SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
Download to read offline
Reward-based Crowdfunding for 
technology-oriented start-ups 
An empirical investigation along the 
entrepreneurship process 
Dennis Brüntje, Dieter W. Joenssen, Britta M. Gossel, 
Thomas Müllerleile, Maike Brehm 
Ilmenau University of Technology 
G-Forum 2014 – November 13, 2014 – Oldenburg, Germany
Outline 
1. Introduction 
2. Theoretical basis and research questions 
3. Methodology 
4. Results 
5. Conclusion 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 2
State of the art about crowdfunding 
• Exploration from different perspectives in various 
disciplines (e.g. Dolata & Schrape 2013; Kuppuswamy & Bayus 2013; Leimeister 2012) 
• Further establishment of an autonomous field in 
entrepreneurship research 
– Conferences (e.g. G-Forum: Brem & Wassong 2013; Hagedorn & Kortleben 2013; Hagedorn 
2012; Müller & Walther 2011; IECER: Beier & Wagner 2014; ICEIRD: Müllerleile et al. 2014) 
– Journals (e.g. Mollick 2014; Moritz & Block 2014; Schwienbacher & Larralde 2012) 
– Scientific Work Groups (FGF, European and German Crowdfunding network) 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 3 
1. Introduction
State of the art about crowdfunding 
• Numerous opportunities for empirical investigations 
• So far essentially we observe … 
– Industry reports (e.g. Crowdfunding Industry Report) 
– Literature investigations (e.g. Moritz & Block 2014) 
– Overview articles (e.g. Hemer 2011) 
– Model-theoretical comparisons (e.g. Belleflamme et al. 2012, 2010) 
– Expert interviews (e.g. Steward & Ramos 2014) 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 4 
1. Introduction
State of the art about crowdfunding 
• Different topics in the various types of crowdfunding 
(i.e. equity-, lending-, reward- or donation-based) 
– Regulatory questions 
(e.g. Germany: Klöhn & Hornuf 2012; USA: Bradford 2012; EU: De Buysere et al. 2012) 
– Success factors (e.g. Harzer 2012; Müllerleile & Joenssen 2014) 
– Capital seeker/provider motivation (e.g. Gerber et al. 2012) 
– Decision behaviour of capital providers 
(e.g. Burtch et al. 2013; Agrawal et al. 2011) 
• But only few works analyze data from crowdfunding 
projects and campaigns (Mollick 2014; for an overview see Moritz & Block 2014) 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 5 
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical basis and research questions 
Observation 1: Crowdfunding in the 
entrepreneurial process 
Classic Venture Capital 
Bank loans 
cf. Moritz & Block 2014:59 based on Hemer 2011:31 
Early-Stage-Gap 
Crowdfunding 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 6 
IPO 
Seed Venture Capital 
Business Angels 
Founder, Friends & Family 
Sources of 
finance 
Pre-Seed / Seed Start-up Emerging Growth Expansion Stage
2. Theoretical basis and research questions 
Observation 2: Signals in Crowdfunding 
• Challenges for entrepreneurs: 
– Instill confidence in potential clients & investors 
– Achieve reasonable level of sincerity 
• Possible signals to reduce perceived risk: 
– Certain organizational structures 
– Sound company history 
– ... 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 7 
Mollick 2014
2. Theoretical basis and research questions 
Observation 3: Crowdfunding as 
catalyst for company foundation? 
Classic Venture Capital 
Bank loans 
Early-Stage-Gap 
Crowdfunding 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 8 
IPO 
Seed Venture Capital 
Business Angels 
Founder, Friends & Family 
Sources of 
finance 
Pre-Seed / Seed Start-up Emerging Growth Expansion Stage 
cf. Moritz & Block 2014:59 based on Hemer 2011:31
2. Theoretical basis and research questions 
Research questions 
1. In which phase of the entrepreneurial process can 
crowdfunding be relevant for financing start-ups? 
2. Are crowdfunding projects, which are proposed either 
by project initiators not explicitly organized in a legal 
entity or by recently founded companies, less likely to 
be funded? 
3. What factors that characterize the crowdfunding 
campaign influence whether the project initiators 
found a company after the campaign? 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 9
Data collection and analysis 
• Automated collection of all (N=1,500) technology 
projects on Kickstarter (04/2009-04/2013) 
– Variables: project title, kickstarter url, location, associated website, 
requested & pledged goal (! success), start date, funding period, 
number of updates & comments, pledge levels 
• Manual coding of successful projects (n=707) 
– Variables: foundation (y/n), date of foundation, legal form, name, 
associated website, date of “death“ 
• In-depth interviews with n=6 German start-ups 
which utilized Kickstarter and Indiegogo 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 10 
3. Methodology
Interview partners (n=6) 
Interview 
partner (IP) Name Company Product Crowdfunding 
Platform 
IP1 Marijo Sarac Bragi LLC. The Dash Kickstarter 
IP2 Matthias Bürger Kinematics 
GmbH TinkerBots Indiegogo 
IP3 Friedrich 
Spielhagen 
LUUV Forward 
GmbH 
Camera 
Stabilizer Indiegogo 
IP4 Mario Martin Panono GmbH Panoramic Ball 
Camera Indiegogo 
IP5 Tore Meyer 4tiitoo GmbH NUIA EyeCharm Kickstarter 
IP6 Eugen Pflüger Parce UG Parce Indiegogo 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 11 
3. Methodology 
Brehm 2014
Technology projects? 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 12 
3. Methodology 
Image Source: https://www.kickstarter.com/discover/categories/technology?ref=discover_index [11/12/2014]
RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 13 
4. Results 
n=707
RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 14 
4. Results 
n=707
RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 15 
4. Results 
n=707
RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 16 
4. Results 
n=707
RQ 2: Company foundation as signal 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 17 
4. Results 
Founded before Founded after Never founded 
Projects (n) 290 88 329 
Pledge goal ($) 15,000 15,000 3,100 
Pledged ($) 34,153 37,606 5,843 
Goal achievement (%) 167 203 139 
Days for funding (total) 31 31.5 30 
Pledge levels (total) 9.5 9 8 
Comments (total) 43 58.5 11 
Backers (total) 267 335.5 95 
n=707, median of all projects within groups
RQ 2: Company foundation as signal 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 18 
4. Results 
Founded before Founded after Never 
> 1 year < 1 year < 1 year > 1 year founded 
Projects (n) 193 97 57 31 329 
Pledge goal ($) 19,500 10,000 25,000 10,000 3,100 
Pledged ($) 43,371 25,496 61,274 16,243 5,843 
Goal achievement (%) 156 178 226 179 139 
Days for funding (total) 31 31 31 35 30 
Pledge levels (total) 10 9 9 7 8 
Comments (total) 52 30 71 38 11 
Backers (total) 311 248 471 158 95 
n=707, median of all projects within groups
RQ 3: Crowdfunding as catalyst 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 19 
4. Results 
Founded before Founded after Never 
> 1 year < 1 year < 1 year > 1 year founded 
Projects (n) 193 97 57 31 329 
Pledge goal ($) 19,500 10,000 25,000 10,000 3,100 
