Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

NS affordable housing letter

An open letter to the Nova Scotia Affordable Housing Commission supporting an energy justice lens for affordable housing.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

NS affordable housing letter

  1. 1. Members of the Nova Scotia Affordable Housing Commission, The signatories to this letter applaud the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for recognizing affordable housing as a critical issue facing Nova Scotians, and to this end launching the Affordable Housing Commission in November 2020. The Nova Scotia Affordable Housing Commission has been mandated to identify sustainable, and actionable long-term solutions to increase the supply of, and access to affordable housing. The community of environmental activists, energy efficiency practitioners and social justice leaders who have signed on to this letter are writing to urge the commission to take a holistic view of affordability that goes beyond rent to include something often left out of this conversation -- our energy costs. CUSP defines energy poverty as spending 6% or more of one's after-tax income on energy needs, which is double the national median of 3%. According to this definition, 37% of Nova Scotians experience energy poverty -- meaning they are spending 6% or more of their after-tax income on energy costs alone. This is the third highest rate of energy poverty in the country. Many tenants in Nova Scotia are responsible for their own energy costs, meaning that in an “affordable” unit under the existing Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation definition (less than 30% of before-tax income) energy costs could use as much as 20% of the housing budget. The higher the energy costs, the more challenging it becomes to find rents low enough to stay below the threshold of affordability. Electricity in Nova Scotia is 17.1¢/kWh, in contrast to the national average (for the provinces only) of 13.8¢/kWh. In addition to the higher electricity costs, many existing rental units are heated with oil - an inefficient and carbon intensive fuel source. Not only should these costs be factored in when designing supports for folks in housing need, but the government must work actively to reduce them. Energy efficiency is an intersectional solution that brings costs down in the existing rental stock, while simultaneously accelerating Nova Scotia toward it’s emissions reduction and climate change commitments. A barrier to energy efficiency retrofits in current rental stock is misplaced/split incentives: tenants don't have the permission to make structural upgrades or take advantage of retrofit programs, while landlords aren't inclined to make improvements because the tenant bears the utility costs. If we include energy costs in a regulated definition of affordability, we can encourage landlords to make upgrades that will benefit their tenants and the environment simultaneously.
  2. 2. For new builds, the province should consider applying more ambitious energy standards rather than simply meeting the current building and energy codes. Multi-unit residential buildings are being built across the country to near net zero and passive standards -- meaning that tenants in these buildings, or the building operators, will have little-to-no energy costs for the life of the building. Applying forward-looking energy standards to new builds now not only ensures energy affordability for decades to come, but it preemptively brings buildings to the near net-zero energy standards that the Government of Canada is seeking to have adopted in 2030. The National Housing Strategy outlines energy efficiency standards for funded projects, and this model could be used as a starting point for Nova Scotia. There are additional benefits to applying an energy efficiency lens to the affordable housing conversation. Heat waves have become an all-to-common impact of climate change, and this extreme weather forces tenants to choose between purchasing an air conditioner or struggling with the health impacts of extreme heat. While new construction is required to follow guidelines for thermal environmental conditions, similar standards do not apply to the existing building stock. This is an equity issue, forcing the most vulnerable to sacrifice their physiological health to avoid taking on an even bigger energy burden. There is innovative and industry-leading work happening here in Nova Scotia, such as the ReCover Initiative and Efficiency Nova Scotia, that should be leveraged at scale to improve the thermal performance and energy efficiency of existing buildings. The connection between affordable housing and energy costs has also been clearly outlined in legislation tabled this week in the U.S. Nova Scotia can build on the policy momentum in Canada and south of the border, and be a leader in solving this complex challenge. We urge you to consider the impacts of energy costs and the health and safety benefits of improved thermal comfort as part of the Commission’s recommendations to the Minister. Failure to do so will result in us missing an opportunity to support Nova Scotia’s most vulnerable, while simultaneously advancing our climate and economic goals. Thank you again for your work on this important topic. Jesse Hitchcock Nova Scotia Regional Champion for Efficiency Canada And Signatories to be added here.

×