Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

More from CGIAR(20)

Advertisement

Transitioning to GTA in small holder aquaculture

  1.               PHOTO Transitioning to GTA in small holder aquaculture Afrina Choudhury, a.Choudhury@cigar.org  Practice Workshop 5: A gender transformative approach in agrifood systems Seeds of Change Conference, University of Canberra, April 2nd  2019
  2. Transitioning to GTA in Aquaculture 1. Women targeted technologies 2. Studies evidencing need for GTA 3. Examples of GTA incorporation
  3. Women-targeted technologies
  4. Why target women? How? Close to home for easy access (time and labor burden, mobility and access  constraints) More control over homestead assets Income opportunity from an underutilized resource (without hindering other  usage) Enhanced resilience through diversified food and income options  Nutritional consumption enabled through small fish Selection based on interest and close proximity to resources Technical knowledge transfer through short-duration trainings Coaching Demonstration set up for practical learning and scaling out Linkage events Targeting women with technologies
  5. Studies evidencing need for GTA
  6. • Understanding the gender dimensions of  adopting climate-smart smallholder  aquaculture innovations • Gender integration in aquaculture research  and technology adoption processes:  Lessons learned in Bangladesh • GENNOVATE study • Women’s Economic Empowerment in  Aquaculture Production Systems in Asia:  Comparative Case Studies and Synthesis  from Bangladesh and Indonesia • Ownership Study Evidence of the need for a different approach
  7. Technology users are embedded in a range of relationships Technical approaches/gap filling can accept/reinforce inequity Gender integration without social change limits sustainability of impacts Need to engage with both women and men & address unequal power relations
  8. Multi-scale look into constraints
  9. The main reasons for men’s and women’s innovations Source: Gennovate
  10. Gender Integration Continuum
  11. Gender-transformative research Integrates efforts to redress gender disparities in resources, markets and technologies with complementary actions to address underlying social norms and power relations. Institutions and policies Community Individual Research and development organizations Technical interventions Gender-transformative action
  12. How we approach GTA in Bangladesh Capacity Development
  13. Examples of GTA incorporation
  14. Tools to facilitate critical reflections
  15. Theory of change behind tools used in Bangladesh
  16. Case 1: Complement technical with GTA in CSISA-BD homestead pond technology
  17. Sessions conducted Study designed and conducted HKI conducts TOT Outreach designed Adoption Study CSISA-BD GTA design
  18. Case 2: Multi-scale GTA +Gill net technology in smallholder aquaculture At the household level, tools used include ‘hopes & fears’, demonstrating and building trust, ‘power hierarchies’, access to nutrition, obstacles to change, ‘who decides’, and exploring gendered behavior. At the community level, tools used include ‘hopes & fears’, ‘looking at our attitudes’, ‘acting like a man/woman’, ‘how will we empower each other’, gender equality solutions, ‘the man box’ (masculinities) and a historical timeline of gender changes.
  19. Addressing dimensions of power Agency, Relations and Structures
  20. Gender transformative Value chain Analyses tool
  21. Coming up in Bangladesh • Quantitative+ qualitative study results to understand outcomes of merging GTA with small holder technology adoption • GTA in market systems approach within value chain and with private sector actors
  22. Thank You This work was undertaken as part of With funding from In partnership with
  23. Tools, resources Tools developed with partners: •Nurturing Connections video & manual (a gender transformative tool to foster critical reflection) •SILC+GTA manual (the savings plus internal lending communities +Gender transformative Approach in Zambia) •GTA with men and boys: Promundo & WorldFish manual (Promoting Gender-Transformative Change with Men and Boys: A Manual to Spark Critical Reflection on Harmful Gender Norms with Men and Boys in Aquatic Agricultural Systems) •Blogpost and video on Moving forward together manual (Video stories within a manual to help families overcome gender based challenges in Zambia) Communicating GTA to a non-scientific audience Animation highlights need to tackle gender norms Studies evidencing need for GTA •Understanding the gender dimensions of adopting climate-smart smallholder aquaculture innovations •Gender integration in aquaculture research and technology adoption processes: Lessons learned in Bangladesh Studies evidencing GTA •Gender Relations and Improved Technologies in Small Household Ponds in Bangladesh: rolling out novel learning approaches.
  24. More Resources Further resources •Gender Strategy Brief – A Gender Transformative Approach to Research in Development in Aquatic Agricultural Systems. •Building Coalitions, Creating Change: An Agenda for Gender Transformative Research in Development Workshop Report •Transforming gender relations: A key to lasting positive agricultural development outcomes. •Measuring gender transformative change. •Gender-transformative approaches to address inequalities in food, nutrition and economic outcomes in aquatic agricultural system •Measuring Gender-Transformative Change: A review of literature and promising practices. •Implementing a gender transformative research approach: Early lessons. In Research in development: Learning from the CGIAR Research Program on Aquatic Agricultural Systems. •Postharvest fish losses and unequal gender relations: drivers of the social-ecological trap in the Barotse Floodplain fishery, Zambia •Collaborative effort to operationalize the gender transformative approach in the Barotse Floodplain • Considering gender: Practical guidance for rural development initiatives in Solomon Islands.

