The Anatomy of the 21st Century Educator
•
10 likes•13,134 views
Keynote given at the King's College London Excellence in Teaching Conference, June 2014
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to The Anatomy of the 21st Century Educator
Similar to The Anatomy of the 21st Century Educator (20)
More from Simon Bates
More from Simon Bates (14)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
The Anatomy of the 21st Century Educator
- 1. The Anatomy of a 21st Century Educator Simon Bates simon.bates@ubc.ca @simonpbates bit.ly/batestalks
- 2. Overview Drivers of change ! Body parts ! Examples CC-BY 2.0 https://flic.kr/p/8PhF4g
- 3. Drivers of change - example CC BY-NC-SA 2.0 https://flic.kr/p/2ZdABF
- 4. Technology - scale and pace Slide credit: Eric Grimson (MIT)
- 5. Technology - scale and pace Slide credit: Eric Grimson (MIT)
- 6. Technology - reach and unbundling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWEq3xifCDw
- 7. Technology - reach and unbundling https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWEq3xifCDw
- 8. Technology - disruptions Graph extracted from http://vikparuchuri.com/blog/on-the-automated-scoring-of-essays/
- 9. Technology - implications Changing the ! ! ! ! of many aspects of life, …and learning is included what, where, when, how, from whom and with whom
- 10. Body parts – the teachers’ anatomy
- 14. Communities of Practice groups whose “members share a passion for something they do and who interact regularly to learn how to do it be7er” (Wenger 2006)
- 17. A bridge between research about learning and implications for teaching practice ! ! Why certain approaches work (or fail) ! Approaches that foster effective learning in different contexts ! Resources: h7p://www.cmu.edu/teaching/principles/index.html ! 1page: CM U website h7p://goo.gl/eLSYYH 2page: Brent & Felder h7p://goo.gl/oUx6A9 5page: Bates & Madhani h7p://goo.gl/lqmSI ! !
- 20. Freeman et al PNAS www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 Wieman commentary PNAS http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1407304111 “This meta-analysis makes a powerful case that any college or university that is teaching its STEM courses by traditional lectures is providing an inferior education to its students”
- 22. www.typeform.com
- 28. ~2010 ~2006 2013
- 29. Example - flipped classrooms
- 30. Example - flipped classrooms
- 31. Example - flipped classrooms CC BY-NC 2.0 https://flic.kr/p/f3ynHx
- 32. Example - flipped classrooms CC BY-NC 2.0 https://flic.kr/p/f3ynHx
- 33. Example - flipped classrooms CC BY-NC 2.0 https://flic.kr/p/f3ynHx Derek Bruff: Class time reconsidered http://prezi.com/donq036eunko/class-time-reconsidered/
- 34. Weekly rhythm for our 1A class
- 35. Weekly rhythm for our 1A class
- 36. Learning gains on PI
- 37. 1 2 3 A ball initially at rest is thrown upwards, comes back down & is caught ! Which of the following is a plausible graph of the acceleration of the ball with time?
- 38. 1 2 3 A ball initially at rest is thrown upwards, comes back down & is caught ! Which of the following is a plausible graph of the acceleration of the ball with time?
