Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement

More from CIAT(20)

Advertisement

Unraveling Virus Complexes in Plants/ CIAT APR 2015

  1. Wilmer J. Cuellar UNRAVELING VIRUS COMPLEXES IN PLANTS 2015 Palmira, Colombia E-mail w.cuellar@cigar.org
  2. Viruses A virus is basically a protein shell with a few genes inside. They occur as part of fast evolving and complex communities and they are ecologically important components of the environment. It is not longer practical for one laboratory to focus on single strains grown in pure culture. They are historically associated with disease.
  3. Mosaics Yellowing Ring SpotLeaf Curling Most of plant pathology in the early 1900s consisted of symptom description In the beginning we had… ‘mosaics’, ‘yellowings’, ‘ringspots’, etc.
  4. TBT Early plant virology days
  5. ‘This masking of symptoms or development of immunity, or whatever it is, seems to hold under greenhouse conditions for practically all the plants tested.’ ‘Attempts have been made to produce symptoms on these leaves from other plants, but without success (...). The virus is still present even though the disease symptoms fail to appear.’ Wingard, 1928. J. Agric. Res. 37, 127-153. But if you leave the plants to grow older…
  6. a.k.a. ‘immunization’, ‘Protective inoculation’, ‘interference’, ‘reciprocal protection’, ‘mutual antagonism’, ‘prophylactic inoculation’, etc. Worked with similar (related) viruses and under laboratory conditions. McKinney, 1929. Mosaic diseases in the Canary Islands, west Africa, and Gibraltar. J. Agric. Res. 39, 557-578. Salaman, R.F. 1933. Protective inoculation against a plant virus. Nature. 131, 468-468. You will get: Cross protection
  7. Things are different in nature: latent and mild viruses In 1925 Johnson (US) analyzed healthy-looking potatoes and found a ‘mild mottle virus’ in almost all US potato varieties (Potato virus X). The X virus was also found in Europe and described as ‘simple mosaic’ in some varieties or ‘latent virus’ in others. In nature: Johnson J. 1925. Wisc. Res. Bull. 63:12pp. Smith K. 1931. Proc. Royal Soc London. 109, 251-267. Salaman RF. 1937. Proc. Royal Soc London. 229, 137-217. Dykstra T.P. 1938. Phytopathology. 629:40-67. X + YYX
  8. Mixed infections are common in cassava worldwide CBSD mosaic CMD mosaic Caribbean mosaicCommon mosaic Frogskin mosaic No mosaic AFRICAAMERICA Mixed infected Single infected
  9. In the search of ‘Frogskin’ aethiology It was first reported in 1971 from southern Colombia (Pineda, et al. 1983) Cauca 1971 • In 1980, flexous viral particles were observed in cassava plants displaying FSD (Pineda B., et al., 1980) • In parallel, mycoplasma related structures were found. Complex infection virus-mycoplama (Pineda B. & Lozano J.C., 1981) • The landrace Secundina (MCol 2063) expressed mosaic symptoms where FSD was endemic (CIAT Cassava Program Annual Reports, 1984,1985) • The presence of a potexvirus (CsVX?) in endemic regions of FSD was reported (Harrison B. D. & Lennon, A. M., 1989) • Multiple dsRNA (viral?) were associated to FSD (Cuervo M., 1989) • In 2007, it is reported the a phytoplasma in FSD-affected plants (Alvarez E., et. al. 2009). • In 2008, a REOvirus is found with cassava plants affected by FSD (Calvert L., et. al. 2008). • FSD plants giving negative results to REOvirus and to Phytoplasma • In 2014 we showed that all affected plants contain a complex infection and there was not enough evidence to associate previous pathogens separately (Carvajal-Yepes et al., 2014)
  10. Sites of study: North Coast, Valle del Cauca, Eastern Plains Improving diagnostics to reduce risk -e.g.Cassava
  11. H RS H RS H RS Symptoms vary depending on the root variety Venezolana (MCOL-2215) Mtai8 MCOL-2737
  12. Reproducing motling symptoms infectedControl
  13. Reproducing leaf deformation symptoms infectedControl
  14. Updated list of virus species infecting cassava NAME TAXONOMY DIAGNOSTIC America CsCMV Potexvirus ELISA/RT-PCR CsVX Potexvirus ELISA CsNAV Potexvirus RT-PCR CsVMV Cavemovirus PCR CsFSaV Reoviridae RT-PCR CsPLV Polerovirus RT-PCR CsTLV Torradovirus RT-PCR Asia CsGMV Nepovirus RT-PCR ICMV Geminvirius PCR SLCMV Geminivirus PCR Africa ACMV Geminivirus PCR EACMV Geminivirus PCR SACMV Geminivirus PCR ICVM Geminivirus PCR CBSV Ipomovirus RT-PCR UCBSV Ipomovirus RT-PCR Let’s take a look Cassava Virologists
