Environmental Services
Understand
Valorize
- Database
Create asset
- Basic studies - Opportunity costs
- Integrated analyses - Market value -Structure systems
(national, sub-
- Zoning - Replacement costs
national, local)
- Ecosystem services
- Government
cooperation
- Private sector
Rural Producer Provider Beneficiary

Law 2.308 of November 11, 2010
Institutional Arrangement
Create State System of Incentives for Environmental Services – SISA,
Program of Incentives for Environmental Services – ISA Carbono and other
programs of environmental services and ecosystem products of Acre

An nested
approach
Projet A Projet B
ProjetC Projet n

Photo: Diego Gurgel
System of Nested Monitoring
National - National Climate Change Plan
- PPCD reduction targets - AM
- INPE Baseline – Resolution = 6.25 ha
- PPCD reduction targets - AC
State - UCEGEO database – Resolution = 0.54 ha
- Adjusted INPE database – Resolution =
0.64 ha
- Define project reduction targets
- Adjusted INPE database – Resolution =
Project 0.64 ha
- UCEGEO database – Resolution = 4 m2
(FORMOSAT)
- UCEGEO database – Resolution = 2,5 m
(SPOT 2012)
- Airbourne Laser – LiDar (pulses/m2)
- Aereal photography – Pixel 25 cm
- Field data

UCGEO: Monitoring of Deforestation
and Fire
Monitoring Evolution
Objective
- SEANP (Indigenous Lands and - Construction of series of historical
- Monitor alterations in land cover Conservation Units)
at medium and high resolutions, deforestation, regeneration, and fires
which allows for an analysis of - Settlement Projects (Traditional - Evaluation of different patterns within
small properties and Differentiated) the same use type
-Private Properties
-Other territorial areas

Metodology
Curve of Deforestation
Baseline (start) (End)
Georreferencing Matrix editing
Acquire Geocover Segmentation Accuracy analysis
imagery Field data
LANDSAT High resolution
(30M) imagery
INPE site Supervised and (FORMOSAT)
unsupervised digital
classification Final product
Treatment (SHP and Excel)
and
correction
Low energy spent
Medium energy spent
High energy spent

Monitoring: Deforestation
0,80
0,74
0,70 Média 90-00 0.32 0,66
Média 01-10 0.30
0,60
Média 06-10 0.15 0,54
Taxa de desmtamento anual (%)
0,50 0,44
0,38
0,40 0,36
0,33 0,33 0,33 0,33
0,29 0,29
0,30 0,26 0,27 0,26
0,23 0,24 0,22
0,24
0,20 0,15
0,14
0,11
0,09
0,10
0,00
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
Anos
Source: INPE (2010)

- State;
- Regions;
- Municipalities;
- Land tenure (UCs,TIs, PAs, Private
properties);
- Watersheds;
- Areas of Permanent Presevation
- Phytophysionomy;
- Geomorphological units;
- Soils;
- Area size

Total carbon stock

Targets for reducing rate of
deforestation by 2020
• Baseline of PPCD-AC: based on historical data and reduction targets and integrated with
PPCDAM
• 2nd version of Baseline: future projection based on a scenario without governance. In first
validation phase, use PRODES data, ZEE database, and vectors of deforestation in Acre.

NEXT STEPS
• FOREST DEGRADATION,
• REGENERATION
• IMPROVED CARBON STOCK
ESTIMATES
• Partnership with Woods Hole Research Center to monitor land use with RADAR
• Partnership with EMBRAPA to elaborate forest biomass inventory (history of
forest degradation)
• Destructive forest inventories to elaborate allometric equations for Acre State
• Calibration of LIDAR, satellite images and forest inventories to estimate carbon
stocks
• Detailed soli mapping by municipalities
• Validation of jurisdictional baseline method
SOURCE: Gregory Asner, Carnegie Institute,
California.