Fare Adjustment Public Meeting

COTA BUS
COTA BUSPublic Transportation in Central Ohio
Proposed Fare Adjustments Public
Meetings
October 17, 2017 12 noon
October 18, 2017 12 noon & 6pm
October 19, 2017 6pm
2
MEETING PURPOSE
Thank you for joining us and participating in this community
discussion.
The purpose of this meeting is to take public comments
and answer questions on proposed fare adjustments that
would be effective on Monday, January 1, 2018. No final
decisions have been made.
3
MEETING FORMAT
Be considerate of meeting attendees and COTA staff.
Please silence cell phones.
We welcome questions at the end of the presentation.
• Please raise your hand, so that we may call on you.
• Ask one question at a time.
• Questions and comments are limited to two (2)
minutes per person.
Participants are encouraged to complete comment cards.
Please print clearly.
4
COTA FARE POLICY
• COTA has a responsibility to operate with and manage taxpayer
funds in a prudent and sound manner.
• A system-wide fare recovery goal of 20% was adopted in 2009.
• As described in COTA’s Long Range Transit Plan, fares are
evaluated every three years.
• COTA fares were last adjusted on January 1, 2012.
• The increase proposed for 2015 was not adopted.
• COTA will conduct a public information and comment process prior
to recommending fare adjustments to the Board of Trustees.
Full policies available at COTA.com/policies/fare-change-policy
5
COTA STAKEHOLDERS
Taxpayers
COTA’s Service Area population
1.3 million
Customers
60,000 weekday trips
18 million annual trips
Employees
Approximately 1,000
COTA Management
FARE ANALYSIS
7
FARE ANALYSIS
• An independent evaluation of COTA’s current fare structure was
completed, including a peer agency comparative analysis.
• Preliminary fare structure options have been identified.
• Next steps:
• Consider input from the public
• Identify structures to be evaluated based on Board and staff input
• Evaluate potential ridership and revenue impacts
• Refine alternatives
• Perform a Title VI analysis
• Make a recommendation to the Board of Trustees
8
SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT EVALUATION
• COTA’s fare structure is in the general range of its peer transit
agencies, in terms of:
• Fares related to class of service – Frequent/Standard; Rush Hour;
Mainstream
• Transfer availability and validity
• Methods of payments
• Special fares
• Fare media
• The target fare recovery rate of 20% is within the range of 15%-30%
for our peer transit agencies. Much of this range is due to local
financial or policy choices, rather than specific system characteristics.
• COTA’s pass program is broadly representative of its peers and is
appropriate to its size.
9
HISTORY OF COTA’S LOCAL BUS BASE CASH FARE
$0.50
$0.74
$1.26
$1.38
$1.59
$1.80
$2.04
$2.21
$2.33
$2.48
$0.50
$0.60
$0.75
$1.00
$1.10
$1.25
$1.50
$1.75
$2.00
$0.00
$0.50
$1.00
$1.50
$2.00
$2.50
$3.00
Local Fare Inflated from 1974 Nominal Local Fare
10
FARE STRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS
• Flatten the structure
• Fewer distinct classes of service, as a result of service changes (TSR)
and new services (CMAX Bus Rapid Transit)
• Reduce potential for customers paying more for a trip because of their
choice of fare media (cash or pass)
• Take advantage of and stay within the capabilities of the new fare
collection system
• Future-proof for planned transition to mobile application payment and
“tap-on” smartcards
11
FARE LEVEL CONSIDERATIONS
• Ensure that transit users pay a fair and reasonable portion of the
total cost of providing transit service (goal of 80 percent taxpayer
support / 20 percent farebox recovery from customers)
