Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Viewers also liked(20)

Advertisement

More from CIFOR-ICRAF(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

Peat emission factors: Navigating the IPCC wetland supplement

  1. Kristell Hergoualc’h and Erin Swails 13 April 2020 Session 1 Peat Emission Factors: Navigating the IPCC Wetland Supplement
  2. Objectives Navigate the Wetland IPCC supplement to: • Present linkages between the 2006 IPCC guidelines and the supplement • Provide an understanding of the structure of the supplement for reporting national emissions/ removals from peatlands
  3. Introduction: Overview of the guidelines 2006 IPCC Guidelines on wetlands restricted to peatlands drained & managed for peat extraction, conversion to flooded lands, & limited guidance for drained organic soils Þ Wetlands Supplement extends content of 2006 Guidelines by filling gaps and providing updates reflecting scientific advances, but does not replace it
  4. Introduction: Overview of the guidelines
  5. Introduction: Overview of the guidelines Chapters 2 and 3 in the Wetlands Supplement do not provide additional guidance for the pools biomass and dead organic matter Ø Generic methods for estimating above-ground and below-ground biomass carbon stock changes for all land-use categories are available in Section 2.3.1, Chapter 2 in Volume 4 of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines
  6. Introduction: Methodological Tiers • Tier: A level of methodological complexity • Tier 1: Default method. Equations & emission factors (EF) for estimating emissions/removals in guidelines • Tier 2: Intermediate method. Country-specific or disaggregation by e.g. climate, peat-nutrient status, etc. • Tier 3: The most complex & data-demanding method. Detailed modeling / high resolution. • All tiers are intended to provide unbiased estimates. Accuracy & precision expected to improve from Tier 1 to Tier 3
  7. Chapter 2: Drained inland organic soils • Updates Vol. 4 in 2006 IPCC Guidelines for soils on: - Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions & removals (Chapt. 4-9) - Methane (CH4) emissions (Chapt. 7) - Nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions (Chapt. 11) • Provides new guidance not in 2006 IPCC Guidelines for: - CH4 emissions from drainage ditches (Chapt. 4-9) - Off-site CO2 emissions associated w/ dissolved organic carbon (DOC) release to drainage waters (Chapt. 4-9) - CO2, CH4 and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions from peat fires
  8. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils CO2
  9. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils N2O EF in Table 2.5 (kg N2O-N ha-1 yr-1)
  10. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils CH4 CH4 / CO - Fire emissions Equation 2.8
  11. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils - CO2 EF in Table 2.2: for the tropics 0.82 t CO2-C ha-1 yr-1 EF in Table 2.1 (t CO2-C ha-1 yr-1), per land use type § On-site soil CO2 emissions § Off-site soil CO2 emissions from DOC exports
  12. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils - FIRES CO2 from wildfire 353 (t dm ha-1) ´ 464 (g CO2-C kg-1 ) ´ 10-3 ´ (44/12) = 601 t CO2 ha-1
  13. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils - FIRES Fire type CO2 95% CI CO 95% CI CH4 95% CI Mg CO2 ha-1 Mg CO ha-1 Mg CH4 ha-1 Wildfire 601 [290; 913] 74 [36; 113] 7 [4; 11] Prescribed 264 [140; 388] 33 [17; 48] 3 [2; 5] MB ´ GEF ´ 10-3
  14. Chapt.2: Drained org. soils - CH4 § EFCH4_land in Table 2.3 (kg CH4 ha-1 yr-1), disaggregated by land use type § EFCH4_ditch and indicative Fracditch in Table 2.4. For the tropics: EFCH4_ditch = 2259 kg CH4 ha-1 yr-1 Fracditch = 0.02
  15. Chapt.3: Rewetted Organic Soils § CO2, CH4 while N2O assumed to be negligible § CO2 fluxes
  16. Chapt.3: Rewetted Organic Soils – CO2 In the tropics: § EFCO2 = 0 t CO2-C ha-1 yr-1 § EFDOC_REWETTED = 0.9 ´ 0.57 = 0.51 t CO2-C ha-1 yr-1 => In the absence of fire, EFrewetted org soil = 0.51 t CO2-C ha-1 yr-1 EFCO2 (Table 3.1) EFDOC_REWETTED (Eq. 3.6 and Table 3.2) Cf. Chapt. 2
  17. Chapt.3: Rewetted Organic Soils – CH4 In the tropics, EFCH4 soil = 41 kg CH4 ha-1 yr-1 EFCH4 soil (Table 3.3) Cf. Chapt. 2
  18. Acknowledgements The capacity building materials were made possible through a grant given by the Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI) to the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) under the Agreement No. INS 2070-19/0010. While CIFOR gratefully acknowledges the support, the information provided in the materials do not represent the views or positions of the Norwegian Government. CIFOR would like to recognize the support by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in generating some of information used in the materials.
  19. Thank you
Advertisement