Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to The Philippine Department of Agriculture and its Cassava Industry Roadmap(20)

Advertisement

More from CIAT(20)

Advertisement

The Philippine Department of Agriculture and its Cassava Industry Roadmap

  1. PHILIPPINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND ITS CASSAVA INDUSTRY ROADMAP Edilberto M. De Luna Assistant Secretary for Field Operations and National Rice Program and Corn Program Coordinator
  2. Purpose of Visit to CIAT 1. Introduce the Philippine cassava research and development program to CIAT 2. Prioritize key topics of collaboration for cassava and related research on integrated farming systems and climate change. 3. Identify specific CIAT areas of expertise and technological innovations relevant to the Philippines 4. Agree on immediate projects and activities, for financing by the Philippine government, other donors and CIAT-CGIAR.
  3. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, PHILIPPINES • The Philippine Department of Agriculture is the executive department of the Philippine government responsible for the promotion of agricultural and fisheries development and growth. • Formed June 23, 1898 and with headquarters in Quezon City, Metro Manila • Led by the Secretary of Agriculture, nominated by the President of the Philippines and a member of the Cabinet. The current Secretary of Agriculture is Engr. Proceso J. Alcala.
  4. DA Organizational Structure • 5 Undersecretaries and 5 Assistant Secretaries • Edilberto De Luna: Asst Secretary for Field Operations and National Coordinator for Rice and Corn-Cassava Programs • Regional executive director for each of the 17 regions in the country • Attached bureaus: • Agricultural Training Institute (ATI) • Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Standards (BAFS) • Bureau of Agricultural Research (BAR) • Bureau of Agricultural Statistics (BAS) • Bureau of Animal Industry (BAI) • Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) • Bureau of Plant Industry (BPI) • Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) • Bureau of Agricultural and Fisheries Engineering (BAFE)
  5. DA ATTACHED AGENCIES, CORPORATIONS & COUNCILS • Agricultural Credit and Policy Council (ACPC) • Livestock Development Council (LDC) • Philippine Council for Agriculture and Fishery (PCAF) • National Dairy Authority (NDA) • National Fisheries Research and Development Institute (NFRDI) • National Meat Inspection Service (NMIS) • National Tobacco Administration (NTA) • Philippine Agricultural Development and Commercial Corporation (PADCC) • Philippine Carabao Center (PCC) • Philippine Center for Postharvest Development and Mechanization (PhilMech) • Philippine Crop Insurance Corporation (PCIC) • Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority (PhilFIDA) • Philippine Fisheries Development Authority (PFDA) • Philippine Rice Research Institute (Philrice) • Quedan Rural Credit and Guarantee Corporation (QUEDANCOR) • Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center (SEAFDEC) • Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA)
  6. MANDATE • Promotion of agricultural development by providing the policy framework, public investments, and support services needed for domestic and export-oriented business enterprises. • Primary concern is to improve farm income and generate work opportunities for farmers, fishermen and other rural workers. • Encourages people's participation in agricultural development through sectoral representation in agricultural policy-making bodies so that the policies, plans and programs are formulated and executed to satisfy their needs. • Use a bottom-up self-reliant farm system approach that will emphasize social justice, equity, productivity and sustainability in the use of agricultural resources. Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
  7. DA BANNER PROGRAMS • AGRI PINOY RICE PROGRAM • AGRI PINOY CORN AND CASSAVA • AGRI PINOY HIGH VALUE CROPS PROGRAM • AGRI PINOY LIVESTOCK • AGRI PINOY FISHERY OTHER PROGRAMS • SUGAR CANE • COCONUT • FARM-TO-MARKET ROAD
  8. CIAT PARTNERSHIP WITH THE PHILIPPINES • Presidential Decree 1249 - legal framework for CIAT partnership with the Philippine national agricultural research system (signed in 1977) • MOUs for inter-institutional partnership (signed in 2015) - Department of Agriculture (DA) - University of the Philippines Los Banos (UPLB) - UPLB Foundation Inc - SEAMEO-SEARCA • Project agreements for financing collaborative research (starting 2016) - DA Bureau of Agricultural Research (BAR)
