SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Open letter UK legal academics #drip

Open letter dated 15 July 2014 to members of the United Kingdom Parliament

1 of 2
Download to read offline
Tuesday 15th July 2014
To all Members of Parliament,
Re: An open letter from UK internet law academic experts
On Thursday 10 July the Coalition Government (with support from the
Opposition) published draft emergency legislation, the Data Retention and
Investigatory Powers Bill (“DRIP”). The Bill was posited as doing no more than
extending the data retention powers already in force under the EU Data
Retention Directive, which was recently ruled incompatible with European
human rights law by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European
Union (CJEU) in the joined cases brought by Digital Rights Ireland (C-293/12) and
Seitlinger and Others (C-594/12) handed down on 8 April 2014.
In introducing the Bill to Parliament, the Home Secretary framed the legislation
as a response to the CJEU’s decision on data retention, and as essential to
preserve current levels of access to communications data by law enforcement
and security services. The government has maintained that the Bill does not
contain new powers.
On our analysis, this position is false. In fact, the Bill proposes to extend
investigatory powers considerably, increasing the British government’s
capabilities to access both communications data and content. The Bill will
increase surveillance powers by authorising the government to;
 compel any person or company – including internet services and
telecommunications companies – outside the United Kingdom to execute an
interception warrant (Clause 4(2));
 compel persons or companies outside the United Kingdom to execute an
interception warrant relating to conduct outside of the UK (Clause 4(2));
 compel any person or company outside the UK to do anything, including
complying with technical requirements, to ensure that the person or
company is able, on a continuing basis, to assist the UK with interception at
any time (Clause 4(6)).
 order any person or company outside the United Kingdom to obtain, retain
and disclose communications data (Clause 4(8)); and
 order any person or company outside the United Kingdom to obtain, retain
and disclose communications data relating to conduct outside the UK (Clause
4(8)).
The legislation goes far beyond simply authorising data retention in the UK. In
fact, DRIP attempts to extend the territorial reach of the British interception
powers, expanding the UK’s ability to mandate the interception of
communications content across the globe. It introduces powers that are not only
completely novel in the United Kingdom, they are some of the first of their kind
globally.
Moreover, since mass data retention by the UK falls within the scope of EU law,
as it entails a derogation from the EU's e-privacy Directive (Article 15, Directive
2002/58), the proposed Bill arguably breaches EU law to the extent that it falls
within the scope of EU law, since such mass surveillance would still fall foul of
the criteria set out by the Court of Justice of the EU in the Digital Rights and
Seitlinger judgment.
Further, the bill incorporates a number of changes to interception whilst the
purported urgency relates only to the striking down of the Data Retention
Directive. Even if there was a real emergency relating to data retention, there is
no apparent reason for this haste to be extended to the area of interception.
DRIP is far more than an administrative necessity; it is a serious expansion of the
British surveillance state. We urge the British Government not to fast track this
legislation and instead apply full and proper parliamentary scrutiny to ensure
Parliamentarians are not mislead as to what powers this Bill truly contains.
Signed,
Dr Subhajit Basu, University of Leeds
Dr Paul Bernal, University of East Anglia
Professor Ian Brown, Oxford University
Ray Corrigan, The Open University
Professor Lilian Edwards, University of Strathclyde
Dr Theodore Konstadinides, University of Surrey
Professor Chris Marsden, University of Sussex
Dr Karen Mc Cullagh, University of East Anglia
Dr. Daithí Mac Síthigh, Newcastle University
Professor David Mead, University of East Anglia
Professor Andrew Murray, London School of Economics
Professor Steve Peers, University of Essex
Julia Powles, University of Cambridge
Professor Burkhard Schafer, University of Edinburgh
Professor Lorna Woods, University of Essex

Recommended

Uk data retention review ver 3.0
Uk data retention review ver 3.0Uk data retention review ver 3.0
Uk data retention review ver 3.0Amr El-Deeb
 
Data Privacy vs. National Security post Safe Harbor
Data Privacy vs. National Security post Safe HarborData Privacy vs. National Security post Safe Harbor
Data Privacy vs. National Security post Safe HarborGayle Gorvett
 
After Schrems, how lawful is cloud storage?
After Schrems, how lawful is cloud storage?After Schrems, how lawful is cloud storage?
After Schrems, how lawful is cloud storage?Seb Oram
 
