Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Monitoring of decentralisation 10.01.2018 en

395 views

Published on

MONITORING
OF THE PROCESS OF POWER DECENTRALISATION
AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE REFORM as of 10th January 2018 (December 2017)

Published in: Government & Nonprofit
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Monitoring of decentralisation 10.01.2018 en

  1. 1. MONITORING OF THE PROCESS OF POWER DECENTRALISATION AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE REFORM as of 10th January 2018 (December 2017)
  2. 2. MONITORING OF THE PROCESS OF DECENTRALISATION OF POWER IN UKRAINE 2 # KEY INDICATORS Slide 1 Dynamics of AH forming 3-6 2 Rating of the oblasts in terms of AH forming 7,8 3 Institute of starostas in amalgamated hromadas 9 4 Cooperation between hromadas 10 5 Results of financial decentralisation 11-17 5.1 Growth of local budgets (2014 – 2017) 11 5.2 Own-source revenues of the local budgets 12,13 5.3 Own-source revenues of the local budgets. Growth rate 14 5.4 Local budget expenditures 15 5.5 Remaining funds of local budgets, deposited funds 16,17 6 State financial support 18-21 6.1 Dynamics of state support for regional development and infrastructure buildup 18 6.2 Status of subvention allocation for social and economic development of specific territories 19 6.3 Status of subvention allocation from the State Budget to local budgets for development of infrastructure of amalgamated hromadas by projects 20 6.4 Status of distribution of State Fund for Regional Development between projects 21 7 Decentralisation in education 22-24 7.1 Establishment of hub schools in the oblasts, incl. AHs 22 7.2 General education schools 23 7.3 General education schools 24 8 Decentralisation in health care, creating hospital districts 25 9 Decentralisation of powers in architectural construction control and improvement of urban development law 26 10 Decentralisation in administrative services provision 27 11 Decentralisation in social policy 28
  3. 3. DYNAMICS OF FORMING AMALGAMATED HROMADAS INDICATOR 1 3 out of those 34 are waiting for CEC decision on setting first elections 699 amalgamated hromadas were formed As of 10.01.2018 Amalgamated hromadas Amalgamated hromadas which are waiting for CEC decision on setting first elections
  4. 4. DYNAMICS OF FORMING AMALGAMATED HROMADAS in 2015 - 2018 699 NUMBER OF AMALGAMATED HROMADAS NUMBER OF HROMADAS WHICH CREATED AMALGAMATED HROMADAS NUMBER OF RESIDENTS IN AMALGAMATED HROMADAS (mln persons) in 2015 - 2018 amalgamated hromadas formed 699 AHs (29,1 % of the total number of the basic level councils as of 01.01.2015) 3264 number of residents in amalgamated hromadas (14,3 % of the total population of Ukraine) 6,0 mln pers. INDICATOR 1 4 amalgamated hromadas were formed (out of those 34 are waiting for CEC decision on setting first elections) 3237 1739 795 1.4 3.1 6.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 2015 2016 2017 + 1,7 + 2,9 0 200 400 600 800 2015 2016 2017 159 366 699 + 207 + 333 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 2015 2016 2017 3264 1739 795 + 944 + 1525
  5. 5. DYNAMICS OF FORMING AMALGAMATED HROMADAS AVERAGE NUMBER OF HROMADAS WHICH FORMED ONE AH AVERAGE POPULATION OF ONE AH 5,0 4,8 4.7 4.55 4.6 4.65 4.7 4.75 4.8 4.85 4.9 4.95 5 5.05 2015 2015-2016 2015- 2017 INDICATOR 1 5 8300 8400 8500 8600 8700 8800 8900 2015 2015-2016 2015-2017 8805 8470 8760
  6. 6. AMALGAMATION OF HROMADAS WITHIN RAYONS Rayons where 100% of hromadas amalgamated Rayons where 50…99% of hromadas amalgamated Rayons where up to 49% of hromadas amalgamated 665 AHs established 490 rayons in total Rayons where none AH was formed 23 occupied rayons AR Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk oblasts INDICATOR 1 6
