Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Advertisement

More from CGIAR(20)

Advertisement

Session 5 Management roles in enhancing diversity by Kathleen Vaughan

  1. Maximizing the Power of Diversity and Inclusion within the CGIAR family Kathleen Vaughan QED Consulting
  2. Mini-workshop Objectives • Understand head/heart/hands framework for diversity • Explore the Global Diversity & Inclusion Benchmarks tool and discuss how where CGIAR and our home organisations • Discuss and identify different ways to take actions to enhance diversity and inclusion at our home organisations and within the larger CGIAR family
  3. Session Roadmap Definitions and Dimensions The Business Case for global diversity & inclusion Global Diversity & Inclusion Benchmarks Taking the Learning Forward 
  4. Diversity Defined Diversity refers to the variety of similarities and differences among people, including but not limited to: gender, gender identity, ethnicity, race, native or indigenous origin, age, generation, sexual orientation, culture, religion, belief system, marital status, parental status, socio- economic difference, appearance, language and accent, disability, mental health, education, geography, nationality, work style, work experience, job role and function, thinking style, and personality type. Source: Global Diversity and Inclusion Benchmarks, © 2016, O’Mara & Richter
  5. Age Sexual Orientation Physical Abilities/ Qualities Gender Ethnicity Race Dimensions of Difference: Primary & Secondary Religious Beliefs Marital Status Parental Status Military Experience Education Work Background Geographic Location Income Adapted from Implementing Diversity, Marilyn Loden, 1996. AgePersonality
  6. H3:A Framework for working with Diversity HEAD - Insight HEART - Inclusion HANDS – Adaptation
  7. Respect for Diversity (UN Definition) Works effectively with people from all backgrounds (hands) Treats all people with dignity and respect (heart and hands) Treats men and women equally (heart and hands) Shows respect for and understanding of diverse points of view and demonstrates this understanding in daily work and decision-making (head and hands) Examines own biases and behaviours to avoid stereotypical responses (head, heart and hands) Does not discriminate against any individual or group (head, heart and hands)
  8. Inclusion Defined Inclusion is a dynamic state of operating in which diversity is leveraged to create a fair, healthy, and high- performing organization or community. An inclusive environment ensures equitable access to resources and opportunities for all. It also enables individuals and groups to feel safe, respected, engaged, motivated, and valued, for who they are and for their contributions toward organizational and societal goals. Source: Global Diversity and Inclusion Benchmarks, © 2016, O’Mara & Richter Inclusion can be experienced at the interpersonal, team, department, organization and societal levels… 8
  9. The Business Case for Global Diversity • Organizations effectively harnessing Global Diversity experience an improved ability to recruit and retain talent and improved leadership effectiveness • Organizations leveraging Global Diversity experience higher creativity and an enhanced quality of problem solving, and consequently increased productivity and profitability over less progressive organizations • Organizations valuing Global Diversity have increased goodwill and reputational capital
  10. 10 Age Research The average work age in the UK, the highest in history. 20 million consumers in the UK are over 50 years old (30% of the population). Older workers (over 40) in the US have: • Higher motivation and job satisfaction • Fewer on-the-job accidents • Equal or better attendance records • Productivity as high as the younger workforce Source: The National Council on the Aging, 2001; Career Magazine, 1998
  11. 11 Ethnicity Research • The 50 Best Companies for Asians, Blacks and Hispanics beat the S&P 500 over the last three and five years. Source: Fortune, July 19, 1999 Research from Tufts University indicates that diverse groups perform better than homogenous groups. In a study involving 200 participants on 29 mock juries, panels of whites and blacks performed better than all-white groups by a number of measures: diverse juries deliberated longer, raised more facts about the case, conducted broader and more wide-ranging deliberations, and made fewer factual errors in discussing evidence. Source: Tufts University, April 2006
  12. 12 Gender (and other) Diversity Research in the UK Sources: Marx, Elisabeth, 1998, A View at the Top Diversity Best Practices in the Corporate World, Women and Equality Unit, dti, 2004 The FTSE 100’s most admired companies have more diverse boards (as defined by functional background, international experience, and gender diversity) than the rest of the FTSE 100. 90% of the top 20 companies by market cap in the FTSE 100 have women directors, while only 40% of the bottom 20 companies have women directors.
  13. 13 GenderResearch in US • 19-year study of 215 Fortune 500 firms • Strong correlation : promoting women into the executive suite = 18% - 69% more profitable than median firms • 3 measures of profitability were used - profit as a percent of revenues, assets and stockholders’ equity This information is made possible by Roy D. Adler, Executive Director, Glass Ceiling Research Center
  14. 14 Valuing Differences - Moving To Teams Within GE, shifting to teams caused productivity gains: For homogeneous teams the gain was 13 percent For diverse teams the gain was 21 percent Source: Study conducted by Bob Lattimer Towers Perrin, Atlanta, Georgia, 1995
  15. 15 Stages in Team Development Productivity Time T1 T2 Homogeneous teams Well-managed Diverse teams well-managed Forming > Storming > Norming > Performing Diverse teams NOT well-managed
  16. 16 Valuing Differences – Greater Innovation Hypothesis: Innovation is positively and significantly associated with both human capital and diversity • Openness to diversity seems to enhance a region’s capacity to produce innovations • Measures of diversity: the Gay index, the Bohemian index, # of foreign born, degree of racial integration • Three Ts: Talent, Technology and Tolerance • Source: Innovation, Human Capital, and Diversity, by Richard Florida and Sam Youl Lee, Carnegie Mellon University, November 2001. No Monopoly on Creativity, by Richard Florida, HBR, Feb. 2004: Breakthrough Ideas for 2004.
  17. Workers with disabilities: the business case • Managing a diverse workforce, including disabled workers, is a major factor in efficiency, productivity and overall success • • People with disabilities make positive contribution to the workplace, are good workers • • Hiring and retaining disabled workers improves workplace morale, team work • • People with disabilities, their families and networks are customers, with large disposable incomes in some countries
  18. Insights?
  19. Where are you? An Organisational Assessment Tool
  20. Global Diversity & Inclusion Benchmarks ü Assess organisational progress in implementing stated commitment to diversity and inclusion ü Global in reach ü Incremental in application ü Descriptive, rather than prescriptive ü4 areas of focus • Foundation • Internal • External • Bridging • ü14 categories, 266 benchmarks •
  21. Table Group Exercise 1. At your tables, review the 14 categories and the 28 benchmarks 2. As a group, identify categories you believe CGIAR has achieved most of the time (i.e. > 80%)? 3. As a group, identify which categories you feel are the most challenging for CGIAR to address? 4. Individually, assess your own oragnisation. In your own opinion, which have you achieved? Which are most challenging? Debrief
  22. D&I Levels of Maturity ●Level of Maturity ●% ●Best Practice ●100 ●Progressive ●75 ●Proactive ●50 ●Reactive ●25 ●Inactive ●0
  23. 5 approaches to D&I ØSocial Justice ØOrganisational Performance ØDignity ØCompliance ØCompetence
  24. Group Discussion Based on our GDIB assessment: 1. What are our most pressing Diversity & Inclusion related issues and concerns? 2. What is the most common approach to D&I within our organisations? 3. What can the CGIAR family do about these D&I concerns? 4. What can you and your teams at work do to create a culture of diversity and inclusion? 5. What support do you need and from whom? •
  25. Wrap up: I can, I will With a partner, reflect on what we have discussed and explored today: Ø What can you do differently? Ø What will you do differently, starting now? • Share your plans for taking steps to enhance diversity and inclusion in the workplace and with your teams. • Group debrief: Let’s gather the best ideas.
  26. Resources available from QED Consulting • Global Diversity & Inclusion Benchmarks (GDIB) • Global Diversity Survey (GDS) • Global Gender Intelligence Assessment (GGIA) • For more information, contact: Kathleen Vaughan Kathleen.Vaughan@xponentially.com +254 735 002 906

