Overview of SuperfundComprehensive Environmental Response,    Compensation and Liability Act          Shahid Mahmud, Envir...
Overview   Origin of CERCLA (Superfund Law)   Key provisions of CERCLA   Key provisions of the National Oil and Hazardo...
The Origin of CERCLA                                  Public awareness of                                   abandoned dum...
Key Provisions of CERCLA Approved as law in 1980 Provides legal authority to respond to a  release of:  A hazardous sub...
Key Provisions of CERCLA Creates Hazardous Substance  Trust Fund Holds those Potentially  Responsible Parties (PRPs)  li...
Key Provisions of CERCLA Authorizes three types of response actions:  Removal Action  Remedial Action  Enforcement Act...
Plan    National Oil and Hazardous Substances             Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) Blueprint for responding to oi...
Removal Actions under Superfund Three types of removal response actions:  1. Emergency Response (Action within hours)  2....
Emergency Response Coordination and implementation of a  wide range of activities to ensure timely  response measures for...
Removal Responses Common at Superfund Sites when contamination  poses an imminent threat to human health and the  environ...
Overview of Superfund Response Process                                               Short-Term                           ...
Site Listing Process - Hazard Ranking                        System (HRS)   Used to identify sites for the National Prior...
Major Phases of Remedial Process NCP defines five major phases:     Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study     Select...
Overview of Remedial Investigation/        Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Process RI/FS supports remedy selection Remedial In...
Remedy Selection Proposed plan informs the public on the  preferred cleanup option Public reviews and provides comments ...
Record of Decision, Remedial Design and                 Remedial ActionRecord of Decision Official decision document on r...
Enforcement and Liability Enforcement principle: those responsible for  hazardous waste sites pay for or perform cleanup....
Post Construction Completion                      Ensure that Superfund cleanup                       actions provide for...
Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Ensure that equipment is installed and  that the remedy performs as intended. Site respons...
Five-Year Reviews/Site DeletionFive-Year Reviews Evaluate the implementation and performance of a   remedy to determine w...
Superfund Site Reuse and Redevelopment Over 600 Superfund sites have been returned  to productive use under the Superfund...
Summary CERCLA provides legal authority to respond  to a release of hazardous substances NCP provides the blueprint for ...
Thank You!!Contact Information:Shahid MahmudTeam Leader, EPA Abandoned Mine Lands TeamOffice of Site Remediation and Techn...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

EPA Superfund

906 views

Published on

0 Comments
1 Like
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
906
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
464
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
14
Comments
0
Likes
1
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

