Different participatory approaches in the
VBDC: different visions of participation?
Daré W.
Final Science Meeting, CPWF, O...
Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta
A participatory program but a unique vision of participation?
 V1- Parti...
Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta
Design a common grid of analysis of our participatory
approaches : the el...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Different participatory approaches in the Volta Basin Development Challenge: different visions of participation?

278 views

Published on

by W. Daré
Presented at the Final Volta Basin Development Challenge Science Workshop, September 2013

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
278
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Different participatory approaches in the Volta Basin Development Challenge: different visions of participation?

  1. 1. Different participatory approaches in the VBDC: different visions of participation? Daré W. Final Science Meeting, CPWF, Ouagadougou, 17-19 september 2013
  2. 2. Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta A participatory program but a unique vision of participation?  V1- Participatory GIS  V2- Action research through Innovation Platforms (IP)  V3- Participatory diagnosis and modeling of small reservoirs management options  V4-Multi –Stakeholder Platforms (MSP) for collective decision- making over water resources in GH and for operationalization of a CLE in BF
  3. 3. Andes • Ganges • Limpopo • Mekong • Nile • Volta Design a common grid of analysis of our participatory approaches : the elements to be considered  The overall objective of the participatory process  The transparency in the introduction of this objective to participants  The main steps of the participatory process • Selection of the participants : - Who are the participants? Target population, beneficiaries, partners of the project? Which status? - Why were they chosen? - By Who? • Tools to support the interactions: degree of liberty • Degree of involvement of participants (Pretty grid)

×