  7. 7. RATING OF THE OBLASTS IN TERMS OF AH FORMING OVERALL RATING AND PLACE BY PARAMETERS Note: when calculating the rating by parameters "Coverage of the oblast territory with AHs” and “Hromadas which amalgamated" the data of hromadas which were joined by other hromadas was accounted for Iv.-Frankivsk 13 Chernivtsi 7 Ternopil 7 Khmelnytskyi 2 Zakarpattia 18 Lviv 14 Volyn 5 Rivne 11 Zhytomyr 1 Chernihiv 3 Odessa 10 Kyiv 17 Vinnytsia 19 Kirovohrad 20 Cherkasy 19 Sumy 9 Kharkiv 16 Poltava 10 Kherson 12 Mykolaiv 8 Donetsk 14 Zaporizhzhia 6 Dnipropetrovsk 4 Luhansk 15 1-5 6-15 16-20 Place in overall rating INDICATOR 2 7 OBLAST Overall rating Key parameters. Overall place by parameters 1 2 3 4 Number of AHs Coverage of the oblast territory with AHs Hromadas which amalga- mated Number of AHs with population less than 5 thous.pers. ZHYTOMYR 1 2 1 1 11 KHMELNYTSKYI 2 5 3 2 8 CHERNIHIV 3 6 4 3 13 DNIPROPETROVSK 4 1 5 5 17 VOLYN 5 5 6 6 12 ZAPORIZHZHIA 6 6 2 4 21 TERNOPIL 7 4 7 7 18 CHERNIVTSI 7 11 10 8 7 MYKOLAIV 8 9 8 9 16 SUMY 9 10 9 10 14 ODESSA 10 13 14 14 5 POLTAVA 10 3 11 12 20 RIVNE 11 12 13 13 10 KHERSON 12 11 12 11 15 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 13 14 18 16 2 DONETSK 14 16 15 15 6 LVIV 14 7 19 17 9 LUHANSK 15 18 16 18 4 KHARKIV 16 17 21 21 1 KYIV 17 17 23 23 3 ZAKARPATTIA 18 19 24 24 1 VINNYTSIA 19 8 20 20 21 CHERKASY 19 12 17 19 21 KIROVOHRAD 20 15 22 22 19
  8. 8. RATING OF THE OBLASTS IN TERMS OF AH FORMING KEY PARAMETERS Note: when calculating the rating by parameters "Coverage of the oblast territory with AHs” and “Hromadas which amalgamated" the data of hromadas which were joined by other hromadas was also accounted for INDICATOR 2 8 Oblast PARAMETER 1. Number of AHs Area of the oblast, sq.km PARAMETER 2. AH area, sq.km No of hromadas in the oblast before AH establish ment PARAMETER 3. Hromadas which amalgamated PARAMETER 4. Number of AHs with population less than 5 thous. persons OVERALL PLACE by parameters 1-4 2015 2016 2017 Total No of AHs in 2015- 2017 Total in 2015-2017 Total in 2015-2017 Total in 2015-2017 No of AHs No of AHs No of AHs No of AHs in CEC AH area % Hromadas which amalga- mated % No of AHs % VINNYTSIA 2 19 13 34 29832 16810 56,4 631 348 55,2 17 50 19 VOLYN 5 10 25 40 20645 11148 54 605 322 53,2 14 35 5 DNIPROPETROVSK 15 19 22 1 57 31865 16396 51,5 569 297 52,2 25 43,9 4 DONETSK 3 3 3 5 14 31914 15668 49,1 348 168 48,3 3 21,4 14 ZHYTOMYR 9 23 13 1 46 20144 9095 45,2 412 169 41 16 34,8 1 ZAKARPATTIA 2 1 3 6 27180 14922 54,9 299 149 49,8 0 0 18 ZAPORIZHZHIA 6 10 20 6 42 13823 5422 39,2 615 242 39,3 21 50 6 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 3 8 12 1 24 8097 2656 32,8 271 97 35,8 3 12,5 13 KYIV 1 1 7 3 12 24598 8917 36,3 313 105 33,5 2 16,7 17 KIROVOHRAD 2 3 8 2 15 23834 7989 33,5 419 135 32,2 7 46,7 20 LUHANSK 2 1 5 3 11 33310 7378 22,2 490 110 22,4 2 18,2 15 LVIV 15 7 13 35 28748 7749 27 503 157 31,2 11 31,4 14 MYKOLAIV 1 18 9 1 29 20047 4777 23,8 365 95 26 12 41,4 8 ODESSA 8 3 14 1 26 28461 7208 25,3 298 95 31,9 5 19,2 10 POLTAVA 12 6 21 4 43 13900 2342 16,8 516 108 20,9 21 48,8 10 RIVNE 5 13 7 1 26 26517 5293 20 386 84 21,8 9 34,6 11 SUMY 1 13 14 1 29 21833 3467 15,9 711 137 19,3 11 37,9 9 TERNOPIL 26 10 4 1 41 26684 5331 20 332 61 18,4 19 46,3 7 KHARKIV 0 4 8 12 31415 3676 11,7 458 57 12,4 0 0 16 KHERSON 1 11 14 1 27 28131 2231 7,9 659 66 10 11 40,7 12 KHMELNYTSKYI 22 4 13 1 40 12777 616 4,8 337 19 5,6 10 25 2 CHERKASY 3 3 20 26 26513 3896 14,7 707 101 14,3 13 50 19 CHERNIVTSI 10 6 10 1 27 20900 3729 17,8 556 97 17,4 6 22,2 7 CHERNIHIV 5 11 21 37 24588 2542 10,3 415 45 10,8 14 37,8 3 TOTAL 159 207 299 34 699 575756 169263 29,4 11215 3264 29,1 252 36,1
