Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Slideshows for you(20)

Similar to Measuring empowerment in the abaca, coconut, seaweed and swine value chains in the Philippines(20)

Advertisement

More from CGIAR(20)

Advertisement

Measuring empowerment in the abaca, coconut, seaweed and swine value chains in the Philippines

  1. Measuring Empowerment in the Abaca, Coconut, Seaweed and Swine Value Chains in the Philippines Hazel Malapit1, Elena Martinez1, Agnes Quisumbing1, Greg Seymour1, Catherine Ragasa1, Deborah Rubin2 1International Food Policy Research Institute 2Cultural Practice 2nd Annual Scientific Conference and Capacity Development Workshop Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | September 25-28, 2018
  2. What is the WEAI? • Measures inclusion of women in the agricultural sector • Survey-based index - interviews men and women in the same household • Methodology: – Similar to multi-dimensional poverty indices (Alkire and Foster 2011) and the Foster-Greere- Thorbeck (FGT) indices – Details on index construction in Alkire et al. (2013)
  3. How is the Index constructed? • An aggregate index in two parts: • Five Domains of Empowerment (5DE) • Gender Parity Index (GPI) • Constructed using interviews of the primary male and primary female adults in the same household
  4. WEAI4VC • Expands empowerment measure to cover multiple stages, different types of actors in the value chain • Pro-WEAI quantitative and qualitative protocols as starting point • Expands production module to livelihoods, including entrepreneurship and wage work Philippines WEAI4VC Pilot • Supported by the Millennium Challenge Corporation • Assess empowerment and gender parity of women across 4 priority value chains (abaca, coconut, seaweed, swine) • Pilot survey with 1600 households in 4 provinces (Sorsogon, Cebu, Bohol, Leyte); 40 KIIs (coconut, seaweed)
  5. Research Questions • What types of activities do women and men perform in the abaca, coconut, seaweed, and swine value chains? Are women and men equally represented across the chains? • What are the gender-based constraints faced by women and men in the abaca, coconut, seaweed, and swine value chains? Do these constraints differ by location, social status, value chain role, or other characteristics? • What types of interventions, technologies, or practices can be targeted to women and men in the abaca, coconut, seaweed, and swine value chains to increase their productivity and alleviate their time burden?
  6. Mixed Methods Quantitative Survey design Qualitative Key Informant Interviews Activity Bohol (Seaweeds) Cebu (Seaweeds) Leyte (Coconut) Total M W M W M W Producers 2 2 2 2 4 4 16 Traders (Formal and/or Informal) 2 2 4 8 Processors (Formal and Informal) 2 2 4 8 Extensionists (Ministry of Agriculture) 1 1 2 Municipal gender focal person 1 1 2 Other relevant actors (e.g., women’s or other association official) 1 1 2 4 Total 10 10 20 40
  7. Excessive workload and lack of group membership contribute most to disempowerment 0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men AbacaCoconutSeaweedSwine Disempowerment score (1-5DE) Input in productive decisions Autonomy in production Ownership of assets Purchase, sale, or transfer of assets Access to and decisions on credit Control over use of income Group member Workload
  8. Gender gaps in average achievements by sub-indicator Legend: Colors represent whether gaps favor FEMALES, MALES, or NEITHER. Rankings 1, 2, 3 indicate the sub-indicators with the largest achievement gaps between women and men within each value chain. Value chain Sub-indicators Abaca Coconut Seaweed Swine Input in productive decisions Input in decisions about VC activities Participation in decisions about VC activities Autonomy in production 3 Access to information about agricultural activities Access to information important for VC activities Autonomy in working conditions Autonomy in wage work Ownership of assets Rights over assets 2 Access to and decisions on credit 1 Access to financial account 1 1 Control over use of income Control over use of agricultural income Control over use of non-agricultural income 1 Control over household purchases Input in decisions about income from VC activities Input in decisions about consumption of output Autonomy in income 2 2 Group membership Workload 3 1 Mutual respect among household members 2 Attitudes about domestic violence from husband Attitudes about domestic violence from employer Access to community programs 3 Access to extension services Livelihoods Resources Income Leadership Time Intrahousehold relationships Access to information & extension
