Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Challenges of collection of city waste

The scale at which our cities our growing, its very difficult for the government to manage the waste alone.
Here are a few challenges on the ground that we have observed around material recovery.

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Challenges of collection of city waste

  1. 1. Post consumer material recovery, . the Challenges ; = ex aw‘ 11 fi . ~ (3% Q fig 2)“ . 51/ Organic waste Recyclables Rejects
  2. 2. Currently what is happening in our cities? “ Mostly resources are mixed and this is collected
  3. 3. We have no space allocated in our urban design. THIS IS CRITICAL. No body wants waste trucks parked outside their homes, but they need to be parked - so where? Cities have to allocate space for transfer points, segregation points, collection centers, processing, debris management, parking and landfills. Without space, we will continue with our mindsets biased to wasteful centralised systems. Equipment & Technology We have a love affair with "Large Projects". We feel we must change this bias to "Large number of small projects". We have to make the right choices on equipment and technology, not forgetting, downtime, maintenance and repair costs. Through put and efficiency in the long term is often ignored, so we spend the money, but have little to show for that investment. To recover materials a city needs. ... The poor and migrant people end up working in this sector. There are no toilets or -v amenities for them as they work, since they have no P I designated spaces. This e 0. again needs to be factored W into the design of the city. . A In addition, their skills and ability to deal with litter and materials needs to , grown and capacities built. & Process Looking for what works is a great place to start at the granular level. If people have adapted and found a way, it means that it works. We must look for examples of positive deviance in the sea of garbage to find new processes and methods for material recovery. Let us not forget that Waste in India is more a mindset challenge not a technological one.
  4. 4. In an Organic waste . i. Best to be managed on site J: Or at Ward Level ii; in a dedicated vehicle . I, Technolo should be eggisy to maintain Collection to be ' I ’n- 09 - 4 v_—w. Best to be aggregated on site J. At ward level there must be a bulb recycling plant it Collection b authorise vendors . I. Govt must subsidise bulb recycling sector ‘ Garden waste ~44 Best to be managed near source J. Or lifted for a fee to ward level shredding iv Collection can be in an organic waste vehicle I Shredding I composting and briqetting of large pieces wcrlcl ti 3 process WCIJIC: be ' as Recyclables ~l« Best to be segregated on site l: or at Ward Level J. Collection to be done by entrepreuners I Safety of recycling should be invested in Collected daily Sent to landfill J, Collection to be in a dedicated vehicle I Scientific landfill F0 59 maintained
  5. 5. "R I. » an I /5.3% . ., 'H. %v_ I i. .I: }i' C? W. , §# ~: »_: r ‘Cg; ., Debris xla Best to be managed by generator ‘I. Hauled to authorised site V‘: Collection and disposal to be monitored . l. Covert to eco-bricks, building alternatives “‘I At ward level there the process we Bulky Items ~L Best to be Hauled for a fee J. must be a bulky items space ~14 Collection b authorise vendors Goiit _must subsidise the space . ,I_I I «nub. _'~ 1‘ .6’ % in Ddllvbvlw