  9. 2016 CIAT Projects Funded by DA Philippines CASSAVA (DA Bureau of Agricultural Research) On-going grant projects - Co-strengthening capacities for cassava crop health (Kris Wyckhuys) - Participation in CIAT regional cassava breeding network - funded through UPLB and PhilRootcrops (Stef De Haan) Project proposal/grant agreement in progress - Emergency response schemes for cassava pest invaders (Kris Wyckhuys) - Pest/disease distribution mapping, diagnosis/prevention/control (PhilRootcrops-led, CIAT support) CLIMATE CHANGE (DA Systemwide Climate Change Office) On-going grant projects - Cross-country study missions Vietnam, Thailand & Indonesia -subgrant from SEARCA (Nora Guerten) - Meta-analysis on mainstreaming climate change in DA policies and programs – subgrant from UPLBFI (Dindo Campilan/Peter Laderach) Project proposal/grant agreement in progress - Decision-support platform for climate-resilient agriculture prioritization (Nora Guerten/Caitlin CDolloff) - Climate-risk vulnerability assessment of agri-fisheries communities (Peter Laderach/Louis Parker) ESTIMATED TOTAL VALUE OF DA-PHILIPPINES FINANCING TO CIAT IN 2016: US$0.8million
  10. Philippine Cassava Industry Development Roadmap CY 2015–2022
  11. RATIONALE Economic Contribution • Php14.80B (1.21%) in the GVA , 2014 current price • About 28,000 jobs generated in Crop Year 2014 Uses • Cassava is one of the staple foods of Filipinos due to high carbohydrate content. • More than 15M Filipinos eat cassava as staple/supplement • Raw material in the production for feeds, alcohol and other industrial products. Source of livelihood • More than 218,000 farm family are dependent (partially/fully ) on cassava production as source of income.
  12. ECONOMIC VALUE OF CASSAVA, 2014 2014 % SHARE 2014 % SHARE GVA in AGRICULTURE & FISHERY 1,424.89 100.00 714.87 100.00 A. AGRICULTURE 1,227.67 86.16 583.50 81.62 Palay 365.33 29.76 147.92 25.35 Corn 88.23 7.19 42.16 7.23 Coconut 98.89 8.06 28.11 4.82 Sugarcane 28.62 2.33 16.05 2.75 Cassava 14.80 1.21 9.54 1.63 Other Crops 230.40 18.77 112.53 19.29 Livestock 176.38 14.37 95.89 16.43 Poultry 127.74 10.41 78.27 13.41 Activities & Services 97.28 7.92 53.03 9.09 B. FISHERY 197.22 13.84 131.37 18.38 INDUSTRY CURRENT PRICES CONSTANT PRICES (rice)
  13. CASSAVA UTILIZATION IN THE PHILIPPINES
  14. HISTORICAL CASSAVA PRODUCTION IN THE COUNTRY, 2005-2014 (PSA-BAS) Vol. 4.48%AAGR = Yield 3.87%Area 0.59% 8.19 8.59 8.93 9.17 9.46 9.66 9.99 10.23 10.87 11.72 1,678 1,757 1,871 1,942 2,044 2,101 2,210 2,223 2,361 2,540 205 205 210 212 216 218 221 217 217 217 0 5 10 15 20 25 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Unitsin'000 Average Root Yield (mt/ha) Volume of Production ('000 mt) Area Harvested ('000 ha) 4.88% 3.96% 2.69% 3.16% 1.80% (0.10)% 2.47% 0.97% 2.02% 0.78% 3.39% 1.66% (1.80)% 2.45% 6.23% (0.04)% (0.18)% 7.80%
  15. Philippine Cassava Imports, 2013 GRAND TOTAL 33,610,635 1,491,976,088 Manioc (Cassava) With High Starch Or Inulin Content, Fresh, Chilled, Frozen Or Dried, Other Than Sliced Or In Form Of Pellets 15,877.50 5,553,439 246,517,157 India 0.02 296 13,139 Thailand 10,457.50 3,611,176 160,300,103 Indonesia (Includes West Irian) 0.44 5,414 240,327 Vietnam 5,419.53 1,936,553 85,963,588 Flour, Meal Or Powder Of Manioc (Cassava) 1,933.22 576,816 25,604,862 United States Of America 0.21 371 16,469 Indonesia (Includes West Irian) 1.83 1,341 59,527 Vietnam 1,931.18 575,104 25,528,867 Manioc(Cassava) Starch 50,267.54 22,948,865 1,018,700,117 United States Of America 0.70 630 27,966 Malaysia (Federation Of Malaya) 20.00 6,585 292,308 Singapore 114.00 9,197 408,255 Thailand 34,222.10 15,411,022 684,095,267 Indonesia (Includes West Irian) 1,777.37 761,863 33,819,099 Vietnam 14,111.78 6,751,177 299,684,747 South Africa, Republic Of 7/ 21.60 8,391 372,476 Item/Country of Origin Volume (MT) CIF Value (USD) CIF Value (Php) PSA-BAS
  16. Residues Of Starch Manufacture And Similar Residues Of Manioc (Cassava) Or Sago, Whether Or Not In The Form Of Pellets 16,001.90 4,015,401 178,243,650 United States Of America 224.34 108,679 4,824,261 Thailand 6,350.00 1,424,107 63,216,110 Vietnam 9,427.56 2,482,615 110,203,280 Residues Of Starch Manufacture And Similar Residues Other Than Manioc (Cassava) Or Sago, Whether Or Not In The Form Of Pellets 1,256.32 516,114 22,910,300 United States Of America 263.12 130,255 5,782,019 Australia 1.26 2,510 111,419 Netherlands 405.30 201,366 8,938,637 Germany 8.51 16,986 754,009 Taiwan (Republic Of China) 0.64 292 12,962 Vietnam 577.50 164,705 7,311,255 Item/Country of Origin Volume (MT) CIF Value (USD) CIF Value (Php) Philippine Cassava Imports, 2013 Continuation… PSA-BAS
