SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
July 3, 2012
QATAR FACULTY of ISLAMIC STUDIES (QFIS)
What We Learned from the MOCK-UP:
LOOKING FORWARD
1
July 3, 2012
THE BEST WAY TO DETERMINE WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED FROM THE MOCK-UP IS TO ANALYZE THE MoM FROM
THE LAST TWO INSPECTIONS AND REFLECT ON THE PROCESS OF DESIGNING AND BUILDING IT. We need to identify
the successes and failures in order to inform ourselves about how we shall proceed to build the actual project into
the landscape.
We shall look at the following to determine our strategy:
 The Process
 The Design Itself
 The Goals of Our Mock-up
VIP Lounge and Lounges
VIP White Marble:
 QF stated that the proposed marble is totally different and didn’t match the control sample.
 The finishing between carpet and marble shall be brass strip and it is missing
The marble is rejected
What we learned:
Matching a material control sample can be problematic, especially when the material is white marble. The
chosen sample was not provided by contractor and a substitute was presented as a variation. It was
rejected for not being the specified material, and if it had been it would have been evaluated. As it stands,
the control sample would not match the provided sample, because they are simple different marbles. From
this, it can be shown that matching the control sample is easier when you get the specified marble, even if
the samples and paving stones will vary by their material nature. It is recommended that we send
representatives to inspect these quarries for consistency and choose the quarried pieces carefully, based on
consistency and even coloration and “marbling” (or patterns of the stone constituents).
The Rhomboid Ceiling:
 QF stated that the hanging rods are visible and the ceiling seems to be not structurally stable
enough.
 RHWL stated that they should be painted.
 JV: suggested to use another kind of support instead of rods to ensure that the ceiling is rigid and to
provide an aesthetically pleasing solution satisfying design intent.
2
July 3, 2012
To be revised by RHWL.
What we learned:
There are several challenges here:
1. Rigidity and diameter of the threaded rod hangers
2. Appearance (need cover to hide threaded rod)
a. White plastic, or color to match ceiling paint color, wrapped around threaded rod to bottom
of ceiling and top of support channels for rhomboids
The book shelf for mosque:
 The unit is white with lacquer finish for books and can be used as a bench, QF stated that the unit is
rather huge, however size may be acceptable as the mosque area is very big.
 There are no supporting feet, however this may be acceptable as it will be located over carpeting on
the Mosque floor.
To be revised by RHWL.
What we learned:
Following the IFC is the best strategy to fulfill design intent.
The T.V.:
LCD screen, it should be flush with the wall surface.
To be revised by RHWL.
What we learned:
Following the IFC is the best strategy to fulfill design intent.
Bench/Coach:
 JV stated that the bench-coach is not acceptable. Matt Mc Turk (RHWL), wants it seamless without
using joints, QF stated that the leather should be more taut without puckering and a smooth
surface visually.
 QF asked JV to double the springs to make the coach more durable, for the fixing pins to be revised.
3
July 3, 2012
The Mock-up Corridor
The screen sample for Mehrab:
 It should be Corian™™ (Glacier White), however the given sample is MDF which doesn’t match the
specifications.
 The angle quality is poor some angles are straight and some are rounded, RHWL said it should be
with 3mm radius rounded angles.
The sample is rejected.
What we learned:
Quality control and communication are the issues here.
QC- Simple attention to detail, consistency, and thoroughness of following the shop drawings to the letter
and matching 3mm Diameter of routing vertices in Corian™ patterning of screen.
The sliding door:
 It is a sandwich glass between two layers of Corian™.
 QF suggested the panel to be Corian™ sandwich between glasses, RHWL said glass may affect and
change the Corian™ color.
To be revised.
What we learned:
Visual effects and their planned effect must be tested and verified, or tweaked as the case may be.
Terrazzo:
Type 4: (with glass chips)
By comparing the proposed and the control sample, QF stated that it contains glass chips of different color
and size.
The Terrazzo type 4 is rejected
What we learned:
Terrazzos are fairly easy to match, or should be. It is important to choose the base material color and chip
selection and density carefully to design a beautiful and consistent material that can be applied easily and
effectively.
4
July 3, 2012
Type 2: (mother of pearl) - for VIP area
The proposed material’s chip density is different and it has many pieces of dark chips, moreover the
substrate/base should be lighter.
The Terrazzo type 2 is rejected
What we learned:
Choose the base or field color carefully to blend well with the chip mix.
Type 1:
The proposed seems to be closer to the control sample; QF stated that contractor has to take care of the
big dots and the color.
It is acceptable pending positive response to the above comment.
What we learned:
Quality control, proper mixing and storage are crucial to success with terrazzo floor installations. Protection
after installation is essential to providing a smooth and clean surface.
Library
The sliding veneer panels (Ref 304):
QF stated that as commented before the finishing is not as per the required quality, moreover angles are
not unified.
Finishing quality to be considered.
What we learned:
Again, quality control, attention to detail, verification of shop drawings-Oversight of work by sub-contractor
with verification by CCC.
Shelves Units:
 The leveling of shelves and how to support to be revised, considering the finishing of holes on
shelves’ back (pins locations).
 For magazine shelves:, they are not as per specified, shelves’ edges and gaps between them and
veneer side to be treated.
