Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

LLA 2011 - J.M. Vose - Treatment of lymphomas in elderley patients

2,388 views

Published on

  • The Kidney Disease Solution EBOOK Download Link ▲▲▲ http://scamcb.com/empoweredh/pdf
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Suffer from Kidney Disease? how his patients avoid dialysis? Aussie Naturopath tells all... click here to find out how  http://ishbv.com/empoweredh/pdf
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Improve your Kidney Health Naturally, click here to find out how ➤➤ https://tinyurl.com/yy8pd5uf
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here

LLA 2011 - J.M. Vose - Treatment of lymphomas in elderley patients

  1. 1. Lymphoma in the Elderly Patient<br />Julie M. Vose, M.D.<br />University of Nebraska Medical Center<br />jmvose@unmc.edu<br />
  2. 2. Issues of NHL and HL in the Elderly<br />Incidence of NHL higher with age, HL – biomodal distribution<br />Is the lymphoma different in older patients?<br />Co-morbid illnesses more common<br />Tolerance of medications and toxicities less<br />Options more limited in older patients – due to organ changes<br />
  3. 3. 50<br />40<br />30<br />20<br />10<br />0<br />0<br />5<br />10<br />15<br />20<br />25<br />30<br />35<br />40<br />45<br />50<br />55<br />60<br />65<br />70<br />75<br />80<br />85<br />Age at Diagnosis for Hodgkin’s and Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL)<br />NHL <br />~75,000 NHL cases/yr<br /> ~7,500 HD cases/yr <br />Cases/100,000<br />Hodgkin's<br />Age at diagnosis<br />Jemal et al. Cancer . 2004;101:3.<br />
  4. 4. Frequency of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Subtypes<br />Composite lymphomas (12%)<br />Small lymphocytic (6%)<br />Follicular (22%)<br />Mantle cell (6%)<br />N = 1403<br />Peripheral T-cell (6%)<br />Marginal zone B-cell, MALT (5%)<br />Mediastinal large B-cell (2%)<br />Anaplastic large T/null cell (2%)<br />Lymphoblastic (2%)<br />Burkitt-like (2%)<br />Diffuse large B-cell<br /> (31%)<br />Marginal zone B-cell, nodal (1%)<br />Lymphoplasmacytic (1%)<br />Burkitt’s (1%)<br />Armitage JO, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:2780–2795.<br />
  5. 5. DLBCL: Prognostic Factors<br />Adverse risk factors correlated with response to chemotherapy and survival<br /><ul><li>Older than 60 yrs of age
  6. 6. LDH > normal
  7. 7. PS ≥ 2
  8. 8. Ann Arbor stage III/IV
  9. 9. Extranodal involvement > 1 site*</li></ul>*Prognostic for patients older than 60 yrs of age only.<br />International NHL Prognosis Factors Project. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:987-994.<br />
  10. 10. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 2 (FLIPI2)<br />FLIPI2 score used to predict outcomes of therapy based on adding number of risk factors (each factor = 1 point)<br />Longest diameter of largest involved node > 6 cm<br />Bone marrow involvement<br /><ul><li>Hemoglobin < 12 g/dL
  11. 11. Age > 60 years
  12. 12. β2-microglobulin > ULN</li></ul>Federico M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4555-4562.<br />
  13. 13. FLIPI2 For Follicular NHL<br />PFS<br />OS<br />Federico M, et al. J ClinOncol. 2009;27:4555-4562..<br />
  14. 14. Assessment<br />Stratified by risk factors (0-1 vs 2-3)<br />R-CHOPevery 3 wks for 8 cycles(n = 202)<br />Untreated elderly patients with stage II-IV DLBCL<br />(N = 399)<br />CHOPevery 3 wks for 8 cycles(n = 197)<br /><ul><li>Primary endpoint: EFS
  15. 15. Secondary endpoints: OS, RR</li></ul>CHOP ± Rituximab in DLBCL: GELA LNH-98.5 Phase III Study<br />Coiffier B, et al. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:235-242. Feugier P, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:4117-4126.<br />
