This document outlines a proposed 4K production workflow for an educational institution. The goals are to design a feasible 4K workflow, analyze weaknesses and bottlenecks, provide guidance to students on 4K production, and improve video production services. The workflow involves testing 4K camera recording options and hardware, an offline post-production process using DaVinci Resolve then Premiere Pro, and conclusions that it enables affordable 4K production and prepares students for industry work, though battery life and long-term storage are drawbacks.
3. Goals & Objectives
David Jakob Final Year Project 3
4K
Design a
feasible
workflow
Analyze weak
points and
bottlenecks
Provide
students a
guide to 4K
Analyze
industry
trends
Improve
video
production
services
Provide
suggestions
for future
development
4. What is 4K?
David Jakob Final Year Project 4
8K UHD 7680 x 4320
4K UHD 3840 x 2160
Cinema4K4096x2160
2K2048x1080
Full HD 1920 x 1080
HD 1280 x 720
5. What does 4K try to be?
Image
Quality
Resolution
Frame Rate
Compression
Dynamic
Range
Color Gamut
David Jakob Final Year Project 5
6. 4K Industry Development
IBM 9MP
Monitor
2001
DALSA Origin
2003
The Digital
Intermediate
e.g. Spider-
Man 2 (2004)
Consumer 4K
NAB 2013
David Jakob Final Year Project 6
7. 4K Distribution
David Jakob Final Year Project 7
Acquisition
Post
Production
Delivery Presentation
Bottleneck of the Industry
8. Analyzing the Data Flow Model
David Jakob Final Year Project 8
REC SanDisk
Extreme Pro
480 GB
SSD
Mac Pro
4K
4K UHD Monitor
4K UHD Monitor
4K UHD Monitor
9. Analyzing the Data Flow Model
REC SanDisk
Extreme Pro
480 GB
SSD
Mac Pro
4K
4K UHD Monitor
4K UHD Monitor
4K UHD Monitor
• Recording Formats
– Compression
– Bit Depth
– Chroma Sampling
• Storage and Transfer
Solutions
– Flash Storage
– Transport
• Comparing Hardware
Performance
• 4K Output Monitoring
David Jakob Final Year Project 9
10. BMPC4K Recording Options
Dimensions Format Bit Depth Sampling Mb/s GB/hr
4000 x 2160 CinemaDNG 12 bit 4:4:4 1600 720
3840 x 2160 ProRes 422 HQ 8 bit 4:2:2 737 332
3840 x 2160 ProRes 422 8 bit 4:2:2 492 221
3840 x 2160 ProRes LT 8 bit 4:2:2 342 154
3840 x 2160 ProRes Proxy 8 bit 4:2:2 151 68
1920 x 1080 ProRes 422 HQ 8 bit 4:2:2 184 83
1920 x 1080 ProRes 422 8 bit 4:2:2 122 55
1920 x 1080 ProRes LT 8 bit 4:2:2 85 38
1920 x 1080 ProRes Proxy 8 bit 4:2:2 38 17
David Jakob Final Year Project 10
13. Test Production
David Jakob Final Year Project 13
Important:
• Rolling vs. Global Shutter
• Shutter Angle
• White Balance
• ISO Performance
• Recording Format
• Dynamic Range: Film vs. Rec. 709
• Hardware and Battery
14. Post Production
Online Workflow
ü Easy
ü Fast
ü Already known to
students
o Computational intense
o Limited suitable
resources
o Not flexible
Offline Workflow
ü Suitable for all work
stations
ü Professional
ü Collaborative
o Slightly more
complicated
o File transfer between
work stations
David Jakob Final Year Project 14
15. Work straight from
SSDs via MultiDock
Import Footage
into Premiere Pro
Edit
Direct Link to
Speed Grade
Apply Titles and
Transitions
Export
Online Workflow
David Jakob Final Year Project 15
16. Offline Round Trip
David Jakob Final Year Project 16
Import Footage
into DaVinci
Resolve
Create Dailies Export Proxies
Import Proxies
into Premiere
EditExport XML
Import XML into
Resolve & Re-
link Footage
Color
Correction
Export XML with
High Bitrate
Clips
Titles and
Transitions
Export
17. Conclusions
Benefits
ü Affordable Hardware
Configuration
ü Offline Workflow
enables Post
Production in Media
Lab
ü Future Proofing
ü Flexibility
ü Prepare Students for
the Industry
Drawbacks
o Battery Life and Display
o Long Time Data
Storage
o Manual Data Transfer
o Available Resources
David Jakob Final Year Project 17
18. Future Development
• Plenty of Fast Storage
• Fiber Network
• 4K Live Productions
• Dedicated Hardware Rig
• Color Grading Suite with Hardware
Controls
David Jakob Final Year Project 18