Advertisement
Advertisement

More Related Content

Similar to Designing for empowerment impact - The Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) project in Bangladesh(20)

Advertisement

More from CGIAR(20)

Advertisement

Designing for empowerment impact - The Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) project in Bangladesh

  1. Designing for empowerment impact The Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) project in Bangladesh Presented by: Akhter Ahmed, Country Representative, IFPRI-Bangladesh Seeds of Change Conference | Canberra, Australia | April 3, 2019
  2. Agriculture-Nutrition-Gender Nexus: Evidence from IFPRI Research  Findings from IFPRI’s 2012 Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS):  Agricultural diversity promotes household and child dietary diversity, and hence, diet quality  Women’s empowerment (measured by WEAI) improves household, child, and maternal dietary diversity  Agricultural diversity increases if primary woman is empowered (measured by WEAI) Agriculture NutritionGender ANGeL aims to strengthen the agriculture-nutrition-gender nexus
  3. Research Design ANGeL aimed to identify actions and investments in agriculture to improve nutrition and empower women. RCT with 5 interventions delivered to both men and women in farm HHs over 17 months:  T1: Nutrition BCC (DAE)  T2: Nutrition BCC (trained community women, or ANGeL Pushti Kormi)  T3: Agriculture Production (DAE)  T4: Agriculture+Nutrition (DAE)  T5: Agriculture+Nutrition+Gender (DAE and HKI)  C: Control Agriculture GenderNutrition
  4. All interventions Statistically Significantly Improved Nutrition Knowledge, with Women Outperforming Men Respondents correctly answered 75% of nutrition questions obtained from training 66.6 63.7 58.1 66.5 67.6 26.1 86.2 92.0 67.9 92.2 93.6 44.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 Control Percentageofrespondents Male Female
  5. Men’s agricultural production knowledge improved, especially for interventions with agriculture training (All impacts statistically significant) 9 8 40 38 36 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Nut (DAE) Nut (APK) Ag Ag+Nut Ag+Nut+Gen Percentagepointdifferencefromendline controlmean Endline Control Mean: 18%
  6. …But impacts on women’s agricultural production knowledge are even greater (T3, T4 and T5 impacts statistically significant) 7 3 59 70 65 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Nut (DAE) Nut (APK) Ag Ag+Nut Ag+Nut+Gen Percentagepointdifferencefromendline controlmean Endline control mean: 5%
  7. Women became more empowered in asset ownership & income decisions. Men became more empowered in production & income decisions -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 F: Asset ownership (EL C mean: 96%) F: Income decisions (EL C mean: 93%) M: Prod'n decisions (EL C mean: 99%) M: Income decisions (EL C mean: 99%) %changefromendlinecontrolmean Selected A-WEAI component indicators ANCOVA impacts of ANGeL treatment arms on selected A-WEAI component indicators (where significant impacts are found) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
  8. Significant improvements in women’s and men’s total gender attitude scores, particularly from T5 0.88 1.12 1.80 0.24 0.48 0.52 2.03 1.16 2.64 1.45 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Female: Total gender attitude score (EL C mean: 39.9) Male: Total gender attitude score (EL C mean: 40.2) %changefromendlinecontrolmean Female and male total gender attitude score Single-difference impacts of ANGeL treatment arms on total gender attitude score (out of 50) T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 8
  9. Improved relationships and joint decisionmaking “As my son fell in love and got married [without my consent], I didn’t accept his wife. I sent them out of house. They have two children and I have never seen their faces. For the last 13 years, I didn’t talk with them. But, after attending six ANGeL sessions, I realized my mistake and feel how wrong I was! Now we are talking to each other and have a lovely relationship between us.”
  10. Conclusions  Women consistently learned more and applied more improved agriculture and nutrition practices than men who attended the same trainings.  Training men and women together creates a mutually supportive environment of learning.  Integrated programming that includes gender sensitization is effective in empowering women and men.  Helen Keller International’s Nurturing Connections curriculum was effective in changing attitudes on gender for men and women  In January 2019, the Ministry of Agriculture committed to scale up ANGeL nationally – rolling out the combination of 3 interventions that were most effective: trainings to men and women in farm households on agriculture, nutrition, and gender.
  11. gender.cgiar.org We would like to acknowledge all CGIAR Research Programs and Centers for supporting the participation of their gender scientists to the Seeds of Change conference. Photo: Neil Palmer/IWMI

Editor's Notes

  1. These are single difference estimates based on endline data. At endline, 18% of male control respondents scored 75% or higher on our test. Men in T1 and T2 scored around 9% percentage points higher, even though there was no formal agricultural training in those treatment arms. Men in T3, T4 and T5 scored 35-40 percentage points higher. All impacts are statistically significant
  2. These are single difference estimates based on endline data. At endline, hardly any female control respondents (only 5%!) scored 75% or higher on our test. Women in T1 and T2 did not see any change in knowledge but remember that there was no formal agricultural training in those treatment arms. Women in T3, T4 and T5 scored 59-70 percentage points higher, a massive increase. Impacts on T3, T4 and T5 are statistically significant
  3. The A-WEAI is made up of 6 indicators. We looked at these six indicators to see where the biggest improvements in empowerment where, using ANCOVA.
Advertisement