  16. 16. CHOP ± Rituximab in DLBCL: 7-Yr Survival Results (GELA LNH-98.5 Study)<br />OS (N = 399)<br />1<br />CHOP<br />R-CHOP<br />0.8<br />0.6<br />Survival Probability<br />0.4<br />0.2<br />P = .0004<br />0<br />*P < .05 (multivariate analysis).<br />0<br />8<br />1<br />3<br />5<br />7<br />6<br />2<br />4<br />Yrs<br />Coiffier B, et al. ASCO 2007. Abstract 8009.<br />
  17. 17. CHOP-14 ± Rituximab in Elderly Patients With DLBCL (RICOVER-60 Trial)<br />CHOP-14 × 6<br />(n=204)<br />R<br />A<br />N<br />D<br />O<br />M<br />I<br />Z<br />E<br />Patients withCD20+ DLBCL,<br />aged 61-80 y,<br />stages I-IV<br />(N=1330)<br />CHOP-14 × 8<br />(n=210)<br />CHOP-14 × 6 + rituximab q2w × 8<br />(n=211)<br />CHOP-14 × 8 + rituximab q2w × 8<br />(n=203)<br />Primary end point: FFTF<br /> Radiotherapy was planned for patients with initial bulky disease or extranodal involvement.<br /> FFTF is defined as additional therapy, failure to achieve CR, progressive disease, relapse, or death.<br /> Pfreundschuh et al. Blood. 2005;106:9a. Abstract 13.<br />
  18. 18. CHOP-14 ± Rituximab in Elderly PatientsWith DLBCL (RICOVER-60 Trial):OS by Cycles and Regimens<br />6 Cycles vs 8 Cycles<br />CHOP-14 vs R-CHOP-14<br />P=0.088<br />P=0.284<br />100<br />80<br />60<br />40<br />20<br />0<br />100<br />80<br />60<br />40<br />20<br />0<br />78%<br />78%<br />77%<br />76%<br />Survival (%)<br />Survival (%)<br />6 × CHOP-14 ± R × 8(n=415)<br />8 × CHOP-14 ± R × 8(n=413)<br />6/8 × CHOP-14 + R × 8(n=414)<br />6/8 × CHOP-14(n=414)<br />0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45<br />Months<br />Months<br />Pfreundschuh et al. Blood. 2005;106:9a. Abstract 13.<br />
  19. 19. Trial design: R-CHOP14 vs. 21<br />R-CHOP21<br />CHOP21  8 cycles<br />Rituximab  8 cycles<br />n=540<br />Newly diagnosed<br />CD20+ve DLBCL<br />R<br /> R-CHOP14<br /> CHOP14  6 cycles<br /> Rituximab  8 cycles<br /> Lenograstim Day 4-12<br />n=540<br />Stratified by<br /><ul><li>IPI (0-1, 2, 3, 4-5)
  20. 20. Age <60 vs. 60
  21. 21. Treatment centre</li></ul>1080 patients; 119 sites<br />Recruitment March 2005 - Nov 2008<br />Cunningham, et al: JCO 8000a, 2011<br />
  22. 22. Overall survival<br />1.0<br />0.9<br />0.8<br />0.7<br />R-CHOP14<br />R-CHOP21<br />0.6<br />117 (22)<br />123 (23)<br />Events, n (%) <br />Probability<br />0.5<br />83%<br />81%<br />2-yr OS<br />0.4<br />p=0.70<br />Log-rank test<br />0.95 (0.74–1.23)<br />HR (95% CI)<br />0.3<br />0.2<br />R-CHOP21 <br />0.1<br />R-CHOP14 <br />0.0<br />0<br />1<br />2<br />3<br />4<br />5<br />6<br />Years from randomisation<br />Patients at Risk<br />1<br />28<br />120<br />R-CHOP21<br />540<br />474<br />392<br />234<br />30<br />242<br />117<br />1<br />540<br />R-CHOP14<br />476<br />393<br />Cunningham, et al: JCO 8000a, 2011<br />
  23. 23. GELA: CHOP ± Radiotherapy in Localized NHL <br />Stratified by treatment center and bulky disease (y vs n)<br />CHOPevery 3 wks for 4 cycles(n = 277)<br />Untreated patients aged > 60 yrs with localizedstage I/II aggressive lymphoma and no adverse prognostic indicators<br />(N = 576)<br />IFRT<br />CHOPevery 3 wks for 4 cycles(n = 299)<br /><ul><li>Primary endpoint: EFS
  24. 24. Secondary endpoints: response rate, OS</li></ul>Bonnet C, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:787-792.<br />
  25. 25. GELA: OS With CHOP ± Radiotherapy – Localized DLBCL<br />100<br />90<br />80<br />70<br />60<br />50<br />Probability of OS (%)<br />40<br />30<br />CHOPCHOP plus radiotherapy<br />20<br />P = .54<br />10<br />0<br />12<br />8<br />9<br />0<br />6<br />5<br />10<br />11<br />1<br />2<br />7<br />3<br />4<br />Yrs After Random Assignment<br />Pts at Risk, nCHOPCHOP plus radiotherapy<br />277 249 226 206 178 153 131 102 75 45 22 1<br />299 265 243 211 187 155 123 98 68 50 30 9<br />Bonnet C, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:787-792.<br />