  15. Phylogenetic tree (nt) CM4919-1 Sec94-2 Sec92-1 CM523-7 CM6740-7_1 CM4574-1 Sec92-2 CM6740-7 CM6740-7_1 CM6740-7_2 CM6740-7 CM4919-1 CM4574-7 Sec13 Nataima Lyophilized 19 FSD23 Mcol2215 1 6 FSD5 SM909-25 Mcol2737-7s 546010-113 FSD86 FSD80 OUT 87 69 60 88 70 62 73 60 0.01 in-vitro Field collected Improving diagnostics tools by surveying virus diversity AAAAAA AAAAAARNA1 RNA2 Full genome characterization CsTLV
  16. Tools for evaluating virus cleaning protocols Positive Negative %ofinfection N: 246 CsFSaV CsFSaV: 42% CsPLV: 4.7% CsTLV: 4.7% 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4
  17. To detect early build up of viruses in the field Virus free plants became infected in the first cycle45% 60%
  18. Tools to evaluate viruses in roots Transgenic Line L17Transgenic Line L10 H VIRUS 2VIRUS 1 NT H VIRUS 2VIRUS 1 NT H LEGEND VIRUS 1 and VIRUS 2: Different virus ifnections. H: Transgenic line grafted with not-infected ‘Secundina’. NT: Non-transgenic line.
  19. Tools to identify their pathogenicity proteins important in disease AAAAAA Normal light Ultraviolet light 1 2 3 C 1 2 3
  20. Three examples of reinforcing diagnostics
  21. Cassava common mosaic disease in the South: Re-emerging mixed infections Photos: Ovidio Antonio Uset INTA, Misiones, Argentina CsCMD-2014 Reports: Misiones (Arg) Corrientes (Arg) Itapúa (Par)
  22. CsCMV: Early identification, early response Cordoba-COL PRO29-COL GU09-COL Arg24-4 Corrientes-ARG Mcol1505-1 U23414-Brazil Mcol22-1 Arg126-6 Arg120-3 Arg128-1 Arg104-3 Arg22-1 Bra456-4 Par92-1 Arg25-1 Arg28-4 Arg97-4 JF913280-Parana Arg127-1 Arg113-6 Arg121 Arg34-4 PAr94-2 Outgroup 99 94 95 100 82 61 100 71 77 70 98 100 91 0.05 2013-2014
  23. p22 can suppress the defense of the plant p22 enhances the accumulation of the virus p22 by itself Induce severe symptoms in other plants (-) (+) (-) (-) P-Pro MTR HEL RdRp p26 p7 p22 Uganda Sweetpotato: Sometimes viruses change strategies P-Pro MTR HEL RdRp p26 p7 Rest of the world East Africa strain West Africa strain
  24. Citrus: Re-evaluation of cleaning systems Main citrus regions in Colombia (2014) 17 ICA-registered nurseries 5 comercial greenhouses 80 samples 99% infected by known pathogens (Mixed infections) CEVd 46% HSVd 81% CTV 60%
  25. Main drivers of disease Anderson PK., et al. 2004. Emerging infectious diseases of plants (...) TRENDS in Ecol and Evol. 19:535-544. Early identification should include the survey for potential pathogens before they jump into crops.
  26. Take home messages and Future directions A high diversity of hosts implies a even wider biodiversity of potential pathogens. We need to understand the biological significance of that diversity and their interactions. It is not longer practical to focus on diagnosis of single isolated pathogens grown in pure culture, especially with diseases affecting RTB crops. An “early identification, early response” strategy. Emphasis basic field research and biological tests. Sequences are needed but not enough. Including the diversity of potential pathogens in wild plants. We suggest the establishment of a Surveillance Network which should incorporate information on disease-conductive environments and considering historical information on previous epidemics.
  27. Carvajal-Yepes M, Olaya C, Lozano I, Cuervo M, Castaño M, Cuellar WJ. (2014) Unravelling complex virus infections in cassava. Virus Research 186, 76-86. Legg J, Kumar L, Makeshkumar T, Ferguson M, Kanju E, Ntawuruhunga P, Cuellar WJ. (2015) Cassava virus diseases: Biology, Epidemiology and Management. Advances in Virus Research. 91, 85-142. DiFeo L, Zanini A, Rodriguez P, Cuervo M, Carvajal-Yepes M, Cuellar WJ. (2015) First report of Cassava common mosaic virus and Cassava frogskin associated virus infecting cassava in Argentina. Plant Disease. 9, 733. Van der Vlugt R, Verbeek M, Dullemans AM, Wintermantel WM, Cuellar WJ, Fox A, Thompson JR. (2015) Torradoviruses. Annual Review of Phytopathology. 53, 23.1-23.28. Cassava Virology - Publications
  28. Cassava virology – CIAT Ivan Lozano Monica Carvajal Jenyfer Jimenez MSc Thesis completed: Cristian Olaya, 2014. MSc-Thesis. UNAL-Palmira, Colombia. Ana M. Leiva, 2015. MSc-Thesis. UNAL-Palmira, Colombia. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Alejandro Quintero Bertha Garcia We inherited a strong Research Laboratory, founded by Dr. Francisco Morales.