  6. 6. Looking at door to door collection of waste ' I ' | |l| |l| l|| ||| ||| |ll ' ' ': s-J'll| :'-«i. . " fi' ' ' l| |l| ||| l|| ||| ||| || iiiiilllllll | ||| ||| ||| ll II iIl| ||| | ' iiiiilllllll | ll| ||| ||| || f; ‘. ‘ . _._ A _| .‘. ... . , '., J__. _._. ..__ 1 Homemaker places garbage .9 2‘ Dogs or crows open the bag -) 3 Pick up auto carnot pick up -) 4. Sweeper may or may rot out ll" night or early morning and strew rraterials on road bits on the street come, garbage stays or street . . iv‘? ' | ||| ||Hl| ||| ||| ||l ' 7' ' | l|| l|| ||| ||| ||l| || l| |l| ||. *‘*iii. i ' iui| fl|Mflll| l|| _|| l iLii"_"l_“ll| lll“_l| fl MIMIIIL 1. Homemaker puts it out. 2 Bag hangs high, away from 3. Garbage is picked up by hangs it on a tree or railing " rats, dogs‘ crows. " collection service Where there is no door to door collection ifir‘ '9 " l| ||| ||| ||| l|| ||| || A . V " . lllllllllllllllllll iIiIiIl_“l| M|fl| "_| " ’ , _ iwIl| l|_| “l| fl"_'“J 1. Homemaker puts garbage in . ) 2. Sweeper also walks to the -) 3. Both the sweeper and .9 4. Tipper comes to pickup once bag daily and walks [0 a spot corner or empty plot to throw homemakers throw in SP0‘ If‘ two days
  7. 7. gl 3:. Daily Dump How come some homes get waste collected well? Plastic Bag tied up to tree or railing + Can be tied up + Is safe from rats/ crows/ dogs when tied + Light weight - Mostly un-segregated waste — Use of plastic - Is ugly Pia ; tic Bucket + Can hold waste in newspaper + is safe from rats/ crows/ dogs when upright + Light weight - Mostly unvsegregated waste - Can get stolen - Can get knocked down and spill contents - Is ugly Learning from what works already - positive deviance Cage outside gate ’Vf‘? ‘p a. ¢ + can hold waste in container + Is safe from rats/ crows/ dogs all the time + Container inside can be light weight - Mostly un-segregated waste - Cannot get stolen since it is fixed - Cannot spill contents - Can be custom built and aesthetic
  8. 8. Organic Waste options Each home should first compost at source or lfl the community. Pick up of wet waste must be limited H1 any city l9 . &‘ val . . . ., ' . .—' L» (b l Nor‘ COIT‘DOStlr‘g Ho-"remaker pJ[S wet waste est dally in green bucket ll’l cage eeper car collect wet ; v:S[E from tcc cages «r Collection of wet waste every day. Vehicle does not load any other material. l * . “'35 3 Tipper helper emples out bucket rrto tre ripper — no other waste l5 the'e Bucket kept bark lf‘ demarkations. So uel cost is not doubled At flats / homes / schools. This then is given to local bio-gas or composting enterprise .5 v ‘5 ‘W1 '. ""If. »;" Jr’ xv, “f . f.l ‘l rage Two vehicles are necessary when collection of wet waste is done door to door. One to collect wet and one to collect rejects and sanitar . lt is best to have vehicles that have . ,~ :3”: .l )5, I l‘ <‘: ; nun, limp .1 The wet waste is taken to ward level bro-gas or compcstu-g Government to give incentive to communities and homes who compost their wet waste at source. They should hel selling compost to armers.
  9. 9. WE Garden & Leaf waste options W lllllfl Each home puts in water and the Pourakarmika puts in the leaves into the Leaf Composter daily Collection of Garden waste every day . Vehicle does not load any other material. At flats I homes / schools. This then is given to local park here branches are shredded and composted O No burning allowed and will be lined. Incentive to communities who compost their leaf and garden waste - reduction in property tax flwfiwn WfiW % g Government to g spend moneyto g tran 3 com sport leaf post and mulch l to farmers - the same money to haul nutrious garden material to landfill can be used to do good work. . _ia . _3.I
  10. 10. Dry waste options - | ||| ||Il-i}. .”" M 1. Homemaker puts out Dry . ) 2. Sweeper can collect dry -) 3. Tipper U095 Dill)’ WY W359 -D 4. Waste dealer can also pick up waste once a week waste from the cages round once a week from the basket if it suits him Collection of Dry waste E Collection of dry K°9P"! E ii? W35“ , § AWBTEMSS i5 only once or twice a week. 5 waste only in paper 5 . a“°55' '9 °' ‘°"°“'°“ W E "“P_°'! a"ti 50 must Vehicle does not load any i bags, No plastic. 5 '“f°'". 'a' 3”‘ f°"“a' § 598'“ "‘ 5¢h°°'5- other material. l E a89"¢'95 5 _ 5 = g EPR at the policy At flats / homes / schools. § 'EV9' This is then given to local entrepreuners
