Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Land Health Surveillance Information for decision making

1,732 views

Published on

Remote sensing –Beyond images
Mexico 14-15 December 2013

The workshop was organized by CIMMYT Global Conservation Agriculture Program (GCAP) and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), the Mexican Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock, Rural Development, Fisheries and Food (SAGARPA), the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), CGIAR Research Program on Maize, the Cereal System Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) and the Sustainable Modernization of the Traditional Agriculture (MasAgro)

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Land Health Surveillance Information for decision making

  1. 1. Land Health Surveillance Information for decision making Keith D Shepherd, Markus G Walsh, Ermias Betemariam Remote Sensing – Beyond Images Hotel Sevilla Palace, Mexico City, 14-15 December 2013
  2. 2. Surveillance Science Principles • Define target population/area • Measure frequency of problems and associated risk factors in populations • • • • • • • Sample units Probability sampling Standardized measurement protocols Case definitions Rapid screening tests Risk quantification Operational surveillance systems built into policy and practice UNEP. 2012. Land Health Surveillance: An Evidence-Based Approach to Land Ecosystem Management. Illustrated with a Case Study in the West Africa Sahel. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/dewa/Portals/67/pdf/LHS_Report_lowres.pdf Shepherd KD and Walsh MG (2007) Infrared spectroscopy—enabling an evidence-based diagnostic surveillance approach to agricultural and environmental management in developing countries. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 15: 1-19.
  3. 3. Land Health Surveillance Sentinel sites Randomized sampling schemes Consistent field protocol Coupling with Prevalence, Risk factors, Digital mapping remote sensing Soil spectroscopy
  4. 4. AfSIS ✓60 primary sentinel sites ➡ 9,600 sampling plots ➡ 19,200 “standard” soil samples ➡ ~ 38,000 soil spectra ➡ 3,000 infiltration tests ➡ ~ 1,000 Landsat scenes ➡ ~ 16 TB of remote sensing data to date
  5. 5. Soil infrared spectra • • • • Mineral composition Iron oxides Organic matter Water (hydration, hygroscopic, free) • Carbonates • Soluble salts • Particle size distribution  Functional properties 1 = Fingerprint region e.g Si-O-Si stretching/bending 2 = Double-bond region (e.g. C=O, C=C, C=N) 3 = Triple bond (e.g. C≡C, C≡N) 4 = X–H stretching (e.g. O–H stretching) NIR = Overtones; key features clay lattice and water OH; SOM affects overall shape
  6. 6. Infrared spectroscopy Dispersive VNIR Handheld MIR ? FT-NIR FT-MIR Robotic Mobile phone cameras ? FT-MIR Portable Shepherd KD and Walsh MG. (2002) Development of reflectance spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66:988-998. Brown D, Shepherd KD, Walsh MG (2006). Global soil characterization using a VNIR diffuse reflectance library and boosted regression trees. Geoderma 132:273–290. Terhoeven-Urselmans T, Vagen T-G, Spaargaren O, Shepherd KD. 2010. Prediction of soil fertility properties from a globally distributed soil midinfrared spectral library. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74:1792–1799
  7. 7. Spectral prediction performance
  8. 8. • Submit batch of spectra online • Uncertainties estimated for each sample • Samples with large error submitted for reference analysis • Calibration models improve as more samples submitted • All subscribers benefit
  9. 9. Spectral Lab Network
  10. 10. Soil-Plant Spectral Diagnostics Lab • • • 500 visitors/yr again 338 instruction 13 PhD, 4 MSc training
  11. 11. Markus Walsh
  12. 12. Soil property maps of Africa at 1 km Legacy soil profiles12,000 locations
  13. 13. Africa Soil Information Service www.africasoils.net Markus Walsh
  14. 14. Probability topsoil pH < 5.5 ... very acid soils prob(pH < 5.5) Africa Soil Information Service www.africasoils.net Markus Walsh
  15. 15. Markus Walsh
  16. 16. Global-Continental Monitoring Systems Applications CGIAR pan-tropical sites Vital signs AfSIS Vital Signs Regional Information Systems National surveillance systems Private sector soil testing Ethiopia, Nigeria Project baselines SLM Cameroon Parklands Malawi Rangelands E/W Africa Cocoa - CDI MICCA EAfrica
  17. 17. What is the decision? Decisions before Data • Review of the Evidence on Indicators, Metrics and Monitoring Systems. http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/output/192446/default.aspx • A Survey and Analysis of the Data Requirements for Stakeholders in African Agriculture http://r4d.dfid.gov.uk/Output/193813/Default.aspx • Government-level programmatic decisions (fertilizer supply/blending; liming programmes) • Farmer or local provider decisions (what fertiliser to apply, where, when)
  18. 18. Explicit decision modelling dealers. • Uncertainties (risks) represented • Value of Information Analysis • Preferences of stakeholders Influence diagram “Make fertilizer recommendations” use case • • • • • • Workflows that use consistent data model Free and open source computer software Automated analyses of remote sensing and market time series Maps, monitoring and decision analysis products and services for Africa Deployable via web and cellular/mobile services Products to CKW’s, farmer groups, land management policy-makers, government agencies and agro-input dealers
  19. 19. Outputs Probabilistic impact projections Identification of high-value variables Aquifer size after 70 years of abstraction (% of original) Replenishment Irrigation growth Initial irrigated area Water use per hectare Aquifer size Natural water use Importance threshold
  20. 20. Smart data – Smart Decisions • Inclusion of uncertain variables allows truly holistic impact assessments • Efficient way of organizing existing knowledge • High information value variables are almost always not those typically measured • Identifies important metrics for monitoring • Provides accumulated evidence for impact attribution • Community of practice & capacity building in decision analysis under uncertainty

×