 For the lighting fixture: to be revised if it is as per specs or not, a flash light is required during
inspection.
5
July 3, 2012
 For veneer: It shows non-homogeneous surface, as some parts are lighter colors and different
grains, moreover the angled joints are not acceptable and must be straight.
The entire unit to be revised after been complied with the above comments.
What we learned:
See above comments
Carpet:
 The carpet in this zone is broadloom (the original product from the specified manufacturer), must
match control sample, revise sample and resubmit for approval.
 Brass strips should be provided between different materials as per IFC documents, and
specifications.
 The broadloom strips, should be fixed as per carpet wave lines.
General Office
Carpet tiles:
 The proposed is for 2 types of installation; one for fixing all tiles at the same direction and the other
is to opposite the direction for adjacent tiles, the first one to be taken.
 The fixation quality is not acceptable; some tiles are not well fixed, the joints are visible and they
aren’t straight.
 The tiles’ color is not matched with the broadloom color, these tiles are customized and the
broadloom is original, so JV has to follow broadloom color for customizing the carpet tiles.
 The lighting fixture finishing is not as per the required quality.
To be provided as noted.
Blinds
The system is approved conditionally, however the curtain fabric is not matching the control sample and
the lower edge is not clean and its mandatory isn’t acceptable, to be revised and to provide different edge.
Façade (curtain wall):
Wall shall be flush with the mullion T section. The built condition does not reflect the IFC documents. This
is the case in many areas, where, due to excessive haste or lack of attention to detail, the finer details were
not adequately addressed, nor understood. Mock-ups are particularly good at pointing out where the
6
July 3, 2012
design has unresolved issues or where the methods and materials of construction might be brought into
question.
To be reviewed by QF architect.
Classroom
The Credenza:
 JV had proposed Ecophone fabric instead of acoustic plaster, QF stated that it is not approved till the
wall panel surface and joints been treated by JV.
 The ceiling lighting fixture is missing.
The toilets
 The slim lighting fixture installation is rejected.
 The shadow gap between walls’ top and ceiling is rejected.
 Floor drain installation, to be revised by JV.
 Door’s knob installation isn’t as per the required quality, to be revised by JV.
 The soap dispenser details and the attached supply system (Gerry can...) to be fixed for QF review.
 The skirting is missing.
Auditorium
The chairs:
They are not acceptable, (they look in a poor quality), and previously rejected, QF stated that new items to
be provided from different manufacturers.
The GRG:
 For walls: the finish is not as per the required quality, the background fabric is dirty and not well
stretched, to be revised by JV.
 For ceiling: the curvature had been made by hand, RHWL stated that he imagined that the curved
part should be casted to give a good quality, moreover ASTAD stated that this part has a lighting
fixture so any default will be obvious
The ceiling is rejected.
7
July 3, 2012
What we learned:
The biggest issue here is-
How can you maximize surface quality of or GRG:
1. Controlled environment (minimize dust etc. with “Clean” environment
2. Careful mixing of GRG pre-mixed bags and time-control of mixed plaster to ensure proper setting up
and curing.
3. Use jigs for forming surfaces with reinforcing fibers
The acoustic fabric panels:
Approved.
Auditorium stairs:
The flooring carpet is just stretched along stair steps, QF asked RHWL to improve the details for this part,
like adding metal angle for steps edge.
The veneer panels:
 The edges quality is very poor.
 RHWL asked JV to provide shadow gap between GRG and veneer to be with white aluminum U
shape profile.
Various Millworks Zone
The ablution water curtain:
 The contractor had used epoxy for fixing the white marble, and that affect the color of the marble
flooring.
 QF stated that installation materials shall be considered to maintain the material quality and
durability.
The lockers and desks/Corian™:
 Holes finishing to be revised.
The hexagonal show case:
It is not completed yet, moreover QF previously stated that the unit to be manufactured by the specified
one or another approved professional manufacture.
8
July 3, 2012
The unit is rejected
What we learned:
The fit, finish and technical requirements of this piece stress the importance of utilizing the best cabinet-
maker possible in order to maximize the odds of success.
VIP Lift
 AS per RHWL, the wooden oak panels shall be with coffee color, for RHWL the color tone for VIP is
fine, for QF/ASTAD the paint is heavy and hiding the grains of wood.
 The surface, corners and edges finishing are not as per the required quality.
 Contractor has to provide the full finishing materials to complete the mock up image, for example: a
stainless steel strip between two wooden panels is missing.
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
What we learned:
The lift cannot be totally evaluated until all elements are installed and in proper position.
Mill works
Lockers:
 It is lacquer finish; the holes are not well finished.
 The internal shelves’ edges are straight, to be revised.
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
What we learned:
The lockers need: Locks, better way to drill ventilation holes in the door
VIP Reception Desk:
 The joint between horizontal and vertical panels is still showing; the manufacturer still has to
improve its finish, as it is subjected to gather dust.
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
What we learned:
Size of desk makes it necessary to construct in pieces, so fit and finish are critical and field finishing will be
necessary.
9
July 3, 2012
The Art Wall
