Advertisement
Determinants of adoption and successful use of agricultural water management technologies: Case of Ethiopia
Upcoming SlideShare
Climate Smart Agriculture -ASB World Bank PresentationClimate Smart Agriculture -ASB World Bank Presentation
Loading in ... 3
1 of 1
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Determinants of adoption and successful use of agricultural water management technologies: Case of Ethiopia(20)

More from International Water Management Institute (IWMI)(20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded(20)

Determinants of adoption and successful use of agricultural water management technologies: Case of Ethiopia

  1. Determinants of Adoption and Successful use of Agricultural  Determinants of Adoption and Successful use of Agricultural f d d f l f l l Water Management Technologies: Case of Ethiopia Water Management T h l gi C W t M g t Technologies: Case of Ethi pi f Ethiopia Hagos, F., Awulachew, S. B., Erkossa, T. and Yilma, A.D. Hagos F Awulachew S B Erkossa T and Yilma A D Introduction I t d ti Study site Study it St dy site • Remains unclear whether such Remains unclear whether such  technologies lend themselves easily to  technologies lend themselves easily to adoption and how successfully such  adoption and how successfully such d ti dh f ll h technologies are utilized by smallholder  technologies are utilized b smallholder h l i ili d by llh ld farmers.  farmers • The objectives of this study are: The objectives of this study are:  h bj i f hi d – t assess th economics of to assess the economics of  to the i f water controls; to understand  water controls; to understand l d d the factors that influence  the factors that influence adoption and successful use.  adoption and successful use p Conclusions l i Objectives  Objectives b • All water control structures are fi All water control structures are financially  t t l t t financially i ll viable; the main issue is institutionalizing  viable; the main issue is institutionalizing ; g cost recovery.  cost recoveryy • The marginal productivities of farm inputs The marginal productivities of farm inputs  is positive is positive p • Ad ti and successful use is i fl Adoption and successful use is influenced  Adoption d f l i influenced d by socio‐economic, environmental and  by socio economic, environmental and y institutional factors. institutional factors Analytical approach Analytical approach ly i l pp h Recommendations • increase/expand extension coverage increase/expand extension coverage  / p g • Net Present Values Net Present Values  including FTCs  is necessary. including FTCs is necessary g y • St h ti f ti analysis ‐ C Stochastic frontier analysis  C‐ Stochastic frontier l i • Improved market access conditions such as Improved market access conditions such as  Douglas production function  Douglas production function improved access roads, transportation and  improved access roads, transportation and p p • E i Estimation of MVPs  Estimation of MVP i f MVPs storage facilities  storage facilities g • Probit model and model and • Promoting educational access can enhance Promoting educational access  can enhance  g the use of these technologies . the use of these technologiesg • Heckman and Deaton models Heckman and Deaton models Increasing the land area allotted to irrigated  Increasing the l d area allotted to irrigated h land ll d d annuals and increased supply of seeds and  annuals and i l d increased supply of seeds and d l f d d accessories is required. accessories is required required. Choice of specific technologies that increase  Choice of specific technologies that increase p g water availability has a lot of bearing in the  water availability has a lot of bearing in the y g www.iwmi.org www iwmi org success of AWMTs.  success of AWMT f AWMTs
Advertisement