Editor's Notes

  1. The way in which gender has been conceptualized and integrated in aquaculture initiatives in Bangladesh over the past thirty years has varied in line with organizational missions and mandates, project objectives and donor interests among other factors. Even so, the targeting of women for interventions focused on homestead ponds has been part of a wide variety of initiatives over time Several studies show that when women fishers access resources effectively together with men, overall levels of production, productivity and utilization can be strengthened (Terry, 2014; Morgan et al. 2013; Rahman et al. 2011; Belton et al. 2011; Shirajee et al. 2010). Aquaculture training is leading to enhanced status and strengthened voice in intrahousehold bargaining, irrespective of methodology. Long-lasting and deeply held beliefs around gender roles and responsibilities can be challenged when women are involved in activities that bring clear economic benefits to their households, or that enable them to perform their culturally ascribed roles more effectively. However, the impacts of involving women can be temporary. Securing long-lasting change can only succeed if women and men themselves take charge of—and feel they benefit as individuals and as families from—changes in gender relations. Innovative methodologies for technology development and dissemination need to focus on promoting farmer adaptive capacity and enabling them to take charge of their own learning, which is not a gender-neutral process. Working with development partners, value chain actors, communities, families and individuals to remove gender-based constraints to women's full participation in aquaculture is essential.
  2. We try to involve or target women but women do not use the technologies in a vacuum – without influences from other actors and institutions. Power relations – and specifically gender power relations – at every level affect the extent to which women can actually use and benefit from these innovations. This CCAFS & AAS funded study of two women targeted aquaculture technologies, disseminated through two WorldFish projects (USAID funded CSISA-BD and AIN), has found that technology interventions that target women alone may not necessarily enhance women’s contributions to aquaculture outcomes and the benefits they derive from them. This discrepancy between expected and actual outcomes arises because women, and men, exist in a multidimensional system of gender relations which influence women’s ability to: adopt technologies, gain and apply knowledge and skills to adapt them, achieve anticipated production and consumption outcomes and share equitably in their benefits.
  3. Often interventions address one part of these multidimensional scales but these interventions are not sustainable. Women exist in multiple array of gender relations which impact her ability to perform
  4. Design and test approaches that integrate technical interventions and social change efforts…AAS research program… including a focus on our own organization culture and capacities
  5. Not replacing accomodative
  6. Applying learning from the study to design a new training approach in the CSISA BD project
  7. These exercises helped address power within ,power to and power with HKI’s Nurturing Connections Promoting gender-transformative change with men and boys by Promundo and AAS Engaging Men and Boys in Gender Transformation by Promundo, USAID & others (page-69) Gender awareness and development by UNDP (page-48) Gender Sensitivity by UNESCO (page-57) Gender Analysis and Awareness Course by BRAC (page-27) We try to involve or target women but women do not use the technologies in a vacuum – without influences from other actors and institutions. Reducing technology adoption gap between men and women by specifically targeting women Technologies cannot be 'delivered' in a gender-neutral way because their impacts will not be gender-neutral; the operating environment is shaped a priori by gender relations (Manfre et al. 2012; Ragasa et al. 2012; Farnworth, 2010). Therefore, on the technology side, ignoring the social context may limit the benefits of an intervention, as barriers to adoption or to benefiting from adoption among marginalized groups are not addressed
  8. Related to the above, "power over" in the box relates to individuals' power over resources/assets. As i recall our CARE framework in fact defines Power over in part this way AND in part relating to Power Over others/Others having power over us. (Which of course intersects closely with the others, including Power To). NB that what is exciting about GTA is that it tackles this aspect of Power over AND that it involves those with POWER OVER others in processes of transformation (not only those 'disempowered). Source: Care framework Power over: ability to influence and coherce: Changes in underlying resources and power to challenge constraints
Advertisement