 The upper gap shall be covered by stainless steel strip.
 The finishing detail of the wall base, between wall and flooring, to be improved for confirming wall
stability and leveling ability.
 The lighting fixture is missing, to be fixed.
 For the side door, the fixing clips shall be recessed flush to make the door tight enough and to give
smaller spacing.
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
What we learned:
The Hexagonal Show Case: Too many unresolved issues still, including: Lighting, wiring, fit and finish,
method of construction, base leveling technique etc.
 QF asked JV to provide a detailed comparison sheet between the manufacturer in charge and the
specified one to show why this manufacturer shall be approved.
 This will be applicable for the hexagonal show case and the library unit.
 QF stated that contractor is requested to show how to control the climate inside the unit, and to
prove that by specific tests to be done by international and reliable laboratory.
 For the lifting desk mechanism, QF asked the contractor to provide sensors to ensure safety during
movement.
The sliding door:
 JV stated that a manufacturer’s representative will be available to explain and show the
maintenance way in case of the internal glass breakage between the corian sandwiches.
Subject to next inspection.
What we learned:
The sliding doors must be built carefully with special attention paid to the proper grain direction and
matching as per ASTAD/QF/LB comments. Hanging the panels and hardware installation and fabrication
requires tight tolerances and fit and finish tolerances to function properly and last.
Path of projection:
 RHWL stated that the angles shall be protected by angle’s accessories (metal or plastic…).
 QF stated that installation of the projection has to be shown.
10
July 3, 2012
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
What we learned:
The video projections are critical in terms of production and ensuring the shape of the wall components are
IDENTICAL from test bed to actual installation. The shape will determine perception of the video projections
completely.
Auditorium
 RHWL stated that all furniture and finishing colors to be revised, chairs, carpet and the acoustic
panels to get a darker tone and QF agreed about that.
 JV had provided different angle types for steps’ nose, one of them (carpet accessory) with silver
color could be acceptable, to be shown next time for entire inspection.
 The dividing strips (brass) to be reviewed after fixing the stairs metal nose, it could be changed to
have a silver color matching the stair angle.
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
Colors to be revised by RHWL.
What we learned:
The complexity of the auditorium, as well as its special acoustic characteristics, will make for challenges,
not only in construction, but acoustic control, finish perceptions being as intended by designers
Color matching is a tricky business and must be carried out under different lighting conditions to make sure
the range of conditions are acceptable in terms of appearance, eye strain color accuracy, glare etc.
Investigating different color schemes is a priority for QF.
Classroom
 The lighting fixture is not as per the required quality as per specification.
JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time.
VIP Lounge
 The chiffon curtain, there are horizontal joints; QF stated that this is not acceptable.
JV to revise the fabric size with the manufacturer to avoid such joints, to be rectified for next
inspection.
11
July 3, 2012
What we learned:
Not following the IFC drawings is rampant among sub-contractors and runs counter to the stated intent of
the project.
Library
 RHWL stated that the library shelf is not as per IFC, for example the side should be one piece;
however contractor provides it into two pieces.
 The desk, many details are missing which affect the finishing quality and the unit stability.
JV to rectify as per noted and to follow the IFC drawings for inspection next time.
What we learned:
Not following the IFC drawings is rampant among sub-contractors and runs counter to the stated intent of
the project.
The relief panel
 ASTAD/ARUP stated that the work mandatory is showing a poor quality.
 The drawing design has to be revised by a professional artist to provide the required picture as per
design intent, as the proposed design is not acceptable.
QF gave JV a final chance for two weeks to rectify all the comments for final inspection and
approval of all the interior elements and approval.
CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS:
Looking at the mock-up is best done through the lens of :
1. The Process- How the Mock-up was conceived
1.1. The Mock-up was conceived as a way to depict accurately the best practices and an identical replica of the
actual building to be built on-site
2. The Design Itself- Elements of the landscaping, facades and interiors
2.1. Again, the buildings elements are meant to be the finest quality the contractor and sub-contractors are
able to produce. Any deficiencies in the design will become apparent and allow for
modification/improvement before fabrication.
3. The Goals of Our Mock-up: How will we use it to improve the actual building’s construction, fit-out and
commissioning
12
July 3, 2012
3.1. Utilize the Mock-up to refine our means and methods and solve any remaining
design/fabrication/construction issues.
3.1.1. Try different methods for direct comparison to determine best method for installation etc.
3.1.2. Do not fear changing how the design intent is achieved. Now is the time to decide how best
to proceed.
3.2. Address any questions raised in these reports from all concerned parties who have a significant
stake in the outcome.
3.3. Revise shop drawings and material submittals/method statements as required improve our over-
all performance and build-quality.
3.4. Agree on modifications to process, methods, materials or any other change before issuing
amended instructions.
NOTES:
13

