Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to The effects of sweetpotato commercialization on men and women producers and traders in Homa bay and Bungoma, Kenya(20)

Advertisement

More from CGIAR(20)

Advertisement

The effects of sweetpotato commercialization on men and women producers and traders in Homa bay and Bungoma, Kenya

  1. C G I A R G E N D E R S C I E N T I F I C C O N F E R E N C E S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 8 , A d d i s A b a b a The effects of sweetpotato commercialization on men and women producers and traders in Homa bay and Bungoma Kenya Netsayi N Mudege & Norman Kwikiriza, Simon Heck Presented by Nozomi Kawarazuka
  2. Outline  Background/introduction  Methods  Results
  3. Background/Objectives  Sweetpotato regarded as a woman’s crop because it has historically not been cultivated for cash  To discuss how • the development and commercialization OFSP value chains affects the framework of opportunities and constraints for smallholder sweetpotato farmers including women • How commercialisation of SP value chains affect livelihoods of small holder farmers
  4. Methodology  Social relations approach  Gender relations are part of social relations of power, which ultimately determine roles, responsibilities as well as distribution of resources and benefits’ (Mudege et al., 2017)  Gender relations can worsen or improve as a result of commercialization  Commercialization provides opportunity for conflict, cooperation and bargaining between men and women which has the potential of improving gender relations as well as increasing the income that accrue to both
  5. Tools  16 FGDs (8men/8women) (Total # 60 men and 80 women)  41 female and 1 male retailer  IDI 10 men 10 women
  6. Challenges related to the sweetpotato enterprise 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 #ofIDIsandFGDsachallengewasmentioned Men IDI Men FGD Women IDI Women FGD “the people with oxen cheat you that they will come until sweet potatoes; vines go bad” (A married female Kabondo)
  7.  R: If you find a man who does not like it all the problems will be heaped on you. You are the one who is going to plant it, weed it. All that will be upon you. When it comes to the day of harvesting he is the one who sits there because he wants to be the one to remove it. At the time of work he is far away and when the time for money comes he draws nearer ….women have problems. You don’t even know how many kilos of sweet potatoes you have harvested. He does not want you to know. He will tell you that you did not come with land and that the land is his… so you will just keep quiet and do your own things (widowed female, Kabondo)
  8. Social and health benefits 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 School fees Buying household goods and furniture/build house Good health Food Maintaining social networks Independence Less labour intensive/can hire labour Early maturity Clothes # of IDIs a benefit of OFSP is mentioned Women Men ‘Sweet potato business is a good husband who gives me money without abuses’ (A married women respondent aged 38, Homabay)
  9. Economic benefits 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Income Bought cattle Bought land/rent/other farming investments Savings Bought goat/sheep Bought an oxplough/motorbike Access to loans/open bank account Debt repayment # of IDIs in which a benefit is mentioned Women Men
  10. Economic benefits  The nature of commercialization has evolved with new modes of commercialization such as involvement of the private sector increasingly becoming dominant  Adv of SP commercialisatio • 1) bulk sales which reduced the drudgery related to small sales which people have to carry on their heads or bicycles for long distances • 2) pricing system is standardized through payment per kilogram which both men and women farmers regarded as fair compared to the traditional way of selling by volume such as bags or heaps; • 3) additionally the major private sector player Organi limited was regarded as an honest broker who always paid for sweetpotato delivered compared to informal market traders who farmers regarded as not to be completely trusted as they could sometimes refuse to pay for goods delivered.
  11. Decisions on income FGD men Commerc ial kamiola1 FGD men Commerc ial kamiola2 FGD commerc ial Bungoma 1 FGD commerc ial Bungoma 2 Fgd commerc ial Kabondo men1 Fgd commerc ial Kabondo men2 FGD Men commerc ial Rodi1 FGD Men commerc ial Rodi2 Own clothes 3000 2,000 600 Taxi home 3000 Food home 1500 2000 1000 1,500 1,000 1500 For wife 500 500 1000 500 Phone 2500 Drink alcohol 5,000 farming 2000 3000 1,000 8,500 3000 2000 Entertainm ent 2000 5000 School fees 3000 4500 4000 3500 School Uniform 1000 1000 1000 Pocket money 500 900 Side chibk 2000 family emergency 1500 1500 debt 1000 500 saving 1500 Men's mock budgets
  12. Decisions on income Susan&Rodi Everline&RodiConsolata&RodiFreda&Kabondo&married&GRACE&WidowSusan&KabondoIrene&KabondoBudget&1&BungomaBudget&2&Bungoma Budget 3 Bungoma Budget&4&BungomaBrenda&Auma Scool&fees 6000 3000 4500 5000 6350 5000 1000 5000 6000 5000 Farming 4000 2000 4100 5000 2000 2000 1000 Household&shopping 7000 1000 1000 1000 2000 3000 3000 2000 1000 1000 Medical 500 Transport 1000 Emeregncy 1000 1000 400 500 2000 veterinary&services 1000 PERSONAL&SHOPPING 1000 1000 fertiliser 1650 2500 seed&ourchase 1000 food 500 saving 1500 2000 2000 2000 1000 Goat 2500 tithe 1000 other&needs 3000 spouse 1000 Women's mock budgets
  13. Impact of commercialization on livelihoods 1.3 2.7 6.0 6.0 4.0 1.3 2.3 4.3 7.0 5.3 3.0 7.0 6.3 2.7 2.0 1.5 2.3 6.7 4.7 5.3 Step 5 Step 4 Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 Men Now Men 3 years ago Women Now Women 3 years ago Perceived changes in people's livelihoods up and down the community ladder over a period of 3 years
  14.  Men blamed SP commercialization for making it harder to get land to rent due to increased competition and rental fees  Women mentioned that availability of money from OFSP has made their lives better since they can rent small pieces of land and stop depending on their men  Increased availability of low level jobs such as sweetpotato washing but blamed for high dropout rates among young men and women
  15.  The person at the bottom of ladder rarely benefits significantly…just provides underpaid labour to sweetpotato (OFSP) farmers • “Unlike the highest ranked person in the community, the person at the lowest level of the ladder of life leads a hopeless life because he is lazy and has not embraced any type of farming to improve his life because he even does not have a piece of land to practice farming. He actually leads the hand to mouth type of life”. (A woman mixed FGD participant, Kabondo).  Women more positive about general livelihood improvement in the community due to agricultural commercialization  Better private markets (e.g. Organi) has led to higher incomes  Freer and more availability of information was also regarded as a reason why the poorest group of farmers was shrinking coupled with increase of people in step3 and Step4.
  16. Discussion  Commercialization allowed women to challenge hierarchical male domination • Women are contributing more to households and are being consulted more by men on household decisions • Women are able to buy livestock, or land and other assets which has improved their economic and social standing relative to their husbans Women are able to fund the life style they want  However some men take over sweetpotato farming and marketing after commercalisation  Gendered access to resources such as land in some instances determined whether and how men and women were able to benefit from commercialization.  in some cases the process of commercialization concentrated power in men’s hands since they were able to make independent decisions on crop cultivation and could also easily control the income which most women could not challenge in deference to the notion of men as heads of households..
  17.  The study validates the importance of joint decision making in ensuring men and women equally benefit  When promoting commercialization, practitioners need to understand how social differentiation within the community may affect the ability of men and women benefitting from commercialization processes.  Other social differences such as marital status and age also impacted on the ability of women to benefit from commercialization. (e.g. widowed vs married; polygamous vs monogamous marriages; older married women vs newly married women)
  18. The International Potato Center (known by its Spanish acronym CIP) is a research-for-development organization with a focus on potato, sweetpotato, and Andean roots and tubers. CIP is dedicated to delivering sustainable science-based solutions to the pressing world issues of hunger, poverty, gender equity, climate change and the preservation of our Earth’s fragile biodiversity and natural resources. www.cipotato.org This study was undertaken as part of the CGIAR Research Programs on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) and Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM). Implementation was led by CIP. Funding support was provided by IFAD/EU and PIM.