• Maintain affordability for customers
• Cover the costs associated with providing service and continuing
service growth and improvements
• Match fares and farebox recovery rates with peer and other Ohio
transit agencies
• Apply adjustments uniformly across the entire fare structure, as
practicable
12
FAREBOX RECOVERY RATES* IN PEER AND OHIO CITIES (2015)
COTA Peers and Ohio Systems
(2016)
Other Similar Systems
(2016)
Cincinnati 33.6%
Buffalo 32.7%
Orlando 29.7%
Milwaukee 27.3%
Charlotte 25.9%
Toledo 24.9%
Providence 22.1%
Cleveland 21.3%
Hartford 20.7%
Indianapolis 18.9%
Columbus (2017 Projection - 14.2%) 18.8%
Louisville 18.5%
Dayton 18.1%
Jacksonville 15.4%
Average without COTA 23.8%
Median without COTA 22.1%
Rochester 35.8%
Broward 31.4%
Tampa 23.5%
Tucson 20.9%
Columbus (2017 Projection - 14.2%) 18.8%
Norfolk 18.6%
Average without COTA 26.0%
Weighted average without COTA 24.3%
* For directly operated buses, not including paratransit services
13
LOCAL BUS FARES FOR COTA PEERS AND OHIO TRANSIT SYSTEMS
City Base Fare Differences (fleet, size, ridership
and service)
Cleveland $2.50 (free transfer) Larger and multimodal
Milwaukee $2.25 (cash, no transfer) –
$1.75 (smart card, free transfer)
Higher service intensity
Buffalo $2.00 (no transfer) Multimodal and lower service intensity
Providence $2.00 + $1.00 transfer Lower service intensity
Columbus $2.00 (free transfer)
Orlando $2.00 (free transfer) More boardings and longer trips
Indianapolis $1.75 (no transfer) Smaller
Cincinnati $1.75 + $0.50 transfer + $0.90
outside city
Dayton $1.75 + $0.25 transfer Smaller
Hartford $1.75 (free transfer) Lower service intensity
Jacksonville $1.50 (no transfer) Smaller and longer trips
Akron $1.25 (free transfer) Smaller
Toledo $1.25 (free transfer) Smaller
14
FARE ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS
• A general fare increase is overdue in terms of both timing and cost
recovery
• COTA’s fare recovery is now at the low end of the range for peers and
similar systems
• Increases in service since 2011 have not been met with corresponding
demand growth
• It is too early to gauge the demand effects of the Transit System
Redesign (TSR), but if projections are realized, cost recovery will be
below goal (about 14%)
• Attention should focus on preventing further loss in fare recovery and
on achieving goals for the structure (e.g. flattening and future-proofing)
FARE ANALYSIS
16
PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
Goals:
• Maintain planned service levels
• Improve systemwide fare recovery from the estimated 14.2% for
2017
Options:
• Option 1: Target for a 20% system-wide fare recovery, per 2009
board policy
• Option 2: Target for an 18% system-wide fare recovery, based on
taxpayers’ share of operating costs of 82 percent
17
PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
Features Proposed for All Options
• Guaranteed Lowest Fare
Similar to a frequency-based discount, this would guarantee riders the
lowest fare for which they are eligible based on the extent of the usage of
their fare cards.
For example, if a day pass is $5 and the rider has paid $5 in fares within a 24 hour period, the rider
would not pay a fare for additional trips taken in the remainder of the 24 hour period.
• End Express Upcharge
This would “flatten” COTA’s fare schedule and make all bus fares consistent
across all express (Rush Hour) and local (Frequent/Standard) lines.
• 2-Hour Round Trip Ticket
This would allow a customer to pay one fare for a 2-hour period, making all
transfers free including round trips.
18
PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
*The AirConnect fares listed are the on-board cash fares. Passes will be accepted at their normal rate.