  9. 9. 2454 Total number of starostas in amalgamated hromadas, out of those: INSTITUTE OF STAROSTAS IN AMALGAMATED HROMADAS Ivano- Frankivsk 84 (17) Zakarpattia 14 (5) Lviv 102(29) Volyn 128 (7) Rivne 69 (19) Ternopil 200 (114) Chernivtsi 68 (12) Khmelnytskyi 281 (181) Zhytomyr 283 (0) Vinnytsia 69 (6) Odessa 83 (37) Mykolaiv 72 (5) Kherson 67 (5) Zaporizhzhia 100 (18) Dnipropetrovsk 109 (31) Kirovohrad 24 (4) Cherkasy 71 (12) Kyiv 40 (5) Kyiv city Chernihiv 260 (50) Sumy 103 (0) Poltava 102 (14) Kharkiv 45 (0) Donetsk 42 (14) Luhansk 38 (15) AR Crimea 100 (29) total number of starostas (elected starostas) 600 were elected INDICATOR 3 8
  10. 10. 535(+23)* hromadas are using tools for intermunicipal cooperation COOPERATION BETWEEN HROMADAS STATUS OF CONCLUDING INTERMUNICIPAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS 118(+7)* intermunicipal cooperation agreements 4 Number of hromadas that have used the tools of intermunicipal cooperation (2) Number of intermunicipal cooperation agreements Ivano- Frankivsk 76 (10) Zakarpattia 4 (2) Lviv 5 (2) Volyn 27 (9) Rivne 2 (1) Ternopil 0 Chernivtsi 0 (1) Khmelnytskyi 12 (2) Zhytomyr 13 (6) Vinnytsia 2 (1) Odessa 9 (2) Mykolaiv 0 Kherson 0 Zaporizhzhia 4 (2) Dnipropetrovsk 8 (3) Kirovohrad 4 (2) Cherkasy 55 (6) Kyiv 5 (2) Kyiv city Chernihiv 22 (6) Sumy 8 (3) Poltava 242 (49) Kharkiv 35 (9) Donetsk 0 Luhansk 0 AR Crimea INDICATOR 4 10 * as compared to the previous month ЖКГ благоустрій пожежна безпека освіта, ох.здоровя, соцзабезпечення інше Housing and utilities Urban land development Fire safety Education, health care, social care Other 37 13 16 25 27 AREAS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF INTERMUNICIPAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS
  11. 11. 2014 2015 2016 2017 68.6 98.2 146.6 192.0 Own-source revenues of the local budgets, bln UAH 2015 2016 2017 45,6 47,5 49,3 Share of local budgets (including transfers) in the consolidated budget of Ukraine, % +29,6 (42%) +48,4 (49%) +45,4 (31%) RESULTS OF FINANCIAL DECENTRALISATION GROWTH OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS (2014 – 2017) INDICATOR 5.1 11
  12. 12. Own-source revenues in January-December 2017 as compared to January-December 2016, bln UAH(%) 146,6 192,0 +45,4 bln UAH (31%) 5,0 9,3 +4,3 bln UAH (by 1,9 times) 2016 2017 2016 2017 Ukraine 366 AHs INDICATOR 5.2RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS 12
  13. 13. OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF 366 AHs in January-December 2017 and 2016, mln UAH RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS INDICATOR 5.2 13 Payments to the budget 366 AHs, total including: 159 AHs amalgamated in 2015 207 AHs amalgamated in 2016 Revenue Deviation Revenue Deviation Revenue Deviation 2016 2017 +/- % 2016 2017 +/- % 2016 2017 +/- % Total, including: 4 959,6 9 275,6 4 316,0 187,0% 3 261,6 4 376,6 1 115,1 134,2% 1 698,1 4 899,0 3 200,9 288,5% Personal income tax 1 749,0 5 211,7 3 462,6 298,0% 1 749,0 2 470,1 721,0 141,2% - 2 741,6 2 741,6 - Excise tax 709,1 794,2 85,1 112,0% 367,8 417,2 49,4 113,4% 341,3 377,0 35,7 110,4% Land fee 1 168,1 1 402,0 233,9 120,0% 559,0 651,7 92,7 116,6% 609,0 750,2 141,2 123,2% Single tax 1 042,0 1 402,6 360,6 134,6% 449,2 605,5 156,3 134,8% 592,8 797,1 204,3 134,5% Property tax 76,8 132,5 55,7 172,5% 35,6 60,3 24,8 169,6% 41,2 72,1 30,9 175,1%
