Advertisement

Implementing NDC target under MRV: Challenge and principle on land based sector

CIFOR-ICRAF
May. 15, 2018
Advertisement

More Related Content

Viewers also liked(20)

Similar to Implementing NDC target under MRV: Challenge and principle on land based sector(20)

Advertisement

More from CIFOR-ICRAF(20)

Advertisement

Implementing NDC target under MRV: Challenge and principle on land based sector

  1. Logo here 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM-Bogor Agricultural University Implementing NDC Target under MRV Challenge and Principle on Land Based Sector
  2. Logo here LUCF in NDC  What challenges in the implementation of MRV for NDC achievement from forest and NDC achievement in general?  What scientific recommendation related to the MRV implementation for NDC from forest? 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University 2 PROLOG • By 2030, under the BAU Indonesian emission will reach 2.87 Gt CO2e (more than doubled of 2010 emission) • LUCF is expected to contribute to about 70% of the emission reduction target of the NDC
  3. Logo here Source: - Ministerial Regulation No. 70/2017 - Guidelines of MRV REDD+ Indonesia INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM FOR MRV 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University
  4. Logo here Source: - Ministerial Regulation No. 70/2017 - Guidelines of MRV REDD+ Indonesia INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM FOR MRV 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University
  5. Logo here Source: - Ministerial Regulation No. 70/2017 - Guidelines of MRV REDD+ Indonesia INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM FOR MRV 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University Annex to Decision 14/CP.19 - Institutional system for monitoring - Consistency in methodology used for construction of RL and results - Data/information that allows for reconstruction of results - Use most recent IPCC GL - AD: combine use of RS and ground base - Estimates: transparent, consistent, as far as possible accurate ~ reduce uncertainties
  6. Logo here Source: - Ministerial Regulation No. 70/2017 - Guidelines of MRV REDD+ Indonesia INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISM FOR MRV 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University Annex to Decision 14/CP.19 - Institutional system for monitoring - Consistency in methodology used for construction of RL and results - Data/information that allows for reconstruction of results - Use most recent IPCC GL - AD: combine use of RS and ground base - Estimates: transparent, consistent, as far as possible accurate ~ reduce uncertainties 1. Institutional arrangement and regulations 2. Human capacity and financial resources 3. Methodology • Estimation (AD and EF) • Uncertainty
  7. Logo here 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 CO2PeatFire CO2PeatDecom poi on CO2EnergyIndustries CO2M anufacturingIndustriesand CO2Non-Croplandto Cropland CO2Transporta on CO2Non-Otherland to Otherland CO2Forestrem ainingForest CH4IndustrialW astewaterTreatm entand CH4RiceCul va on CO2Croplandrem ainingCropland CH4Unm anaged W asteDisposalSites N2O DirectN2O Soils CO2Cem entProduc on CO2Residen al CO2Non-Grasslandto Grassland CH4EntericFerm enta on CH4OilandNaturalGas KontribusiKumulaf(%) Key Categories and Activity Data in LUCF Sector 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University
  8. Logo here 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 CO2PeatFire CO2PeatDecom poi on CO2EnergyIndustries CO2M anufacturingIndustriesand CO2Non-Croplandto Cropland CO2Transporta on CO2Non-Otherland to Otherland CO2Forestrem ainingForest CH4IndustrialW astewaterTreatm entand CH4RiceCul va on CO2Croplandrem ainingCropland CH4Unm anaged W asteDisposalSites N2O DirectN2O Soils CO2Cem entProduc on CO2Residen al CO2Non-Grasslandto Grassland CH4EntericFerm enta on CH4OilandNaturalGas KontribusiKumulaf(%) Activity Data: Spatial & Centralized: Change on land cover (NFMS) Emission Factors: Spatial: National Forest Inventory (NFI) Main Agency: MoEF How to consolidate data from local and other stakeholders ? Activity Data: Non-spatial & Decentralized: Planting area by commodity, amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied, number of livestock etc Emission Factors: Spatial and non-spatial Main Agency: MoA Integration spatial and non-spatial data for generating AD Key Categories and Activity Data in LUCF Sector 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University
  9. Logo here 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 CO2PeatFire CO2PeatDecom poi on CO2EnergyIndustries CO2M anufacturingIndustriesand CO2Non-Croplandto Cropland CO2Transporta on CO2Non-Otherland to Otherland CO2Forestrem ainingForest CH4IndustrialW astewaterTreatm entand CH4RiceCul va on CO2Croplandrem ainingCropland CH4Unm anaged W asteDisposalSites N2O DirectN2O Soils CO2Cem entProduc on CO2Residen al CO2Non-Grasslandto Grassland CH4EntericFerm enta on CH4OilandNaturalGas KontribusiKumulaf(%) Activity Data: Spatial & Centralized: Change on land cover (NFMS) Emission Factors: Spatial: National Forest Inventory (NFI) Main Agency: MoEF How to consolidate data from local and other stakeholders ? Activity Data: Non-spatial & Decentralized: Planting area by commodity, amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied, number of livestock etc Emission Factors: Spatial and non-spatial Main Agency: MoA Integration spatial and non-spatial data for generating AD Key Categories and Activity Data in LUCF Sector 23-25 April 2018: Rizaldi Boer CCROM SEAP-Bogor Agricultural University Challenges: • Data scattered in a number of agencies/institutions • Lack of regulations on AD measurement and reporting • Level of detail of AD allows for capturing mitigation actions (Combination of spatial and non spatial) • System on QA/QC process for key AD not well in place – need for human resources and financial • Limited information on sources of uncertainties for key AD and EF Recommendations: • Assessment of available AD and EF of key sources from different agencies/institutions and their linkage with mitigation • Development of regulation on data measurements and reporting (MMR) from activities contributing significantly to climate change mitigation from different institutions and stakeholder ~ improving institution arrangement • SOP and guideline for MMR that allow other stakeholders to involve • Uncertainty assessment for key sources ~ lead to plan for improvement ~ resource requirements
Advertisement