1. 24 June 2015
Enquiry:
Reference: 15SGBO_TCH02
DEPARTMENT: SGBO
LECTURER: Dr V Tchokonte-Nana
1. Biographic information of the students
2. Feedback on the lecturer
3. Comments from students
Regards
Melanie Petersen
CTL
Copies:
Faculty of Health Sciences
SGBO
Student Feedback Office, X3081
Senior Advisor: Student Feedback
Programme Coordinator:
On 1 June 2015 CTL received feedback from 25 students regarding the above-mentioned lecturer.
The feedback was collected on 15 May 2015.
The feedback is divided into three categories:
The analysis of the data is done in the same order. For category 2, feedback is given as an
average mark on a continuum from one to five. These results are illustrated graphically. The
unedited comments from students are also attached.
Vice Dean (Teaching):

2. 1
Fakulteit Gesondheidswetenskappe
Dosent / Lecturer :
Departement:
Datum / Date :
Biografiese data / Biographical Data
Manlik/Male Vroulik/Female
Geslag 2 23
8.0% 92.0%
Afrikaans Engels/English
Huistaal 13 11
52.0% 44.0%
50-59% 60 - 69%
Matriekgemiddeld 0 2
0.0% 8.0%
Gemiddeld
Average (1)
Stadig
Slow
3.4 1
4.0%
Gemiddeld
Average (2)
Laag
Low
3.3 5
20.0%
3.5 2
8.3%
0-4
9
36.0%
16
Average based on scale 1 to 5 (1 = Very Low and 5 = Very High):
Very Low and Low are grouped as Low and High and Very High as High.
Hoeveel kontaksessies het u met hierdie dosent
gehad?
How many contact sessions did you have with this
lecturer?
(2) Gemiddelde gebaseer op 'n skaal van 1 tot 5 (1 = Baie laag en 5 = Baie hoog):
Baie laag en Laag is saam gegroepeer as Laag en Hoog en Baie hoog as Hoog.
Aantal respondente
1
isiXhosa Ander/Other
0.0%
33.3%
8
My level of interest in this module,
before the start of this module was:
0
N.v.t.
N/A
Dr V Tchokonte-Nana
2
15-05-2015
SGBO
90%+80-89%
44.0%
70 - 79%
40.0%
10
Faculty of Health Sciences
Gender
Number of respondents
Tempo van die module:
Hoog
High
25
Home language 4.0%
0
11
0
32.0%
915
My vlak van belangstelling in hierdie
module, voordat ek daarmee begin het,
was:
12
My vlak van belangstelling in hierdie
module teen die einde van die jaar
was:
58.3%
Medium
Average pace based on scale 1 to 5 (1 = Very slow and 5 = Very fast)
Very slow and Slow are grouped as Slow and Fast and Very Fast as Fast.
0
Matriculation average
My level of interest in this module,
towards the end of the year was:
0
48.0%
64.0% 0.0%
Medium
8.0%
8
Vinnig
Fast
N.v.t.
N/A
(1) Gemiddelde tempo gebaseer op 'n skaal van 1 tot 5 (1 = Baie stadig en 5 = Baie vinnig):
Baie stadig en Stadig is saam gegroepeer as Stadig en Vinnig en Baie vinnig as Vinnig.
Pace in this module: 60.0% 36.0%
14
5-9
10 of meer /
or more
15SGBO_TCH02.xls

3. 2
Dosent / Lecturer
(3)
Gemiddeld
Average
Verskil
Disagree
Neutraal/
Neutral
Stemsaam
Agree
N.v.t.
N.A.
1. 4.6 0 0 25 0
2. 4.5 0 1 24 0
3. 4.2 0 2 23 0
4. 4.0 1 6 18 0
5. 3.6 2 9 14 0
6. 3.8 3 5 17 0
7. 4.0 1 8 16 0
8. 4.2 1 4 20 0
9. 4.4 0 0 25 0
10. 4.4 0 3 22 0
11. 4.4 0 3 22 0
12. 3.7 2 9 14 0
13. 4.0 1 5 18 1
14. 4.7 0 0 25 0
15. 4.3 0 3 22 0
16. 4.4 0 3 22 0
17. 4.0 0 7 15 3
18. 3.9 0 7 11 5
… kom goed voorberei na elke kontaksessie.
Dr V Tchokonte-Nana 15-05-2015
Getal / Number
Hierdie dosent:
This lecturer:
… gee nuttige voorbeelde en toepassings uit eie ervarings of vanuit
die praktyk.
… is punctual for all lectures, tutorials, appointments, etc.
… gebruik uitdeelstukke wat tot sinvolle leer bydra.
… praat altyd hoorbaar en duidelik.
… always speaks audibly and clearly.
… stel werksopdragte (bv. vir tutoriale, praktika, selfstudie, ens.) só
dat studente duidelik weet wat van hulle verwag word.
… is billik wanneer dit by assessering kom.
… is fair when it comes to assessment.
… gee binne 'n redelike tyd terugvoer oor take / toetse.
… gives feedback on tasks/tests within reasonable time.
… sets assignments (e.g. for tutorials, practicals, self-study, etc.) in
such a way that students know exactly what is expected of them.
… tree altyd hoflik teenoor studente op.
… is accessible to students.
… is enthusiastic about the subject-matter that is presented in the module.
… is entoesiasties oor die leerstof wat in die module aangebied word
… is goed georganiseer (beskikbaarhied van studiemateriaal, reëlings ivm
lokale, ens)
… gives useful examples and applications from their own experience
or from practice.
… is well prepared for each contact session.
… is well organised (availability of study material, arrangements
regarding venues, etc.).
… always acts respectfully towards students.
… is toeganklik vir studente.
… appears to have a sound knowledge of the subject.
… uses handouts that contribute to meaningful learning.
… uses a variety of teaching methods.
… 's use of teaching methods (e.g. small group work, lectures, etc.)
contributes to meaningful learning.
… moedig studentedeelname by klasaktiwiteite, groepwerk, ens.aan.
… blyk ‘n grondige kennis van die vakgebied te hê.
… uses teaching aids effectively (e.g. overhead projector, slide
projector, computer, etc.).
… encourage student participation in class activities, group work, etc.
… gebruik 'n verskeidenheid van onderrigmetodes.
… se gebruik van onderrigmetodes (bv kleingroepwerk, lesings, ens)
dra by tot sinvolle leer.
… help my om moeilike aspekte van die werk te verstaan.
… helps me to understand difficut aspects of the work.
… gebruik onderrighulpmiddels doeltreffend (bv. oorhoofse projektor,
skyfieprojektor, rekenaar, ens.).
Feedback on module on a scale of 1 to 5 (1= Disagree strongly and 5 = Agree strongly):
In the table above Disagree strongly and Disagree are grouped as Disagree, and Agree and Agree Strongly as Agree.
… is stiptelik vir alle lesings, tutoriale, afsprake, ens.
(3) Terugvoer oor module op 'n skaal van 1 tot 5 (1= Verskil sterk en 5 = Stem volkome saam):
In die tabel hierbo is Verskil sterk en Verskil saam gegroepeer as Verskil en Stem saam en Stem volkome saam as Stem saam.
15SGBO_TCH02.xls