  14. 14. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% місцеві податки і збори плата за землю єдиний податок податок на нерухоме майно Local taxes and fees growth rate in January-December 2017 as compared to January-December 2016 (by budget levels), in % and mln UAH Місцеві бюджети України Бюджети міст обласного значення Бюджети ОТГ 3043 6134 2814 360 234 1508 1006 505 56 10216 4864 654 local taxes and fees land fee single tax property tax Local budgets of Ukraine Cities of oblast significance budgets AH budgets 0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% Місцеві бюджети України Бюджети міст обласного значення Бюджети ОТГLocal budgets of Ukraine, total Budgets of the cities of oblast significance Budgets of AHs Administrative services fee growth rate in January-December 2017 as compared to January-December 2016 (by budget levels), in % and mln UAH 14 RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION OWN-SOURCE REVENUES OF THE LOCAL BUDGETS. GROWTH RATE INDICATOR 5.3 +24,2% +25,9% +28,5% +13,0% +14,3% +20,0% +35,7% +38,0% +34,6% +70,9% +69,3% +72,5% +40,1% +72,6% +448,7% (майже у 4,5 разів) 74,9 445,5844,4
  15. 15. Development budget expenditures per capita in January-November 2016 and 2017, UAH 888 891 788 1315 1220 882 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 грн. +48,1% +36,9% 15 Local budgets of Ukraine Budgets of the cities of oblast significance Budgets of AHs 2017 2016 RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION LOCAL BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDICATOR 5.4 +11,9%
  16. 16. 33.6 42.3 42.1 22.7 21.6 10.7 10.5 3.9 3.9 0 20 40 60 80 01.01.2017 01.11.2017 01.12.2017 Remaining funds of the local budgets of Ukraine, bln UAH RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION REMAINING FUNDS OF LOCAL BUDGETS, DEPOSITED FUNDS 16 INDICATOR 5.5 78,179,6 -1,5 (decreased by 1,9%) Treasury accounts, Special fund Treasury accounts, General fund Deposit accounts, Special fund Deposit accounts, General fund
  17. 17. 1.7 2.9 2.7 1.2 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 01.01.2017 01.11.2017 01.12.2017 Remaining funds of general fund of the budgets of 366 AHs, bln UAH 9.2 8.1 7.3 3.2 3.1 6.2 5.7 1.1 1 0 5 10 15 20 01.01.2017 01.11.2017 01.12.2017 Remaining funds of the budgets of the cities of oblast significance, bln UAH RESULTS OF FIANACIAL DECENTRALISATION REMAINING FUNDS OF LOCAL BUDGETS, DEPOSITED FUNDS 17 INDICATOR 5.5 4,3 18,6 17,1-1,5 (decreased by 8,1%) 4,6 -0,3 (decreased by 6,5%) Treasury accounts, Special fund Treasury accounts, General fund Deposit accounts, Special fund Deposit accounts, General fund
  18. 18. STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT DYNAMICS OF STATE SUPPORT OF HROMADA DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE BUILDUP 2014 2015 2016 2017 0.5 0.8 3.3 6,2 2.9 3,0 3.5 1,0 1.5 4,0 0.27 0.65 EU funds for support of sectoral regional policy Funds for construction of football fields Subvention for health care development in rural area Subvention for infrastructure of amalgamated hromadas State Fund for Regional Development Subvention for social and economic development 0,5 bln UAH 3,7 млрд. грн 7,3 млрд. грн 16,1 bln UAH State support of hromada development and their infrastructure buildup increased by 32 times INDICATOR 6.1 18
  19. 19. MINFIN, MINREGION: INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT STATUS OF SUBVENTION ALLOCATION FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFIC TERRITORIES 6,234 bln UAH distributed by the CMU . incl. 411,8 mln. UAH for AH development 10 569Projects 6,234bln UAH are provisioned in the State Budget 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 418.9 193.9 599.0 192.4 188.0 127.1 238.9 372.6 326.7 205.1 60.5 345.7 199.9 325.1 233.7 190.8 229.8 111.3 348.2 140.5 246.5 234.7 258.1 295.6 151.0 Subvention allocation to regions for social and economic development of specific territories # Oblast Distributed under the CMU Orders, mln UAH Number of the objects Transferred by MinFin, mln UAH 1 VINNYTSIA 418,9 731 418,9 2 VOLYN 193,9 348 193,9 3 DNIPROPETROVSK 599,0 516 599,0 4 DONETSK 192,4 229 192,4 5 ZHYTOMYR 188,0 900 188,0 6 ZAKARPATTIA 127,1 120 127,1 7 ZAPORIZHZHIA 238,9 285 238,9 8 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 