This presentation was given in the frame of a seminar on the realist approach and its application in global health. It was organized by Valéry Ridde and I for the GHR-CAPS program in November 2012 in Montréal (Canada).
Emilie Robert is a Ph.D. student in public health at Montreal University and is a fellowof the Global Health Research Strengthening Program, funded by the CanadianInstitutes of Health Research and the Population Health Research Network of Quebec.Contact: email@example.com 17
BibliographyMarchal, B., Dedzo, M., & Kegels, G. (2010). A realist evaluation of the management of a well-performingregional hospital in Ghana. BMC health services research, 10, 24. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-24Merton, R.K. (1968). On sociological theories of the middle range. In R.K. Merton (Ed.), Social Theory andSocial Structures (pp. 39-72). New York: Free Press.Pawson, R. (2004). Evidence-based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: SAGE Publications.Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G. & Walshe, K. (2004). Realist synthesis: an introduction. ERSCResearch Methods Programme, University of Manchester.Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. London: SAGE Publications.Pawson, R., & Sridharan, S. (2010). Evidence-based Public Health: Effectiveness and efficiency. In A.Killoran & M. P. Kelly (Eds.), Evidence-based Public Health: Effectiveness and efficiency (pp. 43–62).Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563623.003.04Ridde, V., Robert, E., Guichard, A., Blaise, P., & Van Olmen, J. (2012). Théorie et pratique de l’approcheRealist pour lévaluation des programmes. In V. Ridde & C. Dagenais (Eds.), Approches et pratiques enévaluation de programmes: nouvelle édition revue et augmentée (pp. 255–275). Montréal: Les Presses del’Université de Montréal.Robert, E., Ridde, V., Marchal, B., & Fournier, P. (2012). Protocol: a realist review of user fee exemptionpolicies for health services in Africa. BMJ open, 2(1), e000706. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000706Weiss, K. (1997). How Can Theory-Based Evaluation Make Greater Headway? Evaluation Review, 21, 501. 18