** Transfers will be valid in all vehicles for 2 hours regardless of direction of travel.
Fare Structure Current
Option 1
Est. 20%
Fare Recovery
Option 2
Est. 18%
Fare Recovery
Single Fares
Standard & Frequent $2.00 $2.75 $2.50
Rush Hour (Express) $2.75 $2.75 $2.50
AirConnect* $2.75 $2.75 $5.50
Transfer** Free Free Free
CBUS Free Free Free
Senior, Child, Key $1.00 $1.35 $1.25
ADA Card Free Free Free
Passes
31-day Standard & Frequent $62.00 $86.00 $82.00
31-day Rush Hour $85.00 $86.00 $82.00
31- day Senior, Child, Key $31.00 $43.00 $41.00
7-Day Standard & Frequent $25.00 $34.00 $31.00
Standard & Frequent Day $4.50 $6.25 $5.50
Discount Day Pass $2.25 $3.00 $2.75
Mobility Services
ADA Mainstream $3.50 $4.75 $4.50
ADA Mainstream Monthly $105.00 $146.00 $135.00
Non-ADA Service $5.00 $7.00 $6.00
19
Fare Structure Current
Option 1
Est. 20%
Fare Recovery
Single Fares
Standard & Frequent $2.00 $2.75
Rush Hour (Express) $2.75 $2.75
AirConnect* $2.75 $2.75
Transfer** Free Free
CBUS Free Free
Senior, Child, Key $1.00 $1.35
ADA Card Free Free
Passes
31-day Standard & Frequent $62.00 $86.00
31-day Rush Hour $85.00 $86.00
31- day Senior, Child, Key $31.00 $43.00
7-Day Standard & Frequent $25.00 $34.00
Standard & Frequent Day $4.50 $6.25
Discount Day Pass $2.25 $3.00
Mobility Services
ADA Mainstream $3.50 $4.75
ADA Mainstream Monthly $105.00 $146.00
Non-ADA Service $5.00 $7.00
*The AirConnect fares listed are the on-board cash fares. Passes will be accepted at their normal rate.
** Transfers will be valid in all vehicles for 2 hours regardless of direction of travel.
PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
20
Fare Structure Current
Option 1
Est. 20%
Fare Recovery
Option 2
Est. 18%
Fare Recovery
Single Fares
Standard & Frequent $2.00 $2.75 $2.50
Rush Hour (Express) $2.75 $2.75 $2.50
AirConnect* $2.75 $2.75 $5.50
Transfer** Free Free Free
CBUS Free Free Free
Senior, Child, Key $1.00 $1.35 $1.25
ADA Card Free Free Free
Passes
31-day Standard & Frequent $62.00 $86.00 $82.00
31-day Rush Hour $85.00 $86.00 $82.00
31- day Senior, Child, Key $31.00 $43.00 $41.00
7-Day Standard & Frequent $25.00 $34.00 $31.00
Standard & Frequent Day $4.50 $6.25 $5.50
Discount Day Pass $2.25 $3.00 $2.75
Mobility Services
ADA Mainstream $3.50 $4.75 $4.50
ADA Mainstream Monthly $105.00 $146.00 $135.00
Non-ADA Service $5.00 $7.00 $6.00
PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
*The AirConnect fares listed are the on-board cash fares. Passes will be accepted at their normal rate.
** Transfers will be valid in all vehicles for 2 hours regardless of direction of travel.
21
FARE STRUCTURE CHANGE ACTIVITIES
Oct. 3 - Nov. 3: Public Comment Period – accept and consider
public input
Oct. 17 - 19: Public Meetings on fare structure alternatives
Oct. 19: Board Finance Committee – summarize preliminary public
input and discuss options in greater detail
Oct. 25: Board of Trustees – provide summary of public input and
discussion of Finance Committee
Nov. 8: Board Finance Committee – Present public input results and
discuss recommendations to full Board
Nov. 15: COTA Board of Trustees – present Finance Committee
recommendations and approve 2018 fare structure
Jan. 1: Implement new fare structure
22
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (OCT 3 – NOV 3)
How to offer comments:
• Comment cards at public meetings
• Call (614) 228-1776
• Online contact form at COTA.com/contact
• Facebook: Post on COTABus profile
• Twitter: Tweet at @COTABus
• Write to us at:
Central Ohio Transit Authority
Attention: Fare Adjustment Public Comments
33 N. High St.
Columbus, OH 43215
QUESTIONS?
Thank you for joining us!
1 of 23