372,6 471 372,6 9 KYIV 326,7 519 326,7 10 KIROVOHRAD 205,1 226 205,1 11 LUHANSK 60,5 77 60,5 12 LVIV 345,7 784 345,7 13 MYKOLAIV 199,9 453 199,9 14 ODESSA 325,1 670 325,1 15 POLTAVA 233,7 395 233,7 16 RIVNE 190,8 365 190,8 17 SUMY 229,8 602 229,8 18 TERNOPIL 111,3 216 111,3 19 KHARKIV 348,2 272 348,2 20 KHERSON 140,5 175 140,5 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 246,5 486 246,5 22 CHERKASY 234,7 674 234,7 23 CHERNIVTSI 258,1 311 258,1 24 CHERNIHIV 295,6 594 295,6 25 KYIV CITY 151,0 150 151,0 Total amount allocated 6 234,0 731 6 234,0 Provisioned in the State Budget 6 234,0 10 569 INDICATOR 6.2 19
  20. 20. STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT STATUS OF SUBVENTION ALLOCATION FOR AH INFRASTRUCTURE BY PROJECTS 20 INDICATOR 6.3 * as compared to the previous month 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська % of the amount, distributed between projects, of the total subvention amount for AHs in the oblast Vinnytsia Volyn Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Zaporizhzhia Ivano-Frankivsk Kyiv Kirovohrad Luhansk Lviv Mykolaiv Odessa Poltava Rivne Sumy Ternopil Kharkiv Kherson Khmelnytskyi Cherksay Chernivtsi Chernihiv 2265 (+219)* infrastructure projects 366 AHs established in 2015-2016 1,500 (100%) (+0,008)* bln UAH # Oblast Provisioned funds, thous. UAH Projects, approved by MinRegion No Amount, thous.UAH % of the provisioned subvention sum 1 VINNYTSIA 45 705,6 63 45 705,6 100,0 2 VOLYN 50 122,9 97 50 122,9 100,0 3 DNIPROPETROVSK 135 017,0 150 135 017,0 100,0 4 DONETSK 41 845,9 38 41 845,9 100,0 5 ZHYTOMYR 155 132,4 247 155 132,4 100,0 6 ZAKARPATTIA 14 551,8 20 14 551,8 100,0 7 ZAPORIZHZHIA 70 918,8 115 70 918,8 100,0 8 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 43 224,1 95 43 224,1 100,0 9 KYIV 6 075,3 5 6 075,3 100,0 10 KIROVOHRAD 19 178,9 24 19 178,9 100,0 11 LUHANSK 16 167,9 18 16 167,9 100,0 12 LVIV 63 497,2 124 63 497,2 100,0 13 MYKOLAIV 90 567,0 136 90 567,0 100,0 14 ODESSA 53 017,2 67 53 017,2 100,0 15 POLTAVA 59 161,9 122 59 161,9 100,0 16 RIVNE 64 265,9 130 64 265,9 100,0 17 SUMY 54 607,4 77 54 607,4 100,0 18 TERNOPIL 115 491,2 199 115 491,2 100,0 19 KHARKIV 17 654,0 16 17 654,0 100,0 20 KHERSON 52 113,8 83 52 113,8 100,0 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 167 031,2 230 167 031,2 100,0 22 CHERKASY 17 910,7 32 17 910,7 100,0 23 CHERNIVTSI 61 935,9 86 61 935,9 100,0 24 CHERNIHIV 84 806,0 91 84 806,0 100,0 TOTAL 1 500 000,0 2 265 1 500 000,0 100,0
  21. 21. 3,5 bln UAH % of SFRD funds distributed between projects Provisioned SFRD funds in 2017 STATE FINANCIAL SUPPORT STATUS OF DISTRIBUTION OF SFRD BETWEEN PROJECTS INDICATOR 6.4 21 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська м.Київ 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Vinnytsia Volyn Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Zaporizhzhia Ivano-Frankivsk Kyiv Kirovohrad Luhansk Lviv Mykolaiv Odessa Poltava Rivne Sumy Ternopil Kharkiv Kherson Khmelnytskyi Cherksay Chernivtsi Chernihiv Kyivcity # Region Provisioned for project implementation, thous. UAH Remaining undistribut ed funds, thous. UAHTotal incl. SFRD funds Local budget funds 1 VINNYTSIA 229 567,773 172 989,068 56 578,705 0,0 2 VOLYN 149 625,286 113 128,831 36 496,455 0,0 3 DNIPROPETROVSK 255 845,770 212 628,496 43 217,274 0,0 4 DONETSK 312 150,672 279 137,355 33 013,317 0,0 5 ZHYTOMYR 205 260,068 134 971,054 70 289,014 0,0 6 ZAKARPATTIA 168 203,507 136 726,612 31 476,895 0,0 7 ZAPORIZHZHIA 132 431,308 114 501,389 17 929,919 0,0 8 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 186 243,842 149 822,742 36 421,100 0,0 9 KYIV 160 512,135 113 932,914 46 579,221 0,0 10 KIROVOHRAD 71 690,305 63 599,014 8 091,291 0,0 11 LUHANSK 267 113,020 238 543,309 28 