Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Reducing Infrastructure and Service Fragmentation

574 views

Published on

This presentation was held at the 1st EOSC Stakeholder Forum 28-29/11/2017 in Brussels.
The presentation gives a detailed overview of 5 Science Demonstrators, namely FusionHPC, Photon-Neutron, TextCrowd, PanCancer.

For more information on the EOSCpilot Science Demonstrators visit: https://eoscpilot.eu/science-demonstrators

For more information on the 1st EOSC Stakeholder Forum visit: https://eoscpilot.eu/eosc-stakeholder-forum-shaping-future-eosc

Follow EOSCpilot on Twitter: https://twitter.com/eoscpilot
and LinkedIn: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/eoscpiloteu

Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Reducing Infrastructure and Service Fragmentation

  1. 1. EOSC Stakeholder Forum Brussels 28-29 November 2017 Reducing Infrastructure and Service Fragmentation Panel Steven Newhouse, EMBL-EBI Matthew Viljoen, EGI
  2. 2. Reducing Infrastructure and Service Fragmentation Panel Panelists FHPC: Shaun de Witt (FusionHPC) PN: Michael Schuh (Photon-Neutron) TC: Achille Felicetti (TextCrowd) PC: Sergei Iakhnin (PanCancer) www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & 2
  3. 3. What services have you used during your science demonstrator? Which were easy and which were hard to use? FHPC: Planning to use EGI FedCloud and possibly the EGI CheckIn. PN: Local OpenStack, IAM, external data repositories, data analysis & collaboration tools. TC: Deploying inside EGI VM with EUDAT B2DROP linking to D4Science environment. PC: OpenStack, Shared storage, OneData. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & 3
  4. 4. How easy was it to access the services and capacity you needed? FHPC: Access to EGI FedCloud facilitated by EGI. Possible lack of fat nodes (high mem, low latency). PN: Containerised deployment worked but multi- headed graphic output challenging. TC: Technical skills needed to configure Linux VM. PC: Very hard to find storage capacity – taken 10 months to gain access to 2 out of 3 sites. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & 4
  5. 5. Can you identify one area where better integration would have helped? FHPC: A Fusion VO build around certificates seen as a major barrier. Want more integrated AAI solutions. PN: OpenStack varies across sites which breaks automation. IAM integration varies. Focus on Docker/Singularity. TC: A platform that supports basic components. PC: Service registry with capability matrix. Integration of long-term data repositories with operational storage. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & 5
  6. 6. www.eoscpilot.eu The European Open Science Cloud for Research pilot project is funded by the European Commission, DG Research & Innovation under contract no. 739563 6 Thanks!

×