More Related Content

What's hot

Various materials used in completing kardan university structure
Various materials used in completing kardan university structureVarious materials used in completing kardan university structure
Various materials used in completing kardan university structureSameer Nawab
 
A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...
A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...
A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...Mayur Rahangdale
 
Seminar_Repair & Restoration_of_Structure
Seminar_Repair & Restoration_of_StructureSeminar_Repair & Restoration_of_Structure
Seminar_Repair & Restoration_of_StructureIssar Kapadia
 
2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products
2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products
2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Productsnovacsi
 
Building maintenance
Building maintenance Building maintenance
Building maintenance Janki Patel
 
Specification for different classes of Brickworks
Specification for different classes of BrickworksSpecification for different classes of Brickworks
Specification for different classes of BrickworksVighnesh Rane
 
Keyston Polishing
Keyston PolishingKeyston Polishing
Keyston Polishingsdorandomav
 
TERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, Shells
TERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, ShellsTERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, Shells
TERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, ShellsTerrazzco
 
Bond strengths of porcelain
Bond strengths of porcelainBond strengths of porcelain
Bond strengths of porcelaindviya jain
 
Weifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,Ltd
Weifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,LtdWeifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,Ltd
Weifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,LtdJack Xu
 
Linings Failure Prevention vs. Analysis
Linings Failure Prevention vs. AnalysisLinings Failure Prevention vs. Analysis
Linings Failure Prevention vs. AnalysisInternational Paint
 
Nfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooring
Nfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooringNfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooring
Nfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooringLew Migliore
 
journel clubs in prosthodontics
journel clubs in prosthodonticsjournel clubs in prosthodontics
journel clubs in prosthodonticsdellasain
 

What's hot (19)

Various materials used in completing kardan university structure
Various materials used in completing kardan university structureVarious materials used in completing kardan university structure
Various materials used in completing kardan university structure
 
A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...
A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...
A Case Study of Existing Institutional Building for Assessment and Repair (VJ...
 
Seminar_Repair & Restoration_of_Structure
Seminar_Repair & Restoration_of_StructureSeminar_Repair & Restoration_of_Structure
Seminar_Repair & Restoration_of_Structure
 
2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products
2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products
2011 CTM Session 2: Terminology for Products
 
Building maintenance
Building maintenance Building maintenance
Building maintenance
 
Specification for different classes of Brickworks
Specification for different classes of BrickworksSpecification for different classes of Brickworks
Specification for different classes of Brickworks
 
Glass Tile Thin-Set Mortar
Glass Tile Thin-Set MortarGlass Tile Thin-Set Mortar
Glass Tile Thin-Set Mortar
 
Maintenance of concrete structures
Maintenance of concrete structuresMaintenance of concrete structures
Maintenance of concrete structures
 
Keyston Polishing
Keyston PolishingKeyston Polishing
Keyston Polishing
 
TERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, Shells
TERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, ShellsTERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, Shells
TERRAZZCO Aggregate Brochure: Marble, Glass, Shells
 
Ceramic restoration
Ceramic restorationCeramic restoration
Ceramic restoration
 
Concrete
ConcreteConcrete
Concrete
 
Bond strengths of porcelain
Bond strengths of porcelainBond strengths of porcelain
Bond strengths of porcelain
 
Kumar KV
Kumar KVKumar KV
Kumar KV
 
Weifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,Ltd
Weifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,LtdWeifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,Ltd
Weifang Jinwuhuan Builing Material Co.,Ltd
 
Linings Failure Prevention vs. Analysis
Linings Failure Prevention vs. AnalysisLinings Failure Prevention vs. Analysis
Linings Failure Prevention vs. Analysis
 
Nfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooring
Nfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooringNfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooring
Nfmt vegas14 how to specify commercial flooring
 
journel clubs in prosthodontics
journel clubs in prosthodonticsjournel clubs in prosthodontics
journel clubs in prosthodontics
 
Damp Proof Course
Damp Proof Course Damp Proof Course
Damp Proof Course
 

Similar to WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE MOCK-UP

Glass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix Concepts
Glass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix ConceptsGlass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix Concepts
Glass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix ConceptsBrij Consulting, LLC
 