569,711 0,0 12 LVIV 231 923,766 166 561,277 65 362,490 0,0 13 MYKOLAIV 90 818,881 75 692,949 15 125,932 0,0 14 ODESSA 210 175,516 156 838,407 53 337,109 0,0 15 POLTAVA 179 178,055 93 889,333 85 288,722 0,0 16 RIVNE 150 993,544 126 104,588 24 888,956 0,0 17 SUMY 174 469,986 120 089,735 54 380,251 0,0 18 TERNOPIL 161 432,500 115 198,292 46 234,208 0,0 19 KHARKIV 213 983,055 177 708,126 36 274,929 0,0 20 KHERSON 156 523,291 114 753,812 41 769,479 0,0 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 186 264,103 139 812,459 46 451,644 0,0 22 CHERKASY 123 627,226 81 135,275 42 491,951 0,0 23 CHERNIVTSI 110 460,631 98 655,738 11 804,893 0,0 24 CHERNIHIV 132 014,733 112 553,559 19 461,174 0,0 25 KYIV city 468 656,566 191 025,666 277 630,900 0,0 TOTAL 4 729 165,539 3 500 000,0 1 229 165,539 0,0
  22. 22. DECENTRALISATION IN EDUCATION ESTABLISHMENT OF HUB SCHOOLS IN THE OBLASTS, INCLUDING AHs 476 (+19)* hub schools established, including 152 (+8)* — in AHs 24 Number of hub schools in the oblast (10) Number of hub schools in AHs 926 (+17)* hub school satellites, incl. 299 (+10)*— in AHs 770 (+27)* school buses INDICATOR 7.1 22 * as compared to the previous month Ivano- FrankivskZakarpattia Lviv Volyn 24 (14) Rivne 0 Khmelnytskyi 15 (11) Zhytomyr 32 (18) Vinnytsia Odessa Mykolaiv Kherson Zaporizhzhia DnipropetrovskKirovohrad 7 (1) Kyiv 34 (0) Kyiv city Sumy 22 (5) Kharkiv Donetsk AR Crimea Ternopil Chernihiv Cherkasy Poltava 12 (10) 38 (3) 6 (2) 18 (8) 29 (10) 21 (9) 22 (2) 25 (7) 7 (4) 66 (6) 27 (11) 8 (0) 8 (2) 13(9) 12 (5) 7 (2) Chernivtsi Luhansk 23 (13) 1908 (+45)* pupils with special training needs 491 (+11)* classes with inclusive education in hub schools 38490 (+1587)* pupils are taken to hub schools 2798 (+52)* classes with pupils’ number less than 10
  23. 23. 689 552 394 245 417 560 328 536 565 240 284 926 327 585 461 478 324 460 509 317 396 486 264 372 144 79 513 316 303 86 215 159 127 100 14 378 197 223 171 138 158 300 258 127 345 130 144 151 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні РДА заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні ОМС (міста обл. значення, ОТГ) DECENTRALISATION IN EDUCATION GENERAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS 9952 (-472)* (65,3%) 5279 (+434)* (34,7%) general education institutions under control of LSG (cities of oblast significance, AHs) INDICATOR 7.2 23 general education institutions (GEI) under control of rayon administrations * as compared to the previous month # Oblast Number of GEIs Total including GEIs under control of rayon administra- tions* Including GEIs under control of LSG (cities of oblast signifi- cance, AHs)** 1 VINNYTSIA 833 688 145 2 VOLYN 635 534 101 3 DNIPROPETROVSK 910 307 603 4 DONETSK 561 237 324 5 ZHYTOMYR 683 318 365 6 ZAKARPATTIA 648 545 103 7 ZAPORIZHZHIA 553 229 324 8 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 692 533 159 9 KYIV 681 552 129 10 KIROVOHRAD 348 248 100 11 LUHANSK 292 278 14 12 LVIV 1 216 825 391 13 MYKOLAIV 524 337 187 14 ODESSA 795 568 227 15 POLTAVA 607 434 173 16 RIVNE 617 478 139 17 SUMY 476 321 155 18 TERNOPIL 758 421 337 19 KHARKIV 746 466 280 20 KHERSON 426 258 168 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 730 391 339 22 CHERKASY 580 413 167 23 CHERNIVTSI 409 243 166 24 CHERNIHIV 511 328 183 TOTAL 15231 9952 5279 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська 83% 84% 34% 42% 47% 84% 41% 77% 81% 71% 95% 68% 64% 71% 71% 77% 67% 56% 62% 61% 54% 71% 59% 64% 17% 16% 66% 58% 53% 16% 59% 23% 19% 29% 5% 32% 36% 29% 29% 23% 33% 44% 38% 39% 46% 29% 41% 36% заклади освіти, що перебувають в управлінні РДА (%) заклади освіти, що перебувають в управлінні ОМС (міста обл. значення, ОТГ) (%) Vinnytsia Volyn Dnipropetrovsk Donetsk Zhytomyr Zakarpattia Zaporizhzhia Ivano-Frankivsk Kyiv Kirovohrad Luhansk Lviv Mykolaiv Odessa Poltava Rivne Sumy Ternopil Kharkiv Kherson Khmelnytskyi Cherkasy Chernivtsi Chernihiv education institutions under control of rayon administrations (%) education institutions under control of LSG (city of oblast significance, AH) (%)