  17. Philippine Cassava Exports, 2013 PSA-BAS Item/Country of Origin Quantity (kg) FOB Value (USD) FOB Value (Php) GRAND TOTAL 682,113 30,278,996 Manioc (Cassava) With High Starch Or Inulin Content, Fresh, Chilled, Frozen Or Dried, Sliced Or In Form Of Pellets 65,640 79,485 3,528,339 Australia 527 885 39,285 United States Of America 16,362 10,448 463,787 Hongkong 477 280 12,429 Korea, Republic Of South 3,879 5,872 260,658 Canada 18,302 21,172 939,825 Israel 946 1,230 54,600 Guam 1,357 1,900 84,341 Hawaii 20,385 31,500 1,398,285 Saudi Arabia 3,405 6,198 275,129 Manioc (Cassava) With High Starch Or Inulin Content, Fresh, Chilled, Frozen Or Dried, Other Than Sliced Or In Form Of Pellets 234,641 600,514 26,656,816 Australia 12,858 105,766 4,694,953 United States Of America 61,969 97,645 4,334,462 Japan (Excludes Okinawa) 481 6,264 278,059 Hongkong 2,407 1,545 68,583 Canada 154,688 377,207 16,744,219 Uk Great Britain And N. Ireland 451 695 30,851 United Arab Emirates 603 7,329 325,334 Israel 584 702 31,162 Micronesia, Federated States Of 600 3,361 149,195 Flour, Meal Or Powder Of Manioc (Cassava) 210 2,114 93,840 Afghanistan 210 2,114 93,840
  18. Cost Competitiveness Analysis Export trade scenario, 2013 ITEM Pampanga Maguindanao Bukidnon Masbate BorderPrice(USD/MT) 230 230 230 230 Yield(MT/Ha) 24 17 14 14 ExchangeRate(P/USD) 44 44 44 44 Domestic Cost(P/Ha) 55,663 43,001 32,930 56,098 ForeignCost(P/Ha) 12,020 10,643 7,520 14,285 TotalCost(P/Ha) 67,683 53,644 40,450 70,383 Domestic ResourceCost(P/USD) 10.60 11.72 10.79 20.16 Resource CostRatio 0.24 0.26 0.24 0.45 Source: RFOs, BSP, FAO, UA&P materials The Philippine cassava was generally cost competitive for export. The reason for this export competitiveness was due to low cost of production and high yield in different top producing provinces. The border price used is based from Thailand which is the top exporter of cassava in Asia.
  19. Cost Competitiveness Analysis Import substitution, 2013 RCR < 1 – competitive advantage RCR = 1 – neutral RCR > 1 – competitive disadvantage ITEM Pampanga Maguindanao Bukidnon Masbate Border Price (USD/MT) 230 230 230 230 Yield (MT/Ha) 24 17 14 14 Exchange Rate (P/USD) 44 44 44 44 Domestic Cost (P/Ha) 45,420 33,100 24,180 40,150 ForeignCost (P/Ha) 7,630 6,400 3,770 7,450 Total Cost (P/Ha) 53,050 39,500 27,950 47,600 Domestic Resource Cost (P/USD) 8.49 8.79 7.71 13.67 Resource CostRatio 0.19 0.20 0.17 0.31 The analysis showed the case of substituting domestically produced cassava with imports. Producing cassava in the country is cost competitive against the imports.
  20. TOTAL CASSAVA PRODUCTION TARGETS CY 2015-2022 PARTICULARS TARGETS 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 DEMAND 3821 4179 4568 4911 5254 5692 6136 6621 PRODUCTION (‘000 MT) 3168 3656 4081 4478 4873 5342 5799 6338 AREA (‘000 Ha.) 232 252 270 282 291 302 315 329 YIELD (MT/HA) 13.63 14.50 15.14 15.90 16.73 17.67 18.43 19.26 NET AVAILABLE 2756 3199 3592 3963 4337 4781 5219 5704 SUFFICIENCY LEVEL (%) 72 77 79 81 82 84 85 86
  21. Strengths Weaknesses 1. Sustained government support on farm mechanization and post harvest facilities 2. Available HYV of cassava for food and industrial uses. (NSIC-BPI). 3. Available technology for cassava production and post harvest processing (techno-guide and brochures). 4. Approved standards for dried cassava chips and granules (PNS/BAFPS 29:2010 ). 5. Established standard protocol on plant material certification for cassava (DA-BPI, AO no. 16); and on accreditation and re- accreditation of cassava seed pieces producers (DA-BPI, AO no. 17) 6. Intensive capacity building of farmers. 7. Increased stakeholders participation on industry governance and policy formulation. 8. Availability of idle and new areas for expansion. 1. Dominance of small farmers with limited capital and mostly disorganized. 2. Limited access to quality technical assistance Limited farm machineries and post harvest facilities. 3. Limited supply of quality planting materials. 4. High cost of product consolidation and inter- island transport. 5. Lags behind on GAP certification compared with other ASEAN countries. 6. Limited credit window for cassava growers. 7. High cost of cassava production and post harvest processing. SWOC ANALYSIS Source: Result of regional and national cassava stakeholders consultations, 2013
