Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Poster - peer review practice


Published on

brief case study for Learning & Teaching forum 2015

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Poster - peer review practice

  1. 1. Learning, Teaching & Curriculum FORUM 2015 PEER POWER Chris Hyland & Emily Purser SMAH/Chemistry & Learning Development / Sharing Good Practice: Engaged Feedback
  2. 2. Learning, Teaching & Curriculum FORUM 2015 THE CHALLENGE – ADVANCING ACADEMIC LITERACY • Reading: 3rd year students, preparing for higher level study need to broaden and deepen their independent search for specialist information. They need to appraise extensive current literature on highly specialised topics. • Writing also needs to become more sophisticated in its reference to published literature, demonstration of subject comprehension and coherent argumentation… they need to master the writing of a critical review of academic literature. Learning to critically review chemical literature
  3. 3. Learning, Teaching & Curriculum FORUM 2015 THE SOLUTION – OPEN & SHARE THE WRITING PROCESS Students exchange their draft writing • A draft version of the literature review is submitted two weeks before deadline for final version. • Along with the draft, students complete part A of peer- review sheet, indicating what kind of feedback they want and what part of the review was most exciting for them. • Students are paired up prior to the peer-review session and exchange papers to read critically in relation to criteria. … and comment on a peer’s work • Sitting next to their partner in a computer lab, students clarify minor queries and give immediate feedback. • Using Word’s ‘track changes’ or Turnitin’s ‘Peermark’, they then leave carefully considered comments about various aspects of their partner’s writing. • They then complete part B of peer-review sheet, identifying values in the paper and areas for improvement.
  4. 4. Learning, Teaching & Curriculum FORUM 2015 THE RATIONALE – ONE STONE, MANY BIRDS Peer learning "At a time when university resources are stretched and demands upon staff are increasing, peer learning offers students the opportunity to learn from each other.” David Boud et al 2002 “Peer reviewing and learning works, because it is scalable, especially when good web-based tools are used”. Donald Clark 2011 Peeragogy ““Peer learning and peer production are as old as humanity itself, but they take on new importance in the di gital age”… “As pedagogy theoretically articulates the transmission of knowledge from teachers to students, peeragogy describes the way peers produce and utilize knowledge together” Harold Reingold et al 2015 Peer review at the draft stage enables students to: • improve their writing before final submission date • get more feedback than one teacher alone can manage quickly • understand the evaluation criteria more deeply by applying them • share more information on various specialist topics than they would otherwise have time to read and digest • experience one of the most important aspects of professional work in Science
  5. 5. Learning, Teaching & Curriculum FORUM 2015 THE IMPACT – DEEP ENGAGEMENT, DEEP LEARNING Students report that peer review…Student survey Did the peer review session help you…. • get your literature review ready more rapidly? • think about how to improve your own work? • learn about another topic in pharmacology? • is enjoyable • builds trust and responsibility • saves time in the writing process • leads to greatly improved final papers • deepens understanding of assessment criteria • prepares them for professional collaboration activity • provides a more rewarding learning experience than writing alone 79 80.5 82 83.5 85 Averagemark Pre-peer-review 2011-2012 Post-peer-review 2013-2014
  6. 6. Learning, Teaching & Curriculum FORUM 2015 Student comments