Advertisement

Redd+ forest reference emission levels progress and challenges in developing countries

CIFOR-ICRAF
Dec. 15, 2015
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Redd+ forest reference emission levels progress and challenges in developing countries(20)

More from CIFOR-ICRAF(20)

Advertisement

Redd+ forest reference emission levels progress and challenges in developing countries

  1. REDD+ Forest Reference Emission Levels: Progress and challenges in developing countries Global Landscapes Forum | Paris 5 December 2015 Moderator: María José Sanz Sánchez
  2. Context of this forum • REDD+ readiness is shaping up nicely in several pioneer REDD+ countries • Great progress has been made on several readiness components, including MRV and Forest Reference Levels / Forest Emission Reference Levels • Following the first FREL submission by Brazil in 2014, more countries are submitting their FRL/FREL to the UNFCCC • The panel will provide an opportunity to hear from countries about their experience with FRL/FREL construction, submission and the technical assessment process
  3. Decision 4/CP 15 “…transparently taking into account historic data, and adjust for national circumstances…” Decision 1/CP 16 FREL/FRLs one of the 4 REDD+ elements Decision 12/CP 17Modalities for FREL/FRL Submission guidelines for FREL/FRL information Decision 13/CP 19Guidelines technical assessment Procedure technical assessment (timing etc) Decision 4/CP. 15 Decision 1/CP. 16 Decision 12/CP.17 Annex Decision 13/CP.19 & Annex 4 decisions related to FRLs
  4. UNFCCC submissions Submission Technical assessment report & modified submission Brazil June 2014 November-December 2014 Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Malaysia, Mexico December 2014 - January 2015 October – December 2015 ……… January 2016 November 2016 Overview FREL/FRL submissions to date
  5. Today’s presentations (10-12 Minutes each!) Colombia Cambodia Rep. of Congo Dem. Rep. of Congo Zambia Mr. Gustavo Galindo Mr. Chivin Leng Mr. Georges Boudzanga Mr. Jean-Paul Kibambé Mr. Deuteronomy Kasaro
  6. Discussion Questions to Panelists (2 minute each) Questions form the floor (20 Minutes)
  7. What have been key considerations for your country in selecting the scale of the FREL? Zambia
  8. Do you think that your emissions from degradation are significant and if so, how do you plan to eventually include degradation in the future? Democratic Republic of Congo
  9. How did you choose your approach for adjusting your FREL? Republic of Congo
  10. What are the linkages between your country’s proposed FREL and the development of your NFMS? Cambodia
  11. What were the key challenges/areas for improvement for your country related to data needs for the construction of the FREL? Colombia

Editor's Notes

  1. <number>
  2. Decisions for the construction, submission and technical assessment of FREL/FRLs have all been finalized and adopted. <number>
  3. The 5 countries invited on this panel have either already submitted (Colombia), or have progressed significantly with the development of their FRLs and are considering submitting in the coming weeks (Cambodia, Zambia, Republic of Congo) or in early 2017 (Democratic Republic of Congo). <number>
  4. Read their biography or at least their title <number>
  5. <number>
Advertisement