Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Bridging the gap: sustainable forests, agriculture and food security

2,997 views

Published on

Terry Sunderland, Principal Scientist & Team Leader, Sustainable Landscapes and Food Systems
PEFC Conference: ”Sustainable Landscapes, Sustainable Livelihoods”
Bali, 17th November 2016

Published in: Science
  • Be the first to comment

Bridging the gap: sustainable forests, agriculture and food security

  1. 1. BRIDGING THE GAP: SUSTAINABLE FORESTS, AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SECURITY Terry Sunderland, Principal Scientist & Team Leader, Sustainable Landscapes and Food Systems PEFC Conference: ”Sustainable Landscapes, Sustainable Livelihoods” Bali, 17th November 2016
  2. 2. OUR NEW GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORKS
  3. 3. NEW STRATEGY FOR NEW TIMES  9.6 billion people in 2050  Changing consumption patterns  Continued economic growth  Expectations of justice and equity  Migrations to seek new opportunities  Increased climate variability Only 30-40 years from now, the world will not look as it does today.
  4. 4. REDEFINING FORESTRY: FUNDAMENTALS FOR ACHIEVING THE SDG’S  Food, nutrition and health  Water, energy and housing  Livelihoods and employment  Climate change adaptation and mitigation  Biodiversity conservation  Resilience and safety nets  To environmental and economic external shocks
  5. 5. CIFOR STRATEGY 2016-2025 VISION CIFOR envisions a more equitable world where forestry and landscapes enhance the environment and well-being for all.
  6. 6. CONTEXT From the CIFOR Strategy 2015-2025: • Integration of diverse communities of practice in the sustainable landscapes debate: to be achieved by reconciling the principles of multi-functionality with the practice of managing sustainable landscapes for forestry, food security and nutrition and other benefits. • Increased policy recognition of the need to better integrate the forestry and agricultural sectors: to be achieved by using the landscape approach as the convening factor (c.f. simultaneous yet separate declarations on forestry and agriculture).
  7. 7. FORESTS IN LANDSCAPES • One billion+ people rely on forest products for consumption and income in some way (Agrawal et al. 2013) • Safety-net during times of food and income insecurity (Wunder et al. 2014) • Wild harvested meat and freshwater fish provides 30-80% of protein intake for many rural communities (Nasi et al. 2011; McIntyre et al. 2016) • 75% of world’s population rely on biodiversity for primary health care (WHO), 2003) • 40%-60% of global food production comes from diverse smallholder agricultural systems in complex landscapes (FAO 2011) • Long tradition of managing forests for food (van Vliet et al. 2011) • Forests sustaining agriculture through ecosystem services provision (Foli et al. 2014)
  8. 8. THE ORIGIN OF THE “LANDSCAPE APPROACH” 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010 - present 1980s: Integrated Rural Development 1998: Integrated Natural Resource Management (INRM) 1985 onwards: Integrated Conservation & Development projects (ICDPs) Contributing Sciences: Ecosystem Management Landscape Ecology Island biogeography Conservation rooted frameworks e.g. “Ecosystem Approach” 1992: “Landscape Approach” first documented (Barrett 1992) Last decade: (Integrated) Landscape Approach frameworks
  9. 9. EMBRACING THE LANDSCAPE APPROACH – INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS FOR PEOPLE ACROSS SECTORS “Despite some barriers to implementation, a landscape approach has considerable potential to meet social and environmental objectives at local scales while aiding national commitments to addressing ongoing global challenges.” Reed et al. 2016, Global Change Biology.
  10. 10. OPERATIONALISING THE LANDSCAPE APPROACH: HOW? THEORY PRACTICE E.g. Ten principles Real integration Local stakeholders Conservation: WCS, CI Development: USAID LESTARI Private sector: e.g. APP, APRIL Government: e.g. Ministry of Env. & Forestry
  11. 11. • LA still considered under-theorised but there is a vast body of knowledge now, it really is time to move beyond conceptualization • Acknowledgement of importance of early, continuous and regular engagement of stakeholders and how to make LA’s locally relevant and with local entry points • Previous integrated interventions always seem to fall out of favour because “the next big challenge” comes along • Can we predict what is the next big challenge and incorporate this into LA thinking? • Need maximum evidence of impact – with local stakeholders involved in monitoring, enhance engagement, empowerment
  12. 12. FOREST FUNCTIONS AND LINKS TO FSN
  13. 13. FORESTS AND FOOD SECURITY: THE EVIDENCE Seasonality Off-farm income Agriculture
  14. 14. “Forests are a major repository of food and other resources that play a crucial role in food security. In addition, maintaining diversity in agricultural production systems leads to increased resilience to shocks particularly in the context of a changing climate”. Editorial: Arnold et al. 2011
  15. 15. “Our main findings can be summarized as follows: there is a statistically significant positive relationship between tree cover and dietary diversity; fruit and vegetable consumption increases with tree cover until a peak of 45% tree cover. Overall our findings suggest that children in Africa who live in areas with more tree cover have more diverse and nutritious diets”. Ickowitz et al., 2014
  16. 16. "Our findings suggest that deforestation and land use change may have unforeseen consequences on the quality of local people’s diets. A better understanding of the contribution of forest foods to local diets is needed to understand the true impact that the loss of forests may have for nutrition in the face of agricultural expansion. If indeed forests substantially contribute to dietary quality in some areas as the results here imply, forest loss may result in unforeseen, adverse consequences on nutrition for local people." Rowland et al. 2016
  17. 17. “Areas of swidden/agroforestry, natural forest, timber and agricultural tree crop plantations were all associated with more frequent consumption of food groups rich in micronutrients. The swidden/agroforestry land class was the landscape associated with more frequent consumption of the largest number of micronutrient rich food groups. Swidden cultivation in is often viewed as a backward practice that is an impediment to food security in Indonesia and destructive of the environment. If further research corroborates that swidden farming actually results in better nutrition than the practices that replace it, Indonesian policy makers may need to reconsider their views on this land use”. Ickowitz et al., 2016
  18. 18. FORESTS SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE How does landscape configuration maximise the provision of these goods and services for both sustainable forestry and food production? Water regulation Climate regulation Pollination Pest control Foli et al. 2014; Reed et al. forthcoming
  19. 19. GENDER ISSUES “There is strong and clear evidence of the importance of including women in forest management groups for better resource governance and conservation outcomes”. Leisher et al. 2016 “Women and children collect a diverse range of plant based forest foods while men are primarily responsible for animal protein sources”. Sunderland et al. 2014
  20. 20. GETTING THE MESSAGE OUT
  21. 21. TRAINING JOURNALISTS THIS WEEK IN BALI
  22. 22. WHAT ROLE FOR FOREST CERTIFICATION? • Biodiversity conservation & enhancement • Ecosystem services (including ForCES) • Local employment & welfare • Indigenous people’s rights • Access and sustainable use = Sustainable forestry!!
  23. 23. cifor.org blog.cifor.org ForestsTreesAgroforestry.org THANK YOU t.sunderland@cgiar.org @TCHSunderland

×