Science in the Open


Published on

Thirty minute talk given at the fourth Portugese Open Access Meeting in Braga in late 2009. This talk draws from previous similar talks focussing on advocacy for open data and how to make it work for researchers on the ground.

Published in: Technology, Business
1 Comment
No Downloads
Total views
On SlideShare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Science in the Open

  1. Science in the open What can be done? What should be done?
  2. Science in the open What can be done? What should be d? a done? it le m ig ht he re nd w A
  3. About me.
  4. I live in Bath
  5. I work at RAL
  6. I work for STFC...
  7. But The opinions expressed in this talk are the personal views of the speaker given as a private citizen and should not unders any circumstances be taken of as indicative of STFC, RCUK, or government policy or of any discussions within these organizations of future policy....
  8. I get up in the morning
  9. ...and catch a train
  10. ...and a bus
  11. get to work
  12. I work on... Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Commons Succinate_Dehydrogenase_1YQ3_and_Membrane.png MGMT BDNA_1T38.png
  13. ...and get to do cool stuff
  14. Mixture of small-lab work...
  15. ...and big facility experiments
  16. Lots of reading...
  17. ...meetings...
  18. ...too much travel...
  19. Why?
  20. Why do they pay?
  21. Why do they pay? CC-BY-SA
  22. Why do they pay? w e CC-BY-SA
  23. Cures...
  24. Prestige... CC-BY-SA
  25. ...excitement
  26. Why do I do it?
  27. Mortgage... CC-BY
  28. ...curiosity...
  29. Fun!
  30. This is a privilege.
  31. Not a right.
  33. But how?
  34. But sometimes...
  35. ...formal publication
  36. overkill...
  37. An example
  38. 9:00 am, 4 September 2008
  39. Flickr tag: UC207
  40. 7:36  pm,  4  September  2008
  41. Publishing is easy...
  42., documents, media...
  43. Broadcasting is easy...
  44. ...sharing is harder
  45. Interoperability is the key...
  46. Technical interoperability... ...formats, vocabularies
  47. Legal interoperability...
  48. Legal interoperability...
  49. Legal interoperability...
  50. Technical Legal interop. interop. Process interoperability
  51. Systems need to work with existing process
  52. ...and people
  53. A short story...
  54. MyTea project: A fully semantic laboratory record for chemistry
  55. But not molecular biology
  56. General MyTea Specific Unstructured Structured
  57. General ? MyTea Specific Unstructured Structured
  58. General Blogs ? MyTea Specific Unstructured Structured
  59. A recipe for chaos?
  60. Yes to start with...
  61. But then something interesting happened...
  62. Templates Metadata
  63. Self assembling ontology? Sequence ontology: SO:0000696 “oligo” SO:0000155 “plasmid” ...but... SO:0000006 “PCR product” or SO:0000412 “rest. fragment”?
  64. Capture first...
  65. Dionaea muscipula Musca domestica chomped on ...then add structure
  66. Map our process onto agreed vocabularies
  67. ...when we tell the story
  68. Machines do structure
  69. Machines need structure
  70. ....humans tell stories
  71. Tools that capture the pieces of the research record as we create them
  72. Tools that capture structure as we choose the pieces for our narrative
  73. Tools that exploit structure that is already in the process
  74. What can we do?
  75. Technically able to share
  76. ...the whole record
  77. ...but will we want to share?
  78. No.
  79. The mainstream response looks like
  81. ...or...
  83. ...leading to a lot of...
  85. How do we persuade?
  86. Actually I’m not worried...
  87. Submissions to Genbank 100,000,000,000 75,000,000,000 50,000,000,000 25,000,000,000 0 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006
  88. Average Capacity of Human Scientist 5.00 3.75 2.50 1.25 0 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006
  89. The human scientist (that’s me) Does. Not. Scale.
  90. The web scales
  91. Government doesn’t scale
  92. ...research groups don’t scale
  93. The web scales
  94. Scientists will need to be web-native just to survive
  95. Web native means connected Bollen J, Van de Sompel H, Hagberg A, Bettencourt L, Chute R, et al. (2009) Clickstream Data Yields High- Resolution Maps of Science. PLoS ONE 4(3): e4803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004803
  96. which means sharing...
  97. “I propose the seeming paradox that in science, private property is established by having its substance freely given to others who might want to make use of it.” Merton (1988) ISIS 79:606
  98. Not just papers
  99. And if the objects are not open and available?
  100. Open content builds the network
  101. The network is the only way we will keep up
  102. If we build tools that help scientists build networks...
  103. … then (more) open research will follow
  104. Twitter: @cameronneylon Friendfeed: cameronneylon Thanks to: Text Sciencetwists, Friendfeeders, and the wider online community for ideas, criticism, and conversations. Deepak Singh, Larry Lessig, Andy Powell, and John Wilbanks for presentation inspiration. Flickr and Wikimedia Commons for images