6,385 Consecutive Mini-GastricBypasses: 15 Years LaterDr. Rutledge, DrR@clos.net
First International ConsensusConference on the Mini-Bypass / OneAnastomosis BypassParis 2012 October 18-19Email DrR@CLOS.Net
The Mini-Gastric Bypass  • In spite of initial skepticism;    there is growing evidence that    mini-gastric bypass (MGB) ...
Methods:  • Outcome and long-term follow-up of    a consecutive cohort of patients who    underwent MGB are reported.
Results  • The data on 6,385 patients who underwent    MGB from September 1997 to June 2011    were reviewed.  • Mean preo...
Results  • Early complications occurred in 4.9%.  • 44 (0.7%) patients had anastomotic leaks.  • Three (0.05%) patients pr...
Results  • Excessive weight loss occurred in 1% of    patients; treated by take down of the    bypass.  • Mean % excess we...
Results Mirror Dr Noun’s   • One thousand consecutive mini-gastric     bypass: Noun R, et al. Journal Obes Surg. 2012 May;...
IFSO Varianational Committee Survey    Over 100 Surgeons from Around the World:
IFSO Varianational Committee Survey    • Results (Preliminary)    • Experience with 39,000 cases in the      prior year   ...
MGB: Major Weight Loss, Best?
MGB: Least Weight Regain
MGB: Low Risk of Reflux Sx
MGB: Revision is Easy
Conclusion  •   MGB is an  •   effective,  •   relatively low-risk, and  •   low-failure bariatric procedure.  •   In addi...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

6,385 Consecutive Mini-Gastric Bypasses: 15 Years Later

880 views

Published on

6,385 Consecutive Mini-Gastric Bypasses: 15 Years Later

Published in: Education, Health & Medicine
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
880
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
4
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
27
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

6,385 Consecutive Mini-Gastric Bypasses: 15 Years Later

  1. 1. 6,385 Consecutive Mini-GastricBypasses: 15 Years LaterDr. Rutledge, DrR@clos.net
  2. 2. First International ConsensusConference on the Mini-Bypass / OneAnastomosis BypassParis 2012 October 18-19Email DrR@CLOS.Net
  3. 3. The Mini-Gastric Bypass • In spite of initial skepticism; there is growing evidence that mini-gastric bypass (MGB) is a safe and effective procedure with many of the features of an ideal bariatric surgery.
  4. 4. Methods: • Outcome and long-term follow-up of a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent MGB are reported.
  5. 5. Results • The data on 6,385 patients who underwent MGB from September 1997 to June 2011 were reviewed. • Mean preoperative weight (+/- Standard Deviation) was 143 +/- 31 kg, BMI 47 +/- 7. & 83% were female. • Mean operative time 41 minutes and median length of stay 1 day. Three deaths occurred within 30 days of surgery, (0.05%). The most recent death was 8 years ago
  6. 6. Results • Early complications occurred in 4.9%. • 44 (0.7%) patients had anastomotic leaks. • Three (0.05%) patients presented with dypepsia/bile reflux not responsive to medical therapy and were successfully treated by Braun side-to-side jejuno- jejunostomy. • Gastritis/dyspepsia/marginal ulcer was the most serious long term complication; routinely treated medically.
  7. 7. Results • Excessive weight loss occurred in 1% of patients; treated by take down of the bypass. • Mean % excess weight loss (EWL) of 78%. 10 year weight regain 4.9%. • >50% EWL was achieved for 95% of patients at 18 months and for 92% at 60 months. • 6% of patient had inadequate weight loss or significant weight regain were treated by revision, (addition of ~2 meters to the bypass).
  8. 8. Results Mirror Dr Noun’s • One thousand consecutive mini-gastric bypass: Noun R, et al. Journal Obes Surg. 2012 May;22(5):697-703 • Short-term complications occurred in 2.7% for primary vs. 11.6% for revisionnal MGB (p < 0.01). Five (0.5%) patients presented with leak • Four (0.4%) patients, all with revisional MGB, presented with severe bile reflux and were cured by stapling the afferent loop and by a latero-lateral jejunojejunostomy. • Excessive weight loss occurred in four patients; two were reversed and two were converted to sleeve gastrectomy. • Percent excess weight loss (EWL) of 72.5%
  9. 9. IFSO Varianational Committee Survey Over 100 Surgeons from Around the World:
  10. 10. IFSO Varianational Committee Survey • Results (Preliminary) • Experience with 39,000 cases in the prior year • Lap Band is a "Poor" Surgery • RNY & Sleeve Surgeons have "lots" of leaks • MGB Surgeons Answered More Correct than Non-MGB Surgeons
  11. 11. MGB: Major Weight Loss, Best?
  12. 12. MGB: Least Weight Regain
  13. 13. MGB: Low Risk of Reflux Sx
  14. 14. MGB: Revision is Easy
  15. 15. Conclusion • MGB is an • effective, • relatively low-risk, and • low-failure bariatric procedure. • In addition, • it can be easily revised, converted, or reversed.

×