Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Post Mortem Investigations 2010


Published on

Published in: Technology, Business
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Post Mortem Investigations 2010

  1. 1. 2009 Psychology Exam Post Mortem Assessment Components 1 & 2 Collaborative and Individual Investigations January Summer School 2010 Geoff Slater
  2. 2. General Information • Approx 2/3 had no marks changed – Teachers providing accurate guidance • Approx 1/3 had some marks changed – Most lowered due to overgenerous marking in A and B bands – A few raised due to overzealous marking in C band or below • Both quantitative and qualitative reports evident • Interpretation and evaluation still main area of difficult for students 2
  3. 3. General Information Interpretation  Describe and interpret patterns in data as it relates to the quality of the data  Discuss sample size  Discuss representativeness of the sample Evaluation  Discuss validity of results  Discuss reliability of results  Identify strengths and weaknesses  Research Ethics 3
  4. 4. Teachers should be aware of …… • Base question on simple research question/hypothesis – Relevant to class data – Avoid multiple hypotheses, complex questions • Avoid combing quantitative and qualitative data – Proposal covers only a subsection of the data – Teacher feedback essential early in process • Don’t use self made marks schemes – Usually leads to a downward shift in moderation • Adhere to 1500 word limit – Manage this during drafting stages 4
  5. 5. Students should be aware of …… • Information searches and reporting unnecessary – Extensive book and internet searhes undesirable • Do not include lengthy and detailed descriptions of methods used – These are already given to you • Avoid producing multiple statistics/graphs of irrelevant data – Does not result in higher marks – Must be appropriate to research question/proposal • Graphing raw scores is not a considered as analysis of data 5
  6. 6. Students should be aware of …… • Qualitative analysis – Summary table only include a few responses to illustrate themes – Look for a limited number of themes – Long lists of themes indicate a lack of understanding of the process of content analysis – Generally should focus on only one of the focus group questions • Describing data vs Interpreting data – Describing- tabular, graphical forms with a comment (Group A mean is significantly greater than Group B mean – Interpreting – provide meaning and context to data • Must explain clearly how ethics, strengths etc..affected the outcome of their own particular investigation – Relate discussions to own research program 6
  7. 7. It is advised that…… • Proposals are attached to investigations, • Teachers read and refer to the support materials pertaining to collaborative and individual investigations, • Teachers use the “mark scheme” and “student record for supervision and verification” available in LAM • Teachers join the “online community” for psychology, • New teachers seek clarification and advice early – Curriculum Officer – Experienced teachers 7
  8. 8. Moderation 2010 Great PD opportunity Get to know-understand processes more clearly Will help you and your students