Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.
Common CoreStandards and  Assessments                   Patte Barth  Center for Public Education                 David Bai...
Agenda   • a national overview of the CCSS   • first out the gate – CCSS in Kentucky   • q&a
The Common Core Standards are                   intended to be:      • Aligned with college and work expectations      • F...
The Common Core Standards process:• CCSSO and NGA‟s Center for Best Practices• Advisory group: Achieve, Inc.; ACT, Inc.; C...
46 states & DC have adopted          the CCSS                              adopted                              not       ...
NSBA & CCSS• supports NGA/CCSSO state-led process• supports federal funding for research and/or  help to states for develo...
What’s in the standards –                English language arts      Reading      • Balance of literature and informational...
What’s different?                English language arts     Standards for reading and writing in history/     social studie...
What’s different?Why There Should Be a                    Now look at the following daily schedule for a schoolLonger Scho...
What’s different?  Score points                 The response:                               • provides appropriate and pre...
Balance of texts                                             percent of time on             percent of time on            ...
Balance of                                                         writing modes                                          ...
What’s in the standards –                     Mathematics                                           • Number & quantity   ...
pre-calculus, calculus, advanced                                                         statistics, discrete math, advanc...
Before    Which of the following numbers will round to 26?          a)      25.3          b)      25.5          c)      26...
After Capacity of different baseball stadiums             San Francisco Giants‟ stadium:              41,915 seats        ...
What’s different?• Both assess rounding• The second further requires the ability to reason  mathematically, critique the r...
The Common CoreState Standards            21st century            assessments            for CCSS
State CCSS         assessment consortia• formed to develop common “next generation”  assessments aligned to the CCSS• supp...
Points of collaboration                         SMARTER & PARCC      • working to ensure comparability of scores      • de...
24 states & DC are in the     PARCC consortium                            participant                            non      ...
28 states are in the SMARTER         consortium                           participant                           non       ...
Next Generation Science            Standards• Collaboration of Achieve, NRC, AAAS, NSTA and 26  lead states• “Internationa...
What will be in the standards                    Science    • Practices: behaviors necessary to      the work of scientist...
26 lead states – NextGeneration Science Standards                           participant                           non     ...
Other assessment consortia    • Alternative assessments: $67 million to Dynamic      Learning Maps (DLM) and National Cent...
The Common CoreState Standards            The            challenges
Technology needs     •   33 states offer some level of online testing     •   Most don‟t assess all students     •   Most ...
District needs•   Professional development for staff•   Aligned assessments & curriculum•   Aligned instructional material...
Implementing Common CoreState Standards:The Kentucky ExperienceDavid A. Baird, Associate Executive DirectorKentucky School...
Changes in Kentucky’s System• Passage of Senate Bill 1 in 2009 propelled Kentucky  into a new era in public education• Pre...
32      Kentucky Senate Bill 1 (2009) New academic standards New assessments Program reviews Improved professional  de...
Where Are the Jobs? 90% of fastest growing jobs require at least  two (2) years of education beyond high  school. 80% of...
Kentucky’s Challenge High School Graduation Rate = 76% 38 % of Kentucky’s 2011 high school graduates  were College or Ca...
Remedial Courses = Major Obstacle to           College Degrees Added cost with no credits Adds time/expense to college e...
KY’s College Ready CriteriaMust meet one of the following requirements to beconsidered College Ready:     ACT (11th Grade...
KY’s College Readiness System ACT’s College Readiness Benchmarks* are early indicators of likely college success based on ...
KY’s Career Ready Criteria   Must meet one benchmark for academic area and one for   technical area. Academic:    a) Arme...
KY’s College/Career                    Readiness Strategies1. Courses/Assessments Alignment with Standards2. Transitional ...
 10 years of research by Iowa Association of School  Boards and NSBA Do school boards make a difference in student  achi...
   Set clear and high expectations   Create the conditions for success   Hold the system accountable   Create the publ...
   Embrace the new standards!    −   Clearer and more rigorous    −   Focused on specific knowledge and skills        nec...
   How can the board support these efforts?   Effective professional development    −   Do teachers have sufficient time...
Monitor district’s progress toward successful         implementation of the new standards   What kind of reports is the b...
   Short term consequences   Long term (mutual) benefits   Engage local media in your efforts
   State Level Collaboration   Include relevant topics on board agendas & work    sessions   Use multiple sources of in...
   Partnerships with state agencies and organizations    (accurate/timely/consistent information)   Whole board training...
A role for the federal           government• professional development and technical assistance  through SEAs, regional cen...
If You Want to Learn MoreDavid A. Baird, associate executive director, KSBAdavid.baird@ksba.orgwww.ksba.orgPatte Barth, di...
Watch this space                                             Stay up to date about progress in                            ...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

