Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Viewers also liked(20)

Similar to CIFOR/ICRAF sloping lands in transition (SLANT) project(20)

Advertisement

More from CIFOR-ICRAF(20)

Recently uploaded(20)

Advertisement

CIFOR/ICRAF sloping lands in transition (SLANT) project

  1. Kunming Expert Meeting Forests and Water: From Research to Application 3/24/14 CIFOR/ICRAF Sloping Lands in Transition (SLANT) Project
  2. 2 very relevant CIFOR-led projects  SWAMP (D. Murdiyarso and all) Sustainable Wetlands Adaptation and Mitigation Program Goals:  To quantify GHG emissions arising from both intact and degraded wetlands undergoing different trajectories of land cover change  To quantify the carbon stocks of the representative tropical wetlands of the world – (peat swamp forests and mangroves of Asia, Africa and Latin America–South America, Central America, and the Caribbean)  …  SLANT  Sloping Lands in Transition: Optimizing policies of re/afforestation of upland smallholdings for local livelihoods and ecosystem services
  3.  Partnership with China’s Forest Economics and Development Research Center to assess monitoring of Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP), which is mostly implemented on sloping lands. What led to SLANT?
  4. CCFP background  Aim to reduce flooding & soil erosion, revised to emphasize economic dev. & poverty alleviation  Started in 1999, fully rolled out by 2002 - Phase I: 1999-2007 - Phase II: 2008-2016  Payments to smallholders to convert sloping cropland to forests (>25° in Yangtze River & 15° elsewhere). - Grass: 2 yrs - Economic forest: 5 yrs - Protection forest: 8 yrs  >25 M ha (~3% total land area) - ~65% for protection/conservation - ~40% cropland vs. 60% ‘barren’ land
  5.  25 provinces, 2500 counties & >32 million hhs
  6. Photos: China Forest Economics and Development Research Center
  7. Photos: China Forest Economics and Development Research Center
  8. Photos: China Forest Economics and Development Research Center
  9. Country profiles: China, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Nepal & Philippines, Vietnam CIFOR/ICRAF SLANT (Sloping lands in transition) scoping study
  10. Forest transition in Asia Source: FAO FRA 2010, author’s analysis
  11.  To understand implementation of programs promoting forestry for provision of ecosystem services in smallholder-occupied hilly and mountainous lands in Asia/Pacific  to assess their socio-economic and biophysical effects, including their under-studied effects on resilience of community subsistence systems and capacity for adaptation  to share this knowledge regionally with the aim of improving subsequent interventions and policies. SLANT Aims & objectives
  12.  Sloping lands provide specific ecosystem goods and services. For that reason (actual or claimed) governments/agencies adopt policies promoting reforestation, afforestation, forest management and integration of trees on farms on these lands. Why policies on sloping lands?
  13. Ecosystem services specific to sloping lands Provision of water Purification of water Erosion control: conservation of soils Flood prevention Conservation of soil nutrients Maintenance of habitats Carbon sequestration Maintanence of regional precipitation patterns Human-centered values and services Others
  14. • China: Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP) • India: Hydroelectric development, cash crop production in the North and northeast, biodiversity conservation in the south and southwest • Thailand: Water provision for lowland rice cultivation • Indonesia: Reforestation for PES, timber production Examples of interventions…
  15.  We are interested because sloping lands are home to specific groups of people, often to some extent marginalized (but sometimes well off or even privileged).  How do those “upland” people experience government programs and development efforts specifically targeting sloping lands to produce ecosystems goods and services?  What are existing local practices addressing these issues, and how are those affected by external intervention as well. Social aspects of SLANT
  16.  What defines our “sloping lands”? – High mountain areas (including valleys?) – Slope of occupied area (e.g. >25%)? – Some social identity criteria?  Who are “smallholders & communities” in hilly and mountainous lands in Asia? – Swiddeners – Farmers – Forest managers  Landscapes – Managed forest – Agroforestry systems – Traditional land management systems Definitions
  17. Environmental Relationship between upland farming systems (e.g. shifting cultivation vs. intensification) and: Social & political Soil (nutrients and erosion Marginalization of ethnic groups living on marginal (sloping) lands Water (quantity and quality) to downstream Demise of swidden agriculture in Asia/Pacific Carbon emissions Rights of local communities & urbanization Biodiversity Food security Timber and NTFP production Government reforestation, afforestation, and forest restoration programs in uplands Provision of ecosystem services by traditional upland land management systems Ecocompensation to upstream farmers & communities Community-based natural resource management in uplands Watershed management of headwaters by indigenous/local people A glance at the scope of existing literature
  18.  How effective are sloping land forest restoration programs in providing water ecosystem services? – Flood mitigation – Erosion prevention – Water provision – Water quality  What is the effect of water use for plantation establishment?  How does altered water availability affect local agriculture and food supply?  Local/regional effects, & transboundary (e.g. river basin) effects Water related research questions
  19. Thank you
Advertisement