- 42. ~2010 ~2006 2013
- 44. Ins$tu$ons((signing(up(per(year:( ! 2009:! ! !22( 2010:! ! !66( 2011:! ! !204( 2012:! ! !266( 2013!(Jan,Jun):! !214( Growing(content(repository:( ! Courses:! !2,500( Logins/month:! !75,000( Ques<ons:! !600,000( Answers:! !12,000,000( Answers (20,000,000) Questions (1,000,000)
- 48. Typical implementation Minimum participation requirements for each of two assessment exercises (PW1, PW2) Write 1 Answer 5 Rate / comment 3 5% course credit Physics 101, Energy & Waves Winter Semester: 3 sections, 791 students
- 49. Design and Methodology TOCCLT'.' - QestIsct How 1o... q/t4osTer Submit ond onswer questions on topics in lhe torget region, just obove lhe physics you hove olreody mostered. Dislroclers ) l*"*"ò rNrrltng Ih s region corrk:ins llte plrysics knowledgo ond colrco¡ls you connol leorn yel becouse the louncalions crrc nol in plocc PHYSICS TOPICS IN YOUR TARG T REGION buo'5ot't1 'Den¡¡lu B¿:ovvì 1 J F:rcq - YOUR CHOSEN TOPIC à.. auC'q^ x@ bôo'osro pn ro, d logroo, o 9tS COMMON MISCONCEPÎIONS AND ERRORS (Sec hHÞ:/jÞhy¡.udofo¡.cdu/CJP/trêconcoÞllo¡t.pdt tor o llil ol common mhconcepllons) ¿K N(,qht %cce Açxs no exi¡þ , c.rrrçrJ On oblec'-t 5 õÞYJrnr cìü?À I in rtuiò. ü lrh'brot4ont eprç,e .I¡1enÀs crq den-s,{^ c>Ç c.,þ¡ec , cìo+ .*¿n:r oÇ Çtu,8, fr- btrrqon! $crCe c¿cs Àoc¡:'cr fr¿lt{e- r *hcrn ú? Trr¿e. $ììfifflsz hrrr: ¿lÕoolr-g lnnS (**= tcpo þ/rnl {otr-* qrÇ bq.:. 0" Ooz Physics knowledge ond conccpluol underslonding you lrove olrcody conslrucleC ¡n your heod ¡,<'t.lerJ rt)^,¿z! Þ.rrp r- rr't¡ ,l? Chcck lhol yovr on3Íêr ¡t rêo!ànoblê ðnd potrlble 'f<,,cc Photo by Seth Casteel http://www.littlefriendsphoto.com Permission to use agreed Introduced in tutorials ! Extensive scaffolding exercises ! Revisited in subsequent tutorials ! Tutorials delivered by 24 TAs
- 51. Question/Explanation Quality Bloom’s Taxonomy of levels in the cognitive domain Score Level Description 1 Remember Factual knowledge, trivial plugging in of numbers 2 Understand Basic understanding of content 3 Apply Implement, calculate / determine. Typically one-stage problem 4 Analyze Typical multi-step problem; requires identification of strategy Evaluate Compare &assess various option possibilities; often conceptual Synthesize Ideas and topics from disparate course sections combined. Significantly challenging problem. Text
- 52. 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 0 20 40 60 Numberofquestions Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Bloom's Taxonomy: Question Quality Textp>0.05, NS 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 1 2 3 4 5 6 Taxonomic Category PercentageofSubmittedQuestions First semester N = 350 Second semester N = 252 Bates et al, PRST PER, in press 2014 http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2202
- 53. Question/Explanation Quality Description of explanation quality Score Level Description 0 Missing No explanation provided or explanation incoherent/ irrelevant 1 Inadequate Wrong reasoning and/or answer; trivial or flippant 2 Minimal Correct answer but with insufficient explanation/ justification/ Some aspects may be unclear/incorrect/ confused. 3 Good Clear and detailed exposition of correct method & ans 4 Excellent Thorough description of relevant physics and solution strategy. Plausibility of all answers considered. Beyond normal expectation for a correct solution
- 54. 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 0 20 40 60 Numberofquestions Assessment 1 Assessment 2 Explanation Quality p=0.02
- 55. ~2010 ~2006 2013
- 63. Logistics ! ! Cohort split into 4 groups ! Each week one group tasked with creating LOs ! Each submission counts for 2.5% of final grade ! Repeat cycle twice per Semester ! Students can submit >2 LOs & receive grade for best 2 ! Short survey on submission ! Students encourage to apply CC licenses
- 64. Results: engagement 0 100 200 300 LO 1 LO 2 LO 3 LO 4 LO 5 LO 6 LO 7 LO 8 Number of students Assigned Optional
- 65. Results: types of Los PPT DOC Prezi Ted-Ed PDF Image Other
- 66. Results: time on task 0 100 200 300 400 Less than 0.5h 0.5 to 1 h 1 to 2h 2 to 3h 3 to 4h 4 to 5h More than 5h Number of students
- 67. Results: self reported change in understanding 0 200 400 600 800 None Little Moderate Good Excellent Number of students 0200400600800 Number of students
- 68. PHYS101: Energy and Waves 3. Successes http://youtu.be/BObyt_NJYrE
- 73. How Learning Works: icon credits
- 74. References Student-facing system http://peerwise.cs.auckland.ac.nz/ All the research studies referenced and scaffolding materials referred to are accessible through the PeerWise community site http:// www.peerwise-community.org/