  22. Opportunities Challenges 1. Increasing local and foreign demand due to increasing industrial requirements of cassava for feeds, starch, flour, alcohol and other industrial uses. 2. Presence of foreign investors setting up local processing facilities using cassava as raw materials. 1. Implementation of the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement (AFTA). 2. Land degradation and desertification due to soil erosion. 3. Increasing cost of production inputs. 4. Effects of climate change. 5. Emerging new pests and diseases (ie. pink mealybug and cassava phytoplasma) . SWOC ANALYSIS Source: Result of regional and national cassava stakeholders consultations, 2013
  23. CASSAVA PROGRAM GOAL: Increase cassava production, enhance industry competitiveness, raise farmer’s income and generate more employment opportunities in the rural areas. OBJECTIVES: 1. Increase cassava production (fresh roots) from CY 2014 at 2,540 MMT to 6,467 MMT by year 2022; 2. Increase average yield from 11.72 mt/ha to 19.10 mt/ha by year 2022; 3. Increase yearly income of farmers by 10 percent; 4. Improve quality of cassava primary and other by- products; 5. Increase cassava per capita consumption from 2.59 kg to 7.0 kg starting CY 2017 and succeeding years.
  24. Production PRIORITIES • Increase productivity and product quality improvement • Promote sustainable cassava production system in sloping areas • Encourage private seed pieces growers to participate in the seed system scheme • Develop biotechnology tools for cassava insect and disease resistance. • Provide subsidy to cassava insurance and streamline credit policies to make it more accessible to farmers . • Intensify technical capability of agri- extension workers and farmer leaders.
  25. • Sustain government support in farm mechanization. • Encourage more private sector participation in cassava investment. • Implement approved cassava standards. Postharvest PRIORITIES
  26. Processing PRIORITIES • Encourage the private sector to establish more processing plants in strategic cassava areas. • Promote village level cassava processing for food. • Push for value-adding for cassava export.
  27. Proposed 2016-2020 Collaboration with CIAT and PhilRootcrops • Comprehensive yield gap analysis, for improved research priority-setting and technology delivery in the Philippine cassava sector; • Bolstering biotic resistance against (future) pest invaders at a field, farm and agro-landscape level: an exploratory research initiative; • Multi-variate assessment of drivers of pest attack, geared at a subsequent implementation of national forecasting and alert systems; • Towards sustainable intensification of Philippine cassava crop: customizing crop and soil fertility management schemes to secure pest- suppressive and resilient cassava cropping systems • A national roadmap to deploy clean seed systems, for Philippine root and tuber crops; • Agro-advisories and ICT-based extension tools to boost farmer preparedness in the face of climate change and pest invasion
  28. Other proposed research areas • Adaptability of rapid production techniques of quality planting materials • Development of package of technology(POT) in marginal/sloping areas • Improve the nutrient use efficiency (using tracer technique) to different soil fertility levels. • Development of integrated cassava cropping systems (cassava- livestock-forages-legumes) • Product development for export • Assessment on feasibility of conveyor type dryer compared to other methods of drying (Negros Oriental and Region XII --- solar drying) • Improvement and development of equipment and postharvest facilities (food grade)
  29. Thank You!!

Editor's Notes

  1. Cost Competitiveness under Export Trade Scenario. The analysis showed that a given border price of USD230 per MT and exchange rate of P44.39 per USD, Philippine cassava was generally cost competitive for export. The reason for this export competitiveness was due to low cost of production and high yield in different top producing provinces. The border price used is based from the Thailand which is the top exporter of cassava in the Asia. Cost Competitiveness under Import Substitution Trade Scenario. The analysis showed the case of substituting domestically produced cassava with imports. Adjusted border price is based on FOB, freight/insurance and handling/distribution. Producing cassava in the country is cost competitive against the imports.
Advertisement