close-the-Loop System To Implement For Your Organization in Four Hours or Less • Determine what processes are in place today (e.g. LWBS, AMA, etc.) • Design an EHR report of high risk, discharged patients o Complaints of chest pain, shortness of breath and abdominal pain; age extremes; ESI 2 o Include contact phone numbers o Configure the report to run as automated daily task o Make it available to your ED team • Architect the best means to quickly document patient follow-up call efforts/results in your EHR • Assist with formalizing a call-back process © HIMSS 2015
  43. 43. IHI Triple Aim Satisfaction • Patients appreciate contact • Complaints addressed • Providers held accountable Better Health for Populations Lower Per Capita Costs Better Care for Individuals Safety • Recover from missed diagnosis • Resolve follow-up issues Savings • Improve loyalty • Address frequent visitors
  44. 44. Strategies to Extend Care in the ED : A Review of Benefits Realized for the Value of Health IT http://www.himss.org/ValueSuite S T E P S Increase patient satisfaction as service issues are addresses and concern for progress is expressed Enhance the treatment of high-frequency ED utilizers while optimizing observation admissions Communicate with patients electronically and enhance use of the patient portal Ensure understanding of patient education materials and compliance with aftercare instructions Focus clinical personnel on the resolution of patient issues saving staff for direct patient care
  45. 45. Questions Tim Kelly Timothy.Kelly@StandardRegister.com @T_J_Kelly Tom Scaletta, MD TomScaletta@gmail.com www.engagingpatients.org/author/tscaletta/ Edward-Elmhurst HEALTHCARE

×