Recommended

Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External Costs by
Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External CostsPricing Freight Transport to Account for External Costs
Pricing Freight Transport to Account for External CostsCongressional Budget Office
4.9K views18 slides
Proposed* Fare Adjustment - Public Meeting by
Proposed* Fare Adjustment - Public MeetingProposed* Fare Adjustment - Public Meeting
Proposed* Fare Adjustment - Public MeetingCOTA BUS
1.3K views13 slides
Rpo america map-21_update by
Rpo america map-21_updateRpo america map-21_update
Rpo america map-21_updateRPO America
330 views25 slides
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018) by
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)
Financing Regional Rail by Michael Burrill of Grow Smart Planet (April 2018)Michael Burrill
309 views20 slides
Financing Regional Rail by
Financing Regional RailFinancing Regional Rail
Financing Regional RailJane Evans
90 views20 slides
Mobility Pricing: How to Harness Mobility Pricing to Reduce Congestion, Promo... by
Mobility Pricing: How to Harness Mobility Pricing to Reduce Congestion, Promo...Mobility Pricing: How to Harness Mobility Pricing to Reduce Congestion, Promo...
Mobility Pricing: How to Harness Mobility Pricing to Reduce Congestion, Promo...WSP
229 views24 slides

More Related Content

Similar to Fare Adjustment Public Meeting

dr. cal by
dr. caldr. cal
dr. calPrimum Nocere
388 views93 slides
Robert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee Report by
Robert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee ReportRobert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee Report
Robert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee ReportRobert Hiett
54 views28 slides
Caltrain_Equity_522 by
Caltrain_Equity_522Caltrain_Equity_522
Caltrain_Equity_522Adina Levin
219 views30 slides
Msw .. a frank analysis by
Msw .. a frank analysisMsw .. a frank analysis
Msw .. a frank analysisTapas Ghatak
285 views19 slides
The economic basis of major transport decisions by
The economic basis of major transport decisionsThe economic basis of major transport decisions
The economic basis of major transport decisionsInstitute for Transport Studies (ITS)
1.1K views38 slides
Policy conundrums in urban transport by
Policy conundrums in urban transportPolicy conundrums in urban transport
Policy conundrums in urban transportTristan Wiggill
426 views25 slides

Similar to Fare Adjustment Public Meeting(20)

Robert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee Report by Robert Hiett
Robert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee ReportRobert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee Report
Robert Hiett - Georgia Transit Association Joint Committee Report
Robert Hiett54 views
Caltrain_Equity_522 by Adina Levin
Caltrain_Equity_522Caltrain_Equity_522
Caltrain_Equity_522
Adina Levin219 views
Msw .. a frank analysis by Tapas Ghatak
Msw .. a frank analysisMsw .. a frank analysis
Msw .. a frank analysis
Tapas Ghatak285 views
Policy conundrums in urban transport by Tristan Wiggill
Policy conundrums in urban transportPolicy conundrums in urban transport
Policy conundrums in urban transport
Tristan Wiggill426 views
6 MTC means based_fare_study_update by Adina Levin
6 MTC means based_fare_study_update6 MTC means based_fare_study_update
6 MTC means based_fare_study_update
Adina Levin1.3K views
Cleveland sustainable transportation pass (cstp) by kevin mulhall jr
Cleveland sustainable transportation pass (cstp)Cleveland sustainable transportation pass (cstp)
Cleveland sustainable transportation pass (cstp)
kevin mulhall jr238 views
Congestion management process presentation updated by pyoungkyova
Congestion management process presentation updatedCongestion management process presentation updated
Congestion management process presentation updated
pyoungkyova1K views
NYC Congestion Pricing Scenario Comparisons by streetsblog
NYC Congestion Pricing Scenario ComparisonsNYC Congestion Pricing Scenario Comparisons
NYC Congestion Pricing Scenario Comparisons
streetsblog553 views
Feedback on DRiVE: Distance-based Road user charge Voluntary Experiment by Tristan Wiggill
Feedback on DRiVE: Distance-based Road user charge Voluntary ExperimentFeedback on DRiVE: Distance-based Road user charge Voluntary Experiment
Feedback on DRiVE: Distance-based Road user charge Voluntary Experiment
Tristan Wiggill191 views
DS-16-128 Transportation Utility Fee by CityofKilleen
DS-16-128 Transportation Utility FeeDS-16-128 Transportation Utility Fee
DS-16-128 Transportation Utility Fee
CityofKilleen86 views
Transantiago by BRTCoE
TransantiagoTransantiago
Transantiago
BRTCoE1.3K views
Johnson gilmer presentation by RPO America
Johnson gilmer presentationJohnson gilmer presentation
Johnson gilmer presentation
RPO America421 views
BRT Chennai by edsley
BRT ChennaiBRT Chennai
BRT Chennai
edsley 1.5K views

More from COTA BUS

COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17 by
COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17
COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17COTA BUS
822 views32 slides
September Service Change Public Comment Meetings by
September Service Change Public Comment MeetingsSeptember Service Change Public Comment Meetings
September Service Change Public Comment MeetingsCOTA BUS
684 views27 slides
May 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting by
May 2018 Service Change Public Info MeetingMay 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting
May 2018 Service Change Public Info MeetingCOTA BUS
861 views22 slides
May 2018 Public Comment Meeting Presentation by
May 2018 Public Comment Meeting PresentationMay 2018 Public Comment Meeting Presentation
May 2018 Public Comment Meeting PresentationCOTA BUS
785 views18 slides
Dec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - final by
Dec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - finalDec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - final
Dec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - finalCOTA BUS
515 views22 slides
January 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting by
January 2018 Service Change Public Info MeetingJanuary 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting
January 2018 Service Change Public Info MeetingCOTA BUS
678 views22 slides

More from COTA BUS(20)

COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17 by COTA BUS
COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17
COTA Public Comment Meeting-Jan. 17
COTA BUS822 views
September Service Change Public Comment Meetings by COTA BUS
September Service Change Public Comment MeetingsSeptember Service Change Public Comment Meetings
September Service Change Public Comment Meetings
COTA BUS684 views
May 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting by COTA BUS
May 2018 Service Change Public Info MeetingMay 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting
May 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting
COTA BUS861 views
May 2018 Public Comment Meeting Presentation by COTA BUS
May 2018 Public Comment Meeting PresentationMay 2018 Public Comment Meeting Presentation
May 2018 Public Comment Meeting Presentation
COTA BUS785 views
Dec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - final by COTA BUS
Dec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - finalDec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - final
Dec 7 12_2017_public_mtg - final
COTA BUS515 views
January 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting by COTA BUS
January 2018 Service Change Public Info MeetingJanuary 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting
January 2018 Service Change Public Info Meeting
COTA BUS678 views
Public Comment Meeting-January 2018 Proposed Service Change by COTA BUS
Public Comment Meeting-January 2018 Proposed Service ChangePublic Comment Meeting-January 2018 Proposed Service Change
Public Comment Meeting-January 2018 Proposed Service Change
COTA BUS2.1K views
COTA NextGen-Executive Summary by COTA BUS
COTA NextGen-Executive SummaryCOTA NextGen-Executive Summary
COTA NextGen-Executive Summary
COTA BUS311 views
Public Information Meeting-August 2017 by COTA BUS
Public Information Meeting-August 2017Public Information Meeting-August 2017
Public Information Meeting-August 2017
COTA BUS1.7K views
COTA NextGen-Executive Summary by COTA BUS
COTA NextGen-Executive SummaryCOTA NextGen-Executive Summary
COTA NextGen-Executive Summary
COTA BUS503 views
Public Comment Meeting-September 2017 Proposed Service Changes by COTA BUS
Public Comment Meeting-September 2017 Proposed Service ChangesPublic Comment Meeting-September 2017 Proposed Service Changes
Public Comment Meeting-September 2017 Proposed Service Changes
COTA BUS1.9K views
COTA NextGen-Phase II Public Forum by COTA BUS
COTA NextGen-Phase II Public ForumCOTA NextGen-Phase II Public Forum
COTA NextGen-Phase II Public Forum
COTA BUS219 views
January 2017 Service Changes by COTA BUS
January 2017 Service ChangesJanuary 2017 Service Changes
January 2017 Service Changes
COTA BUS8.4K views
CMAX Public Art by COTA BUS
CMAX Public ArtCMAX Public Art
CMAX Public Art
COTA BUS705 views
Open House Boards by COTA BUS
Open House BoardsOpen House Boards
Open House Boards
COTA BUS239 views
January 2017 Public Comment Meetings by COTA BUS
January 2017 Public Comment MeetingsJanuary 2017 Public Comment Meetings
January 2017 Public Comment Meetings
COTA BUS1.8K views
September Information Meetings by COTA BUS
September Information MeetingsSeptember Information Meetings
September Information Meetings
COTA BUS1.6K views
September Proposed Changes Comment Meetings by COTA BUS
September Proposed Changes Comment MeetingsSeptember Proposed Changes Comment Meetings
September Proposed Changes Comment Meetings
COTA BUS1.6K views
May 2016 Public Information Meeting by COTA BUS
May 2016 Public Information MeetingMay 2016 Public Information Meeting
May 2016 Public Information Meeting
COTA BUS1.7K views
May 2016 Service Change Public Comment Meeting by COTA BUS
May 2016 Service Change Public Comment MeetingMay 2016 Service Change Public Comment Meeting
May 2016 Service Change Public Comment Meeting
COTA BUS2.1K views

Recently uploaded

PPT - SIGMA-GIZ Academies - Topic 4 - Ukraine - Human rights and society.pdf by
PPT - SIGMA-GIZ Academies - Topic 4 - Ukraine - Human rights and society.pdfPPT - SIGMA-GIZ Academies - Topic 4 - Ukraine - Human rights and society.pdf
PPT - SIGMA-GIZ Academies - Topic 4 - Ukraine - Human rights and society.pdfSupport for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA
48 views16 slides
E-Gov, by Emir Ramadanovic (bih) - SIGMA Webinars on service design and deliv... by
E-Gov, by Emir Ramadanovic (bih) - SIGMA Webinars on service design and deliv...E-Gov, by Emir Ramadanovic (bih) - SIGMA Webinars on service design and deliv...
E-Gov, by Emir Ramadanovic (bih) - SIGMA Webinars on service design and deliv...Support for Improvement in Governance and Management SIGMA
5 views11 slides
Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective by
 Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective
Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council PerspectiveScribe
29 views41 slides
Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023 by
Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023
Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023ILCUK
32 views13 slides
Prof. George B. Ploubidis - Future of Ageing by
Prof. George B. Ploubidis - Future of AgeingProf. George B. Ploubidis - Future of Ageing
Prof. George B. Ploubidis - Future of AgeingILCUK
27 views27 slides