Data retention directive is invalid
Data retention directive is invalidData retention directive is invalid
Data retention directive is invalidMonica Lupașcu
 
Communications data retention in an evolving Internet
Communications data retention in an evolving InternetCommunications data retention in an evolving Internet
Communications data retention in an evolving Internetblogzilla
 
Transatlantic data flows following the Schrems II judgment
Transatlantic data flows following the Schrems II judgmentTransatlantic data flows following the Schrems II judgment
Transatlantic data flows following the Schrems II judgmentblogzilla
 
Frequently-asked questions on Freedom of Information and Environmental Inform...
Frequently-asked questions on Freedom of Information and Environmental Inform...Frequently-asked questions on Freedom of Information and Environmental Inform...
Frequently-asked questions on Freedom of Information and Environmental Inform...Chris Rusbridge
 

More Related Content

Similar to Open letter UK legal academics #drip

UK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillance
UK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillanceUK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillance
UK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillanceMark Leiser
 
CJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on SchremsCJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on SchremsGreg Sterling
 
DRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the past
DRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the pastDRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the past
DRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the pastMichael Owen
 
Academic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance lawAcademic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance lawAndrew Murray
 
Internet user's rights and fundamental freedoms day
Internet user's rights and fundamental freedoms dayInternet user's rights and fundamental freedoms day
Internet user's rights and fundamental freedoms daymoldovaictsummit2016
 
Communications Privacy and the State
Communications Privacy and the StateCommunications Privacy and the State
Communications Privacy and the StateGraham Smith
 
Surveillance_Consultation_Paper
Surveillance_Consultation_PaperSurveillance_Consultation_Paper
Surveillance_Consultation_PaperLara Rabiee
 
Legislation
LegislationLegislation
Legislationmegabyte
 
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?blogzilla
 
Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" ruling
Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" rulingFactsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" ruling
Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" rulingSilesia SEM
 
Factsheet data protection_en
Factsheet data protection_enFactsheet data protection_en
Factsheet data protection_enGreg Sterling
 
Science in Parliament and Government by Andrew Miller
Science in Parliament and Government by Andrew MillerScience in Parliament and Government by Andrew Miller
Science in Parliament and Government by Andrew MillerJeremy LeLean
 
The Data Retention Directive: recent developments
The Data Retention Directive: recent developmentsThe Data Retention Directive: recent developments
The Data Retention Directive: recent developmentsblogzilla
 
A question of trust - uk spying review
A question of trust  - uk spying reviewA question of trust  - uk spying review
A question of trust - uk spying reviewRepentSinner
 
A question of trust - uk spying review
A question of trust  - uk spying reviewA question of trust  - uk spying review
A question of trust - uk spying reviewAnonDownload
 
International Cybercrime (Part 1)
International Cybercrime (Part 1)International Cybercrime (Part 1)
International Cybercrime (Part 1)GrittyCC
 
Internet freedom: a comparative assessment
Internet freedom: a comparative assessmentInternet freedom: a comparative assessment
Internet freedom: a comparative assessmentblogzilla
 
Seminar Presentation
Seminar PresentationSeminar Presentation
Seminar PresentationBanji Adenusi
 
Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands
Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands
Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands Axon Lawyers
 

Similar to Open letter UK legal academics #drip (20)

UK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillance
UK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillanceUK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillance
UK Academics pen open letter regarding state surveillance
 
CJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on SchremsCJEU decision on Schrems
CJEU decision on Schrems
 
DRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the past
DRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the pastDRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the past
DRAFT 2 - The Internet has effectively rendered privacy as a thing of the past
 
Academic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance lawAcademic letter re changes in surveillance law
Academic letter re changes in surveillance law
 
Internet user's rights and fundamental freedoms day
Internet user's rights and fundamental freedoms dayInternet user's rights and fundamental freedoms day
Internet user's rights and fundamental freedoms day
 
Communications Privacy and the State
Communications Privacy and the StateCommunications Privacy and the State
Communications Privacy and the State
 
IT and Internet Law
IT and Internet LawIT and Internet Law
IT and Internet Law
 
Surveillance_Consultation_Paper
Surveillance_Consultation_PaperSurveillance_Consultation_Paper
Surveillance_Consultation_Paper
 
Legislation
LegislationLegislation
Legislation
 
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
Can the law control Digital Leviathan?
 
Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" ruling
Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" rulingFactsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" ruling
Factsheet on the "Right to be Forgotten" ruling
 
Factsheet data protection_en
Factsheet data protection_enFactsheet data protection_en
Factsheet data protection_en
 
Science in Parliament and Government by Andrew Miller
Science in Parliament and Government by Andrew MillerScience in Parliament and Government by Andrew Miller
Science in Parliament and Government by Andrew Miller
 
The Data Retention Directive: recent developments
The Data Retention Directive: recent developmentsThe Data Retention Directive: recent developments
The Data Retention Directive: recent developments
 
A question of trust - uk spying review
A question of trust  - uk spying reviewA question of trust  - uk spying review
A question of trust - uk spying review
 
A question of trust - uk spying review
A question of trust  - uk spying reviewA question of trust  - uk spying review
A question of trust - uk spying review
 
International Cybercrime (Part 1)
International Cybercrime (Part 1)International Cybercrime (Part 1)
International Cybercrime (Part 1)
 
Internet freedom: a comparative assessment
Internet freedom: a comparative assessmentInternet freedom: a comparative assessment
Internet freedom: a comparative assessment
 
Seminar Presentation
Seminar PresentationSeminar Presentation
Seminar Presentation
 
Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands
Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands
Hacking Health Camp Strasbourg health data & data protection in the Netherlands
 

More from Chris Marsden

Aligarh Democracy and AI.pptx
Aligarh Democracy and AI.pptxAligarh Democracy and AI.pptx
Aligarh Democracy and AI.pptxChris Marsden
 
CPA Democracy and AI.pptx
CPA Democracy and AI.pptxCPA Democracy and AI.pptx
CPA Democracy and AI.pptxChris Marsden
 
Generative AI, responsible innovation and the law
Generative AI, responsible innovation and the lawGenerative AI, responsible innovation and the law
Generative AI, responsible innovation and the lawChris Marsden
 
Evidence base for AI regulation.pptx
Evidence base for AI regulation.pptxEvidence base for AI regulation.pptx
Evidence base for AI regulation.pptxChris Marsden
 
Generative AI and law.pptx
Generative AI and law.pptxGenerative AI and law.pptx
Generative AI and law.pptxChris Marsden
 
2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)
2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)
2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)Chris Marsden
 
Marsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulation
Marsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulationMarsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulation
Marsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulationChris Marsden
 
Marsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 October
Marsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 OctoberMarsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 October
Marsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 OctoberChris Marsden
 
Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020
Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020
Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020Chris Marsden
 
Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020
Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020
Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020Chris Marsden
 
Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019
Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019 Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019
Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019 Chris Marsden
 
SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...
SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...
SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...Chris Marsden
 
Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...
Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...
Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...Chris Marsden
 
Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...
Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...
Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...Chris Marsden
 
Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018
Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018
Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018Chris Marsden
 
The Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 Sept
The Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 SeptThe Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 Sept
The Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 SeptChris Marsden
 
Marsden Net Neutrality OII
Marsden Net Neutrality OIIMarsden Net Neutrality OII
Marsden Net Neutrality OIIChris Marsden
 

More from Chris Marsden (20)

Aligarh Democracy and AI.pptx
Aligarh Democracy and AI.pptxAligarh Democracy and AI.pptx
Aligarh Democracy and AI.pptx
 
CPA Democracy and AI.pptx
CPA Democracy and AI.pptxCPA Democracy and AI.pptx
CPA Democracy and AI.pptx
 
Generative AI, responsible innovation and the law
Generative AI, responsible innovation and the lawGenerative AI, responsible innovation and the law
Generative AI, responsible innovation and the law
 
Evidence base for AI regulation.pptx
Evidence base for AI regulation.pptxEvidence base for AI regulation.pptx
Evidence base for AI regulation.pptx
 
Gikii23 Marsden
Gikii23 MarsdenGikii23 Marsden
Gikii23 Marsden
 
#Gikii23 Marsden
#Gikii23 Marsden#Gikii23 Marsden
#Gikii23 Marsden
 
Generative AI and law.pptx
Generative AI and law.pptxGenerative AI and law.pptx
Generative AI and law.pptx
 
2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)
2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)
2019: Regulating disinformation with artificial intelligence (AI)
 
Marsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulation
Marsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulationMarsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulation
Marsden CELPU 2021 platform law co-regulation
 
Marsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 October
Marsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 OctoberMarsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 October
Marsden Interoperability European Parliament 13 October
 
Net neutrality 2021
Net neutrality 2021Net neutrality 2021
Net neutrality 2021
 
Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020
Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020
Marsden regulating disinformation Brazil 2020
 
Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020
Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020
Marsden Regulating Disinformation Kluge 342020
 
Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019
Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019 Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019
Marsden Disinformation Algorithms #IGF2019
 
SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...
SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...
SCL Annual Conference 2019: Regulating social media platforms for interoperab...
 
Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...
Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...
Oxford Internet Institute 19 Sept 2019: Disinformation – Platform, publisher ...
 
Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...
Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...
Social Utilities, Dominance and Interoperability: A Modest ProposalGikii 2008...
 
Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018
Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018
Marsden Net Neutrality Internet Governance Forum 2018 #IGF2018
 
The Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 Sept
The Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 SeptThe Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 Sept
The Valetta Effect: GDPR enforcement for Gikii Vienna 14 Sept
 
Marsden Net Neutrality OII
Marsden Net Neutrality OIIMarsden Net Neutrality OII
Marsden Net Neutrality OII
 

Open letter UK legal academics #drip

  • 1. Tuesday 15th July 2014 To all Members of Parliament, Re: An open letter from UK internet law academic experts On Thursday 10 July the Coalition Government (with support from the Opposition) published draft emergency legislation, the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Bill (“DRIP”). The Bill was posited as doing no more than extending the data retention powers already in force under the EU Data Retention Directive, which was recently ruled incompatible with European human rights law by the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the joined cases brought by Digital Rights Ireland (C-293/12) and Seitlinger and Others (C-594/12) handed down on 8 April 2014. In introducing the Bill to Parliament, the Home Secretary framed the legislation as a response to the CJEU’s decision on data retention, and as essential to preserve current levels of access to communications data by law enforcement and security services. The government has maintained that the Bill does not contain new powers. On our analysis, this position is false. In fact, the Bill proposes to extend investigatory powers considerably, increasing the British government’s capabilities to access both communications data and content. The Bill will increase surveillance powers by authorising the government to;  compel any person or company – including internet services and telecommunications companies – outside the United Kingdom to execute an interception warrant (Clause 4(2));  compel persons or companies outside the United Kingdom to execute an interception warrant relating to conduct outside of the UK (Clause 4(2));  compel any person or company outside the UK to do anything, including complying with technical requirements, to ensure that the person or company is able, on a continuing basis, to assist the UK with interception at any time (Clause 4(6)).  order any person or company outside the United Kingdom to obtain, retain and disclose communications data (Clause 4(8)); and  order any person or company outside the United Kingdom to obtain, retain and disclose communications data relating to conduct outside the UK (Clause 4(8)).
  • 2. The legislation goes far beyond simply authorising data retention in the UK. In fact, DRIP attempts to extend the territorial reach of the British interception powers, expanding the UK’s ability to mandate the interception of communications content across the globe. It introduces powers that are not only completely novel in the United Kingdom, they are some of the first of their kind globally. Moreover, since mass data retention by the UK falls within the scope of EU law, as it entails a derogation from the EU's e-privacy Directive (Article 15, Directive 2002/58), the proposed Bill arguably breaches EU law to the extent that it falls within the scope of EU law, since such mass surveillance would still fall foul of the criteria set out by the Court of Justice of the EU in the Digital Rights and Seitlinger judgment. Further, the bill incorporates a number of changes to interception whilst the purported urgency relates only to the striking down of the Data Retention Directive. Even if there was a real emergency relating to data retention, there is no apparent reason for this haste to be extended to the area of interception. DRIP is far more than an administrative necessity; it is a serious expansion of the British surveillance state. We urge the British Government not to fast track this legislation and instead apply full and proper parliamentary scrutiny to ensure Parliamentarians are not mislead as to what powers this Bill truly contains. Signed, Dr Subhajit Basu, University of Leeds Dr Paul Bernal, University of East Anglia Professor Ian Brown, Oxford University Ray Corrigan, The Open University Professor Lilian Edwards, University of Strathclyde Dr Theodore Konstadinides, University of Surrey Professor Chris Marsden, University of Sussex Dr Karen Mc Cullagh, University of East Anglia Dr. Daithí Mac Síthigh, Newcastle University Professor David Mead, University of East Anglia Professor Andrew Murray, London School of Economics Professor Steve Peers, University of Essex Julia Powles, University of Cambridge Professor Burkhard Schafer, University of Edinburgh Professor Lorna Woods, University of Essex