Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Midgley Interoperability US Dept of Ed


Published on

Published in: Education
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Midgley Interoperability US Dept of Ed

  1. 1. Steve Midgley Deputy Director Office of Education Technology US Department of Education
  2. 2. Context Process Content
  3. 3. Context
  4. 4. <ul><li>“ By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” </li></ul><ul><li>President Obama </li></ul>
  5. 5. Process
  6. 6. <ul><li>“ I can't create my future with the tools from your past.” </li></ul>Middle school student Second Life Session
  7. 7. <ul><li>National Education Technology Plan </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Learning </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Teaching </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Assessment </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Infrastructure </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Productivity </li></ul></ul><ul><li>National Broadband Plan </li></ul><ul><ul><li>Digital Learning and Content </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Better Data </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>Improved Infrastructure </li></ul></ul>
  8. 8. Challenges <ul><li>Educational technology market suffers from “a classic market failure . . . that discourages private industry from heavily investing in basic research to exploit emerging information technologies for learning” </li></ul><ul><li>-- Federation of American Scientists </li></ul><ul><li>Education markets are “notoriously difficult to enter [because] they are highly fragmented and often highly political.” </li></ul><ul><li>-- Henry Kelly </li></ul>
  9. 9. Opportunities <ul><li>Billions of dollars spent on educational materials, technology and assessments each year. </li></ul><ul><li>Millions of learning objects, primary source materials and other resources housed in Federal repositories today. </li></ul><ul><li>Thousands of educational Communities of Practice operating online around the world. </li></ul><ul><li>Hundreds of commercial and non-profit organizations working with digital resources and online learning today. </li></ul>
  10. 10. <ul><li>“ The Answer” doesn’t exist </li></ul><ul><li>Solutions will be assembled from everywhere </li></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Federal initiatives </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Industry innovation </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>State and local policy and practice </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><ul><li>Non-profits and reform support organizations </li></ul></ul></ul></ul></ul>Learning Registry Hi, That’s Us!
  11. 11. <ul><li>Everyone should be able to find “our stuff” </li></ul><ul><li>Other people should be able to comment on our stuff </li></ul><ul><li>We shouldn’t intermediate communication or use: “No gatekeepers” </li></ul><ul><li>We should encourage others settle on a solution </li></ul><ul><li>We shouldn’t be the only node on the network </li></ul><ul><li>We shouldn’t reinvent the wheel </li></ul><ul><li>Our stuff is free, but we should make room for-sale </li></ul>Federal Needs
  12. 12. Accelerating Change <ul><li>Q: What accelerates and strengthens growth of a network? </li></ul><ul><li>A: Value </li></ul><ul><li>Q: Where does value come from? </li></ul><ul><li>A: Functionality and Participation </li></ul><ul><li>Q: Can you build participation without functionality? </li></ul><ul><li>A: ? </li></ul><ul><li>Suggested reading: Benkler, Wealth of Networks & Christenson, Disrupting Class </li></ul>
  13. 13. Content
  14. 14. Network Functionality: keep it simple <ul><li>What should a content network do? </li></ul><ul><li>“ Help me find stuff” </li></ul><ul><li>“ Let me share stuff” </li></ul><ul><li>“ Allow me to participate” </li></ul>
  15. 15. Network Functionality: objectives <ul><li>Provide services: permit innovation </li></ul><ul><li>Let everyone participate </li></ul><ul><li>No default “winners” </li></ul><ul><li>Everyone can provide info on anything </li></ul><ul><li>Identity exists </li></ul><ul><li>Re-aggregation is natural </li></ul><ul><li>Usage/utility is shared </li></ul>
  16. 16. Network Brawn Brain
  17. 17. Network Stack
  18. 18. Content Sources <ul><li>Dept of Energy, Treasury, National Science Foundation, NASA, NOAA, Smithsonian, National Archives, Library of Congress, Education, and more </li></ul><ul><li>Publishers, School Districts, States, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Public Broadcasting System, Entrepreneurs, Broadcasters, NGO’s, Teachers </li></ul>
  19. 19. Don’t re-invent the wheel, but axle grease welcome <ul><li>International and NGO </li></ul><ul><li>EU: Globe, European SchoolNet, Ariadne </li></ul><ul><li>Australia </li></ul><ul><li>OERCommons, NYLearns, many others </li></ul><ul><li>Private Sector </li></ul><ul><li>IMS/Jess & co, Academic Benchmarks, many others </li></ul><ul><li>States / Local </li></ul><ul><li>California, Indiana, many others </li></ul>
  20. 20. Advanced Learning Systems: Capabilities <ul><li>Single sign on & identity management </li></ul><ul><li>Purchasing and license acquisition is easy </li></ul><ul><li>Re-using, re-mixing, re-purposing is easy (or even possible) </li></ul><ul><li>Communities can exist and find each other </li></ul><ul><li>Users control their data and privacy (no more stovepipes) </li></ul><ul><li>Instrumentation: it’s possible to see the bigger picture </li></ul><ul><li>Multiple voices (aka meta-data) </li></ul><ul><li>Diverse relevance and recommendation sources </li></ul><ul><li>Value is intensified by diverse parties </li></ul>
  21. 21. Interoperability Needs <ul><li>Lightweight </li></ul><ul><li>Open access and derivation </li></ul><ul><li>Transparent community </li></ul><ul><li>Opt-in & self-assembling </li></ul><ul><li>Easy “on-ramp” </li></ul><ul><li>Simple use-cases have simple implementations </li></ul><ul><li>Workflow is handled but not required </li></ul><ul><li>De-coupled transport </li></ul><ul><li>Open reference implementations & testing harnesses </li></ul><ul><li>Uses existing standards </li></ul><ul><li>Federated identity of resources (plus ancestry!) </li></ul><ul><li>Federated discovery (and therefore relevancy is too) </li></ul><ul><li>Semantic tuples? Something else? </li></ul>
  22. 22. Open Government (that’s you) Participation Welcome (and needed)
  23. 23. [email_address]