  9. Gender gaps in average achievements by sub-indicator Legend: Colors represent whether gaps favor FEMALES, MALES, or NEITHER. Rankings 1, 2, 3 indicate the sub-indicators with the largest achievement gaps between women and men within each value chain. Value chain Sub-indicators Abaca Coconut Seaweed Swine Input in productive decisions Input in decisions about VC activities Participation in decisions about VC activities Autonomy in production 3 Access to information about agricultural activities Access to information important for VC activities Autonomy in working conditions Autonomy in wage work Ownership of assets Rights over assets 3 Access to and decisions on credit 1 Access to financial account 1 1 Control over use of income Control over use of agricultural income Control over use of non-agricultural income 1 Control over household purchases Input in decisions about income from VC activities Input in decisions about consumption of output Autonomy in income 2 2 Group membership Workload 3 1 Mutual respect among household members 2 Attitudes about domestic violence from husband Attitudes about domestic violence from employer Access to community programs 3 Access to extension services Livelihoods Resources Income Leadership Time Intrahousehold relationships Access to information & extension Women favored in group membership  Most coconut producer groups restrict membership to 1 person per HH  Women rather than men attend the meetings as men were out earning income  Women perceived as more trustworthy and often elected to positions such as treasurer in the association Women’s involvement in in production and processing is unfavorable  Passive ownership of trees, but not actively engaged in cultivation or harvesting or processing (eg, copra drying)  Among women respondents involved in coconut who really worked, they were involved in low-profitability crafts and food processing
  10. Gender gaps in average achievements by sub-indicator Legend: Colors represent whether gaps favor FEMALES, MALES, or NEITHER. Rankings 1, 2, 3 indicate the sub-indicators with the largest achievement gaps between women and men within each value chain. Value chain Sub-indicators Abaca Coconut Seaweed Swine Input in productive decisions Input in decisions about VC activities Participation in decisions about VC activities Autonomy in production 3 Access to information about agricultural activities Access to information important for VC activities Autonomy in working conditions Autonomy in wage work Ownership of assets Rights over assets 2 Access to and decisions on credit 1 Access to financial account 1 1 Control over use of income Control over use of agricultural income Control over use of non-agricultural income 1 Control over household purchases Input in decisions about income from VC activities Input in decisions about consumption of output Autonomy in income 2 2 Group membership Workload 3 1 Mutual respect among household members 2 Attitudes about domestic violence from husband Attitudes about domestic violence from employer Access to community programs 3 Access to extension services Livelihoods Resources Income Leadership Time Intrahousehold relationships Access to information & extension Higher autonomy in production than those in coconut, as their work is often done as piecework  Women see this as a good thing, can start and stop to take up domestic responsibilities  BUT, still paid less in comparison to men for a day’s work  Inconsistencies between qual and quant – only 25-29 % show adequacy in child care (need to sort this out!) Gender roles vary across different places for seaweed production and processing
  11. Philippines WEAI4VC Pilot: Preliminary findings • (Original) WEAI scores are relatively high: consistent with (generally) more gender egalitarian culture in the Philippines • Some consistent findings across value chains • Top constraints: Workload and group membership • Very low achievements in autonomy in wage work and working conditions Strong attitudes of maintaining sex-segregation in the workforce Both men and women spoke about the different types of work they do (and should do) in tasks related to coconut farming, but also in talking about appropriate work for their children Parents preferred teaching, nursing or other office work for girls, “good” government jobs or professions like accounting for boys, or emigrate to get jobs in the US! • Some sub-indicators favor men, some favor women Coconut: Expected low involvement of women in coconut production, but not surprising that women favored in coconut groups Seaweed: Piecework for women seaweed producers offers more flexibility to combine with domestic responsibilities, but still paid less than men
  12. Philippines WEAI4VC Pilot: Preliminary findings • Implications for program design • Explore ways to reduce time burdens Consider investments in labor-saving technologies in some of the areas of women’s work, e.g., fresh coconut milk processing or the work of tying seaweed to strings for planting and drying of the harvested seaweed. • Groups may not be an effective delivery platform for interventions • To reduce gender gaps, specific interventions targeted to men or women Need to change stereotypes about appropriate work for young men and young women, both in terms of making agricultural occupations more attractive but also about the types of work that men and women do in agriculture
  13. Photo credit: USC-OPS/Sofronio Masepequiña WEAI Resource Center weai.ifpri.info Thank you!