CCSS Annual 2013 Presentation

660 views

Published on

  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

CCSS Annual 2013 Presentation

  1. 1. Common CoreStandards and Assessments Patte Barth Center for Public Education David BairdKentucky School Boards Assn NSBA’s FRN Conference January 28, 2013
  2. 2. Agenda • a national overview of the CCSS • first out the gate – CCSS in Kentucky • q&a
  3. 3. The Common Core Standards are intended to be: • Aligned with college and work expectations • Focused and coherent • Include rigorous content and application of knowledge through high-order skills • Build upon strengths and lessons of current state standards • Internationally benchmarked so that all students are prepared to succeed in our global economy and society • Based on evidence and research • State led – coordinated by NGA Center and CCSSO 3SOURCE: Common Core State Standards, www.corestandards.org
  4. 4. The Common Core Standards process:• CCSSO and NGA‟s Center for Best Practices• Advisory group: Achieve, Inc.; ACT, Inc.; College Board, NASBE, and SHEEO• Two rounds of public review• Final documents released June 2010• No federal dollars for development; foundation support
  5. 5. 46 states & DC have adopted the CCSS adopted not adopted 5
  6. 6. NSBA & CCSS• supports NGA/CCSSO state-led process• supports federal funding for research and/or help to states for developing assessments• supports nationally available tests that states may adopt voluntarily• opposes federal mandates or coercion, eg. a condition for receiving Title 1 funds
  7. 7. What’s in the standards – English language arts Reading • Balance of literature and informational texts • Text complexity Writing • Emphasis on argument/informative • Writing about sources Speaking and Listening • Inclusion of formal and informal talk Language • Stress on general academic and domain-specific vocabularySOURCE: Common Core Standards, June 2010
  8. 8. What’s different? English language arts Standards for reading and writing in history/ social studies, science, and technical subjects • Complement rather than replace content standards in those subjects • Responsibility of teachers in those subjects Emphasis on research and using evidence Attention to text complexitySOURCE: Common Core Standards, June 2010
  9. 9. What’s different?Why There Should Be a Now look at the following daily schedule for a schoolLonger School Day that has switched to a longer school day.Schools should have a 8:00 Morning Announcements 8:20 Reading Language Artslonger school day for 9:30 Foreign Languagestudents. First, students 10:30 Morning Recesscould learn more about 10:45 Mathematicsdifferent subjects if the 11:45 Lunch 12:45 Historyschool day were longer. 1:45 Art or MusicAlso, students could get 2:15 Afternoon Recessextra help from teachers. 2:45 Science 3:30 Homework PreparationMore hours in class each 3:45 After-School Tutoring or Sportsday would also meanmore vacations scattered Revise the paragraph by adding details from the dailythroughout the year! schedule that help support the reasons for having a longer school day. 9SOURCE: SMARTER Balanced sample item, grade 4 writing, retrieved January 2013
  10. 10. What’s different? Score points The response: • provides appropriate and predominately specific details or evidence 2 • uses appropriate word choices for the intended audience and purpose • provides mostly general details and evidence, but may include extraneous or loosely related details 1 • has a limited and predictable vocabulary that may not be consistently appropriate for the intended audience and purpose • includes few supporting details that may be vague, repetitive, or incorrect or that may interfere with the 0 meaning of the text • has an inappropriate vocabulary for the intended audience and purpose 10SOURCE: SMARTER Balanced sample item, retrieved January 2013
  11. 11. Balance of texts percent of time on percent of time on grade level literary reading reading for information elementary 50% 50% middle school 45% 55% high school 30% 70%NAEP 2009 reading framework, recommended by common core standards, 2012
  12. 12. Balance of writing modes writing to writing to writing to grade level convey persuade explain experience elementary 30% 35% 35% middle school 35% 35% 30% high school 40% 40% 20%NAEP 2009 writing framework, recommended by common core standards, 2012
  13. 13. What’s in the standards – Mathematics • Number & quantity • Algebra - algebraic thinking K-5 • Functions • Modeling - high school • Geometry • Statistics & probability • Emphasis on Mathematical practiceSOURCE: Common Core Standards, June 2010
