Cvm Dqg Final1

543 views

Published on

Published in: Business
0 Comments
2 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

No Downloads
Views
Total views
543
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
3
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
16
Comments
0
Likes
2
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Cvm Dqg Final1

  1. 1. Customer Value Management Concepts and Case Study by Sunil Thawani Adnoc Distribution [email_address] Dubai Quality Group Evening Seminar 30 th May’2000
  2. 2. Customer Value Management Concepts and Case Study <ul><li>Purpose of the Presentation: </li></ul><ul><li>Share Concepts of CVM </li></ul><ul><li>Application of CVM </li></ul><ul><li>Using CVM as a Strategic tool to drive business </li></ul>
  3. 3. CVM - The Concept “ What do we buy ? Value (Benefits) Value/ Benefit = Use + Esteem function of a product (service)
  4. 4. Price, Cost, Profit vs. Value Required Desired (Value) Increasing Benefits- Functions- Performance Price, Cost, Profit Price Cost Zero Value Costs Marginal Price Realization Profit
  5. 5. CVM – Definitions <ul><li>Value : is the customer’s perception of benefits received in relation to the competition </li></ul><ul><li>Price : total price perceived to be paid by the customer in comparison to the competition . </li></ul><ul><li>Cost : total cost to company in comparison to the competition. </li></ul>
  6. 6. The Market Leadership <ul><li>Supplier offering highest Value to Price ratio </li></ul><ul><li>should attain Market Leadership . </li></ul><ul><li>(V/P >= 1) </li></ul><ul><li>Supplier having superior Value to Cost ratio </li></ul><ul><li>should attain Financial Leadership </li></ul><ul><li>(V/C <= 1) </li></ul>
  7. 7. Making Quality a Strategic Weapon Effectiveness Time Stage 1 Conformance Quality (Before 80’s): Deming, Juran, Crosby era Focus - Process Control, Reduce Scrap, SQC, Conformance to Requirements Product with Zero Defects may not necessarily make customers happy ?
  8. 8. Making Quality a Strategic Weapon Effectiveness Time Stage2 Customer satisfaction (late 1980s): Focus : Get close to customer, Understand their needs, Be customer driven e.g. Xerox Part of MBNQA Did not answer why we win/ loose customers ? Often non customers not included Failed to measure performance relative to competition. Conformance Quality
  9. 9. Making Quality a Strategic Weapon Effectiveness Conformance Qlty. Customer satisfaction T Q M Time Stage2 Stage 3 Stage 1 Mkt. perceived Qlty & value relative to competition (1990s) Entire market included How our products compare with competition Requirement of MBNQA
  10. 10. Unanswered Questions ? <ul><li>What are the key buying factors that customers value when they choose among our business and our toughest competition ? </li></ul><ul><li>How do customers rate our performance vs. competition on each of the buying factors ? </li></ul><ul><li>What is the percentage importance of each of these components of customer value ? </li></ul>
  11. 11. Making Quality a Strategic Weapon Effectiveness Conformance Qlty. Customer satisfaction Mkt-perceived Qlty & value relative to competitors C V M T Q M Time Stage 4 Quality key to CVM Use changes in market place as a strategy to drive business and create most value for customers Build on TQM principles
  12. 12. Making Quality a Strategic Weapon Effectiveness Conformance Qlty. Customer satisfaction Mkt-perceived Qlty & value relative to competitors Quality key to CVM Customer Value Management Total Quality Management Time Stage2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 1
  13. 13. Perceived Quality <ul><li>Quality means little in business unless </li></ul><ul><li>Customers perceive your quality as superior to your competition’s . </li></ul><ul><li>Knowing how to achieve “ this “ kind of quality is all that matters. </li></ul>
  14. 14. “ Birth” & Development of CVM <ul><li>30 world Quality experts assembled in US in 1987 for Baldrige Quality Award criterion meeting </li></ul><ul><li>Main focus – Manufacturing Quality/ Process Control </li></ul><ul><li>Many “ thought “ customers opinions cannot be measured & is subjective </li></ul><ul><li>Curt Reimann wanted Quality to be defined & measured from customer perspective </li></ul><ul><li>Contribution of Sidney Schoeffler & Bradley Gale </li></ul>
  15. 15. What is CVM ? <ul><li>How to identify attributes that are important to customers ? </li></ul><ul><li>How to understand the importance customers give to those attributes ? </li></ul><ul><li>How to analyse performance relative to competitors on each attribute ? </li></ul><ul><li>How to use CVM as a Strategy to drive the business ? </li></ul>
