This presentation was given by Andrea Vos (CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research/KIT), as part of the Annual Gender Capacity Development Workshop hosted by the CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research. The event took place on 27-28 September 2018 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, hosted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) and co-organized with KIT Royal Tropical Institute.
See more info at: http://gender.cgiar.org/gender_events/annual-conference-2018/
EARTH DAY Slide show EARTHDAY.ORG is unwavering in our commitment to end plas...
Gender transformative approaches in agriculture
1. Gender transformative approaches
in agriculture
A literature review conducted for the European Commission by the
CGIAR Collaborative Platform for Gender Research
2. gender.cgiar.org
Background and rationale for gender
transformative approaches
Dissatisfaction / critique of mainstream gender integration:
Too technical (focus on gaps),
Superficial,
Based on ‘fixed’ categories of men and women
Reproducing gender inequity though implicit bias
GTAs as alternative to “business as usual”
3. gender.cgiar.org
Understanding gender transformative
approaches
Common threads in the conceptualization of GTA:
GTA center around transformation:
Focus on underlying causes, power dynamics and
structures
Creating an enabling environment
Examine, question and change rigid gender norms
GTAs operate at three interrelated dimensions of change:
Individual capacities and agency
Social relations and norms
Social structures and institutions
Partnerships: engaging with different actors across scales
5. gender.cgiar.org
Women’s empowerment and gender
transformative change
Commonalities:
concerned with individual and collective agency
conceptualization of power:
power to,
power with
power from within
critical reflection, engagement with social structures and
institutions
6. gender.cgiar.org
Women’s empowerment and gender
transformative change
Some (potential) differences:
(targeting power relations)
Emphasis on women’s agency vs. relational aspects of
gender inequity
Who benefits: women or society as a whole?
Explicit focus on men and questioning the effects of harmful
masculinities
Focus on organizational change and learning
7. gender.cgiar.org
Methodologies for gender transformative
change
Participatory Action Research for knowledge generation as
well as a process for transformation
encourage critical self-reflection and explores bias
acknowledge and value different ways of knowing and
forms of knowledge
emphasis on the role and positionality of the facilitator
8. gender.cgiar.org
Methodologies for gender transformative
change
Capacity strengthening and organizational learning:
“talk the talk and walk the walk”
Holistic focus on participants of GTA: community members,
researchers and development actors
Capacity strengthening at inter-related levels of the
individual staff/researcher and the organization
“Learning by doing” to complement traditional training
Strengthening reflective and critical capacities,
Encounter inequality and adversity, which is needed to
understand alternative ways of believing and behaving
9. gender.cgiar.org
Lessons learned on GTA from Aquatic
Agricultural Systems (AAS)
Translate big ideas into principles and concrete strategies
for action (with room for maneuver)
Intersectionality: reframing gender in complex systems
Start at the beginning with contextual analysis and capacity
development around GTAs across the research team
Individual and institutional commitment
Critical reflection
GTAs are long-term and diverse
Presentation is based on a literature review commissioned by the EU as part of their initiative to embed GTAs in policy dialogue, programmes of the United Nations Rome-Based Agencies (e.g. FAO, IFAD, etc)
Provides background on the discourse and practice of GTAs in agriculture and NRM domains
Based on a search of literature within the CGIAR and beyond that conceptualized gender transformative change and approaches.
The rising interest and popularity of GT work springs from a dissatisfaction with current / technical approaches to gender integration:
Focus on gaps (only visible manifestations of gender inequality)
Simplify complex problems
Fixes men and women into categories that are opposing and ignoring other intersecting social relations and changing relations
Reproduces gender inequity through implicit bias
The idea behind GTAs is not new – but rooted in radical ideas of gender justice and feminist analysis.
Could be seen as an effort to put the political back into gender and development theory and practice and address the “second generation challenges” of gender integration.
No single accepted definition, but a diversity of understandings that emphasize different aspects. Some central lines of GTA found in literature:
Social relations and norms that are dynamic and specific to time and place
The goals of GTA can be situated across a spectrum with one the one hand gender transformative change as a means to an end:
Development outcomes that are more impactful and lasting
Increased incomes, productivity, food security, market access
And on the other hand gender transformative change as a process and an outcome in itself
Gender equality as an end goal
Expand range of aspirations, opportunities, increased agency of individuals, households and communities
Most literature is somewhere in the middle, leaning the one way or the other way.
Women’s empowerment and gender transformative approaches overlap and differ in various ways depending on how the concepts are used and understood. These are some general trends.
Potential: depending how empowerment is conceptualized or employed
Women’s empowerment critical to GTAs as GTAs cannot start with the assumption of a level playing field.
This method aligns with those who understand GTAs as both a process and an outcome
It is about questioning of the assumptions and practices underlying gender inequality,
as part of a process of challenging gender-based power imbalances and developing people’s aspirations for self-determination beyond existing gender roles
Examples are:
Transformative Household Methodology, Rapid Care Analysis, Gender Action Learning System and Asset-Based Community Development.
-- emphasis on the role and positionality of the researcher brings us to the next critical part of GTAs ---
Organisations as manifestations of wider social institutions, reflecting and reproducing “rules of the game”.
This idea is not new, but present in gender and organizational development literature where “getting institutions right for women”. GTAs reintroduce this thinking as a central component of its approach
Capacity strengthening is premised on a learning-by-doing approach, in complement to more traditional training.
strengthening reflective and critical capacities,
encounter inequality and adversity, which is needed to understand alternative ways of believing and behaving
Critical reflection – at the root of achieving gender transformative change -
It is not enough to get women and men in the same room, GTAs are about initiating critical reflection on norms, attitudes, practices, processes and policies and identifying options for change. The researchers’ role is to facilitate these discussions.
Next steps lit review:
Peer review and interviews with CGIAR gender researchers involved in GTA work,
Presentation at Inception Workshop in Rome
Develop a recommendation paper for next steps for RBAs to implement GTAs
See GTAs being thoughtfully implemented by the RBAs