Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Diets
Global FoodSystemDietary GuidelinesFood SubsidyProgram
Crop UsesNature, Foley et al. 201136% Calorie production used for animalfeed
Million calories per hectare
foodfeedbiofuelsCaloriesdelivered topeopleCalories available in food systemCalories “lost”Maize~10 %conversionefficiency
Cassidyet al.Submitted
59% Calories produced become food
Cassidyet al.Submitted67% Calorie production used for animalfeed
Cassidyet al.Submitted34% Calories produced become food
Source: FAO Food Balance Shee
What’s recommended?~0.7 grams / kilogram90 kilogram person (200 lbs)63 grams per day = 23 kilograms per yearDietary Refere...
Source: FAO Food Balance Shee23 kg per person yr-1
Hyperpenelopereddit
Land RequirementsTons per grid-cellTons of maize
Vegetal vs. AnimalA.F. Bouwman et al. / Agricultural Systems 84 (2005) 121–153
Square meters per 100 grams producedLand Requirements
Water footprintsHoekstra et al, Water FootprintsHoekstra, A. Y. &Mekonnen, M. M. (2012) The water footprint of humaProceed...
Greenhouse gas emissionsAgriculture accounts for 19%–29% of total globalanthropogenic GHG emissions.Of this, the productio...
Greenhouse gas emissionsKg Nitrogen application per ton maize produced1% Nitrogen applied becomes N2O (according to IPCC)N...
Greenhouse gas emissionsEntericFermentationMethane (CH4) = 21x Global Warming potential of CO2
Greenhouse gas emissions1992 2008Image: NASA
Greenhouse gas emissionsGrams GHGs per100 grams produced
Source: FAO STATMeat = 15%30%14%14%13%7%5%6%4%
Meat = 44%26%44%
29%Meat = 47%
Meat = 64%56%
How will guidelines impact environmental footprints?
Source: FAO Food Balance Shee23 kg per person yr-1
U.S. Guidelines diet shift123 kg perperson per year30 kgper personper year93kgs of fruits,veggies, pulsesand cereals(75% r...
Diet shiftsAverage US diet, 2008 75% reduction meat 75% reduction meat,no beef
Diet shiftsAverage US diet, 2008 2008 meatconsumption, no beef75% reduction meat 75% reduction meat,no beef
Nutrition Guidance in RealityDiscovery’s VitalityHealthy Food Benefit
DataPurchase weights of foods>240,000 participants
Sturm et al. 2013
• An increase in the ratio of fruit and vegetables to total foodexpenditure by 5.7% - 8.5% (dependent on subsidy);• and a ...
Preliminary Results of Purchase Weights
Preliminary Results of Purchase Weights• 16% decrease in the proportion of beef purchase weight;• 10% decrease in the prop...
• ~8 - 13% decrease in land requirements• ~7 - 12% decrease in water footprint• ~8 - 10% decrease in greenhouse gas emissi...
EarthStat.org
Thanks!@Cassidy_Emily (Twitter)
Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations
Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations
Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations
Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations

268 views

Published on

Published in: Technology, News & Politics
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations

  1. 1. Quantifying Environmental Impacts of Diets
  2. 2. Global FoodSystemDietary GuidelinesFood SubsidyProgram
  3. 3. Crop UsesNature, Foley et al. 201136% Calorie production used for animalfeed
  4. 4. Million calories per hectare
  5. 5. foodfeedbiofuelsCaloriesdelivered topeopleCalories available in food systemCalories “lost”Maize~10 %conversionefficiency
  6. 6. Cassidyet al.Submitted
  7. 7. 59% Calories produced become food
  8. 8. Cassidyet al.Submitted67% Calorie production used for animalfeed
  9. 9. Cassidyet al.Submitted34% Calories produced become food
  10. 10. Source: FAO Food Balance Shee
  11. 11. What’s recommended?~0.7 grams / kilogram90 kilogram person (200 lbs)63 grams per day = 23 kilograms per yearDietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide toNutrient Requirements:
  12. 12. Source: FAO Food Balance Shee23 kg per person yr-1
  13. 13. Hyperpenelopereddit
  14. 14. Land RequirementsTons per grid-cellTons of maize
  15. 15. Vegetal vs. AnimalA.F. Bouwman et al. / Agricultural Systems 84 (2005) 121–153
  16. 16. Square meters per 100 grams producedLand Requirements
  17. 17. Water footprintsHoekstra et al, Water FootprintsHoekstra, A. Y. &Mekonnen, M. M. (2012) The water footprint of humaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 3232-3237
  18. 18. Greenhouse gas emissionsAgriculture accounts for 19%–29% of total globalanthropogenic GHG emissions.Of this, the production stage contributes 80%–86% ofemissions at the global levelVermeulen, S., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. (2012). Climate Change aSystems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37(1).
  19. 19. Greenhouse gas emissionsKg Nitrogen application per ton maize produced1% Nitrogen applied becomes N2O (according to IPCC)Nitrous Oxides (N2O) = 310x Global Warming potential CO2
  20. 20. Greenhouse gas emissionsEntericFermentationMethane (CH4) = 21x Global Warming potential of CO2
  21. 21. Greenhouse gas emissions1992 2008Image: NASA
  22. 22. Greenhouse gas emissionsGrams GHGs per100 grams produced
  23. 23. Source: FAO STATMeat = 15%30%14%14%13%7%5%6%4%
  24. 24. Meat = 44%26%44%
  25. 25. 29%Meat = 47%
  26. 26. Meat = 64%56%
  27. 27. How will guidelines impact environmental footprints?
  28. 28. Source: FAO Food Balance Shee23 kg per person yr-1
  29. 29. U.S. Guidelines diet shift123 kg perperson per year30 kgper personper year93kgs of fruits,veggies, pulsesand cereals(75% reduction meat)
  30. 30. Diet shiftsAverage US diet, 2008 75% reduction meat 75% reduction meat,no beef
  31. 31. Diet shiftsAverage US diet, 2008 2008 meatconsumption, no beef75% reduction meat 75% reduction meat,no beef
  32. 32. Nutrition Guidance in RealityDiscovery’s VitalityHealthy Food Benefit
  33. 33. DataPurchase weights of foods>240,000 participants
  34. 34. Sturm et al. 2013
  35. 35. • An increase in the ratio of fruit and vegetables to total foodexpenditure by 5.7% - 8.5% (dependent on subsidy);• and a decrease in the ratio of less desirable to total foodexpenditure by 5.6% - 7.2%Healthy Food Purchases
  36. 36. Preliminary Results of Purchase Weights
  37. 37. Preliminary Results of Purchase Weights• 16% decrease in the proportion of beef purchase weight;• 10% decrease in the proportion of pork purchase weight;• 5.4% increase in proportional vegetable purchases;• 8.8% increase in proportional fruit purchase weight;
  38. 38. • ~8 - 13% decrease in land requirements• ~7 - 12% decrease in water footprint• ~8 - 10% decrease in greenhouse gas emissionsHealthy Food PurchasesPreliminary Results of Purchase Weights
  39. 39. EarthStat.org
  40. 40. Thanks!@Cassidy_Emily (Twitter)

×