Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

The Carbon Market - Martin Hession, UK DECC, CDM Executive Board - EPA June 2010

2,245 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

The Carbon Market - Martin Hession, UK DECC, CDM Executive Board - EPA June 2010

  1. 1. The Carbon Market <ul><li>Martin Hession UK DECC and CDM Executive Board </li></ul>
  2. 2. Why? <ul><li>Reduces costs of given emission reductions and enables tougher targets - Up to 50% (Stern) </li></ul><ul><li>Engages Private Sector and Leverages Private Finance </li></ul><ul><li>Greater certainty on outcome over tax - fixes emission levels not costs </li></ul>
  3. 3. History <ul><li>Kyoto Protocol 1997 - establishes principle of emissions trading and project offsets at international level </li></ul><ul><li>Marrakech Accords 2002 - Detailed Rules, and CDM Prompt Start </li></ul><ul><li>EU ETS 2005 - First Multinational Trading </li></ul><ul><li>EU ETS Link to CDM 2005 - Breathing life ito the protocol </li></ul>
  4. 4. EU ETS <ul><li>Pilot Phase 2005-2008 - Allocation and MRV of emissions </li></ul><ul><li>2nd Phase (KP Commitment Period 2008-2012) - consistency with KP targets </li></ul><ul><li>3rd Phase (Post 2012 - part of the 20/20 package)- unilateral commitment </li></ul>
  5. 5. Clean Development Mechanism Mechanism <ul><li>Emission Reduction Projects in Developing Countries </li></ul><ul><li>Projects Registered and Credits Issued Under the Authority of a Executive Board </li></ul><ul><li>Methodologies Established for Emissions Calculations </li></ul><ul><li>Independent Third Party Auditors </li></ul>
  6. 6. Achievements <ul><li>Billion € markets </li></ul><ul><li>EU ETS and CDM predominate </li></ul><ul><li>Impact on Investment Record on Emissions Reductions 2-5% reduction 1st phase (WB) </li></ul><ul><li>Ratcheting up effort over time </li></ul><ul><li>The EU Emissions Trading Program - 6 billion tonnes traded - worth US$119 billion (€89 billion) allowances and derivatives. </li></ul><ul><li>CDM - 3.7 billion tonnes trade - worth $21 billion. </li></ul><ul><li>US: RGGI Volume 805 mt $2.2bn (up from 62 mt and $198 million) </li></ul><ul><li>Voluntary Market - 46 mt and $338 million </li></ul>
  7. 7. Turning Point? <ul><li>Montreal 2005 - Convention Dialogue </li></ul><ul><li>Nairobi 2006 - Review of the Protocol </li></ul><ul><li>Bali 2007- Road Map -Twin Tracks KP and Convention </li></ul><ul><li>Poznan 2008 - Failure of KP Review </li></ul><ul><li>Copenhagen 2009 - Political Accord - ongoing negotiation </li></ul><ul><li>Cancun 2010 and Johannesburg 2011 </li></ul>
  8. 8. Copenhagen Accord Accord <ul><li>2 degrees + IPCCC reference to 1.5 </li></ul><ul><li>Peaking in emissions </li></ul><ul><li>Pledge’s of action </li></ul><ul><li>Economy wide quantified emission targets for Annex I parties </li></ul><ul><li>Developing Country action with MRV </li></ul><ul><li>Endorsement of REDD and Markets </li></ul><ul><li>Fast Track Funding of €30bn - High-level body, and 100bn by 2020 </li></ul><ul><li>Green Fund - Technology Mechanism </li></ul><ul><li>Assessment by 2015 </li></ul>
  9. 9. Issues <ul><li>Framework and Legal Form - KP plus or New Framework </li></ul><ul><li>Overall Ambition on mitigation - 2 degrees and 450ppm </li></ul><ul><li>Lack of targets post 2012 - KP and Convention (US) </li></ul><ul><li>Conditions for US participation - ongoing no to kyoto style commitments </li></ul><ul><li>Reflecting Actions of Advanced Developing Countries - Moving beyond CDM </li></ul><ul><li>MRV of Emissions and Actions - Monitor, Report and Verify </li></ul><ul><li>Balance of Public and Private Finance - upscaling and the limits of the market </li></ul>
  10. 10. Future <ul><li>Multilateral Framework - Top Down </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Building on the KP </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Commitments of US and Actions of Developing Countries </li></ul></ul><ul><li>More Variable Geometry - Bottom Up </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Multilateral </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Bilateral </li></ul></ul>
  11. 11. Proposals <ul><li>CDM Reform - Interim Instrument </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Effectiveness </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Efficiency </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Equity </li></ul></ul><ul><li>New Mechanisms - Options for Transition </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Upscaled Action </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Reflecting Developing country contributions </li></ul></ul>
  12. 12. Vital Signs? <ul><li>EU </li></ul><ul><ul><li>EU ETS </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Decision of 20-30 and KP </li></ul></ul><ul><li>US </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trading Proposals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>17% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Japan </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Trading Proposals </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>25% </li></ul></ul><ul><li>China </li></ul><ul><li>Pledged to reduce its carbon dioxide emission per unit of GDP by 40-45% by 2020 compared to 2005 levels, raise the level of non-fossil fuels in primary energy consumption to 15% and increase forest coverage by 40 million hectares with a rise in forest stock volume of 1.3 billion cubic metres by 2020 from 2005 levels. </li></ul><ul><li>India </li></ul><ul><li>India will endeavour to reduce the emission intensity of its GDP by 20-25% by 2020 in comparison to the 2005 level through domestic mitigation actions. </li></ul><ul><li>Brazil </li></ul><ul><li>Brazil announced at the summit a “voluntary commitment” to reduce CO2 emissions by between 36.1 and 38.9 percent in the next 10 years. </li></ul><ul><li>Mexico </li></ul><ul><li>South Korea </li></ul>
  13. 13. Further Reading <ul><li>Stern Review - The Economics of Climate Change </li></ul><ul><li>Lazarowitz - Global Carbon Trading; A framework for reducing emissions </li></ul><ul><li>State of the Carbon Market 2010 - World Bank </li></ul><ul><li>10 Years Experience in Carbon Finance - World Bank </li></ul>

×