  16. 16. AT & T Story <ul><li>Successful monopoly business spilt in early 1980s </li></ul><ul><li>Pioneer in Customer Satisfaction measurement </li></ul><ul><li>Excellent plus Good scores 90 % in Equipment, Installation, Repair, Billing, Training, Marketing etc. </li></ul><ul><li>Mgt. target to maximize excellent plus good scores. </li></ul><ul><li>Data used for recognition & rewards program </li></ul><ul><li>Shortcomings : </li></ul><ul><li>Did not explain declining market share even with hi scores </li></ul><ul><li>No correlation between satisfaction scores & Mkt share </li></ul><ul><li>Focussed on internal competition rather than external </li></ul><ul><li>“ Useless” info to understand competitive position </li></ul>
  17. 17. AT & T Story Ray Kordupleski & West Vogel Study Findings <ul><li>1987 </li></ul><ul><li>Customers “ willing to shop around” increased dramatically from 10 % to 40 % for Excellent to Good category. </li></ul><ul><li>Company did nothing to convert “ good “ into </li></ul><ul><li> “ excellent” </li></ul><ul><li>Low scores in What Worth Paid For (WWPF) question even though overall scores of 95+. </li></ul>
  18. 18. AT & T Story - Startling Discoveries <ul><li>Realised “ Quality was a relative thing “ </li></ul><ul><li>( What ultimately matters is not the % of satisfied customers but the extent to which customers are more satisfied with our product than by the competition - Market Perceived Quality) </li></ul><ul><li>Relationship between WWPF (Customer Value) scores and Market Share. </li></ul><ul><li>Changes in WWPF scores predicted changes in market share. </li></ul>
  19. 19. Customer Value is a Leading Indicator of Market Share AT & T market share WWPF- 1987 1988 1989 Adapted from speech given by Raymond E. Kordupleski at the American Marketing Association’s Customer Satisfaction Congress, 1991.
  20. 20. AT & T - Shift to CV Management <ul><li>1990-91 Bob Allen uses CV as strategy : </li></ul><ul><li>Top leadership made to commit to customer value </li></ul><ul><li>CV data used in reviews & planning processes </li></ul><ul><li>Incorporated in AT & T Chairman Quality Award </li></ul><ul><li>Executive compensation revised to include CV indices </li></ul><ul><li>Identified processes which drive relative performance on each attribute. </li></ul><ul><li>Benchmarking studies to improve processes </li></ul><ul><li>Cascaded to employees by teaching & their role in improving CV. </li></ul><ul><li>1992 - AT & T gains significant market share </li></ul>
  21. 21. Conventional Surveys <ul><li>“ Backward looking “ process </li></ul><ul><li>Non customers, Opinion/ Decision makers often left out. Incomplete market opinion </li></ul><ul><li>Customer Service Deptt. is the “ owner “ </li></ul><ul><li>Tactical action (not strategic) </li></ul><ul><li>Does not explain why we win or lose customers ? </li></ul><ul><li>Satisfaction scores lack co relation to Market Share </li></ul>
  22. 22. The Value Edge Process <ul><li>1. Select Product & Market segment </li></ul><ul><li>2. Collect Price, costs, market share data </li></ul><ul><li>3. Select competitors </li></ul><ul><li>4. Develop in-house Value Profile, </li></ul><ul><li>Value/ Price & Value/ Cost ratios. </li></ul><ul><li>5. Validate Value Profile in market & </li></ul><ul><li>& Align with Customer Requirements </li></ul><ul><li>6. Identify improvement opportunities </li></ul><ul><li>7. Prioritise, develop & Implement action plans </li></ul><ul><li>8. Attain market & financial leadership </li></ul>
  23. 23. Step # 3 Selecting Competitors <ul><li>Must include all important customers – 2 to 3 largest competitors </li></ul><ul><li>Fastest growing competitor </li></ul><ul><li>Any competitor with latest/ unusual technology </li></ul><ul><li>Imports </li></ul>
  24. 24. Step # 4 Developing In-house Value Profile <ul><li>List key characteristics - Quality attributes that affect the customers buying decision </li></ul><ul><li>(other than Price) </li></ul><ul><li>Assign relative weights for each attribute </li></ul><ul><li>Estimate customers’ opinion of performance of each of the criterion on a scale of 1-10 </li></ul><ul><li>Develop Value Profile </li></ul>