  24. 24. 689 552 394 245 417 560 328 536 565 240 284 926 327 585 461 478 324 460 509 317 396 486 264 372 144 79 513 316 303 86 215 159 127 100 14 378 197 223 171 138 158 300 258 127 345 130 144 151 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні РДА заклади освіти, які перебувають в управлінні ОМС (міста обл. значення, ОТГ) DECENTRALISATION IN EDUCATION GENERAL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS INDICATOR 7.3 24 437 – GEIs were transferred to communal ownership of AHs 2322 – general education institutions # Oblast No of AHs Number of AHs that took GEIs into communal ownership Number of GEIs transferred to communal ownership of AHs Number of AHs that transferred educational subvention to the rayon budget 1 VINNYTSIA 34 21 79 0 2 VOLYN 40 16 98 0 3 DNIPROPETROVSK 56 34 130 4 4 DONETSK 9 6 52 1 5 ZHYTOMYR 45 37 245 4 6 ZAKARPATTIA 6 6 37 1 7 ZAPORIZHZHIA 36 36 153 0 8 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 23 11 72 0 9 KYIV 9 2 8 0 10 KIROVOHRAD 13 4 15 0 11 LUHANSK 8 2 14 1 12 LVIV 35 33 199 0 13 MYKOLAIV 28 18 79 10 14 ODESSA 25 10 47 1 15 POLTAVA 39 19 93 0 16 RIVNE 25 18 83 0 17 SUMY 28 14 46 3 18 TERNOPIL 40 37 233 3 19 KHARKIV 12 9 40 1 20 KHERSON 26 21 84 5 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 39 26 243 0 22 CHERKASY 26 18 68 8 23 CHERNIVTSI 26 22 113 0 24 CHERNIHIV 37 17 91 2 TOTAL 665 437 2322 44 34 40 56 9 45 6 36 23 9 13 8 35 28 25 39 25 28 40 12 26 39 26 26 37 21 16 34 6 37 6 36 11 2 4 2 33 18 10 19 18 14 37 9 21 26 18 22 17 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська Кількість ОТГ Кількість ОТГ, що прийняли у комунальну власність загальноосвітні навчальні заклади Number of AHs Number of AHs which took ownership over general education institutions (GEI)
  25. 25. DECENTRALISATION IN HEALTH CARE CREATING HOSPITAL DISTRICTS 25 4 (4) Oblasts where hospital districts (and hospital councils) were created and their number Oblasts where hospital districts haven’t been created 82(+19)* hospital districts 40 hospital councils in 20(+3)* regions INDICATOR 8 Ivano- Frankivsk Zakarpattia Lviv Volyn Rivne Khmelnytskyi Zhytomyr Vinnytsia Odessa Kherson Zaporizhzhia Dnipropetrovsk Kirovohrad Kyiv Kyiv city Sumy Kharkiv Donetsk Luhansk AR Crimea Ternopil Chernihiv Cherkasy Poltava Chernivtsi 5 4 (4) 4 (4) 4 (1) 4 (4)4 (4) 4 (3) 3 (3)3 3 3 (3) 3 (3) 5 5 (5) 5 (4) 3 (2) 1 * as compared to the previous month 15 plans of hospital district development in 7 oblasts Mykolaiv 4 6 9
  26. 26. out of 838 cities of oblast significance and AHs only 89LSGs were delegated powers in architecture and construction control incl. 10 (+1)* AHs were delegated powers in architecture and construction control DECENTRALISATION IN ARCHITECTURE CONTROL TRANSFER OF POWERS TO HROMADAS INDICATOR 9 26 * as compared to the previous month % of LSGs in the oblast (cities of oblast significance and AHs), which were delegated powers in architecture and construction control # Oblast Cities of oblast significa nce AHs Number of LSGs, which received authority in the field of architecture and construction control Dynamics (+) compared to the previous period Cities of oblast significan ce Village, settlement and town councils with population less than 50 thous. Total LSG incl. AH 1 VINNYTSIA 6 34 3 1 4 1 - 2 VOLYN 4 40 1 1 - 3 DNIPROPETROVSK 13 56 6 4 10 3 - 4 DONETSK 27 9 7 7 1 - 5 ZHYTOMYR 5 45 2 1 3 1 - 6 ZAKARPATTIA 5 6 1 1 2 1 1 7 ZAPORIZHZHIA 5 36 2 2 - 8 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 6 23 3 2 5 - 