Concrete Polishing Training Seminar
Concrete Polishing Training SeminarConcrete Polishing Training Seminar
Concrete Polishing Training SeminarHeather Cavalier
 
NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2
NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2
NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2Bob Gafvert
 
Greg labbe home performance verification
Greg labbe home performance verificationGreg labbe home performance verification
Greg labbe home performance verificationToronto 2030 District
 
Building Re-Imaging | Case Studies
Building Re-Imaging | Case StudiesBuilding Re-Imaging | Case Studies
Building Re-Imaging | Case StudiesBrad Campbell
 
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E LearningLean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E LearningGaryChastain
 
[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...
[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...
[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...FAHAD Khan
 
Cost effectiveness in qulaity construction
Cost effectiveness in qulaity constructionCost effectiveness in qulaity construction
Cost effectiveness in qulaity constructionSeetha Ram P G
 
Good-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdf
Good-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdfGood-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdf
Good-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdfNguyenQuang243252
 
Glass in the Making (v3) Valuation and Assessment
Glass in the Making (v3) Valuation and AssessmentGlass in the Making (v3) Valuation and Assessment
Glass in the Making (v3) Valuation and AssessmentBrij Consulting, LLC
 
Designing silicone molded components for success
Designing silicone molded components for successDesigning silicone molded components for success
Designing silicone molded components for successUBMCanon
 
Pushing back the boundaries of uncertainty
Pushing back the boundaries of uncertaintyPushing back the boundaries of uncertainty
Pushing back the boundaries of uncertaintydenisesmiles
 
Pushing Back The Boundaries Of Uncertainty
Pushing Back The Boundaries Of UncertaintyPushing Back The Boundaries Of Uncertainty
Pushing Back The Boundaries Of Uncertaintydenisesmiles
 

Similar to WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE MOCK-UP (20)

Mechanical Assignment Help
Mechanical Assignment HelpMechanical Assignment Help
Mechanical Assignment Help
 
Do My Solidworks Assignment
Do My Solidworks AssignmentDo My Solidworks Assignment
Do My Solidworks Assignment
 
Glass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix Concepts
Glass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix ConceptsGlass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix Concepts
Glass Mix Z Form V1 Glass Mix Concepts
 
Concrete Polishing Training Seminar
Concrete Polishing Training SeminarConcrete Polishing Training Seminar
Concrete Polishing Training Seminar
 
NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2
NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2
NIC-MfrsGuide-Ebook2
 
Sample RS 6-10-15
Sample RS 6-10-15Sample RS 6-10-15
Sample RS 6-10-15
 
Greg labbe home performance verification
Greg labbe home performance verificationGreg labbe home performance verification
Greg labbe home performance verification
 
Building Re-Imaging | Case Studies
Building Re-Imaging | Case StudiesBuilding Re-Imaging | Case Studies
Building Re-Imaging | Case Studies
 
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E LearningLean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
 
[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...
[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...
[Yuchip] takes you 3 minutes to learn about 8 factors for choosing a high qua...
 
Sample
SampleSample
Sample
 
Cost effectiveness in qulaity construction
Cost effectiveness in qulaity constructionCost effectiveness in qulaity construction
Cost effectiveness in qulaity construction
 
Good-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdf
Good-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdfGood-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdf
Good-painting-practic-amp-maintenance-amp-repair-painting-standard.pdf
 
Factors affect insulated glass price from china
Factors affect insulated glass price from chinaFactors affect insulated glass price from china
Factors affect insulated glass price from china
 
Factors affect insulated glass price from china
Factors affect insulated glass price from chinaFactors affect insulated glass price from china
Factors affect insulated glass price from china
 
Glass in the Making (v3) Valuation and Assessment
Glass in the Making (v3) Valuation and AssessmentGlass in the Making (v3) Valuation and Assessment
Glass in the Making (v3) Valuation and Assessment
 
Et 01
Et 01Et 01
Et 01
 
Designing silicone molded components for success
Designing silicone molded components for successDesigning silicone molded components for success
Designing silicone molded components for success
 
Pushing back the boundaries of uncertainty
Pushing back the boundaries of uncertaintyPushing back the boundaries of uncertainty
Pushing back the boundaries of uncertainty
 
Pushing Back The Boundaries Of Uncertainty
Pushing Back The Boundaries Of UncertaintyPushing Back The Boundaries Of Uncertainty
Pushing Back The Boundaries Of Uncertainty
 