Editor's Notes

  1. I am a virologist and find viruses as a fascinating concept! They are evolving entities that only make sense in the field of Biology. So here we innocent come and try to classify them: As difficult as this may sound. Virus identification has been an intense activity for the last 100 years. In the beginning biologists were descriptive, classifying viral disease by the symtoms they produced in the affected crop or in specific indicator plants.
  2. I am a virologist and find viruses as a fascinating concept! They are evolving entities that only make sense in the field of Biology. So here we innocent come and try to classify them: As difficult as this may sound. Virus identification has been an intense activity for the last 100 years. In the beginning biologists were descriptive, classifying viral disease by the symtoms they produced in the affected crop or in specific indicator plants.
  3. But there was always the guy who instead of destroying the plants and cleaning the greenhouse after seeing the symptoms, it left the plants to grow old. What he found was that most plants recovered from the infection showing less severe symptoms of the disease.
  4. En este reporte, Postulados de Koch El agente patógeno debe estar presente en cada caso de la enfermedad en las condiciones apropiadas y ausente en las personas sanas. El agente no debe aparecer en otra enfermedad de manera fortuita o saprófita. El agente debe ser aislado del cuerpo en un cultivo puro a partir de las lesiones de la enfermedad. El agente debe provocar la enfermedad en un animal susceptible al ser inoculado. El agente debe ser aislado de nuevo de las lesiones producidas en los animales de experimentación.
  5. En este reporte, Postulados de Koch El agente patógeno debe estar presente en cada caso de la enfermedad en las condiciones apropiadas y ausente en las personas sanas. El agente no debe aparecer en otra enfermedad de manera fortuita o saprófita. El agente debe ser aislado del cuerpo en un cultivo puro a partir de las lesiones de la enfermedad. El agente debe provocar la enfermedad en un animal susceptible al ser inoculado. El agente debe ser aislado de nuevo de las lesiones producidas en los animales de experimentación.
Advertisement