Editor's Notes

  1. Preliminary results from the Philippines pilot First time we are sharing findings from our qualitative work
  2. The WEAI was developed by IFPRI, USAID, and OPHI in 2012 to measure the greater inclusion of women in the agricultural sector as a result of US Government’s Feed the Future (FTF) Initiative It is a survey-based index constructed using interviews of the primary male and primary female adults in the same household Key aspect of index construction: similar to family of multi-dimensional poverty indices (Alkire and Foster 2011, J of Public Econ) and the Foster-Greere-Thorbeck (FGT) indices Details on index construction in Alkire et al. (2013), World Development
  3. Why extend the WEAI? Many development agencies are looking at agricultural interventions at the level of the value chain—covering multiple stages and different types of actors Track empowerment of and identify the constraints facing female agricultural entrepreneurs and wage earners Identify opportunities for empowerment in different value chains Mixed methods: In both sites, the qualitative research will take place between Aug-Oct, to: (1) Validate the quantitative surveys, (2) Explore men’s and women’s views on empowerment across the value chain, (3) Investigate barriers to entry and growth in value chains of different commodities Bangladesh -- Conducted as part of IFPRI’s Policy Research and Strategy Support Program in USAID’s Zone of Influence Philippines -- Conducted by the Office of Population Studies (OPS) of the University of San Carlos on the coconut and seaweed value chains, in Bohol and Leyte
  4. In the Philippines gender norms are generally more egalitarian – it is ranked #10 in the 2017 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap report, highest in Asia
  5. WEAI indicators only, focus on agricultural production, excludes new WEAI4VC indicators Gender gaps are actually quite small, not surprising given the relatively more egalitarian gender norms in this context Lack of group membership may still be reflecting the bad policies towards coops and ag organizations in the past – still a lingering distrust of cooperatives especially for coconut
  6. Includes all indicators, original WEAI plus proposed WEAI4VC indicators Credit, financial account, autonomy in income favor women Workload, Rights over assets favor men
  7. Includes all indicators, original WEAI plus proposed WEAI4VC indicators Credit, financial account, autonomy in income favor women Workload, Rights over assets favor men
  8. Includes all indicators, original WEAI plus proposed WEAI4VC indicators Credit, financial account, autonomy in income favor women Workload, Rights over assets favor men It is not surprising to me that the coconut women are favored in group membership. Most of the associations restricted membership to one person in the household. They reported that it was women rather than men who attended meetings of the coconut producer associations as men were out earning income at jobs, fishing, or other enterprises. Women were perceived as more trustworthy and often elected in positions such as treasurer in the association.   Also not surprising that coconut women have low scores in both production and processing in coconut, as their involvement tends to be either i) passive ownership of the trees, but not actively engaged in their cultivation or harvesting and or processing (e.g. copra drying). Among the women respondents involved in coconut who really worked they were involved in craft and food processing, so that is on-going and lower profitability.  
  9. Includes all indicators, original WEAI plus proposed WEAI4VC indicators Credit, financial account, autonomy in income favor women Workload, Rights over assets favor men Seaweed producers who are women show higher levels of autonomy in production than those in coconut, as their work is often done as piecework. They think this is a good thing, since they can start and stop in order to take up domestic responsibilities of child care. I’m not convinced, as it ends up that they are paid less in comparison to men for a day’s work. This is a point I’m still struggling with in my unfinished paper. It is surprising that the chart on page 73 shows that only 25-29 percent show adequacy in child care among producers, and only slightly higher among processers as that is counter to the perception I had of the work being done within the household.
  10. Includes all indicators, original WEAI plus proposed WEAI4VC indicators Credit, financial account, autonomy in income favor women Workload, Rights over assets favor men
  11. Stay tuned! WEAI4VC is still under construction What does it mean for programming?
  12. Stay tuned! WEAI4VC is still under construction What does it mean for programming?
Advertisement