Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Value of traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management

1,528 views

Published on

This session of the 2014 IUFRO World Congress focused on the relevance of traditional knowledge, practices and social/governance institutions in the conservation, management and restoration of forests and sustainable use of forest biodiversity. Seram Island, Indonesia was used as a case study.

Published in: Environment
  • Be the first to comment

Value of traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management

  1. 1. IUFRO 2014 WORLD CONGRESS Salt Lake City, 7 October 2014 Forest for People: Value of Traditional Knowledge for Sustainable Forest Management Can local wisdom be used in forest conservation around national park?. The case in Seram Island, Central Moluccas, Indonesia Nining Liswanti 1 , Yves Laumonier 2 , Marthina Tjoa 3 and 3 Thomas M. Silaya 1 CIFOR, 2 CIRAD – CIFOR, 3 University of Pattimura
  2. 2. WHY SERAM?  Highly strong in the cultural and customary – applied traditional forest management practices for long time  Traditional land ownership (village, clan, individual territory)  Manusela National Park to protect an area of 1,890 km² (established in 1997), High B/D richness (117 birds & 38 mammals)  4 Ecosystem types (coastal, swamp, lowland, mountain rainforest)
  3. 3. Current issues & threats  Traditional LU for mixed gardens and collection timber and NTFP is forbidden inside the park.  The village boundaries are in close proximity to the MNP, caused of conflict over land and resources  Lack of agricultural land & livelihood option, oil palm plantation, mining and logging concessions, population growth and migration – illegal logging and illegal wild bird trading (Salmon-crested Cockatoo) inside the park To identify the forms of local wisdom for the communities adjacent Manusela National Park for conservation and sustainable forest management of the park
  4. 4. Site Location Population living inside and outside the park:  91.000 people
  5. 5. Social organization & governance • Social Organization village keluarga/ family Mata rumah/ number of family clan soa/ number of clan negeri/ village • Governance  Customary law regulate the customary rights (hak ulayat)  Customary land tenure types  Land owned by village (negeri), clan group (soa), and family (keluarga) • Additional social structure (groups of villages) • Patasiwa & Pataliwa (Sub-ethnic Wemale & Alune) • Pela/Gandong
  6. 6. Important forest and agriculture products  Crops: cloves (Syzygium aromaticum), nutmeg (Myristica fragrans), coconut (Cocos nucifera), cocoa (Theobroma cacao), banana (Musa sp.), sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas)  Fruits: durian (Durio zibethinus), kweni (Mangifera odorata), langsat (Lansium domesticum), manggo (Mangifera indica), mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana), rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum)  Timber: ironwood (Intsia bijuga), gofasa (Vitex cofassus), canary (Canarium spp), samar (Homalium foetidum), lenggua (Pterocarpus indicus), benuang (Octomeles sumatrana)  NTFP: rattan, sago (Metroxylon sagu), dammar resin (Agathis damara), bamboo, palm tree, honey  Animals: pig (Sus scrofa), deer (Cervus timorensis ), cuscus (Phalanger maculatus ), cockatoo (Cacatua moluccensis) , nuri bird (Alisterus amboinensis)
  7. 7. Local Wisdom Practices  Forest is important for subsistent (food, medicine, construction, firewood etc) and livelihoods (NTFP)  Applied in all traditional villages in Seram  The forms of local wisdom: sasi, sacred places (taboo), dusung, and krois, salele, matakau, nanaku, kewang
  8. 8. The forms of Local Wisdom 1. SASI A management system used by the community for sustainable natural resources management where collection of certain forest product (economic or subsistence value) is prohibited. Sasi Gereja (church) Sasi Adat (customary)
  9. 9. Sasi Hutan (forest)  Prohibited to collect forest products for certain period at certain forest area (Seli kaihatu/ anapoha)  Animals (cus-cus, deer, wild pig), timbers (litsea, makila, lenggua, iron wood, ficus, diospyros), NTFP (Metroxylon sago). Sasi tanaman (plantation crops)  A harvest prohibition on fruits that are unripe for certain crops before harvesting (3-6 months), e.g. coconut, cocoa, durian, nutmeg  King determines area for sasi (1-3 ha)  To obtain a maximum harvesting of certain commodities
  10. 10. 2. Natural sacred sites or "taboos"  The community’s effort to protect the forests from internal and external user that caused of forest damage  Prohibited to collect forest products at certain forest areas that have supernatural agencies (ancestor spirits and natural spirits)  People believe that those spirits monitor human conduct and impose punishments on violators (bad luck or demon possessed)
  11. 11. 3. Krois (a cross)  A cross "X" made from two pieces of bamboo or wood that placed surrounding the fruit trees garden to protect the fruits from a thief  People believe that using krois, their garden is filled up with sharp items (dodesu) and ignoring ‘Krois’ will make the thief feel hurt
  12. 12. 4. Dusung  A knowledge for planting techniques by applying agroforestry system  Planting timber trees and various crops (seasonal and annual crops) e.g. lenggua, jabon, walnuts, Albizia sp, dammar resin, clove, nutmeg, sweet potatoes, banana, yam etc  Sasi is used before fruit harvesting Durian (Durio zibethinus) Damar resin (Agathis dammara) Salawatu (Albizia sp) Banana (Musa sp) Pineapple (Ananas comosus)
  13. 13. Other forms of local wisdom  Matakau is an effort to protect natural resources by giving a red mark from fabric material on certain area. It is believe that ignoring Matakau will cause of bad luck or disaster.  Kewang, is a traditional village's institutions that used to monitor and to protect forest resources in the village territory Nanaku  Nanaku is used to protect certain forest areas – put a sign inside the dusung or forest Salele  Salele is applied to protect wild fruit trees from destruction or stolen before harvesting by wrapping the trunk tree with coconut or sago leaf Kewang
  14. 14. Local wisdom for conservation Manusela National Park?  The forms of local wisdom have showed traditional forest management to protect the community’s forest and used in sustainable way – acknowledged by the park management  The park management could adopted and implemented this system by integrating this system in to park management such as sacred places and sasi forest - Involving the community for conservation of national park  This local wisdom give implication to the current regulation of national park for sustainable forest management without damaging the forest.
  15. 15. Some efforts…  The park management proposed to revise the NP spatial planning to exclude all villages and agricultural land inside the park as enclave areas in the forms of traditional use (sasi forest) & cultural zoning (dusung) (2011)  Agreement between the park and community in Masihulan to protect the forest from illegal timber extraction (2012) - the community obtained legal permit to collect dammar resin inside the park  In 2012, local wisdom has been considered for forest conservation of Manusela national park, in order to respect indigenous peoples, to give an opportunity for local people to utilize their traditional land inside the park, to build collaboration partnerships with communities around the park, and to strengthening the capacity of local people  Promoting traditional forest management for ecotourism in Manusela national park
  16. 16. Thank you http://www.cifor.cgiar.org
  17. 17. Village profile Description Sawai Saleman Horale Roho Kanikeh Manusela Kaloa Village establishment 1800s 1800s 1910 1953 1800s 1920 Land areas per HH (mean) 2.52 2.6 37 8.75 3.685 29.07 Religion Moslem, Christian Moslem Christian Christian Christian Christian Christian Total inhabitants (people) 4,517 527 368 232 1868 499 Total HH 653 116 85 61 372 124 Original (HH) 568 102 78 61 342 122 Migrant (HH) 85 14 7 0 30 2 Σ person per HH/mean 2-13 (6) 2-9 (5) 2-10 (5) 2-8 (4) 2-9 (4) 2-12 (5)

×