4. 3
Aantal respondente = 25
Dr V Tchokonte-Nana
4.6
4.5
4.2
4.0
3.6 3.8
4.0
4.2
4.4
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Enthusiastic Well
prepared
Organised Difficult
aspects
Variety
methods
Meaningful
learning
Student
participation
Examples Sound
knowledge
Studentfeedback
4.4 4.4
3.7
4.0
4.7
4.3 4.4
4.0 3.9
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
Teaching
aids
Handouts
meaningful
Speaks
audibly Assignments
clear
Respectful Accessible Punctual Assessment
fair
Timely
feedback
Studentfeedback

5. 4
Dr V Tchokonte-Nana Anatomie 278
Aantal respondente / Number of respondents: 25
1. … is enthusiastic about the subject-
matter that is presented in the
module.
2. … is well prepared for each contact
session.
3. … is well organised (availability of
study material, arrangements
regarding venues, etc.).
4. … helps me to understand difficut
aspects of the work.
5. … uses a variety of teaching
methods.
6. … 's use of teaching methods (e.g.
small group work, lectures, etc.)
contributes to meaningful learning.
7. … encourage student participation in
class activities, group work, etc.
8. … gives useful examples and
applications from their own
experience
or from practice.
9. … appears to have a sound
knowledge of the subject.
10. … uses teaching aids effectively (e.g.
overhead projector, slide
projector, computer, etc.).
11. … uses handouts that contribute to
meaningful learning.
12. … always speaks audibly and clearly.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree

6. 5
13. … sets assignments (e.g. for tutorials,
practicals, self-study, etc.) in
such a way that students know
exactly what is expected of them.
14. … always acts respectfully towards
students.
15. … is accessible to students.
16. … is punctual for all lectures, tutorials,
appointments, etc.
17. … is fair when it comes to
assessment.
18. … gives feedback on tasks/tests
within reasonable time.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree
0
5
10
15
20
25
Disagree Neutral Agree

7. 6
Het u enige kommmentaar oor die dosent?
Do you have any comments about this lecturer?
 Dosent gaan deur werk met 'n goeie tempo - nie te vinnig.
 Really enthusiastic and very patient.
 The lecturer could give better practicle sessions with more direct teaching.
 He is very passionate. He wants his students to excell.
 The lecturer is excited and enthusiastic. He has sound knowledge and conveys it well.
 He is a very informative lecturer. I do not like the fact that his assistant finished our section with him.
 Die klasaktiwiteite wat die dosent uitgedeel het, het baie gehelp om die werk te verstaan.
 It would help if there were more assistants in dissection halls instead of students having to search for
Museles by themselves.
 Hy is baie entoesiasties oor die werk. Hy poog baie sterk om altyd seker te maak ons verstaan die werk.
Goed voorbereid en altyd humoristies en vriendelik. Baie akkomoderende dosent.
 He was quite confusing with how he presented the work and I struggled to follow his thaught processes.
He got sidetracted and spoke about things that was not rekevant to what we were learning which also
made it hard to follow.
 Dr. Nana is very enthusiastic and clearly knows a lot about his subject. He will always explain and re-
explain work until everyone understands. Obviously his accent is quite heavy but I don’t think it hindered
my learning. He did go a bit slow though.
 Made very sure that we understand. Made an effort to explain. Welcomed our questions and we felt
comfortable to ask him to repeat explanations if we didn’t understand or couldn’t hear clearly.
 He's very friendly.