Pledged ($) 43,371 25,496 61,274 16,243 5,843 
Goal achievement (%) 156 178 226 179 139 
Days for funding (total) 31 31 31 35 30 
Pledge levels (total) 10 9 9 7 8 
Comments (total) 52 30 71 38 11 
Backers (total) 311 248 471 158 95 
n=707, median of all projects within groups
RQ 1 & 3: Results Interviews (n=6) 
• Company foundation: 1 before, 5 after 
crowdfunding campaign (! Early-Stage) 
• If crowdfunding has not been successful, further 
company development would have been difficult 
• Faster company development because of 
successful crowdfunding campaign 
• Utilization of crowdfunding because of financing 
and marketing aspects (pre-selling, market-proof) 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 20 
4. Results 
Brehm 2014
Conclusion 
• Crowdfunding seems relevant in every stage of the 
entrepreneurial process, but early-stage financing 
stays most prevalent. 
• Company foundation could prove as signal to reduce 
perceived risks for investors. 
• Higher goal achievement, pledge goals, amount of 
backers and backer feedback seem to have a positive 
influence on company foundation. 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 21 
5. Conclusion
Implications for research and practice 
• We respond to the call for more research that analyzes the 
relevance of crowdfunding for entrepreneurship. 
• We respond to the call for more empirical studies. 
• We examine the relevance of reward-based crowdfunding 
for financing technology-oriented projects. 
• We offer a reflection on crowdfunding beyond the borders 
of the platform by considering the post-crowdfunding phase. 
! New dimension of research for crowdfunding: success and 
relevance of crowdfunding for entrepreneurs over time. 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 22 
5. Conclusion
References 
Agrawal, A.; Catalini, C. & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper Series No. 16820. 
Beck, R. (2014). Crowdinvesting – Die Investition der Vielen. 2nd edition. Leipzig: Amazon. 
Beier, M. & Wagner, K. (2014). Getting money from the crowd: Drivers of fundraising success. Paper IECER 2014, Chur. 
Belleflamme, P.; Lambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). Crowdfunding: An Industrial Organization Perspective, SSRN Working 
Paper 2151179. 
Belleflamme, P.; Lambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2012). Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. CORE Discussion Paper No. 
2011 / 32, SSRN Working Paper 1578175. 
Bradford, C. (2012). Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review, 2012(1), 1-150. 
Brehm, M. (2014). Crowdfunding als Instrument des internationalen Marketings für technologische Produkte. Master thesis: Ilmenau. 
Brem, A. & Wassong, N. (2013). Wer investiert warum? Ergebnisse zu individuellen Investmententscheidungen in Crowdfunding- 
Projekten. Paper G-Forum 2013, Koblenz. 
Burtch, G.; Ghose, A. & Wattal, S. (2013). Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Pro- Social Lending, SSRN 
Working Paper 2271298. 
Crowdfunding Industry Report (2012, 2013). Annual reports by Massolution, Retrieved June 26, 2014 from http:// 
www.crowdsourcing.org/document/crowdfunding-industry-report-abridged-version-market-trends- composition-and-crowdfunding-platforms/ 
14277 & http://research.crowdsourcing.org/2013cf-crowdfunding- industry-report 
De Buysere, K.; Gajda, O.; Kleverlaan, R. & Marom, D. (2012). A Framework for European Crowdfunding, European Crowdfunding 
Network. 
Dolata, U. & Schrape, J.-F. (2013). Zwischen Individuum und Organisation. SOI Discussion Paper 2013-02. 
Gerber, E. M.; Hui, J. S. & Kuo, P. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects 
on crowdfunding platforms, Northwestern University, Creative Action Lab. 
Hagedorn, A. (2012). Crowdinvestment als Finanzierungsform für Unternehmensgründungen in Deutschland. Eine kritische Analyse. 
Paper G-Forum 2012, Potsdam. 
Hagedorn, A. & Kortleben, H. (2013). Eine Analyse des Investitionsverhaltens beim Crowdinvesting. Die Rolle der Motivation und 
asymmetrisch verteilter Information. Paper G-Forum 2013, Koblenz. 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 23
References 
Harzer, A. (2013). Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdfunding. In: Will, A. & Brüntje, D. (Eds.): Menschen – Märkte – Medien – Management: 
Schriftenreihe; 7. Ilmenau: ilmedia. Also available from http://www.db- thueringen.de/servlets/ DocumentServlet?id=20873 
Hemer, J. (2011). A Snapshot on Crowdfunding. Working Papers Firms and Region No. R2/2011, Fraunhofer ISI. 
Klöhn, L. & Hornuf, L. (2012). Crowdinvesting in Deutschland – Markt, Rechtslage und Regelungsperspektive, in: Zeitschrift für 
Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft ZBB, 24(4), 237-266. 
Kickstarter (2014). Kickstarter Stats. Retrieved June 27, 2014 from https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats 
Kuppuswamy, V. & Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in 
Kickstarter. SSRN Working Paper 2234765. 
Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Crowdsourcing: Crowdfunding, Crowdvoting, Crowdcreation. Zeitschrift für Controlling und Management 
(ZFCM), 56, 388-392. 
Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 1-16. 
Moritz, A. & Block, J. (2014). Crowdfunding und Crowdinvesting: State-of-the-Art der wissenschaftlichen 
Literatur. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 62(1), 57-89. 
Müller, C. & Walther, T. (2011). Kritischer Vergleich von Crowd-Funding Angeboten. Paper G-Forum 2011, Zürich. 
Müllerleile, T. & Joenssen, D.W. (2014). Key Success-Determinants of Crowdfunded Projects: An Exploratory Analysis. In: Lausen, B.; 
Krolak-Schwerdt, S. & Böhmer, M. (Eds.). (in press). Data science, learning by latent structures, and knowledge discovery. Springer: 
Heidelberg. 
Müllerleile, T.; Joenssen D.W. & Müllerleile, A. (2014). Crisis, Co-Financing, and Crowdfunding: Igniting Regional Development. In: 
Papadopoulos, G.; Ketikidis, P. & Kofteros, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference for entrepreneurship innovation and 
regional development, 277-285. SEERC, Nicosia. 
Schwienbacher, A. & Larralde, B. (2012). Crowdfunding of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures, in: Cumming, D. (Eds.): The Oxford 
Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance, New York: Oxford University Press, 369-391. 
Steward, J. & Ramos, J. (2014). Crowdfunding and the Role of Managers in Ensuring the Sustainability of Crowdfunding Platforms. JRC 
Scientific and Policy reports. European Commission. EUR 26596 EN. 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 24
Contact Information 
Dennis Brüntje 
Media and Communication Management Group 
Institute for Media and Communication Science – Ilmenau University of Technology 
Ernst-Abbe-Zentrum – Ehrenbergstraße 29 – D-98693 Ilmenau – Germany 
T: +49-3677-69-4680 
F: +49-3677-69-4650 
E: dennis.bruentje@tu-ilmenau.de 
www.tu-ilmenau.de/mkm 
www.facebook.com/fgmkm 
www.twitter.com/fgmkm 
G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 25

