Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

“Manual EMBARQ de segurança viária para projetos de BRT e auditorias de segurança viária dos corredores BRT no Rio de Janeiro” -Luis Antonio Lindau, diretor-presidente da EMBARQ Brasil

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Upcoming SlideShare
London buses Mike Weston
London buses Mike Weston
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 28 Ad

“Manual EMBARQ de segurança viária para projetos de BRT e auditorias de segurança viária dos corredores BRT no Rio de Janeiro” -Luis Antonio Lindau, diretor-presidente da EMBARQ Brasil

Download to read offline

“Manual EMBARQ de segurança viária para projetos de BRT e auditorias de segurança viária dos corredores BRT no Rio de Janeiro” -Luis Antonio Lindau, diretor-presidente da EMBARQ Brasil

“Manual EMBARQ de segurança viária para projetos de BRT e auditorias de segurança viária dos corredores BRT no Rio de Janeiro” -Luis Antonio Lindau, diretor-presidente da EMBARQ Brasil

Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to “Manual EMBARQ de segurança viária para projetos de BRT e auditorias de segurança viária dos corredores BRT no Rio de Janeiro” -Luis Antonio Lindau, diretor-presidente da EMBARQ Brasil (20)

More from WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

“Manual EMBARQ de segurança viária para projetos de BRT e auditorias de segurança viária dos corredores BRT no Rio de Janeiro” -Luis Antonio Lindau, diretor-presidente da EMBARQ Brasil

  1. 1. Traffic Safety on Bus Corridors Overview Background: 2-year research project Main findings regarding safety on bus and BRT corridors Development of design guidelines Road safety auditing: Rio s BRT corridors
  2. 2. Traffic Safety on Bus Corridors Cities included in the study
  3. 3. Main findings: Overall safety impact of a BRT Macrobús, Guadalajara
  4. 4. Main findings: Overall safety impact of a BRT Macrobús, Guadalajara 250 5000 Before BRT During BRT construction After start of operations 4500 Citywide crashes 200 4000 3500 150 3000 2500 100 2000 1500 50 1000 500 0 0
  5. 5. Main findings: Overall safety impact of a BRT / Busway Not all systems have had a positive impact on safety Cristiano Machado Busway, Belo Horizonte Corridor with the highest crash frequency citywide BRTS, Delhi Initial increase in fatalities after the implementation of the bus system
  6. 6. Overview of the research Methodology Crash data collection and analysis Road safety audits and inspections Discussions with safety experts from bus agencies Road test and review: getting feedback to improve the guidelines
  7. 7. Overview of the research Data analysis Example: Results from the Mexico City intersection model Vehicle collision model (NB) Pedestrian crash model (NB) Coef. Coef. Constant -1.518*** -1.857*** Number of legs 0.374*** 0.252*** Number of lanes per leg 0.374*** 0.341*** Left turns per approach 1.705*** 1.268** Market area - 0.664*** Maximum pedestrian crossing distance (m) - 0.026** Pedestrian overpass - -0.147 Center-lane BRT (Metrobus Line 1) -0.029 -0.299 Counterflow bus lane 0.554*** 0.389** Curbside bus lane -0.176 -0.087 No. of observations 216 216 Log likelihood -618.475 -518.539 LR chi2 139.99 104.88 Prob > chi2 0.000 0.000 chibar2(01) 367.14 231.39 Prob >=chibar2 0.000 0.000 *** p<=0.001, ** p<=0.05, * p<=0.1, - variable not included in the model
  8. 8. Overview of the research Road safety inspections Detailed inspection of operating BRT corridors (here, Av. Caracas, TransMilenio) together with certified road safety auditors
  9. 9. Overview of the research Road safety audits Identifying safety issues in project drawings for BRT or bus corridors and suggesting improvements
  10. 10. Overview of the research Main findings
  11. 11. Factors influencing crash frequencies Counterflow Counterflow lanes were strongly correlated with higher crash frequencies across all our models (p<0.001)
  12. 12. Factors influencing crash frequencies Street width and intersection size and complexity Road width and complexity of intersections were the most important predictors of crash frequencies. Metrobus Line 1, Mexico City
  13. 13. Factors influencing crash frequencies Location of bus lanes Central median Shorter pedestrian crossings Fewer mixed traffic lanes Some 4-way intersections turned into T junctions
  14. 14.  
  15. 15. 3500 3000 2500 Acidentes por ano 2000 Sem vítimas No injury 1500 Injury vítimas Com 1000 500 0 2008 2009 2010 Fonte: CET-Rio
  16. 16.    Fonte: CET-Rio, IPEA
  17. 17. Se as recomendações forem incorporadas: Redução da gravidade dos acidentes A cada ano serão evitados (*): 800 acidentes 200 vítimas, incluindo 10 fatalidades (*) há casos onde a simples implantação de um corredor de ônibus levou a um aumento da incidência e gravidade de acidentes

×