EPA Superfund

  1. 1. Overview of SuperfundComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Shahid Mahmud, Environmental Engineer United States Environmental Protection AgencyOffice of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  2. 2. Overview  Origin of CERCLA (Superfund Law)  Key provisions of CERCLA  Key provisions of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP)  Overview of the cleanup process under Superfund10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2
  3. 3. The Origin of CERCLA  Public awareness of abandoned dump sites  Two sites drew significant media attention:  Love Canal in Niagara Falls, New York  “Valley of the Drums” in Brooks, Kentucky10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 3
  4. 4. Key Provisions of CERCLA Approved as law in 1980 Provides legal authority to respond to a release of: A hazardous substance Any pollutant or contaminant that may present an imminent and substantial endangerment Excludes oil releases 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 4
  5. 5. Key Provisions of CERCLA Creates Hazardous Substance Trust Fund Holds those Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) liable Cleanup costs Natural resource damages Inventories and prioritizes sites Establishes a National Priorities List (NPL) 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 5
  6. 6. Key Provisions of CERCLA Authorizes three types of response actions: Removal Action Remedial Action Enforcement Action Encourages participation of states and tribal governments Provides opportunities for community involvement 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 6
  7. 7. Plan National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) Blueprint for responding to oil spills and hazardous substances releases. All Superfund response actions must be consistent with the NCP. The NCP is found at 40 Code of Federal regulations (CFR) Part 300  http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text- idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40cfr300_main_02.tpl NCP provides step-by-step process for conducting Superfund response actions. 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 7
  8. 8. Removal Actions under Superfund Three types of removal response actions: 1. Emergency Response (Action within hours) 2. Time-Critical (Action within 6 months) 3. Non-time Critical (Planning period more than 6 months) On-Scene Coordinator (OSC) investigates site to determine extent of damage and the appropriate actions to take during the response effort. 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 8
  9. 9. Emergency Response Coordination and implementation of a wide range of activities to ensure timely response measures for hazardous substance and oil releases.  Includes large-scale national emergencies such as homeland security incidents. Emergencies range from small-scale spills to large events requiring prompt action and/or evacuation of nearby populations. 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 9
  10. 10. Removal Responses Common at Superfund Sites when contamination poses an imminent threat to human health and the environment. Removal actions can supplement long-term cleanup actions at NPL sites Classified as either time-critical or non-time-critical depending on the extent and type of contamination. Decision to conduct removal documented in an Action Memorandum. 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 10
  11. 11. Overview of Superfund Response Process Short-Term Cleanup Removal SiteSite Discovery Site Listing Long-Term Assessment Clean/ Cleanup Closure Remedial Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Enforcement/Cost Recovery Community Relations 11 Site Reuse
  12. 12. Site Listing Process - Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Used to identify sites for the National Priorities List (NPL) Numerically based scoring system that uses information from initial investigations HRS assesses relative potential of sites to pose a threat to human health and the environment Ranks sites based on their relative risk among sites evaluated Cut-off score of 28.5 was established for placing sites on the NPL An HRS evaluation is performed following procedures defined in the HRS regulation (40 CFR Part 300 Appendix A, part of the NCP) 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 12
  13. 13. Major Phases of Remedial Process NCP defines five major phases:  Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study  Selection of Remedy  Remedial Design  Remedial Action (Site Cleanup)  Operation and Maintenance Overall goal of remedy selection:  Protective of human health and the environment  Maintain protection over time  Minimize untreated waste 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 13
  14. 14. Overview of Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study (RI/FS) Process RI/FS supports remedy selection Remedial Investigation (RI) provides:  Site characterization  Baseline risk assessment FS develops and analyzes remedial action alternatives  Develop and screen alternatives  Detailed analysis of alternatives • Nine Evaluation criteria are basis of remedy selection 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 14
  15. 15. Remedy Selection Proposed plan informs the public on the preferred cleanup option Public reviews and provides comments on the proposed plan All relevant documents are maintained in the site information repository10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 15
  16. 16. Record of Decision, Remedial Design and Remedial ActionRecord of Decision Official decision document on remedy selection Technical, legal and public documentRemedial Design Develop final plans and specifications for selected remedyRemedial Action Contract selection Remedy Construction 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 16
  17. 17. Enforcement and Liability Enforcement principle: those responsible for hazardous waste sites pay for or perform cleanup. CERCLA provides criteria under which a party is liable for cleanup costs. EPA identifies those responsible for contamination at a site and negotiates with them to do the cleanup. EPA can do the cleanup itself and recover its costs from the responsible party. 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 17
  18. 18. Post Construction Completion  Ensure that Superfund cleanup actions provide for the long-term protection of human health and the environment.  Activities include: operations and maintenance (O&M), Five- year reviews, remedy optimization, institutional controls, and deleting sites from the NPL.10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 18
  19. 19. Operation & Maintenance (O&M) Ensure that equipment is installed and that the remedy performs as intended. Site responsibility transfers to the States for Fund lead sites. EPA is responsible for monitoring and ensuring that the work is adequately performed. 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 19
  20. 20. Five-Year Reviews/Site DeletionFive-Year Reviews Evaluate the implementation and performance of a remedy to determine whether it remains protective Required by CERCLA / NCP when hazardous substances remain on site above levels which permit unrestricted use and unlimited exposure.Site Deletion When cleanup levels are met and Operation and Maintenance is complete – Site is deleted from NPL 10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 20
  21. 21. Superfund Site Reuse and Redevelopment Over 600 Superfund sites have been returned to productive use under the Superfund Redevelopment Initiative Some mine site examples include: - Anaconda Smelter Company, Montana - Midvale Slag, Utah10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 21
  22. 22. Summary CERCLA provides legal authority to respond to a release of hazardous substances NCP provides the blueprint for responding to oil spills and hazardous substances releases Program designed to address both short and long-term actions10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 22
  23. 23. Thank You!!Contact Information:Shahid MahmudTeam Leader, EPA Abandoned Mine Lands TeamOffice of Site Remediation and Technology Innovation703-603-8789Mahmud.shahid@epa.gov10/9/2012 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 23

×