Editor's Notes

  1. QED Consulting – Dec 2012 WIPO Ethics Programme – Leader Guide Phase 1 - HRG
  2. Big Picture Business case: increased REVENUES & PROFITS Improved RECRUITING & RETENTION Increased IMAGE reference to readings/ articles in book… especially Hayles,Div. DirectiveCh. 1 and Cox article. Explain goodwill -- growth of Intangibles versus tangibles
  3. Better productivity and retention see Career Magazine article
  4. Emphasise that this is US centric 12
  5. Here is another recent study, this one done in the UK… It indicated that Diversity of function, culture and gender results in better performance – other studies are beginning to show correlations between diversity in a governing board and better financial results.    Over the 3-year-period from 2000-2003 a study on the companies with the most admired boards out-performed S&P 500 companies as follows: Top 5 (most admired) +23% increase in profits Top 15 +3% increase Average S&P –2 Lowest 50 -11% returns Source: Governance Metrics
  6. Power of heterogeneous teams Diversity was of gender, race and age. see Ch 1 page 4 of Hayles,Diversity Directive.
  7. Earlier studies on States (Toffler).. More diverse states more innovative. Florida’s latest piece in HBR – NO Monopoly on Creativity: 1900 – 10% of US workers doing creative work By 2000 – 1/3 of workers… To achieve growth need 3 Ts: talent, technology and tolerance – in addition to gay and bohemian index, # of foreign born and degree of racial integration. Creativity index – top: Sweden, US, Finland, Netherlands, Denmark…
  8. Reference‘Unlocking potential in Portuguese, where the business case is clearly articulated. Dupont study: Disabled workers performed comparable to or better than nondisabled peers with regard to:Safety, Attendance, Job Performance Disabled persons as customers Annual Disabled Income---Estimates In US: $200 Billion In UK: $50 Billion In Canada: $25 Billion
Advertisement