More Related Content

What's hot (8)

Presentation on Crowd Funding
Presentation on Crowd FundingPresentation on Crowd Funding
Presentation on Crowd Funding
 
Crowdfunding
CrowdfundingCrowdfunding
Crowdfunding
 
What is crowdfunding research paper
What is crowdfunding research paperWhat is crowdfunding research paper
What is crowdfunding research paper
 
Crowdfunding x Scholarship
Crowdfunding x ScholarshipCrowdfunding x Scholarship
Crowdfunding x Scholarship
 
Introduction to Crowdfunding
Introduction to CrowdfundingIntroduction to Crowdfunding
Introduction to Crowdfunding
 
4 crowdfunding
4   crowdfunding4   crowdfunding
4 crowdfunding
 
Introduction to CrowdFunding
Introduction to CrowdFundingIntroduction to CrowdFunding
Introduction to CrowdFunding
 
Crowd Funding
Crowd FundingCrowd Funding
Crowd Funding
 

Similar to Reward-Based Crowdfunding for Technology-Oriented Start-Ups

Learnings from DST survey
Learnings from DST surveyLearnings from DST survey
Learnings from DST survey
Parasuram K
 
[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes
[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes
[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes
Challenge:Future
 

Similar to Reward-Based Crowdfunding for Technology-Oriented Start-Ups (20)

Eig guidelines
Eig guidelinesEig guidelines
Eig guidelines
 
Innovation as a Discipline - Can innovation be managed?
Innovation as a Discipline - Can innovation be managed?Innovation as a Discipline - Can innovation be managed?
Innovation as a Discipline - Can innovation be managed?
 
