Successfully reported this slideshow.
Your SlideShare is downloading. ×

Lillehammer Youth Olympics 2016 Final presentation (sajedeh)

Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Ad
Loading in …3
×

Check these out next

1 of 79 Ad

More Related Content

More from Birger Sevaldson (20)

Advertisement

Recently uploaded (20)

Lillehammer Youth Olympics 2016 Final presentation (sajedeh)

  1. 1. Lillehammer 2016 Winter youth Olympic games Sajedeh Ahi System Oriented Design Studio
  2. 2. Introduction GIGA- maps Mediator maps Design magnets Operational Plan for OL park Next Step Content Special part Special part
  3. 3. Introduction
  4. 4. GIGA-map I Organizations Programs Activities Previous Experiences Main Categories places
  5. 5. GIGA-map I Programs Previous Experiences Activitiesplaces Main Categories Organizations International Olympic Committee (IOC) Lillehammer youth Olympic Games Organizing Committee (LYOGOC) National Olympic Committees (NOCs) International Federations (IF s)
  6. 6. Culture and education program (CEP) Olympism Healthy life Skill development Expression Social responsibility Sustainability Peace and dialouge GIGA-map II
  7. 7. GIGA-map III More information for time- line Correction of the previous map New Information New Information New Information New Information
  8. 8. Zoning necessities
  9. 9. Cities - Connections and distances Lillehammer Øyer/ Hafjell Gjøvik Hamar
  10. 10. Venues inside Lillehammer Olympic park The city
  11. 11. Expansion Expansion Expansion GIGA-map IV 4 Design Fields Venues’ development Flow management Athletes’ connection between cities Accommodation
  12. 12. GIGA-map V
  13. 13. Olympic park Håkon Hall Storage area Transportation mall Welcome Center Stortorget Clean Venue Policy Stage place Maihaugen GIGA-map V VENUES DEVELOPMENT FLOW MANAGEMENT ACCOMMODATION2 YOVs CONNECTION Venues Connection Signage Accreditation Streets Situation Streets Capacity Shortest way
  14. 14. I: World Cultural Village in Maihaugen I: OL Network I: Magnets GIGA-map V
  15. 15. GIGA-map Final Version
  16. 16. Lillehammer Øyer/ Hafjell Gjøvik Hamar Places
  17. 17. Activities
  18. 18. 10 days time-line Time-Line
  19. 19. NOC IF s IOC LYOGOC Athletes Coaches Parents Local Sport CEP ceremonies Organizations Participants Programs
  20. 20. 4 Design Fields
  21. 21. Mediators Flow Maps In this project Special part
  22. 22. Olympic Network Active/ Passive
  23. 23. Venues usage rate For 10 days By sport and medal ceremony schedule
  24. 24. Place: Olympic park Purpose: Attractor Form: A collection of Mascot Ice- sculpture Magnet 1
  25. 25. Attract athletes to use the main entrance door Make balance for venue doors usage Lighting- sign
  26. 26. Place: Olympic park Purpose: CEP Helper Form: Tent and Back yard Responsible: LYOGOC Sponsor: P&G Magnet 2 Outdoor CEP Square
  27. 27. NOC IF s IOC LYOGOC Athletes Coaches Parents Local Sport CEP ceremonies Organizations Participants Programs Back to GIGA- map Roles: Accreditation Zoning Disconnection of participants: Athletes Coaches Parents Local people Meeting point A tent with its back yard Special part
  28. 28. 06:00- 07:30 07:30- 08:00 Existing situation 07:30- 08:00 Revised situation
  29. 29. 08:00- 08:30 08:30- 09:00 Revised situation 08:30- 09:00
  30. 30. 13:00- 14:00 15:00- 16:00 21:00- 24:00
  31. 31. Athletes + people+ parents In CEP Gathering Athletes + Coaches+ parents It is a helper. It helps to meet the OL themes. It deals with the accreditation limitation.
  32. 32. Athletes + people+ parents In CEP Gathering Athletes + Coaches+ parents It is a meeting point NOW.
  33. 33. Athletes + people+ parents In CEP GatheringAthletes + Coaches+ parents It is a CEP helper NOW.
  34. 34. Athletes + people+ parents In CEP GatheringAthletes + Coaches+ parents It is a CEP helper NOW.
  35. 35. Athletes + people+ parents In CEP GatheringAthletes + Coaches+ parents It is a gathering place NOW.
  36. 36. Two alternatives . A: A central spot Room for out door activities Attract attention Easier to get People A B Magnet 1&2
  37. 37. Magnet 3 City Square Place: End of pedestrian street Purpose: Lead to the right path Make delay in crowd Form: Stands Responsible: sponsors Schools Sponsors: Panasonic Samsung TINE
  38. 38. 17:00- 18:00
  39. 39. 17:00- 18:00 Revised situation
  40. 40. Make balance for venue doors usage OL time After Olympic Lead to the right path Make delay in crowd Sustainability Technology Cultural diversity Free food Giving information to local Main working time How can we extend the feeling of Storgata to the parking lot ? How can we connect it to pedestrain path?
  41. 41. 17:00- 18:00
  42. 42. 17:00- 18:00
  43. 43. Make balance for venue doors usage Giving information to local Main working time
  44. 44. Make balance for venue doors usage Giving information to local Main working time School students will make the Sami tents and give the day’s matpake.
  45. 45. Magnet 3
  46. 46. Operational Plan Different revisions
  47. 47. Special part
  48. 48. Next Step Venues development
  49. 49. Håkon Hall Håkon hall Dining hall Living room CEP workshops Storage Media center Gym & training facilities Amphi space Welcome ceremony Noisy, not hang out area, 24 hours work 100 PC Some activities are noisy, some need amphi space
  50. 50. Level 0 Two existing alternatives for Dining Hall Easily accessible Sufficient storage area A big and comfortable place for dining tables Close to the KITCHEN Direct Entrance cosy + Pros - Cons KITCHEN
  51. 51. Level 1 Semi open area – to the public- Accreditation check and waiting space
  52. 52. Level 2 CEP
  53. 53. Level 2 Proposed place for dining hall Not a hang out area Easily work 24 hours, less noise Not in the middle of attention No storage Far from KITCHEN + Pros - Cons
  54. 54. Steep road
  55. 55. Thank you

Editor's Notes

  • They help to find out about the best CEP places and also time. It should be considered that adding activities and putting them in pace might change the flow and it might need a revision in flow maps after all.
    Vehicle flow and media flow has not seen in these maps that shlould be added to. It might bring some changes.
    All these maps show one flow. It is good to make the maps for other days as way.
    In case of need of adding a new magnet we have complete control of network and we know where and how.
    There are places that are not in active flow but they are important to be in active one i.e. Maihaugen. Furtheremore it is important to analysis the passive flow too.

  • FLOW MAPS: we need a magnet here in the morning to attract athletes to the main entrance.
    If there are roles for accreditation and zoning which cause disconnection and stress and difficulties, then maybe design should bring a solution to that. A meeting point should exist that every body feels free to meet the others there. Håkon hall situation.
  • If there are roles for accreditation and zoning which cause disconnection and stress and difficulties, then maybe design should bring a solution to that. A meeting point should exist that every body feels free to meet the others there.
  • Athletes are going to hafjell, they will gather in this square and go to the transportation mall afterwards.
  • Conclusion
  • Evaluate the design
    This path is in use for 30% of the day, therefore we do not want it or ...
    The main problem was weak north- south connection which is solved. I did not know it.
  • Evaluate the design
    This path is in use for 30% of the day, therefore we do not want it or ...
    The main problem was weak north- south connection which is solved. I did not know it.

×