  26. 26. DLBCL Treatment<br />Initial Therapy<br /><ul><li>Non-bulky/bulky (≥10 cm) withadverse factors
  27. 27. R-CHOP × 3+RT
  28. 28. R-CHOP × 6-8 ± RT
  29. 29. R-CHOP × 6-81</li></ul>Additional Therapy<br /><ul><li>Candidate for high-dose therapy
  30. 30. Novel non–cross-resistant regimen ± rituximab
  31. 31. ASCT± involved field RT2
  32. 32. Clinical trial2
  33. 33. Not candidate for high-dose therapy
  34. 34. Clinical trial
  35. 35. Rituximab
  36. 36. CEPP ± Rituximab (PO and IV)
  37. 37. PEPC (PO)
  38. 38. EPOCH</li></ul>PD<br /><ul><li>Continue Tx withhigher RT dose
  39. 39. High-dose Txwith ASCT
  40. 40. Clinical trial</li></ul>D <br />L<br />B<br />C<br />L<br />Stage I, II<br />PR<br />Follow-up Therapy<br />Stage III, IV + AA-IPI<br /><ul><li>Continue R-CHOP to 6-8 or
  41. 41. Clinical trial</li></ul>CR/PR<br /><ul><li>R-CHOP × 6-8
  42. 42. Clinical trial</li></ul>1. When RT is contraindicated.<br />In patients achieving CR or PR after second-line therapy<br /> AA-IPI = age-adjusted IPI.<br />NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology, v.3.2009.<br />
  43. 43. Is NHL or HL in Elderly patients a Different Disease?<br />For DLBLC – Increase in ABC DLBLC in patients over age 60?<br />For HL – older patients have a higher percentage of subtypes other than nodular sclerosis<br />Increase in inflammation and immunosuppression<br />Endocrine changes with age<br />
  44. 44. Diffuse Large B-Cell LymphomaHeterogeneous Molecular Pathogenesis<br />20%<br />20%<br />Amplification<br />TP53 mutations<br />RELC-MYCBCL2<br />6%<br />17%-20%<br />Somatic hypermutation<br />IgH<br />C-MYC<br />30%-40%<br />50%<br />t(8;14)<br />BCL6C-MYCPIM1PAX5RhoH/TTF<br />BCL6<br />IgH<br />BCL-2<br />Substituted promoter<br />t(14;18)<br />Lossos I. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6351-6357.<br />
  45. 45. Age and risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity<br />Short term<br />Myelosuppression<br />Mucositis<br />Cardiotoxicity<br />Neurotoxicity<br />Long terms<br />Acute leukemia and MDS<br />Cardiomyopathy<br />Dementia?<br />Functional dependence and frailty?<br />
  46. 46. APhenotype of Frailty<br />Factors Defining Frailty:<br />Weight loss<br />Weakness<br />Poor energy/endurance<br />Slowness<br />Low physical activity<br />Prevalence of Frailty in Community Dwelling Older Adults<br />0 factors: Not frail <br />1 or 2 factors: Intermediate<br />3 or more factors: Frail<br />Copyright © 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved <br />
  47. 47. Phenotype of Frailty Predictive of 5Adverse Outcomes<br />Incidence of Adverse Outcomes Associated with Frailty<br />P<0.0001<br />Copyright © 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved <br />
  48. 48. Impaired Physiological<br />Interleukin-6<br />Anorexia<br />Sarcopenia,<br />Osteopenia<br /><ul><li>Immune function
  49. 49. Cognition
  50. 50. Clotting
  51. 51. Glucose Metabolism</li></ul>Inflammation<br />Neuroendocrine<br /> Dysregulation<br />Insulin –like growth factor-1<br />Dehydroeplandrosterone<br />Sulfate<br />Sex steroids<br />Pathway to Frailty<br />Clinical<br />Molecular and Disease<br />Oxidative stress<br />Mitochondrial deletions<br />Shortened Telomeres<br />DNA damage<br />Cell senescence<br />Slowness<br />Weakness<br />Weight<br /> Loss<br />Low Activity<br />Fatigue<br />Gene<br />variation<br />Inflammatory <br />Diseases<br />Copyright © 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved <br />