  14. 14. pre-calculus, calculus, advanced statistics, discrete math, advanced quantitative reasoning, specific technical POS Pathways through Algebra II Math III high school Geometry Math II mathematics Algebra I Math I Traditional sequence Integrated sequence • 2 algebra courses • 3 integrated courses • 1 geometry course • all include number, • DPS included algebra, geometry, DPS • 1 higher course • 1 higher courseSOURCE: Common Core Standards, Mathematics Appendix A, 2010
  15. 15. Before Which of the following numbers will round to 26? a) 25.3 b) 25.5 c) 26.7 d) 27.1 15SOURCE: Virginia SOL released items, grade 4 math, 2010
  16. 16. After Capacity of different baseball stadiums San Francisco Giants‟ stadium: 41,915 seats Washington Nationals‟ stadium: 41,888 seats San Diego Padres‟ stadium: 42,445 seats Jeff said, “I get the same number when I round all three numbers of seats in these stadiums.” Sara said, “When I round them, I get the same number for two of the stadiums but a different number for the other stadium.” Can Jeff and Sara both be correct? Explain how you know. 16SOURCE: The Mathematics Common Core Toolbox, grade 4
  17. 17. What’s different?• Both assess rounding• The second further requires the ability to reason mathematically, critique the reasoning of others, and communicate their own reasoning 17
  18. 18. The Common CoreState Standards 21st century assessments for CCSS
  19. 19. State CCSS assessment consortia• formed to develop common “next generation” assessments aligned to the CCSS• supported by $346 million federal grants• PARCC: Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College & Careers headed by Achieve, Inc.• SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium headed by Washington state department of education 19
  20. 20. Points of collaboration SMARTER & PARCC • working to ensure comparability of scores • developing protocols for Artificial Intelligent scoring • examining interoperable technology infrastructure • working toward same deadlines, 2014-15 20SOURCE: Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS, webinar April 4, 2011
  21. 21. 24 states & DC are in the PARCC consortium participant non participant 21
  22. 22. 28 states are in the SMARTER consortium participant non participant 22
  23. 23. Next Generation Science Standards• Collaboration of Achieve, NRC, AAAS, NSTA and 26 lead states• “Internationally benchmarked”• Second draft recently released for public review• Intended to be adopted „in whole‟• Carnegie Corp, Noyce Foundation & Dupont sponsors 23
  24. 24. What will be in the standards Science • Practices: behaviors necessary to the work of scientists & engineers • Cross-cutting concepts: the „big ideas‟, eg., patterns, scale, cause & effect, etc. • Disciplinary core ideas: physical sciences; life sciences, earth & space sciences; and engineering, technology & applications. 24SOURCE: Next Generation Science Standards, www.nextgenscience.org
  25. 25. 26 lead states – NextGeneration Science Standards participant non participant 25
  26. 26. Other assessment consortia • Alternative assessments: $67 million to Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) and National Center and State Collaboration (NCSC) – Assessments for students with “most significant cognitive impairments” • Assessments for ELL: $10.5 million to ASSETS, Assessment Services Supporting ELLs Through Technology Systems 26SOURCE: The K-12 Center at ETS, www.k12center.org
  27. 27. The Common CoreState Standards The challenges
  28. 28. Technology needs • 33 states offer some level of online testing • Most don‟t assess all students • Most are voluntary • Most are summative only • Most schools will need more computers & more bandwidth 28SOURCE: SETDA, Technology Requirements for Large Scale, Computer-Based & Online Assessment, June 2011
  29. 29. District needs• Professional development for staff• Aligned assessments & curriculum• Aligned instructional materials• Supports for students 29
  30. 30. Implementing Common CoreState Standards:The Kentucky ExperienceDavid A. Baird, Associate Executive DirectorKentucky School Boards Association
  31. 31. Changes in Kentucky’s System• Passage of Senate Bill 1 in 2009 propelled Kentucky into a new era in public education• Preparing all students for life after high school… – college and career readiness for all.• Mutual accountability for K-12 and post secondary systems 31
  32. 32. 32 Kentucky Senate Bill 1 (2009) New academic standards New assessments Program reviews Improved professional development New accountability system Unified plan for improving college/career readiness 32
