Advertisement

Rural Development and Local Governance: Key Factors to Promote Peatland Restoration

Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
Nov. 30, 2020
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Rural Development and Local Governance: Key Factors to Promote Peatland Restoration(20)

Advertisement

More from Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Rural Development and Local Governance: Key Factors to Promote Peatland Restoration

  1. Rural Development and Local Governance: Key Factors to promote peatland restoration (Plenary Session) Dr. Myrna A. Safitri Peatland Restoration Agency
  2. Why Rural Development matters - More than 1,000 villages are in targeted areas of peatland restoration; covering an area of 1.4 million hectares; more than 50% overlaps with concession and conservation areas. - Data in 2015 showed that 87% of the villages were less developed villages. - Village and peasants must be ‘subject’ of peatland restoration, not just a locus/object of projects. - Art. 18 of UN Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas (UNDROP) “Peasants and other people working in rural areas have the right to contribute to the design and implementation of national and local climate change adaptation and mitigation policies, including through the use of practices and traditional knowledge.”
  3. What we do - Peat care Village Program (Desa Peduli Gambut) has implemented since 2017 with 10 main activities to facilitate the strengthening of local institution, to integrate peatland restoration into village development (plan and budget) and to build participatory governance of peatland restoration. - Inclusive approach, work with diverse community groups: local elite, peasants, women, youth. - Promote the improvement of IDM, particularly on the indicators of ecological resilience. - Together with the peasants, seek for solution of climate-smart agriculture. - Develop a landscape-based green economy intervention, combining Rural Zone Policy (Kawasan Perdesaan) with Peatland Hydrological Unit (KHG).
  4. Lessons-learned 1. Utilize all existing policies and programs; do improvement and innovation, make them work! 2. Number and diversity matters; local elites cannot be avoided but they need to be included. 3. Better engagement with ‘local champions’. 4. Collect and develop data and map with the communities.
  5. Concluding Remarks Pak Ismail, Desa Pedekik, Bengkalis 191120. 1. Landscape approach need to be developed through a green economy model based on peatland rural zones (Kawasan Perdesaan Gambut) 2. Adopt & adapt IDM as indicators of successful intervention; BRG develops IDPG (Indeks Desa Peduli Gambut) using triple criteria & indicators (social, economi and ecological resilience) 3. Be open to hybrid local institution 4. Be open to new local wisdom
  6. Thank you
Advertisement