WHAT WE LEARNED FROM THE MOCK-UP

  • 1. July 3, 2012 QATAR FACULTY of ISLAMIC STUDIES (QFIS) What We Learned from the MOCK-UP: LOOKING FORWARD 1
  • 2. July 3, 2012 THE BEST WAY TO DETERMINE WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED FROM THE MOCK-UP IS TO ANALYZE THE MoM FROM THE LAST TWO INSPECTIONS AND REFLECT ON THE PROCESS OF DESIGNING AND BUILDING IT. We need to identify the successes and failures in order to inform ourselves about how we shall proceed to build the actual project into the landscape. We shall look at the following to determine our strategy:  The Process  The Design Itself  The Goals of Our Mock-up VIP Lounge and Lounges VIP White Marble:  QF stated that the proposed marble is totally different and didn’t match the control sample.  The finishing between carpet and marble shall be brass strip and it is missing The marble is rejected What we learned: Matching a material control sample can be problematic, especially when the material is white marble. The chosen sample was not provided by contractor and a substitute was presented as a variation. It was rejected for not being the specified material, and if it had been it would have been evaluated. As it stands, the control sample would not match the provided sample, because they are simple different marbles. From this, it can be shown that matching the control sample is easier when you get the specified marble, even if the samples and paving stones will vary by their material nature. It is recommended that we send representatives to inspect these quarries for consistency and choose the quarried pieces carefully, based on consistency and even coloration and “marbling” (or patterns of the stone constituents). The Rhomboid Ceiling:  QF stated that the hanging rods are visible and the ceiling seems to be not structurally stable enough.  RHWL stated that they should be painted.  JV: suggested to use another kind of support instead of rods to ensure that the ceiling is rigid and to provide an aesthetically pleasing solution satisfying design intent. 2
  • 3. July 3, 2012 To be revised by RHWL. What we learned: There are several challenges here: 1. Rigidity and diameter of the threaded rod hangers 2. Appearance (need cover to hide threaded rod) a. White plastic, or color to match ceiling paint color, wrapped around threaded rod to bottom of ceiling and top of support channels for rhomboids The book shelf for mosque:  The unit is white with lacquer finish for books and can be used as a bench, QF stated that the unit is rather huge, however size may be acceptable as the mosque area is very big.  There are no supporting feet, however this may be acceptable as it will be located over carpeting on the Mosque floor. To be revised by RHWL. What we learned: Following the IFC is the best strategy to fulfill design intent. The T.V.: LCD screen, it should be flush with the wall surface. To be revised by RHWL. What we learned: Following the IFC is the best strategy to fulfill design intent. Bench/Coach:  JV stated that the bench-coach is not acceptable. Matt Mc Turk (RHWL), wants it seamless without using joints, QF stated that the leather should be more taut without puckering and a smooth surface visually.  QF asked JV to double the springs to make the coach more durable, for the fixing pins to be revised. 3
  • 4. July 3, 2012 The Mock-up Corridor The screen sample for Mehrab:  It should be Corian™™ (Glacier White), however the given sample is MDF which doesn’t match the specifications.  The angle quality is poor some angles are straight and some are rounded, RHWL said it should be with 3mm radius rounded angles. The sample is rejected. What we learned: Quality control and communication are the issues here. QC- Simple attention to detail, consistency, and thoroughness of following the shop drawings to the letter and matching 3mm Diameter of routing vertices in Corian™ patterning of screen. The sliding door:  It is a sandwich glass between two layers of Corian™.  QF suggested the panel to be Corian™ sandwich between glasses, RHWL said glass may affect and change the Corian™ color. To be revised. What we learned: Visual effects and their planned effect must be tested and verified, or tweaked as the case may be. Terrazzo: Type 4: (with glass chips) By comparing the proposed and the control sample, QF stated that it contains glass chips of different color and size. The Terrazzo type 4 is rejected What we learned: Terrazzos are fairly easy to match, or should be. It is important to choose the base material color and chip selection and density carefully to design a beautiful and consistent material that can be applied easily and effectively. 4
  • 5. July 3, 2012 Type 2: (mother of pearl) - for VIP area The proposed material’s chip density is different and it has many pieces of dark chips, moreover the substrate/base should be lighter. The Terrazzo type 2 is rejected What we learned: Choose the base or field color carefully to blend well with the chip mix. Type 1: The proposed seems to be closer to the control sample; QF stated that contractor has to take care of the big dots and the color. It is acceptable pending positive response to the above comment. What we learned: Quality control, proper mixing and storage are crucial to success with terrazzo floor installations. Protection after installation is essential to providing a smooth and clean surface. Library The sliding veneer panels (Ref 304): QF stated that as commented before the finishing is not as per the required quality, moreover angles are not unified. Finishing quality to be considered. What we learned: Again, quality control, attention to detail, verification of shop drawings-Oversight of work by sub-contractor with verification by CCC. Shelves Units:  The leveling of shelves and how to support to be revised, considering the finishing of holes on shelves’ back (pins locations).  For magazine shelves:, they are not as per specified, shelves’ edges and gaps between them and veneer side to be treated.  For the lighting fixture: to be revised if it is as per specs or not, a flash light is required during inspection. 5