Recently uploaded(20)

Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective by Scribe
 Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective
Assets of Community Value: From a Local Council Perspective
Scribe 29 views
Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023 by ILCUK
Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023
Professor Stephen Harridge and Tom Addison - Future of Ageing 2023
ILCUK32 views
Prof. George B. Ploubidis - Future of Ageing by ILCUK
Prof. George B. Ploubidis - Future of AgeingProf. George B. Ploubidis - Future of Ageing
Prof. George B. Ploubidis - Future of Ageing
ILCUK27 views
COP 28 GHANA DELEGATES.docx by Kweku Zurek
COP 28 GHANA DELEGATES.docxCOP 28 GHANA DELEGATES.docx
COP 28 GHANA DELEGATES.docx
Kweku Zurek6.8K views
Project Nexus Regional Rail by Lee Haber
Project Nexus Regional RailProject Nexus Regional Rail
Project Nexus Regional Rail
Lee Haber7 views
MMF Newsletter March 2022.pdf by mmpcofficial
MMF Newsletter March 2022.pdfMMF Newsletter March 2022.pdf
MMF Newsletter March 2022.pdf
mmpcofficial22 views
Andreas Schleicher Global Launch of PISA - Presentation - 5 December 2023 by EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher Global Launch of PISA - Presentation - 5 December 2023Andreas Schleicher Global Launch of PISA - Presentation - 5 December 2023
Andreas Schleicher Global Launch of PISA - Presentation - 5 December 2023
EduSkills OECD90 views