The Garage Group on Bringing the Outside In: Collaborating with External Stak...
The Garage Group on Bringing the Outside In: Collaborating with External Stak...The Garage Group on Bringing the Outside In: Collaborating with External Stak...
The Garage Group on Bringing the Outside In: Collaborating with External Stak...
 
A STUDY OF INVESTORS AWARENESS ON DIGIALIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS
A STUDY OF INVESTORS AWARENESS ON DIGIALIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDSA STUDY OF INVESTORS AWARENESS ON DIGIALIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS
A STUDY OF INVESTORS AWARENESS ON DIGIALIZATION OF MUTUAL FUNDS
 
Guest lecture at JADS on startup fundraising (h. kienhuis)
Guest lecture at JADS on startup fundraising (h. kienhuis)Guest lecture at JADS on startup fundraising (h. kienhuis)
Guest lecture at JADS on startup fundraising (h. kienhuis)
 
Module 4_PPP_PROJECT_PROCESS_DEVELOPMENT.pdf
Module 4_PPP_PROJECT_PROCESS_DEVELOPMENT.pdfModule 4_PPP_PROJECT_PROCESS_DEVELOPMENT.pdf
Module 4_PPP_PROJECT_PROCESS_DEVELOPMENT.pdf
 
Design thinking for emerging market growth
Design thinking for emerging market growthDesign thinking for emerging market growth
Design thinking for emerging market growth
 
Corporate - Startup Collaboration: An Overview
Corporate - Startup Collaboration: An OverviewCorporate - Startup Collaboration: An Overview
Corporate - Startup Collaboration: An Overview
 
I Can't Make THAT Decision!
I Can't Make THAT Decision!I Can't Make THAT Decision!
I Can't Make THAT Decision!
 
Digital transformation
Digital transformationDigital transformation
Digital transformation
 
Generation & Screening of Project Idea
Generation & Screening of Project IdeaGeneration & Screening of Project Idea
Generation & Screening of Project Idea
 
ISSIP Education & Research SIG Innovation Team Education
ISSIP Education & Research SIG Innovation Team EducationISSIP Education & Research SIG Innovation Team Education
ISSIP Education & Research SIG Innovation Team Education
 
Entrepreneurship (Project identification)
Entrepreneurship (Project identification)Entrepreneurship (Project identification)
Entrepreneurship (Project identification)
 
Digitization acceleration why it matter for institutional funding and grants...
Digitization acceleration  why it matter for institutional funding and grants...Digitization acceleration  why it matter for institutional funding and grants...
Digitization acceleration why it matter for institutional funding and grants...
 
Rohit Talwar - FCCI and Convention 2020 Presentation to the IMEX Politician'...
Rohit Talwar - FCCI and Convention 2020 Presentation to the  IMEX Politician'...Rohit Talwar - FCCI and Convention 2020 Presentation to the  IMEX Politician'...
Rohit Talwar - FCCI and Convention 2020 Presentation to the IMEX Politician'...
 
Business & Financial Planning for Enterprise Ireland Finance 4 Growth Mar 15
Business & Financial Planning for Enterprise Ireland Finance 4 Growth Mar 15Business & Financial Planning for Enterprise Ireland Finance 4 Growth Mar 15
Business & Financial Planning for Enterprise Ireland Finance 4 Growth Mar 15
 
Learnings from DST survey
Learnings from DST surveyLearnings from DST survey
Learnings from DST survey
 
Crowd4 ovo pitch v02
Crowd4 ovo pitch v02Crowd4 ovo pitch v02
Crowd4 ovo pitch v02
 
[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes
[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes
[Challenge:Future] From Outputs to Outcomes
 
How young people are engaging with ict in the commonwealth
How young people are engaging with ict in the commonwealthHow young people are engaging with ict in the commonwealth
How young people are engaging with ict in the commonwealth
 

More from Dennis Brüntje

More from Dennis Brüntje (20)

Die Masse machts - Crowdfunding als Finanzierungs- und Marketingalternative
Die Masse machts - Crowdfunding als Finanzierungs- und MarketingalternativeDie Masse machts - Crowdfunding als Finanzierungs- und Marketingalternative
Die Masse machts - Crowdfunding als Finanzierungs- und Marketingalternative
 
Serial Crowdfunding/-investing – Der Weg vom Startup zum Mittelstand
Serial Crowdfunding/-investing – Der Weg vom Startup zum MittelstandSerial Crowdfunding/-investing – Der Weg vom Startup zum Mittelstand
Serial Crowdfunding/-investing – Der Weg vom Startup zum Mittelstand
 
Die Menge macht's – Crowdfunding als Finanzierungsalternative
Die Menge macht's – Crowdfunding als FinanzierungsalternativeDie Menge macht's – Crowdfunding als Finanzierungsalternative
Die Menge macht's – Crowdfunding als Finanzierungsalternative
 
Die Menge macht's – Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative
Die Menge macht's – Crowdinvesting als FinanzierungsalternativeDie Menge macht's – Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative
Die Menge macht's – Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative
 
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (Ferienakademie)
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (Ferienakademie)Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (Ferienakademie)
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (Ferienakademie)
 
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (aktualisiert)
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (aktualisiert)Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (aktualisiert)
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative (aktualisiert)
 
Wie tickt die Crowd? Was finanziert die Crowd?
Wie tickt die Crowd? Was finanziert die Crowd?Wie tickt die Crowd? Was finanziert die Crowd?
Wie tickt die Crowd? Was finanziert die Crowd?
 
