Accelrated Perioperative Nursing Education- Pilot Project (ORNAC 2013)

483 views

Published on

Slides presented at the International Alliance for Perioperative Best Practice ORNAC 23rd National & International Conference with IFPN April 21-25, 2013. This presentation outlined a pilot project from Saskatchewan to accelerate the graduation rate of Operating Room nurses.
The second part of the presentation discusses mobile learning and development of perioperative nursing education programs.

Published in: Education, Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
483
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
2
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
11
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide
  • Multiple Regional Health Authorities (RHA) required access to ORs for training.
  • No students failed, withdrew, or could not complete.Survey monkeyGroup averages: #1- 89.8%, #2- 87.9% & #3- 88.6%.
  • Engage students when they want to learn and where they want to learn.
  • Accelrated Perioperative Nursing Education- Pilot Project (ORNAC 2013)

    1. 1. International Alliance for Perioperative Best PracticeORNAC 23rd National & International Conference with IFPNApril 21-25, 2013©E.J. Ahlquist 2013
    2. 2.  Educational Programs are never static.◦ Ie. SIAST Perioperative Nursing Program↳Operating Room Techniques Program Drivers or emerging trends effect educationaldesign.◦ Practice◦ Environment◦ Need◦ Technology◦ etc
    3. 3.  Background Program Overview Project Design Results Lessons Learned Educational Change
    4. 4.  Saskatchewan Surgical Initiative (SSI)Sooner, Safer, Smarter◦ Surgical wait time is a key concern for patients andfamilies.◦ Goal to reduce wait times to less than 3months by2014.◦ Staged approach to reduction: <12 months, <6months, and <3months.
    5. 5.  SIAST developed a proposal to provideadditional educated Perioperative Nurses inan expedited fashion. Collaboration with the Saskatoon HealthRegion and the Saskatchewan Ministry ofHealth. Highly successful◦ Zero attrition◦ Timely response to industry demand
    6. 6.  2 intakes per academic year (fall and winter).1. Fall intake of 6 students2. January intake of 12 students Provincial demand for graduates spiked.◦ Provincial expectations◦ Shift toward standardized education◦ Utilization of Operating Rooms capacity provincially
    7. 7. Learning Method: 6 theory courses delivered by distance(asynchronous online). 5 day psychomotor skills lab. 10 weeks of clinical practice.◦ 4 weeks of SIAST instructor led.◦ 6 weeks of preceptor led.
    8. 8. Traditional “Pilot Project” Asynchronous onlinetheory.◦ 23 weeks theory.◦ Full-time employment.◦ SIAST Instructor.◦ Students online activities.Ie. SKYPE™◦ 5 day psychomotor skillslab.◦ 10 week clinical. Modified deliveryschedule:◦ ⇓theory to10weeks.◦ Salaried while studying.◦ Saskatoon Instructor.◦ Learning activitieshybridized.◦ 5 day psychomotor skillslab.◦ 10 week clinical.
    9. 9.  Clinical Sequencing
    10. 10.  Complicated◦ Macro level provincial needs.◦ Unpredictable nature of requests.◦ Managing partnership.◦ Quality assurance. Established schedules◦ Two traditional clinical sessions.◦ Balanced recruitment.◦ Managing intake locations.
    11. 11.  Secondary effects Expansion of clinical education locations. Enhanced standardization of education. RISK of becoming to Urban-centric. Enhanced or new relationships with Regional HealthAuthorities. Opportunity…
    12. 12.  Previous onlinelearning experience. Demonstratedcomputer literacy. Onsite orientation. Sufficient time. Positive feedback on ITsupport. #1: Instructor support.
    13. 13.  21 graduates.◦ Attrition rate: 0%Therefore…◦ Employment: 100% Student satisfaction.◦ 100% of respondents would recommend thisapproach to peers.◦ 70% felt the length of time was sufficient. Most respondents wanted longer clinical education,not theory. High academic performance.◦ 88.8% average.
    14. 14. 1. Expensive!2. Complicated.a. Organization.b. Responsibilities.3. IT support.4. Program support.5. Selective screening.
    15. 15.  Not an effective long-term strategy. Expensive to deliver.◦ Salary replacement◦ Instructor time intensive Funding was provided for an annual increase inprogramming. Long-term projections of need.◦ Retirement◦ Maternity leave◦ Internal “churn” Awards/Recognitions◦ SAHO Green Ribbon◦ SHEA finalist
    16. 16.  Drivers or emerging trends effect educationaldesign.◦ Practice◦ Environment◦ Need◦ Technology◦ etc
    17. 17.  There is continual changes in the clinicalpractice environment.Ie. Incremental changes Transformational changes
    18. 18.  Institutional policies reflect this approach.◦ Minor Revision◦ Major Revision Funding for change reflect policies. Opportunities…
    19. 19.  Many changes can occur in the educationalenvironment.Ie. Leadership Physical location Culture Advances/changes
    20. 20.  A range of events or circumstances can effectthe need for change in education. The “need” identified in this project.◦ Ministry direction effecting increased graduationrates.
    21. 21.  The INTERNET.◦ Mainstream◦ Shapes our daily lives (ie. Texting, calendars,mobile maps, etc)◦ Distributed learning◦ Massive Online Open Courses (ie. edX)◦ Mobile learning Applications (Apps)
    22. 22. http://programs.siast.sk.ca/instrumentor/
    23. 23.  Mobile TSUNAMI. Students all have smart-phones.◦ Integrated into daily lifeTotal Active Apps (currently available for download):845,911Total Inactive Apps (no longer available for download):300,040Total Apps Seen in US App Store: 1,145,951Number of Active Publishers in the US App Store:226,514
    24. 24.  Most Popular Categories1 - Games (142,136 active)2 - Education (90,861 active)3 - Entertainment (75,655 active)4 - Lifestyle (68,963 active)5 – Books (55,823 active)
    25. 25.  Web based Application. Portable and compatible with multipledevices.◦ Ie. Desktop, laptop, tablet, smart-phones, etc Next step in the “evolution” of distanceeducation. Students are familiar with using Smart-phones. Prototype stage- testing with end-users◦ Ie. Students, health professionals, etc
    26. 26. Features: Canadian Content High resolution images Close-up images of instruments Laparoscopic instruments◦ Types◦ Assembly Audio pronunciation Authentic presentation
    27. 27. Design: End user focus.◦ Need vs Directed◦ Grass-roots vs Top-down Authentic presentation.◦ Images, backgrounds, etc◦ Audio pronunciation◦ Minimized information overload Self-assessment of learning.◦ Matched assessment to level of learning
    28. 28.  Innovative educational approach. Responding to expressed need.◦ Ie. Out-dated and poor resolution images Dynamic resource.◦ Updated images- 3D◦ Video◦ Additional graphics
    29. 29.  Education is never static. There will be continuous drivers for change.◦ Incremental or transformational Open and Mobile education is here to stay. The focus of any educational program needsto be on meeting the needs of learners.
    30. 30.  Thank you!!

    ×