Fare Adjustment Public Meeting

  • 1. Proposed Fare Adjustments Public Meetings October 17, 2017 12 noon October 18, 2017 12 noon & 6pm October 19, 2017 6pm
  • 2. 2 MEETING PURPOSE Thank you for joining us and participating in this community discussion. The purpose of this meeting is to take public comments and answer questions on proposed fare adjustments that would be effective on Monday, January 1, 2018. No final decisions have been made.
  • 3. 3 MEETING FORMAT Be considerate of meeting attendees and COTA staff. Please silence cell phones. We welcome questions at the end of the presentation. • Please raise your hand, so that we may call on you. • Ask one question at a time. • Questions and comments are limited to two (2) minutes per person. Participants are encouraged to complete comment cards. Please print clearly.
  • 4. 4 COTA FARE POLICY • COTA has a responsibility to operate with and manage taxpayer funds in a prudent and sound manner. • A system-wide fare recovery goal of 20% was adopted in 2009. • As described in COTA’s Long Range Transit Plan, fares are evaluated every three years. • COTA fares were last adjusted on January 1, 2012. • The increase proposed for 2015 was not adopted. • COTA will conduct a public information and comment process prior to recommending fare adjustments to the Board of Trustees. Full policies available at COTA.com/policies/fare-change-policy
  • 5. 5 COTA STAKEHOLDERS Taxpayers COTA’s Service Area population 1.3 million Customers 60,000 weekday trips 18 million annual trips Employees Approximately 1,000 COTA Management
  • 7. 7 FARE ANALYSIS • An independent evaluation of COTA’s current fare structure was completed, including a peer agency comparative analysis. • Preliminary fare structure options have been identified. • Next steps: • Consider input from the public • Identify structures to be evaluated based on Board and staff input • Evaluate potential ridership and revenue impacts • Refine alternatives • Perform a Title VI analysis • Make a recommendation to the Board of Trustees
  • 8. 8 SUMMARY OF INDEPENDENT EVALUATION • COTA’s fare structure is in the general range of its peer transit agencies, in terms of: • Fares related to class of service – Frequent/Standard; Rush Hour; Mainstream • Transfer availability and validity • Methods of payments • Special fares • Fare media • The target fare recovery rate of 20% is within the range of 15%-30% for our peer transit agencies. Much of this range is due to local financial or policy choices, rather than specific system characteristics. • COTA’s pass program is broadly representative of its peers and is appropriate to its size.
  • 9. 9 HISTORY OF COTA’S LOCAL BUS BASE CASH FARE $0.50 $0.74 $1.26 $1.38 $1.59 $1.80 $2.04 $2.21 $2.33 $2.48 $0.50 $0.60 $0.75 $1.00 $1.10 $1.25 $1.50 $1.75 $2.00 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 Local Fare Inflated from 1974 Nominal Local Fare
  • 10. 10 FARE STRUCTURE CONSIDERATIONS • Flatten the structure • Fewer distinct classes of service, as a result of service changes (TSR) and new services (CMAX Bus Rapid Transit) • Reduce potential for customers paying more for a trip because of their choice of fare media (cash or pass) • Take advantage of and stay within the capabilities of the new fare collection system • Future-proof for planned transition to mobile application payment and “tap-on” smartcards
  • 11. 11 FARE LEVEL CONSIDERATIONS • Ensure that transit users pay a fair and reasonable portion of the total cost of providing transit service (goal of 80 percent taxpayer support / 20 percent farebox recovery from customers) • Maintain affordability for customers • Cover the costs associated with providing service and continuing service growth and improvements • Match fares and farebox recovery rates with peer and other Ohio transit agencies • Apply adjustments uniformly across the entire fare structure, as practicable
  • 12. 12 FAREBOX RECOVERY RATES* IN PEER AND OHIO CITIES (2015) COTA Peers and Ohio Systems (2016) Other Similar Systems (2016) Cincinnati 33.6% Buffalo 32.7% Orlando 29.7% Milwaukee 27.3% Charlotte 25.9% Toledo 24.9% Providence 22.1% Cleveland 21.3% Hartford 20.7% Indianapolis 18.9% Columbus (2017 Projection - 14.2%) 18.8% Louisville 18.5% Dayton 18.1% Jacksonville 15.4% Average without COTA 23.8% Median without COTA 22.1% Rochester 35.8% Broward 31.4% Tampa 23.5% Tucson 20.9% Columbus (2017 Projection - 14.2%) 18.8% Norfolk 18.6% Average without COTA 26.0% Weighted average without COTA 24.3% * For directly operated buses, not including paratransit services
  • 13. 13 LOCAL BUS FARES FOR COTA PEERS AND OHIO TRANSIT SYSTEMS City Base Fare Differences (fleet, size, ridership and service) Cleveland $2.50 (free transfer) Larger and multimodal Milwaukee $2.25 (cash, no transfer) – $1.75 (smart card, free transfer) Higher service intensity Buffalo $2.00 (no transfer) Multimodal and lower service intensity Providence $2.00 + $1.00 transfer Lower service intensity Columbus $2.00 (free transfer) Orlando $2.00 (free transfer) More boardings and longer trips Indianapolis $1.75 (no transfer) Smaller Cincinnati $1.75 + $0.50 transfer + $0.90 outside city Dayton $1.75 + $0.25 transfer Smaller Hartford $1.75 (free transfer) Lower service intensity Jacksonville $1.50 (no transfer) Smaller and longer trips Akron $1.25 (free transfer) Smaller Toledo $1.25 (free transfer) Smaller
  • 14. 14 FARE ANALYSIS CONCLUSIONS • A general fare increase is overdue in terms of both timing and cost recovery • COTA’s fare recovery is now at the low end of the range for peers and similar systems • Increases in service since 2011 have not been met with corresponding demand growth • It is too early to gauge the demand effects of the Transit System Redesign (TSR), but if projections are realized, cost recovery will be below goal (about 14%) • Attention should focus on preventing further loss in fare recovery and on achieving goals for the structure (e.g. flattening and future-proofing)