Editor's Notes

  1. For example, when groundnuts were commercialized in Zambia and men became more involved in groundnuts, women did not see this as losing control of groundnut production and income, but were happy that men were more helpful which reduced women’s labour demands.
  2. Family disagreements related to use of income and investments mentioned as a key challenge An analysis of baseline data for sweetpotato sales among widowed and married women who indicated that they made decisions regarding selling of sweetpotato, shows higher sales for married women compared to widowed women. For example, it was often noted that widowed women often did not have access to the capital they needed to hire labour and oxen to help with land preparation to expand their farming enterprise.
  3. Thus, while for men family disagreements did not affect their ability to participate, for women these could affect their ability to participate and benefit from OFSP. Other men groups also mentioned misuse of money by men as a big problem causing suffering to women and children in the household: Alcoholism resulting from new found extra cash by men was regarded as a key problem leading to violence within the home.
  4. Both men and women mentioned that engaging in OFSP trade increased independence in decision making for women. For example, women can easily buy household goods, can easily go on a journey or attend family functions and funerals without having to beg for travel money. both men and women perceived more respect from other community members when they started doing well through their engagement in orange fleshed sweetpotato sales
  5. Women’s budgets were similar thematically to the first ideal budget by men. Women invested more in schooling and farming. Women often stated that men’s budgets were not always transparent and some men used family money on alcohol while women were concerned with issues like food and school fees. Although there are men who consult their wives, both men and women agreed that women’s budgets were usually family friendly but were usually not consulted by men once the money came in However, women who made joint budget decisions with their husbands were often happy about how money is used. This shows that if joint decisions are made regarding expenditures, families benefit. Only women respondents mentioned that orange sweetpotato farming businesses had enabled them to have savings, open bank accounts as well as make it easy for them to pay back debt.
  6. Step 5 is better off step 1 worse off
  7. . households where men and women made joint decisions about production of OFSP and its marketing, produced more sweetpotato for the market and made joint decisions about use of income from marketed sweetpotato compared to households that did not make joint production decisions. t from commercialization However, it is interesting to note that women in polygamous experienced more independence and ability to participate in the commercialized OFSP production and often hailed it as providing a means for them to look after their families without waiting for the husband or begging for his money Additionally, it was also clear that compared to older married women, newly married women had little control over income from sweetpotato commercialization even when they were contributing all the labour, because of deference paid to male household heads. Often the children of the poorest in the community also provided labour to better off farmers missing out on education creating a vicious cycle of poverty
Advertisement