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als FinanzierungsalternativeDie Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Finanzierungsalternative
 
Crowdinvesting im internationalen Vergleich (Team 6)
Crowdinvesting im internationalen Vergleich (Team 6)Crowdinvesting im internationalen Vergleich (Team 6)
Crowdinvesting im internationalen Vergleich (Team 6)
 
Crowdfunding im internationalen Vergleich (Team 5)
Crowdfunding im internationalen Vergleich (Team 5)Crowdfunding im internationalen Vergleich (Team 5)
Crowdfunding im internationalen Vergleich (Team 5)
 
Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdfunding (Team 4)
Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdfunding (Team 4)Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdfunding (Team 4)
Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdfunding (Team 4)
 
Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdinvesting (Team 3)
Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdinvesting (Team 3)Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdinvesting (Team 3)
Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdinvesting (Team 3)
 
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Alternative zur Finanzierung von Existe...
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Alternative zur Finanzierung von Existe...Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Alternative zur Finanzierung von Existe...
Die Masse machts - Crowdinvesting als Alternative zur Finanzierung von Existe...
 
Überblick Crowdinvesting-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 2)
Überblick Crowdinvesting-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 2)Überblick Crowdinvesting-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 2)
Überblick Crowdinvesting-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 2)
 
Überblick Crowdfunding-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 1)
Überblick Crowdfunding-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 1)Überblick Crowdfunding-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 1)
Überblick Crowdfunding-Plattformen in Deutschland (Team 1)
 
Crowdfunding and Co-Creation. What are fruitful interconnections?
Crowdfunding and Co-Creation. What are fruitful interconnections?Crowdfunding and Co-Creation. What are fruitful interconnections?
Crowdfunding and Co-Creation. What are fruitful interconnections?
 
270611 - Status Quo Team 4
270611 - Status Quo Team 4270611 - Status Quo Team 4
270611 - Status Quo Team 4
 
270611 - Status Quo Team 3
270611 - Status Quo Team 3270611 - Status Quo Team 3
270611 - Status Quo Team 3
 
270611 - Status Quo Team 2
270611 - Status Quo Team 2270611 - Status Quo Team 2
270611 - Status Quo Team 2
 
270611 - Status Quo Team 1
270611 - Status Quo Team 1270611 - Status Quo Team 1
270611 - Status Quo Team 1
 

Recently uploaded

Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
daisycvs
 
00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![© ر
00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![©  ر00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![©  ر
00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![© ر
nafizanafzal
 
A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...
A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...
A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...
prakheeshc
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg Pfizer
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg PfizerJual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg Pfizer
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg Pfizer
Pusat Herbal Resmi BPOM
 
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样
AS
 
Obat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di Pasuruan
Obat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di PasuruanObat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di Pasuruan
Obat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di Pasuruan
Obat Aborsi Jakarta Wa 085176963835 Apotek Jual Obat Cytotec Di Jakarta
 
Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312
Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312
Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312
LR1709MUSIC
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_May 13th, 2024_ENVol. 007.pdf
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_May 13th, 2024_ENVol. 007.pdfThe Vietnam Believer Newsletter_May 13th, 2024_ENVol. 007.pdf
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_May 13th, 2024_ENVol. 007.pdf
 
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
Abortion pills in Muscut<Oman(+27737758557) Cytotec available.inn Kuwait City.
 
00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![© ر
00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![©  ر00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![©  ر
00971508021841 حبوب الإجهاض في دبي | أبوظبي | الشارقة | السطوة |❇ ❈ ((![© ر
 
A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...
A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...
A BUSINESS PROPOSAL FOR SLAUGHTER HOUSE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN MYSORE MUNICIPAL ...
 
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg Pfizer
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg PfizerJual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg Pfizer
Jual Obat Aborsi Di Sibolga wa 0851/7541/5434 Cytotec Misoprostol 200mcg Pfizer
 
Understanding Financial Accounting 3rd Canadian Edition by Christopher D. Bur...
Understanding Financial Accounting 3rd Canadian Edition by Christopher D. Bur...Understanding Financial Accounting 3rd Canadian Edition by Christopher D. Bur...
Understanding Financial Accounting 3rd Canadian Edition by Christopher D. Bur...
 
1Q24_EN hyundai capital 1q performance
1Q24_EN   hyundai capital 1q performance1Q24_EN   hyundai capital 1q performance
1Q24_EN hyundai capital 1q performance
 
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样
一比一原版(USYD毕业证书)悉尼大学毕业证原件一模一样
 
Innomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdf
Innomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdfInnomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdf
Innomantra Viewpoint - Building Moonshots : May-Jun 2024.pdf
 
Home Furnishings Ecommerce Platform Short Pitch 2024
Home Furnishings Ecommerce Platform Short Pitch 2024Home Furnishings Ecommerce Platform Short Pitch 2024
Home Furnishings Ecommerce Platform Short Pitch 2024
 
stock price prediction using machine learning
stock price prediction using machine learningstock price prediction using machine learning
stock price prediction using machine learning
 
Obat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di Pasuruan
Obat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di PasuruanObat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di Pasuruan
Obat Aborsi Pasuruan 0851\7696\3835 Jual Obat Cytotec Di Pasuruan
 
How Bookkeeping helps you in Cost Saving, Tax Saving and Smooth Business Runn...
How Bookkeeping helps you in Cost Saving, Tax Saving and Smooth Business Runn...How Bookkeeping helps you in Cost Saving, Tax Saving and Smooth Business Runn...
How Bookkeeping helps you in Cost Saving, Tax Saving and Smooth Business Runn...
 
Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312
Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312
Shots fired Budget Presentation.pdf12312
 
The Art of Decision-Making: Navigating Complexity and Uncertainty
The Art of Decision-Making: Navigating Complexity and UncertaintyThe Art of Decision-Making: Navigating Complexity and Uncertainty
The Art of Decision-Making: Navigating Complexity and Uncertainty
 
Global Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdf
Global Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdfGlobal Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdf
Global Internal Audit Standards 2024.pdf
 
Moradia Isolada com Logradouro; Detached house with patio in Penacova
Moradia Isolada com Logradouro; Detached house with patio in PenacovaMoradia Isolada com Logradouro; Detached house with patio in Penacova
Moradia Isolada com Logradouro; Detached house with patio in Penacova
 
Navigating Tax Season with Confidence Streamlines CPA Firms
Navigating Tax Season with Confidence Streamlines CPA FirmsNavigating Tax Season with Confidence Streamlines CPA Firms
Navigating Tax Season with Confidence Streamlines CPA Firms
 
Should Law Firms Outsource their Bookkeeping
Should Law Firms Outsource their BookkeepingShould Law Firms Outsource their Bookkeeping
Should Law Firms Outsource their Bookkeeping
 
Unlocking Growth The Power of Outsourcing for CPA Firms
Unlocking Growth The Power of Outsourcing for CPA FirmsUnlocking Growth The Power of Outsourcing for CPA Firms
Unlocking Growth The Power of Outsourcing for CPA Firms
 

