Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Rajasthan priorities trade, palit

Rajasthan priorities trade, palit

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Rajasthan priorities trade, palit

  1. 1. Enhancing Exports and Trade Amitendu Palit Rajasthan Priorities conference, Jaipur June 8 -11
  2. 2. 1st analyzed solution Development of an Inland Container Depot (ICD) and Container Terminal
  3. 3. Definition and Justification ICDs, or Dry Ports, are ‘….logistics centre connected to one or more modes of transport for the handling, storage and regulatory inspection of goods moving in international trade and the execution of applicable customs control and formalities” (Article 1 of Inter-governmental Agreement on Dry Ports)’ Apart from connecting landlocked hinterland to global trade, Dry Ports enable multimodal transport operations reducing congestion on specific modes of traffic Some key dry ports in Asia : Yunnan Tengjun (China), Yiwu (China), Khorgas (Kazakhstan), Sejong (Korea), Sungai Duku (Indonesia), Lard Krabang (Thailand), Riyadh (Saudi Arabia), Dadri (India) Birganj (Nepal), Sialkot (Pakistan) An additional ICD in Rajasthan, equipped with container terminal, would benefit exporters by bringing down logistics cost and incentivizing exports.
  4. 4. Description To add to existing Dry Ports in Rajasthan - : Jodhpur (Bhagat Ki Kothi), Jaipur (Kanakpura) and Kathuwas To be developed in sync with CONCOR’s existing network of dry ports and feeder connections with Indian Railways To be located in close proximity to Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) for enabling forward and backward linkages. To come up over 120 hectares -15% larger than Dadri ICD Facility expected to have throughput capacity of 5,00,000 TEU Initial capacity utilization pegged at 60% with annual throughput growth of 5%
  5. 5. Projected Costs: 20 Year Span FIXED COSTS: LAND, TRAIN LICENSE, INFRASTRUCTURE; & OPERATING COSTS (INR CRORE) YEARS 1-5: FIXED COSTS; YEARS 6-20: OPERATING COSTS;
  6. 6. Projected Benefits: 20 Year Span • Initial revenue expectation – INR 400 crore Assessment benchmarked to Dadri ICD throughput-revenue performance Can increase further from more capacity utilization arising from Rajasthan’s strong efforts in improving Doing Business
  7. 7. 2nd analyzed solution Establishing a Free Trade Warehousing Zone
  8. 8. Definition and Justification Free Trade Warehousing Zones (FTWZs) are customised logistic facilities for seamless movements of goods and services with the freedom to carry out trade transactions. They are located close to seaports/airports/ dry ports. FTWZs in India emphasized since FTP 2004-2009. To be set up over minimum area of 100,000 sq meters. FTP 2015-2020 encourages these as ‘international trading hubs’. Academic literature and evidence supports FTWZs for encouraging exports as FTWZs reduce logistic costs and facilitate trade. Since the first FTWZ – Arshiva in Panvel, Maharashtra - more coming up. Warehousing and logistic capacities in Rajasthan can greatly improve from a FTWZ
  9. 9. Description To be located in close proximity to Delhi Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) for enabling forward and backward linkages. To come up over 125 acres –midway between Arshiya in Maharashtra and Nanguneri in Tamil Nadu FTWZs are characterized by high capital costs for development and operating expenses. Expected to operate at 70% capacity, i.e. available warehousing space, due to strong demand of warehousing for trade cargo
  10. 10. Projected Costs: 20 Year Span FIXED COSTS: LAND, DEVELOPMENT; & OPERATING COSTS (INR CRORE) YEARS 1-6: FIXED COSTS; YEARS 7-20: OPERATING COSTS;
  11. 11. Projected Benefits – 20 Year Span Initial revenue – INR 275 crore, expected to rise by 2% each year Estimates based on indicative warehousing charges and strong capacity utilization of 70% Benefits remain below costs till Year 11. Might remain lower for more years if capacity utilization falters
  12. 12. 3rd analyzed solution Scientific testing and certification facilities for organic product exports
  13. 13. Definition and Justification Rajasthan 3rd largest organic food producing state after MP, HP Lesser use of pesticides due to favourable climatic conditions conducive for organic farming. Rajasthan’s proficiency in oil seeds production makes it well positioned to grow into an organic food export hub with oil seeds comprising most of India’s organic exports. Rajasthan State Seed and Organic Certification Agency (ROCA) accredited by APEDA for certification Empirical research points to lack of adequate certification facilities as a constraints for organic exports as lack of certification invites NTMs in global markets We expect additional modern testing and certification facilities to encourage substitution from domestic production to exports.
  14. 14. Description To add to existing certification facilities such as those under ROCA, but to be organic product-specific To be developed in line with the norms laid out by Food Safety and Standards Association of India (FSSAI) To be located in close proximity to capital Jaipur. To come up over 5 acres
  15. 15. Projected Costs: 10 Year Span FIXED COSTS: LAND & BUILDING, LAB & EQUIPMENT; & OPERATING COSTS (INR CRORE) YEARS 1-3: FIXED COSTS; YEARS 4-10: OPERATING COSTS;
  16. 16. Projected Benefits – 20 Year Span Initial revenue – INR 13 crore, expected to rise by 5% each year Estimates based on expected substitution of organic food produce to exports from domestic consumption Benefits exceed costs from Year 4. Might be higher if international price premiums increase
  17. 17. Summing Up BCR (5% DISCOUNT RATE) Intervention Cost (INR crore) Benefit (INR crore) BCR Quality of Evidence 1 3,137 4,853 1.5 Strong 2 3,007 2,736 0.9 Strong 3 50 75 1.5 Strong TAKEAWAYS Interventions 1 and 2 have operating costs > fixed costs. Greater capacity use and more revenues can alter BCRs Intervention 3 : low-hanging fruit Policy benefits to be distinguished between those yielding returns over medium and longer terms (i.e.1 & 2) vis-à-vis those in much nearer term (i.e. 3).

×