  11. 11. Rejects and Sanitary Waste options In most cities we do not have the ability to collect sanitary and reject waste separately door to door l. Homemaker puts rejects and _) 2. Sweeper can collect reject -) 3. Tipper helper empties out rejects . ) 4. The rejects is taken to ward level sanitary waste out in newspaper waste from the cages Into the tipper — inside a large transfer point to send to landfill packet in cage container since wet waste may also be picked up. Collection of reject and § Scientific landfill are irnporranr in Governinent to give encourage sanitar sanitary waste every day. § different areas of the city, this has to pads without plastic and washable an Vehicle has to have a 3 be part of the urban pian industry that moves away from single use container to hold this g diapers separate from wet waste g At homes door to door only For flats, the sanitary ; waste can be collected by : medical agencies ; 1-—-v» _ Uger cloth sanitary napkins Cotton non-disposable diapers O
  12. 12. Debris and Bulky waste options . Most cities are expanding so debris and bulky items will only grow - we have to have a strategy for thes age , /A ’ g i. i‘ " . . V : ' 'i “ lllllllllllllllllll “" «" | l|| l|| l|| l|l| ||| ll ' '5 lllllllllllllllllll V —' ’ ‘_ iiiiiilllllll llllllllllll $3 iiiiilllllll llllllllllll , ‘-~ 7 r _ » , Jllllllllml llllllllllll . t I . __J_w¢___O . . . . 1. Homemaker changes . ) 2. Sweeper does not pick up -) 3. Tipper does not pick up debris .9 4. The debris lies till a tractor hauls bathroom fittings and mattress debris it an puts it in a lake or empty plot and puts them out Collection of bulky items § For both debris and buiky items § Government to give incentives to industry and debris need to be § there needs to be space aiiotated in i that rec cles the debris and bulky items. linked to material recovery g the urban pian Items 0 bulky nature can also become - a city needs to plan for g g swap libraries or low cost sales and using debris for eco-bricks, g “ encourage local enterprise. bulky materials for = ° recycling or makin into urban landscapes! rough 0 artists interventions g 0
  13. 13. llllllllllllllllll iititllflwlllfllflm 1. Homemaker throws out batteries, bulbs into rejects today Aggregation of E-waste is im ortant before it can be pic ed up, since the economics do not work out. For homes this is the problem, the volumes generated do not make it attractive for agencies to come to pick up the E-waste -D E- waste options This is the most legislated and most profitable materials for recovery I ill I | ]‘ 2 Sweeper picks up the rejects and adds it to the pile sent to landfill . ) 3. Tipperalso adds the rejectsto final . , 4, i-omeiraker sells computers, TV, pile being sert to landfill to Lin-authorised informal sector Wl'l| Ci‘ will end up pollutirg the environment with toxic cherricals E-waste needs new business models for post consumer collection. Otherwise, the pollution cannot be controlled. Bulbs and tubelights are a challenge. If the Government does not create many recyclers, we will have a mercury pol ution disaster. Bulbs and tubelight recyclers need subsidy and recognition. These also need to be stored carefully
  14. 14. 5} 3:, Daily Dump Details can bring change Innovative practices and business models can make using less, throwing less a cool new trend Architects redesign Artissts; show how New materials go details for proper waste can bring life back into soil collection and make g to urban land; JCuPeS § without pollution weiste elegant

    Be the first to comment

    Login to see the comments

The scale at which our cities our growing, its very difficult for the government to manage the waste alone. Here are a few challenges on the ground that we have observed around material recovery.


Total views


On Slideshare


From embeds


Number of embeds