  • 16. 16 PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS Goals: • Maintain planned service levels • Improve systemwide fare recovery from the estimated 14.2% for 2017 Options: • Option 1: Target for a 20% system-wide fare recovery, per 2009 board policy • Option 2: Target for an 18% system-wide fare recovery, based on taxpayers’ share of operating costs of 82 percent
  • 17. 17 PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS Features Proposed for All Options • Guaranteed Lowest Fare Similar to a frequency-based discount, this would guarantee riders the lowest fare for which they are eligible based on the extent of the usage of their fare cards. For example, if a day pass is $5 and the rider has paid $5 in fares within a 24 hour period, the rider would not pay a fare for additional trips taken in the remainder of the 24 hour period. • End Express Upcharge This would “flatten” COTA’s fare schedule and make all bus fares consistent across all express (Rush Hour) and local (Frequent/Standard) lines. • 2-Hour Round Trip Ticket This would allow a customer to pay one fare for a 2-hour period, making all transfers free including round trips.
  • 18. 18 PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS *The AirConnect fares listed are the on-board cash fares. Passes will be accepted at their normal rate. ** Transfers will be valid in all vehicles for 2 hours regardless of direction of travel. Fare Structure Current Option 1 Est. 20% Fare Recovery Option 2 Est. 18% Fare Recovery Single Fares Standard & Frequent $2.00 $2.75 $2.50 Rush Hour (Express) $2.75 $2.75 $2.50 AirConnect* $2.75 $2.75 $5.50 Transfer** Free Free Free CBUS Free Free Free Senior, Child, Key $1.00 $1.35 $1.25 ADA Card Free Free Free Passes 31-day Standard & Frequent $62.00 $86.00 $82.00 31-day Rush Hour $85.00 $86.00 $82.00 31- day Senior, Child, Key $31.00 $43.00 $41.00 7-Day Standard & Frequent $25.00 $34.00 $31.00 Standard & Frequent Day $4.50 $6.25 $5.50 Discount Day Pass $2.25 $3.00 $2.75 Mobility Services ADA Mainstream $3.50 $4.75 $4.50 ADA Mainstream Monthly $105.00 $146.00 $135.00 Non-ADA Service $5.00 $7.00 $6.00
  • 19. 19 Fare Structure Current Option 1 Est. 20% Fare Recovery Single Fares Standard & Frequent $2.00 $2.75 Rush Hour (Express) $2.75 $2.75 AirConnect* $2.75 $2.75 Transfer** Free Free CBUS Free Free Senior, Child, Key $1.00 $1.35 ADA Card Free Free Passes 31-day Standard & Frequent $62.00 $86.00 31-day Rush Hour $85.00 $86.00 31- day Senior, Child, Key $31.00 $43.00 7-Day Standard & Frequent $25.00 $34.00 Standard & Frequent Day $4.50 $6.25 Discount Day Pass $2.25 $3.00 Mobility Services ADA Mainstream $3.50 $4.75 ADA Mainstream Monthly $105.00 $146.00 Non-ADA Service $5.00 $7.00 *The AirConnect fares listed are the on-board cash fares. Passes will be accepted at their normal rate. ** Transfers will be valid in all vehicles for 2 hours regardless of direction of travel. PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS
  • 20. 20 Fare Structure Current Option 1 Est. 20% Fare Recovery Option 2 Est. 18% Fare Recovery Single Fares Standard & Frequent $2.00 $2.75 $2.50 Rush Hour (Express) $2.75 $2.75 $2.50 AirConnect* $2.75 $2.75 $5.50 Transfer** Free Free Free CBUS Free Free Free Senior, Child, Key $1.00 $1.35 $1.25 ADA Card Free Free Free Passes 31-day Standard & Frequent $62.00 $86.00 $82.00 31-day Rush Hour $85.00 $86.00 $82.00 31- day Senior, Child, Key $31.00 $43.00 $41.00 7-Day Standard & Frequent $25.00 $34.00 $31.00 Standard & Frequent Day $4.50 $6.25 $5.50 Discount Day Pass $2.25 $3.00 $2.75 Mobility Services ADA Mainstream $3.50 $4.75 $4.50 ADA Mainstream Monthly $105.00 $146.00 $135.00 Non-ADA Service $5.00 $7.00 $6.00 PRELIMINARY FARE STRUCTURE OPTIONS *The AirConnect fares listed are the on-board cash fares. Passes will be accepted at their normal rate. ** Transfers will be valid in all vehicles for 2 hours regardless of direction of travel.
  • 21. 21 FARE STRUCTURE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Oct. 3 - Nov. 3: Public Comment Period – accept and consider public input Oct. 17 - 19: Public Meetings on fare structure alternatives Oct. 19: Board Finance Committee – summarize preliminary public input and discuss options in greater detail Oct. 25: Board of Trustees – provide summary of public input and discussion of Finance Committee Nov. 8: Board Finance Committee – Present public input results and discuss recommendations to full Board Nov. 15: COTA Board of Trustees – present Finance Committee recommendations and approve 2018 fare structure Jan. 1: Implement new fare structure
  • 22. 22 PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD (OCT 3 – NOV 3) How to offer comments: • Comment cards at public meetings • Call (614) 228-1776 • Online contact form at COTA.com/contact • Facebook: Post on COTABus profile • Twitter: Tweet at @COTABus • Write to us at: Central Ohio Transit Authority Attention: Fare Adjustment Public Comments 33 N. High St. Columbus, OH 43215

Editor's Notes

  1. How was this calculated?
  2. Need to provide information on how the scenarios were created.
  3. Need to provide information on how the scenarios were created.
  4. Need to provide information on how the scenarios were created.
  5. Need to provide information on how the scenarios were created.
  6. Need to provide information on how the scenarios were created.
  7. Need to provide information on how the scenarios were created.