Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Sabine Rotthier – I-scan tool. e-Government: a new cance or a new problem?

804 views

Published on

CORVÉ pre-conference – Tuesday Dec 14th 2010

  • Be the first to comment

Sabine Rotthier – I-scan tool. e-Government: a new cance or a new problem?

  1. 1. eGovernment: New Opportunity or New Problem?Conclusions of the I-scan Project <br />14th Dec 2010<br />Pre-ConferenceLift-OffTowards Open Government<br />Sabine Rotthier<br />
  2. 2. Mainquestion of the conference: <br />Howcancentralgovernments and the European Union support and promotelocaleGovernment? <br />I-scan project <br />29 Flemishmunicipalities<br />I-scan Project: Study of Local eGov<br />2<br />
  3. 3. I-scan Project: Study of LocaleGov<br />Where does the municipal organisation stand in its development? <br />To which degree has the organisation implemented ICT? <br />How does the municipalityalignorganisation and ICT?<br />3<br />
  4. 4. ICT<br />O = +<br />I = +<br />Pos. alignment<br />O = -<br />I = +<br />No alignment<br />Organisation<br />O = +<br />I = -<br />No alignment<br />O = -<br />I = -<br />Neg. alignment<br />4<br />
  5. 5. 5<br />
  6. 6. Three Key Questions <br />Do municipal divisions think in terms of processes?<br />Organisational framework<br />supportedby<br />Do municipal divisions speak the same language?<br />Do we understand each other? <br />Semantic framework<br />supportedby<br />Canmunicipaldivisionscommunicatewitheachother?<br />Technological framework<br />6<br />
  7. 7. Can Municipal Divisions Talk to Each Other?<br />Software applicationsformunicipalities:<br />4 capitalmarketplayers<br />Problem: <br />No compatibilitybetween different applications<br />Vendor lock-in<br />Islandautomatisation<br />Different ways of coping withthissituation<br />7<br />
  8. 8. Attitude towards ICT suppliers<br />8<br />
  9. 9. Three Key Questions <br />Do municipal divisions think in terms of processes?<br />Organisational framework<br />supportedby<br />Do municipal divisions speak the same language?<br />Do we understand each other? <br />Semantic framework<br />supportedby<br />Canmunicipaldivisionscommunicatewitheachother?<br />Technological framework<br />9<br />
  10. 10. Do MunicipalDivisionsSpeak the Same Language?<br />Problematic in everymunicipality<br />Reasons: <br />Focus on own services and tasks /preference to control own data<br />No use of authentic sources: unknown / unawareness of value for municipalities<br />Data are locked in in applications<br />10<br />
  11. 11. Recommendations to the Central Governements<br />Develop open standards for data <br />Make authentic sources available for municipalities<br />Ensure clear communication about what municipalities can and may do with authentic sources<br />11<br />
  12. 12. Three Key Questions <br />Do municipal divisions think in terms of processes?<br />Organisational framework<br />supportedby<br />Do municipal divisions speak the same language?<br />Do we understand each other? <br />Semantic framework<br />supportedby<br />Canmunicipaldivisionscommunicatewitheachother?<br />Technological framework<br />12<br />
  13. 13. Do MunicipalDivisionsThink in Terms of Processes?<br />E-government<br />NOT: justimplementing ICT<br /> BUT: analysing, reorganising and improving the internalworking and service delivery = BPR<br />Whiletechnologybyitselfcannottransform bad procedures intogoodones, eGovernmentcreates the opportunity for the public sector to manage itstasksdifferently.<br /> No BPR = automatisation of bad processes / reinforcement of existingsituation<br />13<br />
  14. 14. A = Active<br />F = Fragmented<br />I = Intention<br />Aw = Aware<br />N = Notaware<br />The attention devoted to processes<br />14<br />
  15. 15. <ul><li>On the basis of intrinsic needs
  16. 16. Extrinsic motivation
  17. 17. On the basis of intrinsic needs
  18. 18. Extrinsic motivation </li></ul>15<br />
  19. 19. <ul><li>ICT division is not involved, but does show interest and tries to play a bigger role
  20. 20. ICT division is involved
  21. 21. ICT division is not involved and is not interested
  22. 22. ICT division is not involved</li></ul>16<br />
  23. 23. <ul><li>Examining processes, without much added value for the organisation
  24. 24. Description of the desired situation
  25. 25. Lever for concrete improvements, with a view to more efficient operation and services
  26. 26. Analysing
  27. 27. Lever for concrete improvements, with a view to more efficient operation and services
  28. 28. Analysing
  29. 29. Little interest and not much added value
  30. 30. Description of the existing situation </li></ul>17<br />
  31. 31. Recommendations to the Central Governements<br /><ul><li>Support municipalities with process descriptions of regulations
  32. 32. Coordinate your policy with local practice on the basis of mutual consultation
  33. 33. Stimulateknowledgedevelopment about ICT and organisational change</li></ul>18<br />
  34. 34. Recommendations versus Citadel Statement: Does we match?<br />19<br />YES, WE MATCH!<br />Information/ process and applicationlayer<br />Clearguidelines and data models for the use of personal details aboutcitizens<br />Common service deliveryarchitecture<br />Onecommonlanguage<br />Open Data<br />Standards<br />Framework to addresscommonprivacy issues<br />Best practiceshow to workwithauthenticregistrations<br />
  35. 35. Thankyouforyourattention<br />More information: <br />sabine.rotthier@hogent.be<br />Book: eGovernment: New Opportunity or New Problem? OnUSB-Stick in the conference map. <br />20<br />

×