  52. 52. Goals of Treatment<br />Prolongation of survival<br />Symptom Palliation<br />Prolongation of active life expectancy<br />Must balance toxicity with short and long term quality of life issues<br />
  53. 53. Lymphoma and age: same treatment, same benefits<br />Complete response<br />All patients<br />p < 0.001<br />Full-dose patients<br />100<br />100<br />80<br />80<br />68%<br />65%<br />64%<br />60%<br />57%<br />55%<br />60<br />60<br />52%<br />Patients (%)<br />37%<br />40<br />40<br />20<br />20<br />0<br />0<br />< 40<br />40–54<br />55–64<br /> 65<br />< 40<br />40–54<br />55–64<br /> 65<br />Age (years)<br />Age (years)<br />Dixon DO, et al. J Clin Oncol. 1986;4:295-305.<br />
  54. 54. Lymphoma and age: same treatment, same benefits<br />Cumulative survival<br />Overall survival (months)<br />Lee KW, et al. Cancer. 2003;98:2651-6.<br />
  55. 55. EORTC guidelines for G-CSF prophylaxis<br />R-CHOP 21 associated with high risk of FN1<br />Patient-related factors add to risk<br />Overall risk ≥20%<br />
  56. 56. Elements of geriatric assessment<br />Function<br />Comorbidity<br />Geriatric syndromes<br />Polypharmacy<br />Nutrition<br />Social support<br />Income<br />
  57. 57. Cancer and aging: Activities of Daily Living (ADL)<br />
  58. 58. Cancer and age: Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)<br />
  59. 59. Other Benefits of Geriatric Assessment<br />Detect reversible comorbidity<br />Nutrition<br />Disability and handicaps<br />Caregiver<br />Treatment goals<br />Risk of chemotherapy-related toxicity<br />
  60. 60. CGA and four-year mortality rate<br />Four-year mortality (%)<br />Risk score<br />CGA = comprehensive geriatric assessment.<br />Lee SJ, et al. JAMA. 2006;295:801-8.<br />
  61. 61. Predictive model II<br />Predictive risk factors for grade 3–5 chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer<br />Possible score range: 0–25<br />GI = gastrointestinal; GU = genitourinary; MOS = months of study.<br />Hurria et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28 Suppl 15s:[abstract 9001].Data presented at ASCO 2010.<br />
  62. 62. “High” 83%<br />( ≥ 12)<br />“Mid” 53%<br />(6–11)<br />92%<br />76%<br />63%<br />“Low” 27%<br />(0–5)<br />45%<br />31%<br />21%<br />N = 39<br />N = 50<br />N = 36<br />N = 161<br />N = 64<br />N = 123<br />ROC: 0.72 <br />100%<br />80%<br />60%<br />Grade 3–5 toxicities (%)<br />40%<br />20%<br />0%<br />≥ 14<br />0–4<br />5<br />6–8<br />9–11<br />12–13<br />Total score<br />Model performance:prevalence of toxicity by score<br />ROC = receiver operating characteristic.<br />
  63. 63. Alternative regimens for DLBCL<br />Pre-phase treatment – prednisone, Rituximab, vincristine<br />Shorter duration – with RT or RIT?<br />Alternative agents – mitoxantrone, doxil, etoposide, infusional agents<br />Dose reduction – mini CHOP<br />Cardioprotective agents<br />May need to add novel agents to the backbone<br />
  64. 64. R-CEOP vs. R-CHOP for DLBCL<br />Moccia et al, ASH 2009 abstract 408<br />
  65. 65. R-mini CHOP<br />Patients over 80 years<br />Rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1<br />Cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 day 1<br />Doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 day 1<br />Vincristine 1 mg day 1<br />Prednisone 40 mg/m2 days 1-5<br />Peyrade et al: Lancet Oncol 12: 460-68, 2011<br />
  66. 66. R-mini CHOP<br />Peyrade et al: Lancet Oncol 12: 460-68, 2011<br />
  67. 67. Lymphoma in the Elderly<br />Consider a geriatric assessment pre-treatment to identify issues<br />Personalize therapy for the patient<br />Clinical trials using novel therapies with standard therapy<br />Goal to get therapy done in a shorter time<br />Utilize support treatments to keep the therapy on time and expected doses<br />

×