  • 6. July 3, 2012  For veneer: It shows non-homogeneous surface, as some parts are lighter colors and different grains, moreover the angled joints are not acceptable and must be straight. The entire unit to be revised after been complied with the above comments. What we learned: See above comments Carpet:  The carpet in this zone is broadloom (the original product from the specified manufacturer), must match control sample, revise sample and resubmit for approval.  Brass strips should be provided between different materials as per IFC documents, and specifications.  The broadloom strips, should be fixed as per carpet wave lines. General Office Carpet tiles:  The proposed is for 2 types of installation; one for fixing all tiles at the same direction and the other is to opposite the direction for adjacent tiles, the first one to be taken.  The fixation quality is not acceptable; some tiles are not well fixed, the joints are visible and they aren’t straight.  The tiles’ color is not matched with the broadloom color, these tiles are customized and the broadloom is original, so JV has to follow broadloom color for customizing the carpet tiles.  The lighting fixture finishing is not as per the required quality. To be provided as noted. Blinds The system is approved conditionally, however the curtain fabric is not matching the control sample and the lower edge is not clean and its mandatory isn’t acceptable, to be revised and to provide different edge. Façade (curtain wall): Wall shall be flush with the mullion T section. The built condition does not reflect the IFC documents. This is the case in many areas, where, due to excessive haste or lack of attention to detail, the finer details were not adequately addressed, nor understood. Mock-ups are particularly good at pointing out where the 6
  • 7. July 3, 2012 design has unresolved issues or where the methods and materials of construction might be brought into question. To be reviewed by QF architect. Classroom The Credenza:  JV had proposed Ecophone fabric instead of acoustic plaster, QF stated that it is not approved till the wall panel surface and joints been treated by JV.  The ceiling lighting fixture is missing. The toilets  The slim lighting fixture installation is rejected.  The shadow gap between walls’ top and ceiling is rejected.  Floor drain installation, to be revised by JV.  Door’s knob installation isn’t as per the required quality, to be revised by JV.  The soap dispenser details and the attached supply system (Gerry can...) to be fixed for QF review.  The skirting is missing. Auditorium The chairs: They are not acceptable, (they look in a poor quality), and previously rejected, QF stated that new items to be provided from different manufacturers. The GRG:  For walls: the finish is not as per the required quality, the background fabric is dirty and not well stretched, to be revised by JV.  For ceiling: the curvature had been made by hand, RHWL stated that he imagined that the curved part should be casted to give a good quality, moreover ASTAD stated that this part has a lighting fixture so any default will be obvious The ceiling is rejected. 7
  • 8. July 3, 2012 What we learned: The biggest issue here is- How can you maximize surface quality of or GRG: 1. Controlled environment (minimize dust etc. with “Clean” environment 2. Careful mixing of GRG pre-mixed bags and time-control of mixed plaster to ensure proper setting up and curing. 3. Use jigs for forming surfaces with reinforcing fibers The acoustic fabric panels: Approved. Auditorium stairs: The flooring carpet is just stretched along stair steps, QF asked RHWL to improve the details for this part, like adding metal angle for steps edge. The veneer panels:  The edges quality is very poor.  RHWL asked JV to provide shadow gap between GRG and veneer to be with white aluminum U shape profile. Various Millworks Zone The ablution water curtain:  The contractor had used epoxy for fixing the white marble, and that affect the color of the marble flooring.  QF stated that installation materials shall be considered to maintain the material quality and durability. The lockers and desks/Corian™:  Holes finishing to be revised. The hexagonal show case: It is not completed yet, moreover QF previously stated that the unit to be manufactured by the specified one or another approved professional manufacture. 8
  • 9. July 3, 2012 The unit is rejected What we learned: The fit, finish and technical requirements of this piece stress the importance of utilizing the best cabinet- maker possible in order to maximize the odds of success. VIP Lift  AS per RHWL, the wooden oak panels shall be with coffee color, for RHWL the color tone for VIP is fine, for QF/ASTAD the paint is heavy and hiding the grains of wood.  The surface, corners and edges finishing are not as per the required quality.  Contractor has to provide the full finishing materials to complete the mock up image, for example: a stainless steel strip between two wooden panels is missing. JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. What we learned: The lift cannot be totally evaluated until all elements are installed and in proper position. Mill works Lockers:  It is lacquer finish; the holes are not well finished.  The internal shelves’ edges are straight, to be revised. JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. What we learned: The lockers need: Locks, better way to drill ventilation holes in the door VIP Reception Desk:  The joint between horizontal and vertical panels is still showing; the manufacturer still has to improve its finish, as it is subjected to gather dust. JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. What we learned: Size of desk makes it necessary to construct in pieces, so fit and finish are critical and field finishing will be necessary. 9