  25. 25. Step # 4 Value Profile - Car Co. <ul><li>Category/ Weightage Performance (1-10) Value Score (WxP) </li></ul><ul><li>Factor A B C A B C </li></ul><ul><li>Style 20 5 7.5 6 100 150 120 </li></ul><ul><li>- Shape </li></ul><ul><li>-Colour </li></ul><ul><li>-Glass Area </li></ul><ul><li>Engineering 30 8 8 6 240 240 180 </li></ul><ul><li>-Power </li></ul><ul><li>- Maintenance </li></ul><ul><li>- Safety </li></ul><ul><li>Comfort 30 6 8 7 180 240 210 </li></ul><ul><li>- Legroom </li></ul><ul><li>-Driving </li></ul><ul><li>- Options </li></ul><ul><li>Spares & 20 8 8.5 5 160 170 100 </li></ul><ul><li>Services </li></ul><ul><li>Total 100 680 800 610 </li></ul>
  26. 26. Step # 4 – Inhouse Value Profile
  27. 27. Step # 5 – Validate Value Profile In Market <ul><li>Identify & contact all the users of “Product” in customers/ non customers’ organisation </li></ul><ul><li>Drive it from top </li></ul><ul><li>Validate value profile. </li></ul><ul><li>(Information may not be as structured as inhouse profile) </li></ul><ul><li>Realign value profile </li></ul><ul><li>Findings bound to be different from in-house </li></ul>
  28. 28. The Competitive Advantage Strategy <ul><li>Attain uniqueness in a factor/ category that customers value greatly </li></ul><ul><li>Select one/ more factors that many buyers perceive as important. Position yourself to meet those needs </li></ul><ul><li>Customers will be willing to pay for uniqueness with premium </li></ul>
  29. 29. Step # 7 Prioritise to Improve Car C’s Competitive Strategy
  30. 30. Customer Value Map Worse Value Superior Inferior Higher Price Lower Price DD CC BB AA Better Value Value Index 1.0 Price Index 1.0
  31. 31. Step # 7 - Value Factor – Process Matrix
  32. 32. Value Edge - Internal Customer Application in Hospital <ul><li>Set up about 20 years back in small town in India. </li></ul><ul><li>Vision to provide best possible health care to residents. </li></ul><ul><li>Developed into a 150 bed hospital with all facilities like OPD, Diagnostic centre, Surgery </li></ul><ul><li>Concern - Declining Quality of Service & Loss of Market Share to competition from within town & from nearby big city. </li></ul>
  33. 33. Sample Customer Value Structure <ul><li>Supplier : Pharmacy Customer : Patient/ Relative </li></ul><ul><li>Quality Attributes Weight Perf Wx P Max. Poss. Gap </li></ul><ul><li> 1-10 Score </li></ul><ul><li>Minimum Waiting 15 6 90 150 60 </li></ul><ul><li>Time </li></ul><ul><li>Availability of prescribed 30 7 210 300 90 </li></ul><ul><li>Medicines </li></ul><ul><li>Explain doses details 15 6 90 150 60 </li></ul><ul><li>Timings - open after 10 2 20 100 80 </li></ul><ul><li>OPD closes </li></ul><ul><li>Properly packed medicine 15 8 120 150 30 </li></ul><ul><li>Courtesy 10 7 70 100 30 </li></ul><ul><li>Provide empty bottles 05 0 00 50 50 </li></ul><ul><li>Total 100 </li></ul>
  34. 34. Sample Customer Value Structure <ul><li>Supplier : Radiology Customer : Ward Patients </li></ul><ul><li>Quality Attributes Weight Perf Wx P Max. Poss. Gap </li></ul><ul><li> ( 1- 10) Score </li></ul><ul><li>No/ Min. Waiting 25 4 100 250 150 </li></ul><ul><li>Time </li></ul><ul><li>Reports delivered 30 7 210 300 90 </li></ul><ul><li>promptly to ward </li></ul><ul><li>Accuracy 30 9 270 300 30 </li></ul><ul><li>Courtesy to patient 15 7 105 150 45 </li></ul><ul><li>Total 100 </li></ul>
  35. 35. CVM – Today’s Business Need <ul><li>“ Be better than your best competitors in providing customer value “ – Bob Allen, AT & T </li></ul><ul><li>“ Yesterday does not count. All that counts is providing the most value to customers tomorrow “ – Jack Welch, GE </li></ul><ul><li>We have to become single minded in our quest to deliver better value “ – Ed Artzt, P & G. </li></ul><ul><li>“ Premier companies are serious about delivering value to customers . “ – Larry Bossidy, Allied Signal </li></ul>
  36. 36. CVM - A Versatile Tool <ul><li>Honda - applied to luxury car segment </li></ul><ul><li>Milliken & Company - applied to carpet tile business </li></ul><ul><li>NBC Bearings - applied to ball bearings </li></ul><ul><li>Michelin Tyre company - applied to radial tyres </li></ul><ul><li>And Parke Davis,, AT & T, Allied Signal, J & J, </li></ul><ul><li>Gillette, Hewlett Packard, Westinghouse, FedEX </li></ul>
  37. 37. Benefits <ul><li>Delighted Customers </li></ul><ul><li>Benchmarking against the competitors. </li></ul><ul><li>Identifying the right things. </li></ul><ul><li>Teamwork by committed employees. </li></ul><ul><li>Enhanced Market Share </li></ul><ul><li>Gaining Competitive Edge </li></ul><ul><li>Enables Competitive Strategic planning . </li></ul>
  38. 38. Thank you Questions & Answers Session

×