9 KYIV 13 9 7 7 14 - 10 KIROVOHRAD 4 13 2 2 - 11 LUHANSK 14 8 1 1 - 12 LVIV 9 35 3 1 4 - 13 MYKOLAIV 5 28 1 1 - 14 ODESSA 7 25 6 1 7 2 - 15 POLTAVA 6 39 2 2 4 - 16 RIVNE 4 25 1 1 - 17 SUMY 7 28 2 2 - 18 TERNOPIL 4 40 2 2 - 19 KHARKIV 7 12 3 1 4 - 20 KHERSON 4 26 2 2 - 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 6 39 5 5 - 22 CHERKASY 6 26 2 2 - 23 CHERNIVTSI 2 26 1 1 2 1 - 24 CHERNIHIV 4 37 1 1 - 25 KYIV city 1 1 1 - TOTAL 173 665 67 22 89 10 1 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Вінницька Волинська Дніпропетровська Донецька Житомирська Закарпатська Запорізька Івано-Франківська Київська Кіровоградська Луганська Львівська Миколаївська Одеська Полтавська Рівненська Сумська Тернопільська Харківська Херсонська Хмельницька Черкаська Чернівецька Чернігівська м.Київ 10% 2% 14% 19% 6% 18% 5% 17% 64% 12% 5% 9% 3% 22% 9% 4% 6% 5% 21% 7% 11% 6% 7% 2% 100%
  27. 27. INDICATOR 10DECENTRALISATION IN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES PROVISION 27 56 ASCs already operate in AHs 734 Distribution of ASCs between authorities which established them Ivano- Frankivsk Zakarpattia Lviv Volyn Rivne Khmelnytskyi Zhytomyr Odessa Mykolaiv Kherson Zaporizhzhia DnipropetrovskKirovohrad Kyiv Kyiv city Sumy Kharkiv Donetsk Luhansk AR Crimea Ternopil Chernihiv Cherkasy Poltava Chernivtsi 23 42 30 Vinnytsia 18 40 26 24 21 35 37 17 41 24 22 33 285625 29 33 25 45 17 15 27 total number of created ASCs 468 — rayon state administrations 65 — oblast centres and Kyiv city 133 — cities of oblast significance 68 — other LSG (incl. 56 — in AHs) 734
  28. 28. DECENTRALISATION IN SOCIAL POLICY 40 Regional social services centres, established by AHs 1 Social services division, social care division, social services provision sectors in AHs (3) Social services centres for families, children and youth 428 positions of social workers in 216 AHs INDICATOR 11 Oblast No of AHs Submission of documents for assignment of all types of social support CreationofremoteworkplacesbyPension Fundforprovisionofpensionservices (numberofAHs)* Social services improvement introduction of social workers into the staffing structure Performing the functions of controlling compliance with labour law** Protection of children rights in executive bodies of city, settlement and village councils of AHs Noofpersonswhich performthefunctions Noofstarostaswhich performthefunctions NoofAHs Noofexperts Nooflabour inspectors Creationofchildren’s affairsoffices Noofpublicofficials delegatedthepowers (incaseoffailureto createoffices) VINNYTSIA 33 0 33 16 14 23 8 0 15 VOLYN 39 27 39 8 10 10 2 0 12 DNIPROPETROVSK 53 56 17 17 20 40 6 4 32 DONETSK 9 24 13 4 5 30 3 2 2 ZHYTOMYR 45 154 170 11 13 20 1 6 25 ZAKARPATTIA 6 6 8 3 0 0 4 0 11 ZAPORIZHZHIA 34 23 26 10 12 22 2 0 14 IVANO-FRANKIVSK 20 11 35 3 10 29 2 2 6 KYIV 6 6 5 2 2 2 - 4 2 KIROVOHRAD 13 21 20 3 3 9 - 2 10 LUHANSK 8 7 27 0 3 5 - 0 0 LVIV 33 37 44 23 12 12 6 0 16 MYKOLAIV 21 60 7 13 9 31 - 1 14 ODESSA 23 18 33 6 3 5 1 13 5 POLTAVA 32 42 31 4 9 13 2 0 0 RIVNE 24 42 39 6 13 19 2 0 8 SUMY 27 64 35 15 5 5 3 7 4 TERNOPIL 40 15 43 14 21 21 - 0 11 KHARKIV 12 13 24 1 4 16 3 0 10 KHERSON 24 40 32 12 9 24 4 0 21 KHMELNYTSKYI 33 60 238 16 10 26 3 1 20 CHERKASY 24 5 0 8 5 8 2 0 2 CHERNIVTSI 22 41 23 10 16 49 4 1 16 CHERNIHIV 33 13 14 9 8 9 1 2 11 TOTAL 614 785 956 214 216 428 59 45 267 * - according to data of Pension Fund ** - according to data of State Labour Service Kherson 1 Zaporizhzhia 4 Dnipropetrovsk 1 Kharkiv 3 Donetsk (1) Luhansk Odessa 1 Kirovohrad 1 (1) Sumy 1 Cherkasy Poltava 1 (2) Mykolaiv 10 Kyiv 1 Chernihiv (1) Ivano- Frankivsk 3Zakarpattia 1 Lviv 1 (1) Volyn Rivne (1) Khmelnytskyi 4 (3) Zhytomyr 16 (2) Vinnytsia Ternopil (1) Chernivtsi Crimea 175 labour inspectors of LSGs, out of those 59 in AHs 28

×