Reward-Based Crowdfunding for Technology-Oriented Start-Ups

  • 1. Reward-based Crowdfunding for technology-oriented start-ups An empirical investigation along the entrepreneurship process Dennis Brüntje, Dieter W. Joenssen, Britta M. Gossel, Thomas Müllerleile, Maike Brehm Ilmenau University of Technology G-Forum 2014 – November 13, 2014 – Oldenburg, Germany
  • 2. Outline 1. Introduction 2. Theoretical basis and research questions 3. Methodology 4. Results 5. Conclusion G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 2
  • 3. State of the art about crowdfunding • Exploration from different perspectives in various disciplines (e.g. Dolata & Schrape 2013; Kuppuswamy & Bayus 2013; Leimeister 2012) • Further establishment of an autonomous field in entrepreneurship research – Conferences (e.g. G-Forum: Brem & Wassong 2013; Hagedorn & Kortleben 2013; Hagedorn 2012; Müller & Walther 2011; IECER: Beier & Wagner 2014; ICEIRD: Müllerleile et al. 2014) – Journals (e.g. Mollick 2014; Moritz & Block 2014; Schwienbacher & Larralde 2012) – Scientific Work Groups (FGF, European and German Crowdfunding network) G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 3 1. Introduction
  • 4. State of the art about crowdfunding • Numerous opportunities for empirical investigations • So far essentially we observe … – Industry reports (e.g. Crowdfunding Industry Report) – Literature investigations (e.g. Moritz & Block 2014) – Overview articles (e.g. Hemer 2011) – Model-theoretical comparisons (e.g. Belleflamme et al. 2012, 2010) – Expert interviews (e.g. Steward & Ramos 2014) G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 4 1. Introduction
  • 5. State of the art about crowdfunding • Different topics in the various types of crowdfunding (i.e. equity-, lending-, reward- or donation-based) – Regulatory questions (e.g. Germany: Klöhn & Hornuf 2012; USA: Bradford 2012; EU: De Buysere et al. 2012) – Success factors (e.g. Harzer 2012; Müllerleile & Joenssen 2014) – Capital seeker/provider motivation (e.g. Gerber et al. 2012) – Decision behaviour of capital providers (e.g. Burtch et al. 2013; Agrawal et al. 2011) • But only few works analyze data from crowdfunding projects and campaigns (Mollick 2014; for an overview see Moritz & Block 2014) G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 5 1. Introduction
  • 6. 2. Theoretical basis and research questions Observation 1: Crowdfunding in the entrepreneurial process Classic Venture Capital Bank loans cf. Moritz & Block 2014:59 based on Hemer 2011:31 Early-Stage-Gap Crowdfunding G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 6 IPO Seed Venture Capital Business Angels Founder, Friends & Family Sources of finance Pre-Seed / Seed Start-up Emerging Growth Expansion Stage
  • 7. 2. Theoretical basis and research questions Observation 2: Signals in Crowdfunding • Challenges for entrepreneurs: – Instill confidence in potential clients & investors – Achieve reasonable level of sincerity • Possible signals to reduce perceived risk: – Certain organizational structures – Sound company history – ... G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 7 Mollick 2014
  • 8. 2. Theoretical basis and research questions Observation 3: Crowdfunding as catalyst for company foundation? Classic Venture Capital Bank loans Early-Stage-Gap Crowdfunding G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 8 IPO Seed Venture Capital Business Angels Founder, Friends & Family Sources of finance Pre-Seed / Seed Start-up Emerging Growth Expansion Stage cf. Moritz & Block 2014:59 based on Hemer 2011:31
  • 9. 2. Theoretical basis and research questions Research questions 1. In which phase of the entrepreneurial process can crowdfunding be relevant for financing start-ups? 2. Are crowdfunding projects, which are proposed either by project initiators not explicitly organized in a legal entity or by recently founded companies, less likely to be funded? 3. What factors that characterize the crowdfunding campaign influence whether the project initiators found a company after the campaign? G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 9
  • 10. Data collection and analysis • Automated collection of all (N=1,500) technology projects on Kickstarter (04/2009-04/2013) – Variables: project title, kickstarter url, location, associated website, requested & pledged goal (! success), start date, funding period, number of updates & comments, pledge levels • Manual coding of successful projects (n=707) – Variables: foundation (y/n), date of foundation, legal form, name, associated website, date of “death“ • In-depth interviews with n=6 German start-ups which utilized Kickstarter and Indiegogo G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 10 3. Methodology
  • 11. Interview partners (n=6) Interview partner (IP) Name Company Product Crowdfunding Platform IP1 Marijo Sarac Bragi LLC. The Dash Kickstarter IP2 Matthias Bürger Kinematics GmbH TinkerBots Indiegogo IP3 Friedrich Spielhagen LUUV Forward GmbH Camera Stabilizer Indiegogo IP4 Mario Martin Panono GmbH Panoramic Ball Camera Indiegogo IP5 Tore Meyer 4tiitoo GmbH NUIA EyeCharm Kickstarter IP6 Eugen Pflüger Parce UG Parce Indiegogo G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 11 3. Methodology Brehm 2014
  • 12. Technology projects? G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 12 3. Methodology Image Source: https://www.kickstarter.com/discover/categories/technology?ref=discover_index [11/12/2014]
  • 13. RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 13 4. Results n=707
  • 14. RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 14 4. Results n=707
  • 15. RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 15 4. Results n=707
  • 16. RQ 1: Entrepreneurial Process G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 16 4. Results n=707
  • 17. RQ 2: Company foundation as signal G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 17 4. Results Founded before Founded after Never founded Projects (n) 290 88 329 Pledge goal ($) 15,000 15,000 3,100 Pledged ($) 34,153 37,606 5,843 Goal achievement (%) 167 203 139 Days for funding (total) 31 31.5 30 Pledge levels (total) 9.5 9 8 Comments (total) 43 58.5 11 Backers (total) 267 335.5 95 n=707, median of all projects within groups
  • 18. RQ 2: Company foundation as signal G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 18 4. Results Founded before Founded after Never > 1 year < 1 year < 1 year > 1 year founded Projects (n) 193 97 57 31 329 Pledge goal ($) 19,500 10,000 25,000 10,000 3,100 Pledged ($) 43,371 25,496 61,274 16,243 5,843 Goal achievement (%) 156 178 226 179 139 Days for funding (total) 31 31 31 35 30 Pledge levels (total) 10 9 9 7 8 Comments (total) 52 30 71 38 11 Backers (total) 311 248 471 158 95 n=707, median of all projects within groups