  33. 33. Where Are the Jobs? 90% of fastest growing jobs require at least two (2) years of education beyond high school. 80% of all jobs require some training beyond high school. (Degrees or Industry Certificates) Nation’s colleges need to increase number of degrees by 10% per year to meet demand. Kentucky = 5,200 more graduates per year 33
  34. 34. Kentucky’s Challenge High School Graduation Rate = 76% 38 % of Kentucky’s 2011 high school graduates were College or Career Ready High remediation rate = fewer college degrees What is your state’s challenge? 34
  35. 35. Remedial Courses = Major Obstacle to College Degrees Added cost with no credits Adds time/expense to college education Result: more likely to leave w/o diploma College freshmen requiring remedial reading have 17% chance of attaining degree in 8 years 35
  36. 36. KY’s College Ready CriteriaMust meet one of the following requirements to beconsidered College Ready:  ACT (11th Grade)  English – 18  Mathematics – 19  Reading – 20  COMPASS (12th Grade)  KYOTE (12th Grade) 36
  37. 37. KY’s College Readiness System ACT’s College Readiness Benchmarks* are early indicators of likely college success based on student EXPLORE, PLAN, or ACT scores. Test Content Area EXPLORE PLAN ACT 8th 10th 11thEnglish English 13 15 18Math Algebra 17 19 19Reading Social Sciences 15 17 20Science Biology 20 21 24 * Reflects the minimum score needed on an ACT subject area test to indicate a 50% chance of obtaining a “B” or better or a 75% chance of obtaining a “C” or better in the corresponding credit-bearing college course. 37
  38. 38. KY’s Career Ready Criteria Must meet one benchmark for academic area and one for technical area. Academic: a) Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) b) ACT Work Keys (applied math, locating information and reading for information) Technical: a) Kentucky Occupational Skills Standards Assessment (KOSSA) b) Industry certificates 38
  39. 39. KY’s College/Career Readiness Strategies1. Courses/Assessments Alignment with Standards2. Transitional Interventions3. Acceleration o Project Lead the Way o Advance KY4. Persistence to Graduation –- Collection and Use of Data5. Academic and Career Advising6. Career Readiness Definition/Pathways7. Innovative Routes To Graduation8. District 180/Turnaround Low Performing Schools9. New Accountability Model 39
  40. 40.  10 years of research by Iowa Association of School Boards and NSBA Do school boards make a difference in student achievement? What are the specific board roles that impact student achievement?
  41. 41.  Set clear and high expectations Create the conditions for success Hold the system accountable Create the public will to succeed Learn as a board team
  42. 42.  Embrace the new standards! − Clearer and more rigorous − Focused on specific knowledge and skills necessary for postsecondary success Does your board understand the differences between the new and old standards?
  43. 43.  How can the board support these efforts? Effective professional development − Do teachers have sufficient time and support to learn new standards? Adequate technology
  44. 44. Monitor district’s progress toward successful implementation of the new standards What kind of reports is the board receiving? How does the superintendent’s evaluation reflect implementation of the standards? Establish relationships with key stakeholders
  45. 45.  Short term consequences Long term (mutual) benefits Engage local media in your efforts
  46. 46.  State Level Collaboration Include relevant topics on board agendas & work sessions Use multiple sources of information ⁻ Center for Public Education ⁻ Kentucky Department of Education ₋ Kentucky Educational Television ₋ Prichard Committee – “Ready Kentucky” ₋ Kentucky PTA
  47. 47.  Partnerships with state agencies and organizations (accurate/timely/consistent information) Whole board training modules Statewide training opportunities Facilitation of community discussions
  48. 48. A role for the federal government• professional development and technical assistance through SEAs, regional centers or district consortia• funds for technology to support new assessments• research on what works in common core implementation
  49. 49. If You Want to Learn MoreDavid A. Baird, associate executive director, KSBAdavid.baird@ksba.orgwww.ksba.orgPatte Barth, director, NSBA‟s Center for Public Educationpbarth@nsba.orgwww.centerforpubliceducation.orgwww.data-first.orgCommon Core State Standardswww.corestandards.org
  50. 50. Watch this space Stay up to date about progress in common core implementation and policy www.centerforpubliceducation.org/commoncoreDownload videos, presentationsand other data resourceswww.data-first.org/learning-center

×