  • 10. July 3, 2012 The Art Wall  The upper gap shall be covered by stainless steel strip.  The finishing detail of the wall base, between wall and flooring, to be improved for confirming wall stability and leveling ability.  The lighting fixture is missing, to be fixed.  For the side door, the fixing clips shall be recessed flush to make the door tight enough and to give smaller spacing. JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. What we learned: The Hexagonal Show Case: Too many unresolved issues still, including: Lighting, wiring, fit and finish, method of construction, base leveling technique etc.  QF asked JV to provide a detailed comparison sheet between the manufacturer in charge and the specified one to show why this manufacturer shall be approved.  This will be applicable for the hexagonal show case and the library unit.  QF stated that contractor is requested to show how to control the climate inside the unit, and to prove that by specific tests to be done by international and reliable laboratory.  For the lifting desk mechanism, QF asked the contractor to provide sensors to ensure safety during movement. The sliding door:  JV stated that a manufacturer’s representative will be available to explain and show the maintenance way in case of the internal glass breakage between the corian sandwiches. Subject to next inspection. What we learned: The sliding doors must be built carefully with special attention paid to the proper grain direction and matching as per ASTAD/QF/LB comments. Hanging the panels and hardware installation and fabrication requires tight tolerances and fit and finish tolerances to function properly and last. Path of projection:  RHWL stated that the angles shall be protected by angle’s accessories (metal or plastic…).  QF stated that installation of the projection has to be shown. 10
  • 11. July 3, 2012 JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. What we learned: The video projections are critical in terms of production and ensuring the shape of the wall components are IDENTICAL from test bed to actual installation. The shape will determine perception of the video projections completely. Auditorium  RHWL stated that all furniture and finishing colors to be revised, chairs, carpet and the acoustic panels to get a darker tone and QF agreed about that.  JV had provided different angle types for steps’ nose, one of them (carpet accessory) with silver color could be acceptable, to be shown next time for entire inspection.  The dividing strips (brass) to be reviewed after fixing the stairs metal nose, it could be changed to have a silver color matching the stair angle. JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. Colors to be revised by RHWL. What we learned: The complexity of the auditorium, as well as its special acoustic characteristics, will make for challenges, not only in construction, but acoustic control, finish perceptions being as intended by designers Color matching is a tricky business and must be carried out under different lighting conditions to make sure the range of conditions are acceptable in terms of appearance, eye strain color accuracy, glare etc. Investigating different color schemes is a priority for QF. Classroom  The lighting fixture is not as per the required quality as per specification. JV to rectify as per noted for inspection next time. VIP Lounge  The chiffon curtain, there are horizontal joints; QF stated that this is not acceptable. JV to revise the fabric size with the manufacturer to avoid such joints, to be rectified for next inspection. 11
  • 12. July 3, 2012 What we learned: Not following the IFC drawings is rampant among sub-contractors and runs counter to the stated intent of the project. Library  RHWL stated that the library shelf is not as per IFC, for example the side should be one piece; however contractor provides it into two pieces.  The desk, many details are missing which affect the finishing quality and the unit stability. JV to rectify as per noted and to follow the IFC drawings for inspection next time. What we learned: Not following the IFC drawings is rampant among sub-contractors and runs counter to the stated intent of the project. The relief panel  ASTAD/ARUP stated that the work mandatory is showing a poor quality.  The drawing design has to be revised by a professional artist to provide the required picture as per design intent, as the proposed design is not acceptable. QF gave JV a final chance for two weeks to rectify all the comments for final inspection and approval of all the interior elements and approval. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: Looking at the mock-up is best done through the lens of : 1. The Process- How the Mock-up was conceived 1.1. The Mock-up was conceived as a way to depict accurately the best practices and an identical replica of the actual building to be built on-site 2. The Design Itself- Elements of the landscaping, facades and interiors 2.1. Again, the buildings elements are meant to be the finest quality the contractor and sub-contractors are able to produce. Any deficiencies in the design will become apparent and allow for modification/improvement before fabrication. 3. The Goals of Our Mock-up: How will we use it to improve the actual building’s construction, fit-out and commissioning 12
  • 13. July 3, 2012 3.1. Utilize the Mock-up to refine our means and methods and solve any remaining design/fabrication/construction issues. 3.1.1. Try different methods for direct comparison to determine best method for installation etc. 3.1.2. Do not fear changing how the design intent is achieved. Now is the time to decide how best to proceed. 3.2. Address any questions raised in these reports from all concerned parties who have a significant stake in the outcome. 3.3. Revise shop drawings and material submittals/method statements as required improve our over- all performance and build-quality. 3.4. Agree on modifications to process, methods, materials or any other change before issuing amended instructions. NOTES: 13