  • 19. RQ 3: Crowdfunding as catalyst G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 19 4. Results Founded before Founded after Never > 1 year < 1 year < 1 year > 1 year founded Projects (n) 193 97 57 31 329 Pledge goal ($) 19,500 10,000 25,000 10,000 3,100 Pledged ($) 43,371 25,496 61,274 16,243 5,843 Goal achievement (%) 156 178 226 179 139 Days for funding (total) 31 31 31 35 30 Pledge levels (total) 10 9 9 7 8 Comments (total) 52 30 71 38 11 Backers (total) 311 248 471 158 95 n=707, median of all projects within groups
  • 20. RQ 1 & 3: Results Interviews (n=6) • Company foundation: 1 before, 5 after crowdfunding campaign (! Early-Stage) • If crowdfunding has not been successful, further company development would have been difficult • Faster company development because of successful crowdfunding campaign • Utilization of crowdfunding because of financing and marketing aspects (pre-selling, market-proof) G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 20 4. Results Brehm 2014
  • 21. Conclusion • Crowdfunding seems relevant in every stage of the entrepreneurial process, but early-stage financing stays most prevalent. • Company foundation could prove as signal to reduce perceived risks for investors. • Higher goal achievement, pledge goals, amount of backers and backer feedback seem to have a positive influence on company foundation. G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 21 5. Conclusion
  • 22. Implications for research and practice • We respond to the call for more research that analyzes the relevance of crowdfunding for entrepreneurship. • We respond to the call for more empirical studies. • We examine the relevance of reward-based crowdfunding for financing technology-oriented projects. • We offer a reflection on crowdfunding beyond the borders of the platform by considering the post-crowdfunding phase. ! New dimension of research for crowdfunding: success and relevance of crowdfunding for entrepreneurs over time. G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 22 5. Conclusion
  • 23. References Agrawal, A.; Catalini, C. & Goldfarb, A. (2011). The geography of crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper Series No. 16820. Beck, R. (2014). Crowdinvesting – Die Investition der Vielen. 2nd edition. Leipzig: Amazon. Beier, M. & Wagner, K. (2014). Getting money from the crowd: Drivers of fundraising success. Paper IECER 2014, Chur. Belleflamme, P.; Lambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2010). Crowdfunding: An Industrial Organization Perspective, SSRN Working Paper 2151179. Belleflamme, P.; Lambert, T. & Schwienbacher, A. (2012). Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. CORE Discussion Paper No. 2011 / 32, SSRN Working Paper 1578175. Bradford, C. (2012). Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review, 2012(1), 1-150. Brehm, M. (2014). Crowdfunding als Instrument des internationalen Marketings für technologische Produkte. Master thesis: Ilmenau. Brem, A. & Wassong, N. (2013). Wer investiert warum? Ergebnisse zu individuellen Investmententscheidungen in Crowdfunding- Projekten. Paper G-Forum 2013, Koblenz. Burtch, G.; Ghose, A. & Wattal, S. (2013). Cultural Differences and Geography as Determinants of Online Pro- Social Lending, SSRN Working Paper 2271298. Crowdfunding Industry Report (2012, 2013). Annual reports by Massolution, Retrieved June 26, 2014 from http:// www.crowdsourcing.org/document/crowdfunding-industry-report-abridged-version-market-trends- composition-and-crowdfunding-platforms/ 14277 & http://research.crowdsourcing.org/2013cf-crowdfunding- industry-report De Buysere, K.; Gajda, O.; Kleverlaan, R. & Marom, D. (2012). A Framework for European Crowdfunding, European Crowdfunding Network. Dolata, U. & Schrape, J.-F. (2013). Zwischen Individuum und Organisation. SOI Discussion Paper 2013-02. Gerber, E. M.; Hui, J. S. & Kuo, P. (2012). Crowdfunding: Why people are motivated to post and fund projects on crowdfunding platforms, Northwestern University, Creative Action Lab. Hagedorn, A. (2012). Crowdinvestment als Finanzierungsform für Unternehmensgründungen in Deutschland. Eine kritische Analyse. Paper G-Forum 2012, Potsdam. Hagedorn, A. & Kortleben, H. (2013). Eine Analyse des Investitionsverhaltens beim Crowdinvesting. Die Rolle der Motivation und asymmetrisch verteilter Information. Paper G-Forum 2013, Koblenz. G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 23
  • 24. References Harzer, A. (2013). Erfolgsfaktoren im Crowdfunding. In: Will, A. & Brüntje, D. (Eds.): Menschen – Märkte – Medien – Management: Schriftenreihe; 7. Ilmenau: ilmedia. Also available from http://www.db- thueringen.de/servlets/ DocumentServlet?id=20873 Hemer, J. (2011). A Snapshot on Crowdfunding. Working Papers Firms and Region No. R2/2011, Fraunhofer ISI. Klöhn, L. & Hornuf, L. (2012). Crowdinvesting in Deutschland – Markt, Rechtslage und Regelungsperspektive, in: Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft ZBB, 24(4), 237-266. Kickstarter (2014). Kickstarter Stats. Retrieved June 27, 2014 from https://www.kickstarter.com/help/stats Kuppuswamy, V. & Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdfunding Creative Ideas: The Dynamics of Project Backers in Kickstarter. SSRN Working Paper 2234765. Leimeister, J. M. (2012). Crowdsourcing: Crowdfunding, Crowdvoting, Crowdcreation. Zeitschrift für Controlling und Management (ZFCM), 56, 388-392. Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 1-16. Moritz, A. & Block, J. (2014). Crowdfunding und Crowdinvesting: State-of-the-Art der wissenschaftlichen Literatur. Zeitschrift für KMU und Entrepreneurship, 62(1), 57-89. Müller, C. & Walther, T. (2011). Kritischer Vergleich von Crowd-Funding Angeboten. Paper G-Forum 2011, Zürich. Müllerleile, T. & Joenssen, D.W. (2014). Key Success-Determinants of Crowdfunded Projects: An Exploratory Analysis. In: Lausen, B.; Krolak-Schwerdt, S. & Böhmer, M. (Eds.). (in press). Data science, learning by latent structures, and knowledge discovery. Springer: Heidelberg. Müllerleile, T.; Joenssen D.W. & Müllerleile, A. (2014). Crisis, Co-Financing, and Crowdfunding: Igniting Regional Development. In: Papadopoulos, G.; Ketikidis, P. & Kofteros, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th international conference for entrepreneurship innovation and regional development, 277-285. SEERC, Nicosia. Schwienbacher, A. & Larralde, B. (2012). Crowdfunding of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures, in: Cumming, D. (Eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurial Finance, New York: Oxford University Press, 369-391. Steward, J. & Ramos, J. (2014). Crowdfunding and the Role of Managers in Ensuring the Sustainability of Crowdfunding Platforms. JRC Scientific and Policy reports. European Commission. EUR 26596 EN. G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 24
  • 25. Contact Information Dennis Brüntje Media and Communication Management Group Institute for Media and Communication Science – Ilmenau University of Technology Ernst-Abbe-Zentrum – Ehrenbergstraße 29 – D-98693 Ilmenau – Germany T: +49-3677-69-4680 F: +49-3677-69-4650 E: dennis.bruentje@tu-ilmenau.de www.tu-ilmenau.de/mkm www.facebook.com/fgmkm www.twitter.com/fgmkm G-Forum 2014 | Reward-based CF for technology-oriented start-ups | © D. Brüntje et al. Page 25